Whats The Difference Between These Cmdlets? - powershell

In PowerShell 3 if you are searching for a command you could use both, both Get-Help Get-* and Get-Command Get-* work?
So whats the major difference ?

Both commands share a lot of information in common but the main difference is that Get-Help outputs MAML objects (which are "text based", error prone and even can be out dated) while Get-Command gets you real objects (metadata), that you can further investigate.
For most help parts, Get-Help is displaying pre-made help, contained in XML files.
For other parts, Get-Help "is using" Get-Command to generate the information, like the SYNTAX section.
Get-Command also gets you information that Get-Help doesn't, like the module of the command, , it's DLL path (in case of a compiled cmdlet), parameter sets, and so on.
One is not a replacement for the other, you use both under different circumstances.

The way I think of it is - Get-Command returns the technical information about commands (DLL, implementing type, function body for functions, etc), Get-Help returns the user-friendly information about commands (detailed syntax, examples, explanation of parameters, etc).
And Get-Command returns a normal object, which behaves perfectly normally and predictably, whereas Get-Help returns a weird formatted help object which is really only intended for viewing in the console, not for processing in code.

Related

Call Write-Host on the results of a call to Get-Content [duplicate]

I've been trying to work with an API that only accepts raw text or base64 encoded values in a JSON object. The content I'm POSTing is data from an XML file. So I used Powershell's Get-Content cmdlet (without -Raw) to retrieve the data from the .xml and then base64 encode it and sent it to the API. The API then decodes it, but the XML formatting was lost.
I found a SO post about using the -Raw switch on Get-Content, but it seems like the documentation for this switch is vague. When I used the -Raw switch, encoded it and sent it back to the API, the formatting was good.
briantist's helpful comment on the question sums up the answer succinctly (in his words; lightly edited, emphasis added):
Get-Content [by default] reads a file line by line and returns an array of the lines. Using -Raw reads the entire contents of the file as a single string.
The name -Raw is tad unfortunate, because it mistakenly suggests reading raw bytes, whereas -Raw still detects encodings and ultimately reads everything into a .NET [string] type.
(By contrast, you need either -Encoding Byte (Windows PowerShell) or -AsByteStream (PowerShell Core) to read a file as a byte array.)
Given -Raw's actual purpose, perhaps something like -Whole would have been a better name, but that ship has sailed (though adding an alias name for a parameter is still an option).
Let's take a look at why this information may currently be difficult to discover [Update: It no longer is]:
[Update: This section is now OBSOLETE, except the link to the PowerShell documentation GitHub repository, which welcomes contributions, bug reports, suggestions]
A Tale of PowerShell Documentation Woes
The central conflict of this tale is the tension between the solid foundation of PowerShell's potentially great help system and its shoddy current content.
As is often the case, third parties come to the rescue, as shown in gms0ulman's helpful answer.
As briantist also points out, however, PowerShell's documentation is now open-source and welcomes contributions; he states:
"I will direct your attention to the Edit link
[for the Get-Content help topic on GitHub] [...] so you can actually fix it up and submit something better
(including examples). I have done it before; they do accept pull
requests for it."
The caveat is that while future PowerShell Core versions will benefit from improvements, it's not clear whether improvements will make their way back into Windows PowerShell.
Let's ask PowerShell's built-in help system, accessible via the standard Get-Help cmdlet (the content for which may not be preinstalled; install when prompted, or run Update-Help from an elevated session):
Get-Help Get-Content -Parameter Raw
Note how you can conveniently ask for help on a specific parameter (-Parameter Raw).
On Windows PowerShell v5.1, this yields:
-Raw
Ignores newline characters and returns the entire contents of a file in one string.
By default, the contents of a file is returned as a array of strings that is delimited
by the newline character.
Raw is a dynamic parameter that the FileSystem provider adds to the Get-Content cmdlet.
This parameter works only in file system drives.
This parameter is introduced in Windows PowerShell 3.0.
Required? false
Position? named
Default value
Accept pipeline input? false
Accept wildcard characters? false
That is indeed what we were looking for and quite helpful (leaving the awkward phrasing "delimited by the newline character" aside and that on Windows a newline is a character sequence).
On Powershell Core v6.0.2, this yields:
-Raw
Required? false
Position? Named
Accept pipeline input? false
Parameter set name (All)
Aliases None
Dynamic? true
While the meta-data is more detailed - including a hint that the parameter is dynamic (see below) - it is crucially missing a description of the parameter.
Some provider-cmdlet parameters are dynamic, in that they are specific to a given provider, so there is a mechanism to specify the target provider when asking for help, by passing a provider-specific example path to the -Path parameter.
In the case at hand, let's therefore try (PowerShell Core on Windows):
Get-Help Get-Content -Parameter Raw -Path C:\
Sadly, the result is the same unhelpful response as before.
Note that, as long as you're invoking the command from a filesystem location, explicit use of -Path should not be necessary, because the provider underlying the current location is implicitly targeted.
Now let's take a look at the online versions of PowerShell's help topics:
As it turns out, a given provider cmdlet can have multiple documentation pages:
A generic one that applies to all providers.
Provider-specific pages that document provider-exclusive behavior and parameters, such as -Raw for the filesystem provider.
Sadly, the generic topics make no mention of the existence of the provider-specific ones, making them hard to discover.
Googling Get-Content takes you to https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/module/microsoft.powershell.management/get-content, the generic topic, which contains the following misleading statement: This parameter is not supported by any providers that are installed with Windows PowerShell.
This is not only unhelpful, but actively misleading, because the PowerShell file-system provider clearly is installed with PowerShell and it does support -Raw.
[Drive] providers are PowerShell's generalization of the filesystem drive metaphor to support targeting other [typically hierarchical] storage systems with a unified set of cmdlets. For instance, Windows PowerShell also ships with the registry drive provider, which allows managing the registry as if it were a drive.
The -Online switch for Get-Help conveniently allows opening the online version of the requested topic in the browser; so let's try that (Get-Help Get-Content -Online):
Windows PowerShell v5.1: Takes you a 404 page(!) related to v4.
PowerShell Core v6.0.1: Takes you to the same generic topic that googling does.
There's a sliver of hope, however: The aforementioned 404 page offers a link to the filesystem-provider-specific topic:
Get-Content for FileSystem
It is there that we finally discover the online version of the truly relevant, provider-specific information, which is the same that Get-Help Get-Content -Parameter Raw provides locally, but - as stated - only in Windows PowerShell.
As per Kory Gill's comment and your own, the built-in Get-Help and MSDN documentation should be your first port of call. But you've already RTFM!
When that fails, ss64 is great reference for Powershell documentation and additional examples.
Get-Content page here. It has this to say about -Raw:
Return multiple lines as a single string (PowerShell 3.0)
In PowerShell 2.0 use the static method: [System.IO.File]::ReadAllText(string path)

Correct syntax for .INPUTS/.OUTPUTS comment based help in powershell?

I plan to use PlatyPS for online documentation of our PowerShell scripts. I have a problem with the .INPUTS and .OUTPUTS syntax. The Microsoft documentation states:
.INPUTS
The Microsoft .NET Framework types of objects that can be piped to the
function or script. You can also include a description of the input
objects.
.OUTPUTS
The .NET Framework type of the objects that the cmdlet returns. You
can also include a description of the returned objects.
But whatever format I try to use in the comment based help, PlatyPS ends up taking every whole line as a input or output type, and there's never any description (as in Type: "[OBJECT] This a description of the type", and Description: "").
I tried to delve into PlatyPS code: it went a bit over my head, but I ended up thinking it's not even a PlatyPS thing: that's how things are output by the PowerShell parser itself.
So, question: does anyone know how to format Inputs and Outputs comment based help so that it's understood as a type THEN a description?

In what scenario was Invoke-Expression designed to be used?

9/10 times if you are trying to use the Invoke-Expression cmdlet, there is a better way. Building the arguments to a command dynamically? Use an array of arguments. Building the arguments to a cmdlet? Use splatting with an array or hashtable. Your command has a space in the path to it? Use the call operator (&).
This might seem open ended, but Invoke-Expression is an easily accessible cmdlet where the answer is almost always to never use it. But the cmdlet exists for a reason, is not deprecated, and most criticisms of its use state something similar to, "it's almost never the right answer", but never states when it is acceptable to use it. In what case is it acceptable to use Invoke-Expression? Or to word it a bit less openly, how was Invoke-Expression designed to be used?
To quote from a PowerShell team blog post titled Invoke-Expression considered harmful (emphasis added):
The bottom line: Invoke-Expression is a powerful and useful command for some scenarios such as creating new scripts at runtime, but in general, if you find yourself using Invoke-Expression, you should ask yourself, or maybe a respected colleague if there is a better way.
EBGreen notes:
Or to phrase it another way, It [Invoke-Expression] is ok to use as long as a user is never involved in any part of generating the string that will be invoked. But even then, not using it will enforce better habits than using it would.
In short:
As a matter of habit, always consider a different (usually more robust and secure) solution first.
If you do find that Invoke-Expression is your only choice, carefully consider the security implications: if a string from an (untrusted) outside source (e.g., user input) is passed directly to Invoke-Expression, arbitrary commands may be executed.
Therefore: Only use Invoke-Expression if you fully control or implicitly trust the input.
Note: As of Windows PowerShell v5.1 / PowerShell Core v6.1.0, the official Invoke-Expression help topic doesn't provide such guidance; this GitHub issue suggests rectifying that.
Rare examples of justified (safe) use of Invoke-Expression:
Creating PSv5+ custom classes dynamically:
so that the class can be used in a remote session.
so that the set of properties can be created based on conditions at runtime.
Using Invoke-Expression in combination with Write-Output:
to parse a string with embedded quoting, with extra precautions.
to parse command lines stored in a file, if trusted.
Using Invoke-Expression for nested property access:
via a property path stored in a string.

What does the -raw switch parameter in Get-Content really do in Powershell? Finding helpful documentation

I've been trying to work with an API that only accepts raw text or base64 encoded values in a JSON object. The content I'm POSTing is data from an XML file. So I used Powershell's Get-Content cmdlet (without -Raw) to retrieve the data from the .xml and then base64 encode it and sent it to the API. The API then decodes it, but the XML formatting was lost.
I found a SO post about using the -Raw switch on Get-Content, but it seems like the documentation for this switch is vague. When I used the -Raw switch, encoded it and sent it back to the API, the formatting was good.
briantist's helpful comment on the question sums up the answer succinctly (in his words; lightly edited, emphasis added):
Get-Content [by default] reads a file line by line and returns an array of the lines. Using -Raw reads the entire contents of the file as a single string.
The name -Raw is tad unfortunate, because it mistakenly suggests reading raw bytes, whereas -Raw still detects encodings and ultimately reads everything into a .NET [string] type.
(By contrast, you need either -Encoding Byte (Windows PowerShell) or -AsByteStream (PowerShell Core) to read a file as a byte array.)
Given -Raw's actual purpose, perhaps something like -Whole would have been a better name, but that ship has sailed (though adding an alias name for a parameter is still an option).
Let's take a look at why this information may currently be difficult to discover [Update: It no longer is]:
[Update: This section is now OBSOLETE, except the link to the PowerShell documentation GitHub repository, which welcomes contributions, bug reports, suggestions]
A Tale of PowerShell Documentation Woes
The central conflict of this tale is the tension between the solid foundation of PowerShell's potentially great help system and its shoddy current content.
As is often the case, third parties come to the rescue, as shown in gms0ulman's helpful answer.
As briantist also points out, however, PowerShell's documentation is now open-source and welcomes contributions; he states:
"I will direct your attention to the Edit link
[for the Get-Content help topic on GitHub] [...] so you can actually fix it up and submit something better
(including examples). I have done it before; they do accept pull
requests for it."
The caveat is that while future PowerShell Core versions will benefit from improvements, it's not clear whether improvements will make their way back into Windows PowerShell.
Let's ask PowerShell's built-in help system, accessible via the standard Get-Help cmdlet (the content for which may not be preinstalled; install when prompted, or run Update-Help from an elevated session):
Get-Help Get-Content -Parameter Raw
Note how you can conveniently ask for help on a specific parameter (-Parameter Raw).
On Windows PowerShell v5.1, this yields:
-Raw
Ignores newline characters and returns the entire contents of a file in one string.
By default, the contents of a file is returned as a array of strings that is delimited
by the newline character.
Raw is a dynamic parameter that the FileSystem provider adds to the Get-Content cmdlet.
This parameter works only in file system drives.
This parameter is introduced in Windows PowerShell 3.0.
Required? false
Position? named
Default value
Accept pipeline input? false
Accept wildcard characters? false
That is indeed what we were looking for and quite helpful (leaving the awkward phrasing "delimited by the newline character" aside and that on Windows a newline is a character sequence).
On Powershell Core v6.0.2, this yields:
-Raw
Required? false
Position? Named
Accept pipeline input? false
Parameter set name (All)
Aliases None
Dynamic? true
While the meta-data is more detailed - including a hint that the parameter is dynamic (see below) - it is crucially missing a description of the parameter.
Some provider-cmdlet parameters are dynamic, in that they are specific to a given provider, so there is a mechanism to specify the target provider when asking for help, by passing a provider-specific example path to the -Path parameter.
In the case at hand, let's therefore try (PowerShell Core on Windows):
Get-Help Get-Content -Parameter Raw -Path C:\
Sadly, the result is the same unhelpful response as before.
Note that, as long as you're invoking the command from a filesystem location, explicit use of -Path should not be necessary, because the provider underlying the current location is implicitly targeted.
Now let's take a look at the online versions of PowerShell's help topics:
As it turns out, a given provider cmdlet can have multiple documentation pages:
A generic one that applies to all providers.
Provider-specific pages that document provider-exclusive behavior and parameters, such as -Raw for the filesystem provider.
Sadly, the generic topics make no mention of the existence of the provider-specific ones, making them hard to discover.
Googling Get-Content takes you to https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/module/microsoft.powershell.management/get-content, the generic topic, which contains the following misleading statement: This parameter is not supported by any providers that are installed with Windows PowerShell.
This is not only unhelpful, but actively misleading, because the PowerShell file-system provider clearly is installed with PowerShell and it does support -Raw.
[Drive] providers are PowerShell's generalization of the filesystem drive metaphor to support targeting other [typically hierarchical] storage systems with a unified set of cmdlets. For instance, Windows PowerShell also ships with the registry drive provider, which allows managing the registry as if it were a drive.
The -Online switch for Get-Help conveniently allows opening the online version of the requested topic in the browser; so let's try that (Get-Help Get-Content -Online):
Windows PowerShell v5.1: Takes you a 404 page(!) related to v4.
PowerShell Core v6.0.1: Takes you to the same generic topic that googling does.
There's a sliver of hope, however: The aforementioned 404 page offers a link to the filesystem-provider-specific topic:
Get-Content for FileSystem
It is there that we finally discover the online version of the truly relevant, provider-specific information, which is the same that Get-Help Get-Content -Parameter Raw provides locally, but - as stated - only in Windows PowerShell.
As per Kory Gill's comment and your own, the built-in Get-Help and MSDN documentation should be your first port of call. But you've already RTFM!
When that fails, ss64 is great reference for Powershell documentation and additional examples.
Get-Content page here. It has this to say about -Raw:
Return multiple lines as a single string (PowerShell 3.0)
In PowerShell 2.0 use the static method: [System.IO.File]::ReadAllText(string path)

What is the equivilent of whatis in powershell

I have learned the basics of using UNIX but I am now trying to learn how to use powershell. Most of the commands are similar or easy to find the equivalent of. However, I have not found the equivalent of whatis. Is there an equivalent? I have tried searching online but the search engines take "whatis" as being "what is". Is there anybody that knows what the equivalent is or if there is an equvalent at all?
use Get-Help to display help about cmdlets and concepts. It is your best friend when you can't remember commands
Get-Help <cmdlet>
I would also suggest Get-Alias to see which UNIX commands map to PowerShell cmdlets
You can even create you own aliases. You can add whatis to map to get help.
New-Alias whatis Get-Help
which would then allow you to do
whatis <cmdlet>
For good measure, the second best command to get familiar with is
Get-Command
Using Get-Command along side Get-Help will help (pun intended) you get up to speed with PowerShell. I do suggest using a filter with Get-Commad as the list tends to be very long. It allows wildcard filters
Get-Command *-command