The version of Playframework is 1.2.x,and I want to transform the query.ResultList to VO.
I created a Part entity bean as below:
#Entity
#Table(name="evaluation_part")
public class Part extends Model {
public String name;
public String collegeName;
public int peopleNum;
}
The data:
id name collegeName peopleNum
1 Jsj1 JJJJ 32
2 Jsj2 JJJJ 23
3 Jsj3 JJJJ 32
4 Tjb1 TTTT 11
5 Tjb2 TTTT 14
6 Tjb3 TTTT 16
My value object class:
public class PartVO {
public String collegeName;
public int peopleNum;
}
And I want to use the native query to get the result:
String sql="select collegeName,SUM(peopleNum) as peopleNum from evaluation_part group by collegeName";
The query result is:
collegeName peopleNum
TTTT 41
JJJJ 87
I tried:
String sql="select collegeName,SUM(peopleNum) as peopleNum from evaluation_part group by collegeName";
Query query =JPA.em().createNativeQuery(sql);
List<PartVO> partVOs = query.getResultList();
for(int i=0;i<partVOs.size();i++) {
System.out.println(partVOs.get(i).collegeName);
}
Following error is what i am getting
ClassCastException occured : [Ljava.lang.Object; cannot be cast to valueobject.PartVO
You don't have to user raw sql to do that. With hql you can use the new operator to create your VO (see http://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/orm/3.3/reference/en/html/queryhql.html#queryhql-select)
You have to define a two arg constructor in your partVO class, then you can do
select new package.PartVO(collegeName, SUM(peopleNum)) from Part group by collegeName
Solution 1:Only use 'select new Part()'(constructor defined in the Part class) in the HQL that u can convert object to Part.Hibernate use reflection to automatically inject all the fields u need.
Solution 2:Here the returned type of result must be Object[],so that u can got every field of the record fetched from database by the index of array;
The difference between solution1 and solution2:the previous use constructor in the query and the later transform a record into Object[].
In your case,ignore the complex relationship between entities,solutions above will make work.
Referenced Code here:
package controllers;
import play.*;
import play.db.jpa.JPA;
import play.mvc.*;
import java.util.*;
import models.*;
/**
* This demo is intended for fetching data from MYSQL.
* #author dhl#oopsplay.org
*/
public class Application extends Controller {
public static void index() {
render();
}
/**
* Prepare some data to test.
*/
public static void addPart() {
//Add a part record to database.
Part newPart=new Part("software","zjut",8).save();
if(newPart.isPersistent()){
renderText("Add successfully,there are %s records in the \'evaluation_part\' table.For convenience,please click the back button in the browser to go back previous page.",Part.count());
}
}
/**
* Fetch part entities from database;
*/
public static void fetchPart() {
//-------------------Solution 1-------------------
//[Pay attention]:Only use 'select new Part()'(constructor defined in the Part class) in the query that u can convert object to Part.
//Hibernate use reflection to automatically inject all the fields u need.
List<Part> parts1=JPA.em().createQuery("select new Part(name,collegeName,peopleNum) from Part").getResultList();
//For convenience, i output the detail in the console, focus on the change there.
Logger.info("The name of first record is :%s", parts1.get(0).name);
//-------------------Solution 2-------------------
//[Pay attention]:Here the returned type of result must be Object[],so that u can got every field of the record fetched from database;
List<Object[]> parts2=JPA.em().createNativeQuery("select name,collegeName,peopleNum from evaluation_part").getResultList();
Logger.info("The name of first record is :%s", parts2.get(0)[0]);
for(int i=0;i<parts2.size();i++){
//The difference between solution1 and solution2:the previous use constructor in the query and the later transform a record into Object[].
Logger.info("Name from parts1 is: %s", parts1.get(i).name);
Logger.info("Name from parts2 is: %s", parts2.get(i)[0]);
}
renderText("There are %s record in the \'evaluation_part\' table",parts2.size());
}
}
You can use the version of createNativeQuery(...) method that also accepts as argument the Class of the result instance(s):
http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/6/api/javax/persistence/EntityManager.html#createNativeQuery(java.lang.String, java.lang.Class).
However make sure this actually works, as Play Framework doesn't implement all the features of JPA in it's implementation of the API.
Related
I have a Card entity class with many columns.
I used dto because I want to get some columns from this Entity.
I created a DTO class and wrote a query to CardRepositoryCustom.
But when I try to run the Query I get various errors "No constructor taking".
My dto class:
#Data
#NoArgsConstructor
#AllArgsConstructor
public class CardDTO {
private String test1;
private String test2;
private String test3;
private String test4;
}
JPQL RepositoryCustom :
#Repository
#Transactional
public class CardRepositoryCustom {
public CardDTO test1() {
JpaResultMapper jpaResultMapper = new JpaResultMapper();
String q = "SELECT "+
" c.test1 "+
"FROM "+
" CardEntity c ";
Query query = entityManager.createQuery(q);
try {
return jpaResultMapper.uniqueResult(query, CardDTO.class);
} catch (NoResultException nre) {
return null;
}
}
}
Errors:
java.lang.RuntimeException: No constructor taking: java.lang.String
at org.qlrm.mapper.JpaResultMapper.findConstructor(JpaResultMapper.java:107) ~[qlrm-1.7.1.jar:na]
at org.qlrm.mapper.JpaResultMapper.uniqueResult(JpaResultMapper.java:64) ~[qlrm-1.7.1.jar:na]
at ....
I know how to fix this error.
You just need to write the following constructor in the DTO class as shown below.
public CardDTO(String test1) {
this.setTest1(test1);
}
Here I am curious, if I want test2, test3, test4 and write Query in Custom class, should there be as many constructors in DTO class as that number?
I think this method is really inefficient. Is there any solution I am not aware of?
This seems to be more about QLRM than JPA or Spring.
Judging from the error message the constructor has to match the arguments provided. Probably the easiest variant is to always provide all arguments, possibly with a value of null or some other literal.
The query in your example would then become.
SELECT c.test1, null, null, null FROM CardEntity c
Of course QLRM just provides a JpaResultMapper and it would probably not too difficult to provide your own, or offer a PR to QLRM that inspects names of the result set and tries to match them to parameter names or the constructor.
In Spring Data Jpa to get first 10 rows I can do this findTop10By...(). In my case the number or rows is not defined and comes as a parameter.
Is there something like findTopNBy...(int countOfRowsToGet)?
Here is another way without native query. I added Pageable as a parameter to the method in the interface.
findAllBySomeField(..., Pageable pageable)
I call it like this:
findAllBySomeField(..., PageRequest.of(0, limit)) // get first N rows
findAllBySomeField(..., Pageable.unpaged()) // get all rows
I don't know of a way to do exactly what you want, but if you are open to using #Query in your JPA repository class, then a prepared statement is one alternative:
#Query("SELECT * FROM Entity e ORDER BY e.id LIMIT :limit", nativeQuery=true)
Entity getEntitiesByLimit(#Param("limit") int limit);
Did it by using pagination, as described in the first answer. Just adding a more explicit example.
This example will give you the first 50 records ordered by id.
Repository:
#Repository
public interface MyRepository extends JpaRepository<MyEntity, String> {
Page<MyEntity> findAll(Pageable pageable);
}
Service:
#Service
public class MyDataService {
#Autowired
MyRepository myRepository;
private static final int LIMIT = 50;
public Optional<List<MyEntity>> getAllLimited() {
Page<MyEntity> page = myRepository.findAll(PageRequest.of(0, LIMIT, Sort.by(Sort.Order.asc("id"))));
return Optional.of(page.getContent());
}
}
Found the original idea here:
https://itqna.net/questions/16074/spring-data-jpa-does-not-recognize-sql-limit-command
(which will also link to another SO question btw)
I am working with Spring Data 2.0.6.RELEASE.
I am working about pagination for performance and presentation purposes.
Here about performance I am talking about that if we have a lot of records is better show them through pages
I have the following and works fine:
interface PersonaDataJpaCrudRepository extends PagingAndSortingRepository<Persona, String> {
}
The #Controller works fine with:
#GetMapping(produces=MediaType.TEXT_HTML_VALUE)
public String findAll(Pageable pageable, Model model){
Through Thymeleaf I am able to apply pagination. Therefore until here the goal has been accomplished.
Note: The Persona class is annotated with JPA (#Entity, Id, etc)
Now I am concerned about the following: even when pagination works in Spring Data about the amount the records, what about of the content of each record?.
I mean: let's assume that Persona class contains 20 fields (consider any entity you want for your app), thus for a view based in html where a report only uses 4 fields (id, firstname, lastname, date), thus we have 16 unnecessary fields for each entity in memory
I have tried the following:
interface PersonaDataJpaCrudRepository extends PagingAndSortingRepository<Persona, String> {
#Query("SELECT p.id, id.nombre, id.apellido, id.fecha FROM Persona p")
#Override
Page<Persona> findAll(Pageable pageable);
}
If I do a simple print in the #Controller it fails about the following:
java.lang.ClassCastException:
[Ljava.lang.Object; cannot be cast to com.manuel.jordan.domain.Persona
If I avoid that the view fails with:
Caused by:
org.springframework.expression.spel.SpelEvaluationException:
EL1008E:
Property or field 'id' cannot be found on object of type
'java.lang.Object[]' - maybe not public or not valid?
I have read many posts in SO such as:
java.lang.ClassCastException: [Ljava.lang.Object; cannot be cast to
I understand the answer and I am agree about the Object[] return type because I am working with specific set of fields.
Is mandatory work with the complete set of fields for each entity? Should I simply accept the cost of memory about the 16 fields in this case that never are used? It for each record retrieved?
Is there a solution to work around with a specific set of fields or Object[] with the current API of Spring Data?
Have a look at Spring data Projections. For example, interface-based projections may be used to expose certain attributes through specific getter methods.
Interface:
interface PersonaSubset {
long getId();
String getNombre();
String getApellido();
String getFecha();
}
Repository method:
Page<PersonaSubset> findAll(Pageable pageable);
If you only want to read a specific set of columns you don't need to fetch the whole entity. Create a class containing requested columns - for example:
public class PersonBasicData {
private String firstName;
private String lastName;
public PersonBasicData(String firstName, String lastName) {
this.firstName = fistName;
this.lastName = lastName;
}
// getters and setters if needed
}
Then you can specify query using #Query annotation on repository method using constructor expression like this:
#Query("SELECT NEW some.package.PersonBasicData(p.firstName, p.lastName) FROM Person AS p")
You could also use Criteria API to get it done programatically:
CriteriaBuilder cb = entityManager.getCriteriaBuilder();
CriteriaQuery<PersonBasicData> query = cb.createQuery(PersonBasicData.class);
Root<Person> person = query.from(Person.class);
query.multiselect(person.get("firstName"), person.get("lastName"));
List<PersonBasicData> results = entityManager.createQuery(query).getResultList();
Be aware that instance of PersonBasicData being created just for read purposes - you won't be able to make changes to it and persist those back in your database as the class is not marked as entity and thus your JPA provider will not work with it.
I use code first approach in my project. In the prject I have classes with MetadataType attribute, which I don't use in my EF model. Class with metadata has some constant public fields (in addition to fields from main type). Now when I tried to query EF it threw exception that in metadata class there fields not mapped... se below in details
class M1
{
int Id;
string Name
}
class M2
{
int Id;
DateTime Date
}
[MetadataType(typeof(PageOFSRevenueMetadata))]
class NotRelatedToModel
{
int Prop1;
int Prop2;
}
class PageOFSRevenueMetadata
{
public const string RuleSet1 = "r1";
public const string RuleSet2 = "r2";
// Data Vaidation Attrs...
int Prop1;
int Prop2;
}
In my context I have mapping only for M1 and M2. In the DB exists table with name 'NotRelatedToModel', but I don't want to use it in my model. I use EF 6
Now when I try to make join query on M1 and M2 it threw below exception
'NotRelatedToModel' contains the following unknown properties or fields: RuleSet1, RuleSet2. Please make sure that the names of these members match the names of the properties on the main type
I can move this static fields to another place and it seems to work, but I would like to know why it is happend ? How the EF code first mapping works ?
Thanks in advance
Is it possible to call a TVF in EF6 Code First?
I started a new project using EF6 Database first and EF was able to import a TVF into the model and call it just fine.
But updating the model became very time consuming and problematic with the large read-only db with no RI that I'm stuck dealing with.
So I tried to convert to EF6 code first using the Power Tools Reverse Engineering tool to generate a context and model classes.
Unfortunately the Reverse Engineering tool didn't import the TVFs.
Next I tried to copy the DBFunctions from my old Database First DbContext to the new Code First DbContext, but that gave me an error that my TVF:
"cannot be resolved into a valid type or function".
Is it possible to create a code first Fluent mapping for TVFs?
If not, is there a work-around?
I guess I could use SPs instead of TVFs, but was hoping I could use mostly TVFs to deal with the problematic DB I'm stuck with.
Thanks for any work-around ideas
This is now possible. I created a custom model convention which allows using store functions in CodeFirst in EF6.1. The convention is available on NuGet http://www.nuget.org/packages/EntityFramework.CodeFirstStoreFunctions. Here is the link to the blogpost containing all the details: http://blog.3d-logic.com/2014/04/09/support-for-store-functions-tvfs-and-stored-procs-in-entity-framework-6-1/
[Tested]
using:
Install-Package EntityFramework.CodeFirstStoreFunctions
Declare a class for output result:
public class MyCustomObject
{
[Key]
public int Id { get; set; }
public int Rank { get; set; }
}
Create a method in your DbContext class
[DbFunction("MyContextType", "SearchSomething")]
public virtual IQueryable<MyCustomObject> SearchSomething(string keywords)
{
var keywordsParam = new ObjectParameter("keywords", typeof(string))
{
Value = keywords
};
return (this as IObjectContextAdapter).ObjectContext
.CreateQuery<MyCustomObject>(
"MyContextType.SearchSomething(#keywords)", keywordsParam);
}
Add
public DbSet<MyCustomObject> SearchResults { get; set; }
to your DbContext class
Add in the overriden OnModelCreating method:
modelBuilder.Conventions.Add(new FunctionsConvention<MyContextType>("dbo"));
And now you can call/join with
a table values function like this:
CREATE FUNCTION SearchSomething
(
#keywords nvarchar(4000)
)
RETURNS TABLE
AS
RETURN
(SELECT KEY_TBL.RANK AS Rank, Id
FROM MyTable
LEFT JOIN freetexttable(MyTable , ([MyColumn1],[MyColumn2]), #keywords) AS KEY_TBL
ON MyTable.Id = KEY_TBL.[KEY]
WHERE KEY_TBL.RANK > 0
)
GO
I was able to access TVF with the code below. This works in EF6. The model property names have to match the database column names.
List<MyModel> data =
db.Database.SqlQuery<MyModel>(
"select * from dbo.my_function(#p1, #p2, #p3)",
new SqlParameter("#p1", new System.DateTime(2015,1,1)),
new SqlParameter("#p2", new System.DateTime(2015, 8, 1)),
new SqlParameter("#p3", 12))
.ToList();
I actually started looking into it in EF6.1 and have something that is working on nightly builds. Check this and this out.
I have developed a library for this functionality. You can review my article on
UserTableFunctionCodeFirst.
You can use your function without writing SQL query.
Update
First of all you have to add reference to the above mentioned library and then you have to create parameter class for your function. This class can contain any number and type of parameter
public class TestFunctionParams
{
[CodeFunctionAttributes.FunctionOrder(1)]
[CodeFunctionAttributes.Name("id")]
[CodeFunctionAttributes.ParameterType(System.Data.SqlDbType.Int)]
public int Id { get; set; }
}
Now you have to add following property in your DbContext to call function and map to the property.
[CodeFunctionAttributes.Schema("dbo")] // This is optional as it is set as dbo as default if not provided.
[CodeFunctionAttributes.Name("ufn_MyFunction")] // Name of function in database.
[CodeFunctionAttributes.ReturnTypes(typeof(Customer))]
public TableValueFunction<TestFunctionParams> CustomerFunction { get; set; }
Then you can call your function as below.
using (var db = new DataContext())
{
var funcParams = new TestFunctionParams() { Id = 1 };
var entity = db.CustomerFunction.ExecuteFunction(funcParams).ToList<Customer>();
}
This will call your user defined function and map to the entity.