I've got a Flot chart issue. When I use the recommended DOCTYPE, the chart does not display. But if I remove the DOCTYPE it shows up perfectly.
I am using excanvas.js. Here's the DOCTYPE I have:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
I have tried numerous other DOCTYPES, but to no avail.
Am I not using excanvas.js properly? I am calling it along with everything else:
<script src="../flot/jquery.flot.js"></script>
<script src="../flot/jquery.flot.resize.js"></script>
<script src="../flot/excanvas.min.js"></script>
<link href="../flot/layout.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
Thanks, all!
Related
Is it possible to merge JS files (or CSS files) with parcel ?
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<title>Title</title>
<script src="/js/aos.js"></script>
<script src="/js/club.js"></script>
</head>
<body>
</body>
</html>
When I run
parcel build js.html
I got 2 minified .js files into /dist
Is there a way to get one single file ?
regards
I don't think there's currently a config-driven way to get parcel to do this, but if your project can tolerate using modules (and if you have a choice - i.e. you wrote both aos.js and club.js), I would highly recommend this to avoid bugs that can come with global variables), then you can have your html reference a single index.js file, which then imports all of it's dependencies, like this:
index.html
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<title>Title</title>
<script src="/js/index.js" type="module"></script>
</head>
<body>
</body>
</html>
Note the type="module" property in the script tag - see documentation
js/index.js
import "js/aos.js"
import "js/club.js"
I am trying to use sails.js and Zurb Foundation 6.2. I used this handy npm generator that sets up my grunt tasks. The output looks pretty good. I have a single js file that contains jquery, foundation, etc.
In my layout.ejs, I have this:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title><%=typeof title == 'undefined' ? 'New Sails App' : title%></title>
<!-- Viewport mobile tag for sensible mobile support -->
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1, maximum-scale=1">
<!--STYLES-->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/styles/app.css">
<!--STYLES END-->
</head>
<body>
... some html ...
<%- body %>
<!--SCRIPTS-->
<script src="/js/dependencies/sails.io.js"></script>
<script src="/js/dependencies/foundation.js"></script>
<!--SCRIPTS END-->
<script>
$(document).foundation();
</script>
</body>
</html>
When I run the page, I get this error:
**TypeError: url.indexOf is not a function
jQuery.fn.load()
foundation.js:9612
<anonymous>
foundation.js:11913
<anonymous>**
My reading on this suggests that the issue is either that something is not be loaded, is being loaded more than once, or is in the wrong order. How do I narrow that down? I tried to use CDN's for each piece and still couldn't make it work.
Thank you for your help.
Foundation is not currently compatible with jQuery 3.0.0, Foundation is using the deprecated jQuery.fn.load(). Use jQuery 2.2.x for now. See issue and PR:
https://github.com/zurb/foundation-sites/issues/8834
https://github.com/zurb/foundation-sites/pull/8923
I am creating a custom Share page that must have none of the Alfresco UI on it, but which still needs access to the Alfresco and YAHOO objects.
I have successfully created the page and caused it to open in a new tab, but I get errors that the Alfresco and YAHOO objects are undefined.
What are the minimum includes I must add to my Freemarker template to get access to those objects?
Update: I have gotten the Alfresco and YAHOO objects to load, but now am getting "Uncaught Error: extend failed, please check that all dependencies are included."
Here are the freemarker and javascript includes I've got so far, if it'll help:
<#import "import/alfresco-common.ftl" as common />
...
<script type="text/javascript" src="../scripts/ajax/yahoo/yahoo-min.js"> </script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="../scripts/ajax/yahoo/connection/connection-min.js"> </script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="../scripts/ajax/common.js"> </script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="../scripts/ajax/utilities/utilities.js"> </script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="../yui/yuiloader/yuiloader.js"> </script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="../js/alfresco.js"> </script>
Update 2: Based on the first answer, the first few lines of the template look like this and again yield Uncaught ReferenceError: YAHOO is not defined:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<region-id>head-resources</region-id>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1, maximum-scale=1, user-scalable=no">
<meta name="apple-mobile-web-app-capable" content="yes">
<title></title>
<script>
var urlParams;
Update 3: I've reduced the source to the minimum necessary to demonstrate the problem. What follows next is the template component definition file, followed by the freemarker template itself. Definition:
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<page>
<title>iPad Viewer</title>
<title-id>page.iPad.title</title-id>
<description>iPad Viewer</description>
<description-id>page.iPad.description</description-id>
<template-instance>viewer-ipad</template-instance>
<authentication>user</authentication>
</page>
Freemarker template:
<html>
<body>
<div class="content">
<#region-id>head-resources</#region-id>
<script>
alert(YAHOO);
alert(Alfresco);
</script>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Error is:
Caused by: freemarker.core.ParseException: Parsing error in template "org/alfresco/viewer-ipad.ftl" in line 11, column 7: Unclosed #... when the end of the file was reached.
I'm not sure how you created the page, but this is not needed when you define your regions.
Probably there are all in the <region-id>head-resources</region-id> So if you include that in the page-template that should suffice.
As far as I understood, we needed to use styleClass= as the JSF components don't support using just class=.
I've noticed recently that some components that were using class= were still rendering correctly. As a minimal example,
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE html
PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html">
<h:head>
<title>Simple JSF Facelets page</title>
</h:head>
<h:body>
<h:inputText class="wut" anothertag="hi" value="me"/>
</h:body>
</html>
This produces
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="/individuallifefaz/javax.faces.resource/theme.css.xhtml?ln=primefaces-aristo"/>
<title>Simple JSF Facelets page</title></head>
<body>
<input type="text" name="j_idt5" value="me" class="wut"/>
</body>
</html>
Why is this working? It's clearly not just passing through any unknown tags, as the anothertag is stripped out.
This is actually done by the view technology Facelets, not by the JSF component itself. Facelets has an alias for class attribute which automatically maps to styleClass. This was implemented as part of support for jsfc attribute as used in "designer friendly Facelets" which should make things like this possible:
<input type="text" jsfc="h:inputText" class="foo" />
If you use JSF with a different view technology (although so far there's none which is a serious alternative to Facelets, and JSP is deprecated), then there's no guarantee that <h:inputText class> would work.
See also:
Is there a way to run a JSF page without building the whole project?
This is my first time posting a question on this site, but certainly not the first time finding answers in it.
I have used stackoverflow as a resource to fix several issues I've faced with my new blog, that is until last night, when I found this issue which I just can't fix.
When I try to share the home page of my blog, I don't get the proper image specified in the og:image tag... once I check my site via de FB debugger, it shows me this:
https://developers.facebook.com/tools/debug/og/object?q=ivanfuentes.com
Curiously enough, I do not find any issues when I check for a page, or a post:
https://developers.facebook.com/tools/debug/og/object?q=ivanfuentes.com%2Fvideos%2F
https://developers.facebook.com/tools/debug/og/object?q=http%3A%2F%2Fivanfuentes.com%2Fthe-popularity-contest%2F
So, I know it's an issue that is generated in the home page only, but during the last 18 hours, have been unable to find it.
I have OG meta tags specified dinamically via a wordpress plugin... currently, it's "Facebook AWD", but I've had several other Facebook sharing, all-in-one's, and OG plugins, which give me the same results in the debugger, which makes me think I messed up somewhere else. I have no embarrassment in admitting I'm quite a newbie, so it's highly likely I messed up while trying to modify some code... probably when I added a few lines to make the site IE compliant?
Hope I gave enough information, and someone gets to help me, as this is not only about the proper image being displayed on a Facebook link, but rather about me likely having a mess in my code, and that could (WILL) mean trouble once I make any mods/updates to my site in the future.
Thanks for the time!
Your html is a complete mess and that's why the debugger is complaining.
Visiting your page and looking at the code I can see this:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
<div id="fb-root"></div>
<script>
...
</script>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:og="http://ogp.me/ns#" xmlns:fb="https://www.facebook.com/2008/fbml">
<head profile="http://gmpg.org/xfn/11">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
<div id="fb-root"></div>
<script>
...
</script>
<title>Ivan Fuentes Hagar</title>
Two problems there:
The sdk code is inserted twice
In both cases there's a div placement before the body
In the debugger result for this page when clicking the bottom link (Scraped URL: See exactly what our scraper sees for your URL) you can also see broken html but in another variation:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"><body>
<div id="fb-root"></div>
<script>
...
</script><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<script>
...
</script><title>Ivan Fuentes Hagar</title>
There problems here:
The body definition is right after the html
There's no head definition
All of the tags which suppose to live inside the head are inside the body
The sdk script is loaded inserted twice
In both cases I found 3 occurrences of the <div id="fb-root"></div>.
As you can see you have some fixin' up to do with the html output of your wordpress.
I'm not sure why the outputs is different for the debugger, I thought that maybe due to the user agent string, but trying curl --user-agent "facebookexternalhit/1.1 (+http://www.facebook.com/externalhit_uatext.php)" "http://ivanfuentes.com/" returns the exact results as with the browser.