I am trying to find out if it's possible to send a XMPP IM message to a room instead of individuals.
Everything you need should be defined in the XEP-0045 extension standard.
For everything else you have to ask more specifically.
Sending message in group and sending individual message is different thing. Both handles in different ways. Although! You can send message in group using your room's object i.e. XMPPRoom (Specifically for iOS Client) as bellow:
[XMPPRoom sendMessage:#"Your Message"];
For more information on XMPP MUC follow XEP-0045 doccument.
Related
I'm developing an instant messaging app on android with SMACK library that uses OPENFIRE as a xmpp server. I want to get last message of each conversation from MessageArchiveManager in openfire server that was enabled by MONITORING SERVICE plugin(based on XEP-0313).
I know that mamManager.queryArchive() can gets the messages that related to specific jid or can get a specific number of messages that exists in server(with no custom sepration), but we suppose that smack doesn't knows which JIDs has conversation on server!
One solution is that send request per each ROSTER entry, but it has heavy cost when it contains numerous contacts and perhaps we have a conversation with anybody out of Roster. Is there any way or plugin or another extension to do this?
How to retrieve mucroom offline messages from openfire and any plugin available for this one?
Thank you,
You cannot. Multi User Chat in XMPP is presence based. When you are online you get the message. When you get offline, you leave the room and will not get anymore message until you join the room again by sending a presence message.
Update: With ejabberd 16.09, you can now use MUC/Sub protocol to subscribe to chat rooms. When subscribed, you do not have to join the room again to receive the messages. Protocol is documented here: https://docs.ejabberd.im/developer/xmpp-clients-bots/proposed-extensions/muc-sub/
In my current project I want to communicate with people in a XMPP Multi User Chat. But also I need to send data to all participants in the conference, but this data should not be seen as a message.
Is it possible to send data (strings) to all participants in a MuC channel by not using a normal chat message?
I'm using Smack API, and I assume, that all participants use my program.
Thanks in advance!
The solution is to use a normal message (with type="groupchat"), but do not include a <body>.
I do not know how this is done in Smack, or if it is possible (I hope it is). An example message would be:
<message to="room#conference.server" type="groupchat">
<yourdata xmlns="your-xmlns">
<anything-you-want-here/>
</yourdata>
</message>
XMPP clients will ignore this message, as it has no <body> tag.
I have an iphone app where I want to use chat rooms. I've installed an XMPP server (ejabberd) and downloaded the XMPP framework for iOS from google code (http://code.google.com/p/xmppframework/). The server and client work as expected, since I'm able to log in and send chat messages between two users.
However, when I try to create a chat room using the createOrJoinRoom method of the XMPPRoom class (in XEP-0045), I don't get any reply from the server and the chat room is not created.
I've debugged to see what kind of package is sent to the server and it looks like this:
<presence from="test2#beta.bogus.net/mynick" to="muumit15#conference.beta.bogus.net">
<x xmlns="http://jabber.org/protocol/muc"/>
</presence>
I get no error message back but the chat room (muumit15) is not created. At the same time I can use e.g. Adium client to create a chat room and it succeeds. The server has been configured so that every user has a right to create chat rooms.
Any ideas? I even tried sniffing the TCP/IP traffic sent by the Adium client but that was encrypted/compressed/binary so I couldn't see what kind of packages it is sending.
See section 7.2.2 of XEP-0045, particularly Example 18:
<presence
from='hag66#shakespeare.lit/pda'
to='coven#chat.shakespeare.lit/thirdwitch'>
<x xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/muc'/>
</presence>
Note that the to address MUST contain a resource, and yours doesn't. The resource is the string after the /, which is used as your nickname in the room. For more information on the XMPP address format, see RFC 6122.
I am basically writing a XMPP client to automatically reply to "specific" chat messages.
My setup is like this:
I have pidgin running on my machine configured to run with an account x#xyz.com.
I have my own jabber client configured to run with the same account x#xyz.com.
There could be other XMPP clients .
Here is my requirement:
I am trying to automate certain kind of messages that I receive on gtalk. So whenever I receive a specific message eg: "How are you" , my own XMPP client should reply automatically with say "fine". How are you". All messages sent (before and after my client replies) to x#xyz.com but should be received by all clients (my own client does not have a UI and can only respond to specific messages.).
Now I have already coded my client to reply automatically. This works fine. But the problem I am facing is that as soon as I reply (I use the smack library), all subsequent messages that are sent to x#xyz.com are received only by my XMPP client. This is obviously a problem as my own client is quite dump and does not have a UI, so I don't get to see the rest of the messages sent to me, thereby making me "lose" messages.
I have observed the same behavior with other XMPP clients as well. Now the question is, is this is a requirement of XMPP (I am sorry but I haven't read XMPP protocol too well). Is it possible to code an XMPP client to send a reply to a user and still be able to receive all subsequent messages in all clients currently listening for messages? Making my client a full fledged XMPP client is a solution, but I don't want to go that route.
I hope my question is clear.
You may have to set a negative presence priority for your bot..
First thing to know is that in XMPP protocol every client is supposed to have a full JID. This is a bare JID - in your case x#xyz.com with a resource in the end e.g. x#xyz.com/pidgin or x#xyz.com/home (where /pidgin and /home are the resource). This is a part of how routing messages to different clients is supposed to be achieved.
Then there are the presence stanzas. When going online a client usually sends a presence stanza to the server. This informs about e.g. if the client is available for chat or away for lunch. Along with this information can be sent a priority. When there are more than one clients connected the one with the highest priority will receive the messages sent to the bare JID (e.g. ClientA(prio=50) and ClientB(prio=60) -> ClientB receives the messages sent to x#xyz.com). But there are also negative priorities. A priority less than 0 states that this client should never be sent any messages. Such a stanza might look like this
<presence from="x#xyz.com/bot">
<priority>-1</priority>
</presence>
This may fit your case. Please keep in mind it also depends on the XMPP server where your account is located, which may or may have not fully implemented this part of the protocol.
So to summarize: I recommend you to look through the Smack API how to set a presence and set the priority to <0 for your bot client right after it connected.