I have installed a blog engine to refinerycms which is working perfectly.
Now I have generated a migration with some table fields changes (of course not refinerycms or blog tables), but I'm getting an error:
== CreateBlogStructure: migrating ============================================
-- create_table("refinery_blog_posts", {:id=>true})
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence "refinery_blog_posts_id_seq1" for serial column "refinery_blog_posts.id"
rake aborted!
An error has occurred, this and all later migrations canceled:
PG::Error: ERROR: relation "refinery_blog_posts" already exists
: CREATE TABLE "refinery_blog_posts" ("id" serial primary key, "title" character varying(255), "body" text, "draft" boolean, "published_at" timestamp, "created_at" timestamp NOT NULL, "updated_at" timestamp NOT NULL)
Tasks: TOP => db:migrate
(See full trace by running task with --trace)
Check your db/schema.rb
You most likely have the same table being created there in addition to a migration in db/migrate/[timestamp]your_migration
You can delete the db/migrate/[timestamp]your_migration if it is a duplicate of the one found in the schema and it should work.
PG::Error: ERROR: relation “refinery_blog_posts” already exists
Pg is a Rails gem, the piece of code that allows communication between Rails and PostgreSQL. It relates your migrations to SQL tables, thus a relation error. So, what the error is saying is:
I'm trying to create table X, based on migration X, but table X
already exists in the database.
Possible solutions:
Create migrations that drop those, probably old, tables.
Change the migration's name.
Login to PostgreSQL and drop the table. Something like:
$ psql -U username databasename
then
database_name=# drop table table-name;
The exact commands might be a little different though.
Adding as this is an obvious but easy to overlook cause of this error (and this is the first post search engines bring up).
If you accidentally defined the same relationship twice in the same migration this is the error that shows up.
def change
create_table :books do |t|
t.belongs_to :author
t.belongs_to :author # Duplicated column definition
end
end
Seems obvious but easy to overlook. To fix just remove the duplicated reference.
Related
Let me start by saying that I’m a Linux/Unix admin. That being said my manager has tasked me with moving older PostgreSQL databases to a RedHat server running 8.4.20. I was successful moving a 7.2.1 db but I’m running into issues moving a 7.4.20 db.
I use pg_dump –c filename and psql < filename. For the problematic db everything runs until I get to a CREATE CONSTRAINT TRIGGER statement. If I run it as it is in the file I get :
NOTICE: ignoring incomplete trigger group for constraint "" FOREIGN KEY data(ups) REFERENCES upsinfo(ups)
DETAIL: Found referenced table's DELETE trigger.
CREATE TRIGGER
If I run set schema 'pg_catalog'; I get:
ERROR: relation "upsinfo" does not exist
The tables (I think) involved are:
CREATE TABLE upsinfo (
ups text NOT NULL,
ipaddr inet,
rcomm text,
wcomm text,
reachable boolean,
managed boolean,
comments text,
region text
);
CREATE TABLE data (
date timestamp with time zone,
ups text,
mib text,
value text
);
The trigger problem trigger statement:
CREATE CONSTRAINT TRIGGER "<unnamed>"
AFTER DELETE ON upsinfo
FROM data
NOT DEFERRABLE INITIALLY IMMEDIATE
FOR EACH ROW
EXECUTE PROCEDURE "RI_FKey_cascade_del"('<unnamed>', 'data', 'upsinfo', 'UNSPECIFIED', 'ups', 'ups');
I know that the RI_FKey_cascade_del function is defined differently in the different versions of pg_catalog. Note that search_path is set to ‘public, pg_catalog’ so I’m also confused why I have to set the schema.
Again I’m not a real PostgreSQL DBA so try to be kind.
Oof, those are really old postgres versions, including the version you're upgrading to (8.4 was released in 2009, and support ended in 2014).
The short answer is that, as long as upsinfo and data are being created and populated, you're probably fine, and good to go. But one of your foreign key relationships is broken.
The long answer, well, let me see if I can explain what is going on (or, at least, what I think is going on).
I'm guessing that the original table definition of data included something like FOREIGN KEY (ups) REFERENCES upsinfo (ups) ON DELETE CASCADE. That causes postgres to automatically make some trigger constraints: 1- every time there's a new row for data, make sure that its ups column matches an existing row in upsinfo, and 2- every time you delete a row from upsinfo, delete the corresponding rows in data, based on the matching ups value.
That (not very informative) error message can come up when the foreign key relationship doesn't work. In order for a foreign key to make sense, the referenced value needs to be unique -- there should be only one row in upsinfo for each distinct value of ups. In order for postgres to know that, there needs to be a unique index or primary key on upsinfo.ups.
In this case, one of a couple things could be breaking it:
There's no primary key or unique index on upsinfo.ups (postgres should not have allowed a foreign key, but may have in very old versions)
There used to be a unique index, but it hadn't properly enforced uniqueness, so it didn't get successfully imported (a bug, again likely from a very old version)
In either case, if that foreign key relationship is important, you can try to fix it once the import is complete. Start by trying to make a unique index on upsinfo.ups, and see if you have problems. If you do, resolve the duplicate entries, and try again till it works. Then issue something like:
ALTER TABLE data
ADD FOREIGN KEY (ups) REFERENCES upsinfo (ups) ON DELETE CASCADE;
Of course, if things are working, it's possible you don't need to fix the foreign key, in which case you're probably able to ignore those errors and just move forward.
Hope that helps, and good luck!
This seems to be a part of ON DELETE CONSTRAINT. If I were you I would delete all such statements and replace them with a proper constraint definition on the target table.
Table definition should then look like this:
CREATE TABLE bookings (
boo_id serial NOT NULL,
boo_hotelid character varying NOT NULL,
boo_roomid integer NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT pk_bookings
PRIMARY KEY (boo_id),
CONSTRAINT fk_bookings_boo_roomid
FOREIGN KEY (boo_roomid)
REFERENCES rooms (roo_id) MATCH SIMPLE
ON UPDATE CASCADE ON DELETE CASCADE
) WITHOUT OIDS;
And this part is what will internally create the trigger:
CONSTRAINT fk_bookings_boo_roomid
FOREIGN KEY (boo_roomid)
REFERENCES rooms (roo_id) MATCH SIMPLE
ON UPDATE CASCADE ON DELETE CASCADE
But, to be honest, I do not have an understanding for an upgrade to an unsupported version. You know the Postgres is version 9.5 now, right?
I searched for this problem. But my postgres user has enough grant and I do not think I have misspelling error. However I am newbie.
I have this error message:
21:38:03 set search_path='public'
21:38:03 ALTER TABLE public.tbl_user DROP CONSTRAINT "fk-user-access-user-id"
21:38:03 ERROR: constraint "fk-user-access-user-id" of relation "tbl_user" does not exist
I use the PhpStorm. I just open the database view, expanded the tbl_user table, right click and select "drop". And I got this error in the console.
So the above SQL command generated by the PhpStorm.
Then I tried with these commands manually on Ubuntu:
ALTER TABLE tbl_user DROP CONSTRAINT "fk-user-access-user-id"
ALTER TABLE "tbl_user" DROP CONSTRAINT "fk-user-access-user-id"
But I get the same error.
In the PhpStorm I see this definition:
"fk-user-access-user-id" FOREIGN KEY (access_id) REFERENCES tbl_access (id)
The tbl_access table exists with the primary id key.
I do not understand this error message, because the "fk-user-access-user-id" foreign key is at the tbl_user and so for me the 'relation "tbl_user" does not exist' strange. I do not understand.
I tried to find similar problem on StackOverflow, but I gave up after 20x question reading.
By the way, the postgres code was generated by the Yii framework.
$this->addColumn('{{%user}}', 'access_id', $this->integer()->notNull()->defaultValue(1)->after('status'));
$this->addForeignKey('fk-user-access-user-id', '{{%user}}', 'access_id', '{{%access}}', 'id');
first row mean add access_id column to the user table.
second row: create foreign key with 'fk-user...' name on tbl_user table's access_id column references to tbl_access table's id column.
So I used this PHP code to generate this SQL commands. I prefer this way because for me the migration files are very useful.
Most likely the definition and actual implementation in your underlying DB has changed from what the app has recorded. Depending on what the history is, either a change in the app for that foreign key relationship was not migrated to persist the change at the database level, or someone has executed some operation directly at the DB level to remove the relationship. You will need to sync up the app layer to the DB at this point I would think.
I used the commands pg_dump and psql to backup my production DB and restore it into my development server.
Now when I try to simply insert a new record to one of my tables I get the following error message:
ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint
"communication_methods_pkey" DETAIL: Key (id)=(13) already exists.
How come that the id is already in use? I need to update something in order to have the id increment counter back on the right track?
It sounds like the sequences used to do the primary key for each table are not on the correct value. It is interesting that pg_dump did not include a sequence setval at the end of it (I believe it is supposed to).
Postgres recommends the following process to correct sequences: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Fixing_Sequences
Essentially, it takes you through identifying all your sequences and creating a sql script to run to set them to 1 more than your inserted value's ids.
Here is some SQL for PostgreSQL (I know it's a silly query; I've boiled the original query down to the simplest broken code):
CREATE TABLE entity (
id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY
);
WITH new_entity
AS (INSERT INTO entity DEFAULT VALUES
RETURNING id
)
SELECT id FROM new_entity;
Here it is running on PostgreSQL 9.1:
psql:../sandbox/test.sql:3: NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence "entity_id_seq" for serial column "entity.id"
psql:../sandbox/test.sql:3: NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index "entity_pkey" for table "entity"
CREATE TABLE
id
----
1
(1 row)
Here it is not running on PostgreSQL 8.4:
psql:../sandbox/test.sql:3: NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence "entity_id_seq" for serial column "entity.id"
psql:../sandbox/test.sql:3: NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index "entity_pkey" for table "entity"
CREATE TABLE
psql:../sandbox/test.sql:9: ERROR: syntax error at or near "INSERT"
LINE 2: AS (INSERT INTO entity DEFAULT VALUES
Obviously, the table creation goes fine in both cases, but it wipes out on the second query in PostgreSQL 8.4. From this error message I am unable to gather exactly what the problem is. I don't know what it is that 9.1 has and 8.4 doesn't have that could result in this syntax error. It's hilariously hard to google it. I am approaching the level of desperation required to trawl through the pages of PostgreSQL release notes between 8.4 and 9.1 and finding out if anything related to WITH … AS or INSERT … RETURNING was changed or added, but before I go there I am hoping one of you has the experience and/or godly google-fu to help me out here.
Data-modifying statements in WITH were introduced in Postgres 9.1
When updating schema, doctrine always drops and add constraints. I think, it is something wrong...
php app/console doctrine:schema:update --force
Updating database schema...
Database schema updated successfully! "112" queries were executed
php app/console doctrine:schema:update --dump-sql
ALTER TABLE table.managers DROP CONSTRAINT FK_677E81B7A76ED395;
ALTER TABLE table.managers ADD CONSTRAINT FK_677E81B7A76ED395 FOREIGN KEY (user_id) REFERENCES table."user" (id) NOT DEFERRABLE INITIALLY IMMEDIATE;
...
php app/console doctrine:schema:validate
[Mapping] OK - The mapping files are correct.
[Database] FAIL - The database schema is not in sync with the current mapping file.
How can this may be fixed?
After some digging into doctrine update schema methods, I've finally found an issue. The problem was with table names - "table.order" and "table.user". When doctrine makes diff, this names become non equal, because of internal escaping (?). So, "user" != user, and foreign keys to those tables (order, user) always recreating.
Solution #1 - just rename tables to avoid name matching with postgresql keywords, like my_user, my_order.
Solution #2 - manually escape table names. This not worked for me, tried many different escaping ways.
I've applied solution #1 and now I see:
Nothing to update - your database is already in sync with the current
entity metadata
I have had the same issue on Postgres with a uniqueConstraint with a where clause.
* #ORM\Table(name="avatar",
* uniqueConstraints={
* #ORM\UniqueConstraint(name="const_name", columns={"id_user", "status"}, options={"where": "(status = 'pending')"})
Doctrine is comparing schemas from metadata and new generated schema, during indexes comparation where clauses are not matching.
string(34) "((status)::text = 'pending'::text)"
string(20) "(status = 'pending')"
You just have to change you where clause to match by
((avatar)::text = 'pending'::text)
PS: My issue was with Postgres database
I hope this will help someone.
I have come across this several times and it's because the php object was changed a few times and still does not match the mapping to the database. Basically a reboot will fix the issue but it can be ugly to implement.
If you drop the constraint in the database and php objects (remove the doctrine2 mappings), then update schema and confirm that nothing needs to be updated. Then add the doctrine mapping back to the php, update the schema using --dump-sql and review the changes that are shown. Confirm that this is exactly what you want and execute the update query. Now updating the schema should not show that anything else needs to be updated.