I need to get the elevation in meters, of specific points within in a 1km square of ground.
Each point will be 5 meters apart, meaning a total of 40,000 specific points.
The elevation for each of these points will be stored in a 200x200 matrix.
I have tried to use the Google Maps Elevation API, but I think the amount of data I need to request will exceed the terms of service.
I also need to use the elevation data on Matlab, but reading the terms of service for the Google API, I believe I would be limited to using the data within Google Maps itself.
Please could you suggest a solution for me?
After reading all the Terms and Conditions for Google's elevation API, I believe you would be fine in using it for PERSONAL use in Metlab.
However, if you intend to publish the results or anything derived from the data, you will need to include a google map with it... but that could be in the form of a link to a map with just the 200x200 points plotted - a fifteen minute job to knock up ;)
Go for it :)
Related
I'm a complete illiterate when it comes to working with geographical data, so bear with me.
For our application we will be tracking a fairly large amount of rapidly changing points on a map. It would be nice to be able to cache the location of these points in some kind of map-tile structure so it would be easy to find all points currently in the same tile or neighbouring tiles, making it easier to quickly determine the nearest neigbours and have special logic for specific tiles, etc.
Although we're working for one specific (but already large) location, it would be nice if a solution would scale to other locations as well. Since we would only cache tiles that concern the system, would just tiling the enitre planet be the best option? The dimensions of a tile would then be measured in arc seconds/minutes, or is that a bad idea?
We already work with Postgres and this seems like something that could be done with PostGIS (is this what rasters are?), but jumping in to the documentation/tutorials without knowing what exactly I'm looking for is proving difficult. Any ideas?
PostGIS is all that you need. It can store your points in any coordinate reference system, but you'll probably be using longitude/latitude. Are your points coming from a GPS device?
PostGIS uses GIST indexing, making the search for points close to a given point quite efficient. One option you might want to look at, seeing that you are interested in tiling, is to "geohash" your points. Basically, this turns an (X,Y) coordinate pair into a single "string" with a length depending on the level of partitioning. Nearby points will have the same geohash value (= 1 tile) and are then easily identified with standard database search tools. See this answer and related question for some more considerations and an example in PostgreSQL.
You do not want to look at rasters. These are gridded data, think aerial photography or satellite images, weather maps, etc.
But if you want a more specific answer you should give some more details:
How many points? How are they collected?
Do you have large clusters?
Local? Regional? Global?
What other data does this relate to?
Pseudo table structure? Data layout?
etc
More info = better answer
Cheers, hope you get your face back
I am going to design an Android application and I will be needing the distances of the pathways inside our university(pathways between buildings)
I read about OSM(OpenStreetMap) and tried it. It is a map which is editable which means anyone can contribute to that map(like a wikipedia map version).
It has many routing services that give routes and directions between two point(start and end).
There is a routing service named GraphHopper and it is very easy to use. I can just drag and drop the start and end pt and it gives the distance(km) between the two pts.
What I want to know is how did they come up with the distance?
Is the distance reliable and accurate?
Any help is greatly appreciated because I want to use the distances for my Android app and I need to know if these distances have basis.
The distance is 'accurate' in the sense that it correctly processes the existing information from OpenStreetMap and correctly adds road segments for the final route. You can just try for your local area and compare to your own knowledge.
There could be mapping errors, where a road is incorrectly mapped. And there could be also roads missing and so the router uses a detour making the path unnecessarily longer. Also there are different modes like for cars or bikes or fastest and shortest where you get a different distance between two coordinates.
I have a series of nature reserves that need to be plotted, as polygon overlays, on a map using the coordinates contained within KML data. I’ve found a tutorial on the Apple website for displaying KML overlays on map instances.
The problem is that the reserves vary in size greatly - from a small pond right up to several hundred kilometers in size. As a result I can’t use the coordinates of the center point to find the nearest reserves. Instead I need to calculate the nearest point of the reserves polygon to find the nearest one. With the data in KML - how would I go about trying to achieve this?
I've only managed to find one other person ask this and no one had replied :(
Well, there are a couple different solutions depending on your needs. The higher the accuracy required, the more work required. I like Phil's meanRadius parameter idea. That would give you a rough idea of which polygon is closest and would be pretty easy to calculate. This idea works best if the polygons are "circlish". If the polygon are very irregular in shape, this idea loses it's accuracy.
From a math standpoint, here is what you want to do. Loop through all points of all polygons. Calculate the distance from those points to your current coordinate. Then just keep track of which one is closest. There is one final wrinkle. Imagine a two points making a line segment that is very long. You are located one meter away from the midpoint of the line. Well, the distance to these two points is very large, while, in fact you are very close to the polygon. You will need to calculate the distance from your coordinate to every possible line segment which you can do in a variety of manners which are outlined here:
http://www.worsleyschool.net/science/files/linepoint/distance.html
Finally, you need to ask yourself, am I in any polygons? If you're 10 meters away from a point on a polygon, but are, in fact, inside the polygon, obviously, you need to consider that. The best way to do that is to use a ray casting algorithm:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point_in_polygon#Ray_casting_algorithm
I have a database with the current coordinates of every online user. With a push of a button the user can update his/her coordinates to update his current location (which are then sent off to server). The app will allow you to set the radius of a circle (where the user is in the center) in which you can see the other users on a map. The users outside the circle are discarded.
What is the optimal way to find the users around you?
1) The easiest solution is to find the distance between you and every user and then see if it's less than the radius. This would place the sever under unnecessarily great load as comparison has to be made with every user in the world. In addition, how would one deal with changes in the locations?
2) An improved way would be to only calculate and compare the distance with other users who have similar latitude and longitude. Again in order to be efficient, if the radius is decreased the app should only target users with even closer coordinates. This is not as easy as it sounds. If one were to walk around the North Pole with, say, 10m radius then every step around the circumference would equal to a change of 9 degrees longitude. Every step along the equator would be marginal. Still, even being very rough and assuming there aren't many users visiting the Poles I could narrow it down to some extent.
Any ideas regarding finding users close-by and how to keep them up to date would be much appreciated! :)
Andres
Very good practice is to use GeoHash concept (http://geohash.org/) or GeoModel http://code.google.com/p/geomodel/ (better for BigTable like databases). Those are efficient ways of geospatial searches. I encourage you to read some of those at links I have provided, but in few words:
GeoHash translates lon and lat to unique hash string, than you can query database through those hashes. If points are closer to each other similar prefix will bi longer
GeoModel is similar to GegoHash with that difference that hashed are squares with set accuracy. If square is smaller the hash is longer.
Hope I have helped you. But decision, which you will pick, is yours :).
Lukasz
1) you would probably need a two step process here.
a) Assuming that all locations go into a database, you can do a compare at the sql level (very rough one) based on the lat & long, i.e. if you're looking for 100m distances you can safely disregard locations that differ by more than 0.01 degree in both directions. I don't think your North Pole users will mind ;)
Also, don't consider this unnecessary - better do it on the server than the iPhone.
b) you can then use, for the remaining entries, a comparison formula as outlined below.
2) you can find a way to calculate distances between two coordinates here http://snipplr.com/view/2531/calculate-the-distance-between-two-coordinates-latitude-longitude/
The best solution currently, in my opinion, is to wrap the whole earth in a matrix. Every cell will cover a small area and have a unique identifier. This information would be stored for every coordinate in the database and it allows me to quickly filter out irrelevant users (who are very far away). Then use Pythagoras to calculate the distance between all the other users and the client.
I'd like to know (from a high level view) what would be required to take a pdf floor plan of a building and determine where exactly you are on that floor plan using GPS coordinates? In addition to location, the user would be presented with a "turn by turn" directions to another point on the map, navigating down hallways, between cubicles, etc.
Use case: an iPhone app that determined a user's location and guided them to a conference room or person's office in the building.
I realize that this is by no means trivial, but any help is appreciated. Thanks!
It's an interesting problem. When you're using Core Location, you're not necessarily using GPS. Using WiFi and cell tower triangulation, you can get pretty good location results. So from Core Location you get a latitude and longitude fix. (You might also get altitude info, since GPS data is 3-dimensional. You also will get an accuracy value.)
So you have lat and lon. You need to map these coordinates to the PDF plan's coordinates. Assuming that the plan is aligned with the latitude and longitude lines, and that you have a lat-long fix for one of the points on the plan, you need to calculate the x-axis scale and y-axis scale. Then it's some calculations to map the lat-long to x-y coordinates on the PDF plan.
GPS may not be accurate enough for this purpose, especially indoors. Assuming errors on
the order of 10 meters, you'll have difficulty determining which floor the user is on.
Here's a neat (?) idea that might work: can you post some "You are here" placards
at various locations around the building? You could label each one with a unique,
machine-readable location code (maybe a QR code or something similar), then take an
image using the camera, have your app read that image and interpret the location code,
and use that instead of GPS to determine the start location.
GPS inside? That's your first -- and biggest -- hurdle.
Next hurdle is knowing the GPS coordinates of at least three points on that PDF to define the plane of of your map in the real world. (The PDF will need to be to scale, of course.)
So that gives you where you are on the PDF. Now you'll need to figure out some way to determine where you can walk (or where you can't) to get directions.