I'm new with objective c programming and implementation of wcf, so i may or may not sound like an idiot with my questions. Was wondering what's the best practice in terms of calling web services from objective c.
My plan, for login, is to create a wcf service to check if the username and password exist. If it returns TRUE then you create a "Cookie" that will store the session on your app? I'm planning to return the Id of the user as well so that whenever the user requests for some data change from the iphone app it can know which user it is. BUT I'm skeptical about returning the users Id. Is it safe? Or should I generate a type of GUID or token to return from the WCF to my iphone, store that and then whenever they request for a transaction then WCF can verify the user?
Can somebody please point me to the right direction as to where to start in terms of objective c security.
Thanks!!!
I think you are on right track :-)
If your server supports session id mechanism then in response of login send a unique session id to client so that in subsequent requests server can compare it with the local one. You can use GET or POST both, but in my opinion POST is better way here.
Go for HTTPS.
If you want to cache the credentials on the app side, look for keychain.
Related
I am attempting to make a website's back-end API (I want to make the back-end independent of the front-end so I'm only making a server-side API for now, abiding to RESTfulness as much as possible). I haven't done this before so I'm unaware of the 'best' & most secure way to do things.
How I do it now:
Some parts of the API should only be accessible to a specific user after they login and up to 24 hours later.
To do this, I am generating a random Session ID whenever a user logs in (I'm using passwordless logins so the user is assigned that ID when they click on a link in their email) on the server side, which respond by sending that session ID to the client once. The client then stores this session ID in localstorage (or a file in disk if the client is not a web browser).
Next, I store that ID along with the associated email in my DB (MySQL table) on the server side.
Now every time the client want something from my API, they have to provide the email & session ID in the URL (I don't want cookies for now), which the server checks against the ones in the DB, if they exist then the server responds fully else responds with an error.
After 24 hours, the server deletes the email/session ID pair and the user has to login again (to generate another session ID and associate it with their email).
Now the questions:
Is my method secure or does it have obvious vulnerabilities? Is
there another battle-tested way I'm not aware of?
Is there a better way for the client to store the session ID (if
they are a web browser)?
What is the best way to generate a unique session ID? Currently I
generate a random 16-char string that I set as the primary key of
the session-email table.
Is using a MySQL table the most performant/best way to store session
IDs (given it will be queried with each request)?
Do I need to encrypt session IDs in any way? Is it secure for the
client to send it as a 'naked' URL param?
Sorry for having too many questions in one post but I think they're related by the single scenario above. If it makes any difference, I'm using F# and I expect my client to either be an android app or a web app.
Your REST API MUST not know anything about the REST client session, not even the session id. If you don't want to send a password by every request, all you can do is signing the user id, and the timeout, so the service can authenticate based on the signature. Use JSON web token: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSON_Web_Token
You can have a server side REST client, which can have the session your described. The question is, does it really worth the effort to develop a REST service instead of a regular web application? I am not sure in your case, but typically the answer is no, because you won't have any 3rd party REST client and your application does not have enough traffic to justify the layered architecture or it is not big enough to split into multiple processes, etc...
If security is important then you MUST use a true random generator algorithm or hardware. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Random_number_generation#.22True.22_vs._pseudo-random_numbers It is not safe to send anything through HTTP, you must use HTTPS instead. You MUST use the standard Authorization header instead of a query param. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_access_authentication
I'm currently trying to setup FOSOAuthServerBundle with my Symfony2 app.
Everything seems to be setup and functional, anyway I'm stuck after the installation.
What is the proper workflow with URLs to get the access_token ?
I tried /oauth/v2/auth, but sounds like I need to define a Client object first.
How to create/generate Client ? Clients are always supposed to be created manually ?
FOSOAuthServerBundle doc is great, but seems to skip all the usage workflow. Am I supposed to check the OAuth2 doc for this ?
Thanks !
In short, yes. You should be using the oAuth2 RFC to determine which workflow you want to use. In regards to client registration the RFC specifically states that the means through which a client registers is beyond the scope of the specification (https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6749#section-2).
With that being said I can give you some insight into how I did this. My application is a mobile phone application that connects to several services running on various servers. I'm also using the Resource Owner Password Credentials Grant.
The way I approached this was: when the application loads, the first thing it does is to check if it has an oAuth2 client id. If it doesn't, then it POSTS to a create client endpoint I've setted up with the meta-data I need. The endpoint validates the POST, creates the client and returns the client information. The application stores the client id and the process doesn't have to be repeated the next time.
Application loads;
Application checks for oAuth2 client id;
If there is one, the process ends;
If there isn't, it posts to http://www.example.com/client;
If we get a 200, store the oAuth2 client id.
I could have also created the oAuth2 client when the user created an account in the application, but I wanted to make the registration process as fast as possible. Creating the client would have added some extra waiting time to the process.
Check this: http://blog.logicexception.com/2012/04/securing-syfmony2-rest-service-wiith.html
It's quite simple to convert to Doctrine, whether you use it.
There's a command-line that does exactly what you need: create a Client!
We intend to develop rest based api. I explored the topic but it seems, you can secure api when your client is an app (So there are many ways, public key - private key etc). What about websites / mobile website, if we are accessing rest based api in website which do not use any login for accessing contents ( login would be optional ) then how could we restrict other people from accessing rest based api ?
Does it make sense using Oauth2.0 ? I don't have clear idea of that.
More clear question could be ,How can we secure get or post request exposed over web for the website which doesn't use any login ?
If it's simple get request or post request , which will return you json data on specific input, now i have mobile website , who will access those data using get request or post request to fetch data. Well, some else can also access it , problem is i am not using Login, user can access data directly. But how can we restrict other people from accessing that data.
What do you think is the difference between securing a website that is not using REST vs one that is using REST API?
OAuth provides authorisation capabilities for your site, in a REST architecture this means a user of the mobile application will have to provide their credentials before being allowed to access the resource. The application can then decide on if that user has access to the requested resource. However you've said your website doesn't need use authorisation.
You can use certificates however good luck managing the certificate for each client. My take on it is for your explanation you don't need to secure your website because you will never be able to manage a trust relationship between the client and the server. There are some options though:
You build your own client application that you ship out to people which can verify itself with the server using a packaged certificate with the client. E.g. iOS has this kind of feature if you build for that device.
You provide a capability to download a certificate that is 'installed' in the browser and used when communicating to your REST API
Use something like a handshaking protocol so when a client wants to make the first request it says; 'hi I'm a client can we chat?' And the server responds with 'yes for the next X minutes we can however make sure you send me this key everytime you tell me something YYYYYY' (you can use something like SecureUDID or equivalent for other devices than iOS).
There are probably others but you get the basic idea. Again in my opinion if your resource doesn't need authorisation then you don't need to secure that REST API. Can I ask what kind of data are you exposing via this REST API or functionality your providing? That might help provide a better answer.
You want authorization: only some agents (mobile clients) and/or users should be allowed to access those APIs.
To solve that problem, you need identification: a way for the server to tell who is who (or what), so the right decision can be made.
There are many different way to provide some form of identification, depending how much you care about security.
The simplest is a user agent string, specific to your mobile clients. But it can be faked easily. Slightly harder to fake are client based 'secrets' - embed some kind of secret or key in your mobile client code. You can make it really complicated and secret, but as ramsinb pointed out, you can't get security this way as it would require you to be able to guarantee that the secret you're shipping with the client (wether it's code, algorithm or any other fancy construct) can't be compromised or reverse engineered. Not happening when you don't control the client.
From there, 3 choices:
Security isn't really required, don't bother
Security isn't really required, but you still want to limit access to your API to either legit users/agents or people ready to invest some time hacking your protection - go with a specific user agent or a client embedded secret - don't invest much into it as it won't block people who really want access to get it anyway
Security IS required - and then I don't think there is a way around authentication, wether it's login/password, user specific (device specific?) keys, OpenID, etc... No matter what, you'll have to add to the user burden to some extent, although you can limit that burden by allowing authentication to persist (cookies, storage....)
I'm developing an iPhone app that lets users upload photos to a Google App Engine backend written in Python.
Data is transferred between the device and server via HTTP POST and GET. What is the simplest, most secure way to ensure only iPhones with my app can get data? Also, I don't want the user to enter in credentials, it should be invisible to her.
I could embed a key in the device and send that with every request which the server would check against. But a malicious user could potentially decompile the app and obtain the key. Any suggestions?
With your requirement that the user not enter any form of password, your options are severely limited. As you note, any shared secret key in the app can be pulled out by someone via binary extraction etc. -- in effect, you can't stop a really dedicated cracker finding out the secret and then just submitting that to the server.
There are approaches that are not watertight, but which might make it harder for wholesale abuse of your service. One example might be to release updates for your app every month (or two weeks, or whatever) that contain a new shared secret. Then obviously your web service has to expect the new shared secret, as well as accepting the exising secret, for each time period.
If your data is very sensitive, you might want to stop eavesdropping by using HTTPS; but as Nick says, if you use HTTPS for anything except authentication, you have extra hoops to jump through at App submission time.
Whenever you have a key stored on a device or in software that is accessible by someone it is subject to attack. iOS's keychain is generally a helpful way to store things you want to secure. However, it is still subject to attack. As with all security you need come up with a model that is appropriate for your application.
Also note that there are encryption export restrictions that you should familiarize yourself with if you be intending to use encryption for more than authorization.
I am looking for some suggestions on how to secure access to a RESTful API which initially be used by an iPhone application, but will have other clients in the future. The data exposed by this API must be kept secure as it may contain health information. All access will be done over HTTPS.
I was thinking that I'd like to require pre-registration of the iphones at setup and then also some type of PIN/Password on each request. So, simply knowing the password without pre-registering the phone/client won't provide access. I was thinking about somehow tying it to the iPhone identifier if that is possible, but not sure it would provide any additional security. The iPhone identifier is just another piece of information and it may not even be that secret.
So, some requirements would be:
Use some type of pin-based solution on the iPhone, but want more security then a simple 4-6 digit pin can provide.
No passwords could be sent in the clear.
Not be subject to reply attacks
Having to pre-exchange some data between client and server when setting up client is OK.
I would think that, if the application contains medical records, you would want to have the user authenticate every time they use the application or, at least, have some way of pushing down a disable message that renders the app useless in the case where it is lost or stolen. The 4-6 character password (pin) would also concern me with respect to HIPAA, if it applies.
You might want to treat it as a standard web app from the server perspective and do session-based authentication and access with a session that times out, perhaps after a long period, and re-authentication on timeout.
You could use SSL with client authentication. If a device gets lost, you can remove the certificate on the server. There are some obstacles though:
It is not entirely clear if/how you can do client authenticated SSL on the iPhone Unfortunately, there is not much documentation about it. Have a look at Certificate, Key, and Trust Services Reference
You have to create a private key for every device
You also have to figure out a secure way to transfer the private key to the device