In my current code base, when i create a VM, DNS name is being dynamically set as same as the instance name. For example, consider if my VM name is "anandInstance", DNS name of the name is being generated as "anandInstance.cloudapp.net". Is there a way to change the DNS name like "dns1.cloudapp.net" during the creation thru REST API??
"Connect to existing VM" , is it possible to achieve this option through REST call? In case "connect to existing.." option , we are getting a list of vms/services to choose and VM is getting created successfully. How to achieve the same using API.
Thanks
In my current code base, when i create a VM, DNS name is being
dynamically set as same as the instance name. For example, consider if
my VM name is "anandInstance", DNS name of the name is being generated
as "anandInstance.cloudapp.net". Is there a way to change the DNS name
like "dns1.cloudapp.net" during the creation thru REST API??
I don't think it is possible. Imagine what a nightmare in the portal would become if you were able to do so? How would you link a Cloud Service (whatever.cloudapp.net) to an actual deployment (MyDemoVm123). However you can use your own domain and have CNAME records pointing to your "want-to-change-for-some-reason.cloudapp.net" (frankly I surely think that soon we will use even longer names)
"Connect to existing VM" , is it possible to achieve this option
through REST call?
Connection to a VM is essentially opening a RDP session. If it a windows VM, you can try using the Download RDP file API call. Once you get the file, just start it with "process.start". If it is linux VM, just start SSH client on port 22 (or one you have defined) from the Cloud Service DNS name you have.
UPDATE
From the azure portal,for stand alone machineoption, we are able to give the dns name with deafult cloudoneapp.net. How to do the same
through the rest api call.any specfic paramter is there to specify the
same?
When you are using the REST API, you first create a Cloud Service (still named hosted service in the REST API) where your machine will be hosted. Here you give the name for that hosted service (the dns name with deafult cloudoneapp.net). Then you call the Create Virtual Machine Deployment API action.
In case "connect to existing.." option , we are getting a list of vms/services to choose and VM is getting created successfully. How to
achieve the same using API.
When you want to get list of all VMs, just get a list of all Hosted Services, then get properties of each and make a guess whether it is a VM or a Cloud Service (maybe by querying for Properties of each service). I don't see a direct access to the list of Virtual Machines. But as this feature being PREVIEW, things might change in the future.
Hope my answer is clear?
Related
I am currently looking into deploying Traefik/Træfik on our service fabric cluster.
Basically I have a setup where I have any number of Applications (services), defined with a tenant name and each of these services is in fact a separate Web UI.
I am trying to figure out if I can configure a single frontend to target a backend so I don't have to define a new frontend each time I deploy a new UI app. Something like
[frontend.tenantui]
rule = "HostRegexp:localhost,{tenantName:[a-z]+}.example.com"
backend = "fabric:/WebApp/{tenantName}"
The idea is to have it such that I can just deploy new UI services without updating the frontend configuration.
I am currently using the Service Fabric provider for my backend services, but I am open to using the file provider or something else if that is required.
Update:
The servicemanifset contains labels, so as to let traefik create backends and frontends.
The labels are defined for one service, lets call it WebUI as an example. Now when I deploy an instance of WebUI it gets a label and traefik understands it.
Then I deploy ANOTHER instance with a DIFFERENT set of parameters, its still the WebUI service and it uses the same manifest, so it gets the same labels, and the same routing. But what I would really want was to let it have a label containing some sort of rule so I could route to the name of the service instance (determine at runtime not design time). Specifically I would like for the runtime part to be part of the domainname (thus the suggestion of a HostRegexp style rule)
I don't think it is possible to use the matched group from the HostRegexp to determine the backend.
A possibility would be to use the Property Manager API to dynamically set the frontend rule for the service instance after creating it. Also, see this for a complete example on using the API.
(I'm afraid I'm probably about to reveal myself as completely unfit for the task at hand!)
I'm trying to setup a Redshift cluster and database to help manage data for a class/group project.
I have a dc2.large cluster running with either default options, or what looked like the most generic in the couple of place I was forced to make entries.
I have downloaded Aginity (Win64) as it is described as being specialized for Redshift. That said, I can't find any instructions for connecting using it. The connection dialog requests the follwoing:
Server: using the endpoint for my cluster (less :57xx at the end).
UserID: the Master username for the database defined for the cluster.
Password: to match the UserID
SSL Mode (Disable, Allow, Prefer, Require): trying various options
Database: as named in cluster setup
Port: as defined in cluster setup
I can't get it to connect ("failed to establish connection") and don't know if I'm entering something wrong in Aginity or if I haven't set up my cluster properly.
Message: Failed to establish a connection to 'abc1234-smtm.crone7m2jcwv.us-east-1.redshift.amazonaws.com'.
Type : Npgsql.NpgsqlException
Source : Npgsql
Trace : at Npgsql.NpgsqlClosedState.Open(NpgsqlConnector context, Int32 timeout)
at Npgsql.NpgsqlConnector.Open()
at Npgsql.NpgsqlConnection.Open()
at Aginity.MPP.Common.BaseDataProvider.get_Connection()
at Aginity.MPP.Common.BaseDataProvider.CreateCommand(String commandText, CommandType commandType, IDataParameter[] commandParams)
at Aginity.MPP.Common.BaseDataProvider.ExecuteReader(String commandText, CommandType commandType, IDataParameter[] commandParams)
--- Inner Exception: ---
......
It seems there is not enough information going into Aginity to authorize connection to my cluster - no account credential are supplied. For UserID, am I meant to enter the ID of a valid user? Can I use the root account? What would the ID look like? I have setup a User with FullAccess to S3 and Redshift, then entered the UserID in this format
arn:aws:iam::600123456789:user/john
along with the matching password, but that hasn't worked either.
The only training/tutorial I have been able to find/do on this is the Intro AWS direct you to, at https://qwiklabs.com/focuses/2366, which uses a web-based client that I can't find outside of the tutorial (pgweb).
Any advice what I am doing wrong, and how to do it right?
Well, I think I got it working - I haven't had a chance to see if I can actually create table yet, but it seems to be connected. I had to allow inbound traffic from outside the VPC, as per the above snapshot.
I'm guessing there's a better way than opening it up to all IP addresses, but I don't know the users' (fellow team members) IPs, and aren't they all subject to change depending on the device they're using to connect?
How does one go about getting inside the VPC to connect that way, presumably more securely?
Using 5.1.163 version of service fabric run time.
Created a service fabric application with one stateless web api (i.e. using owin communication listener).
Modified the generated code so that listening endpoint to contain partition id/instance id/new_guid (just as is the case for stateful services). This should allow me to create another app instance so that I can have multi-tenancy at application level.
By default, Local.xml file is set to 1 instance for this service.
Deployed it to local machine by F5. Verified that it is deployed to only one instance.
Verified that service is working fine.
Navigated to local service fabric explorer and clicked on the Cluster/Application/AppType node. Clicked on 'Create app instance'.
It successfully created 2nd app instance.
However in this new instance, the service is deployed to all 5 nodes.
I was expecting it deploy the service instance only one node. Is this a bug? But only in this version of service fabric?
When you deploy a Service Fabric application using Visual Studio (or from PowerShell) you use the Deploy-FabricApplication.ps1 that is generated for your application and found in /scripts under your SF project. This script does two things (mainly):
Create/update the application type
Create a new/upgrade existing instance of the application type
The second part there is similar to what you do in the SF Explorer, except this one also considers the publisher profile file you supply. The PS-script actually reads your publisher profile xml files and extracts any parameters in there to a hashset (a dictionary) and passes that as an argument in step 2.
You can create an instance of an SF application type using the PS cmdlets (alternatively you can use FabricClient). The following command does this: New-ServiceFabricApplication. Here you have the chance to supply your own application parameters, including instance count for services in your new application instance (if you have a dynamic parameter for that in your application manifest).
So, when you use the SF explorer to create a new application instance you cannot control how that instance is created, it is always using the default parameter values as specified directly in ApplicationManifest.xml, not values you have specified in your publisher profiles (local1, local5, cloud, etc.).
To controll the creation, run New-ServiceFabricApplication with yor parameters as a hashset.
I am trying to start a google compute engine (GCE) instance with a pre-configured FQDN. We are intending to run an application that is licensed based on the contents of /etc/hosts.
I am starting the instances using the Google Cloud SDK utility - gcloud.
I have tried setting the "hostname" key using the metadata option like so:
gcloud compute instances create mynode (standard opts) --metadata hostname=mynode.example.com
Whenever I log into the developer console, under computer, instances, I can see hostname under "Custom metadata". This appears to be a new, custome key - it has no impact on what:
http://metadata.google.internal/computeMetadata/v1/instance/hostname
returns.
I have also tried setting "instance/hostname" like the below, which causes a parsing error when using gcloud.
--metadata instance/hostname=mynode.example.com
I have successfully used the startup scripts functionality of the metadata server to run a startup script that parses the new, internal IP address of the newly created instance, updated /etc/hosts. This appears to work but doesn't feel "like the google way".
Can I configure the FQDN (specifically, a domain name, as the instance name is always the hostname) of an instance, during instance creation, using the metaserver functionality?
try this:
Go to your GCE >> VM instances panel.
stop your gce instance.
clic on the instance name.
Edit your instance, adding this values on Custom metadata fields:
Key field: hostname / Value field: your.server.hostname
Key field: startup-script / Value field: sudo -s hostnamectl set-hostname your.server.hostname
setup-example-image.png
Finally, start your instance and test with a hostnamectl command.
regards!
According to this article 'hostname' is part of the default metadata entries that provide information about your instance and it is NOT possible to manually edit any of the default metadata pairs. You can also take a look at this video from the Google Team. Within the first few minutes it is mentioned that you cannot modify default metadata pairs. As such, it does not seem like you can specify the hostname upon instance creation other than through the use of a start-up script like you've done already. It is also worth mentioning that the hostname you've specified will get deleted and auto-synced by the metadata server upon reboot unless you're using a start-up script or something that would modify it every time.
If what you're currently doing works for what you're trying to accomplish, it might be the only workaround to your scenario.
Here is a patch for /usr/share/google/set-hostname to set FQDN to GCE instance.
https://gist.github.com/yuki-takeichi/3080521322f0f1d159ea6a343e2323e6
Before you use this patch, you must set your desired FQDN in your instance's metadata by specifying hostname key.
Hostname is set each time instance's IP address is renewed by dhclient. set-hostname is just a hook script which dhclient executes and serves new IP address and internal hostame to, and modifies /etc/hosts. This patch changes the source of hostname by querying instance's metadata from metadata server.
The original set-hostname script is here:
https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/compute-image-packages/blob/master/google_config/bin/set_hostname.
Use this patch at your own risk.
When creating a VM, you can specify a custom FQDN hostname as an optional parameter. This feature is currently in Beta.
$ gcloud beta compute instances create INSTANCE_NAME --hostname example.hostname
This should work across OSes, and eliminate the need for workaround scripts.
More info in the docs.
-- Sirui (Product Manager, Google Compute Engine)
I've looked throughout this site to find answered questions and found a few things that work but with a couple solutions combined. This thread seems the place to answer.
1) echo example.com > /etc/hostname
2) add -- 127.0.1.1 example.com in /etc/hosts
3) add -- hostnamectl set-hostname
example.com -- command to /etc/rc.local script
4) uncomment /etc/dhcp/dhclient.conf line:
supersede domain-name "example.com";
5) profit.... Seems to stick after each reboot
(Note example.com is your domain name: fqdndomain.com - yourfqdndomain.org)
Also note this is for Ubuntu or Debian. Other Unix May slightly vary. I've tested this on Ubuntu 16.04
Always on the wording NOT possible to manually edit any of the default metadata pairs, how about the instant level default metadata "/scheduling"? we could set them manually as mentioned in this article
I'm performing REST API operation Start Role (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj157189.aspx)
In the link https://management.core.windows.net/{subscription-id}/services/hostedservices/{service-name}/deployments/{deployment-name}/roles/{role-name}/Operations we have replaced {service-name}, {deployment-name} and {role-name} with name of VM.
In result we have next message:
"ResourceNotFoundThe resource service name hostedservices is not supported."
List Hosted Services operation (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windowsazure/ee460781.aspx) shows us that we have 2 WMs as hosted services.
Get Role operaion (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj157193.aspx) also gives info about each of VMs.
Thanks in advance.
You are using:
{subscription-id}/services/hostedservices/{service-name}/deployments/{deployment-name}/roles/{role-name}/Operations
But the correct Uri is:
{subscriptionID}/services/hostedservices/{serviceName}/deployments/{deploymentName}/roleInstances/{roleInstanceName}/Operations
See the difference?
I haven't worked with this particular operation, however a few things:
service-name: It should be the name of the hosted service (the one with .cloudapp.net) and what you see when you list your hosted service.
deployment-name: Generally speaking it's a GUID returned by Get Deployment operation (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windowsazure/ee460804.aspx).
role-name: Role name is also returned when you do a Get Deployment operation. You should use that. I'm not sure if it is same as the name of your VM.
Can you retry your operation after changing these values?
In my case, deployment name is the name of the first VM I created in this cloud service. So, if I added 3 machines to the same cloud service, all of them have the same deployment name - the name of the first machine.