I'm new to cocoa development and wondering what the right approach would be to the following:
I have a window with controls who's size is dynamic. In other words, I don't know the width of the window in advance. I also want to give the window a padding of 15px. In the CSS world I would simply pad a div and make it inline to accomplish this. I can't seem to figure out how to do this with NSWindow/NSView.
Question is too vague to be sure, but IFF I'm understanding you, you want a subview of the window to resize itself to always be 15pixels from the left and right sides of the enclosing window (for example).
here are the two constraints (as set up in Interface Builder, but you can do the same thing from code):
That's one view whose width is set to adjust while keeping the left and right padding to the window frame at 15 pixels (points actually, but don't worry about that).
As your view hierarchy gets more complicated you'll use different techniques for different pieces of the layout. Which is why matt was suggesting that you haven't been specific enough to actually answer a question. (What specific part of what you are you trying to do isn't working and what did you try that didn't work?). I've shown you the first step of the simplest outer layer above and it reflects a principle that carries down through your view hierarchy, but there are other cases - two items with the same width, three items with the same horizontal space between them, and so on - that require different techniques.
It sounds reading the auto layout documentation all the way through would be helpful for you. It talks about different types of relations (Equal is what I used below) and some on techniques. Unfortunately Apple's documentation situation is a bit of a mess at the moment which makes this more difficult than it should be (sigh).
What used to be the definitive auto layout guide is "unmaintained" and the place that documentation seems to be heading is incomplete and certainly less accessible. The most useful part for this context is the NSLayoutContraint documentation, though that links to the "Unmaintained" document noted above (sigh).
I know this question is a long shot, but I am just wondering if someone found a better solution. Using boundingRect is not accurate as it does not work with word wrapping. The reason I do not wish to use sizeToFit is that it incurs quite a hefty performance penalty when there are a lot of labels to calculate, thus causing jerkiness during scrolling (I am using UICollectionView).
There is the internal method that makes sizeToFit possible - sizeThatFits(_ size: CGSize) -> CGSize. You can use it to compute the size without actually relayouting the view.
Except that there's nothing more. There's a lot of methods, as you mentioned that compute bounding boxes of strings with different fonts/attributes/whatever, but they are always a little off, as the UI controls have inner layout or margins that are not publicly accessible. Even if you get it to work now it changes heavily from iOS to iOS.
As a solution I propose caching the sizes. Invalidate on model changes, rotations or collection view width changes.
I am currently trying to get the hang of Auto-layout in Xcode, and with it, i have found some problems.
Now, i don't have a 100% grasp on how auto-layout works exactly, so as i learn on it might become easy, but i think it is very hard to be honest. I am usually making games, and of thus, i programmatically add a lot of views to the screen. Now, auto-layout seems to mess everything up when i do this, so i constantly have to make sure that every single auto-layout feature is just right, and there are a bunch!
So, if you do not want to support other orientations, is auto-layout really needed? i mean, if i am making a game for the iPad and using landscape mode only, is there any reason for me to use auto-layout?
Thanks on advance
A couple of thoughts:
Auto layout is not mandatory.
But auto layout provides a mechanism for dealing with situations when views change sizes and/or locations:
changing orientation, as you pointed out;
supporting different screen sizes (e.g. iPhone 3.5" screen vs 4.0" screen);
controls whose size changes based upon content (e.g. a UILabel whose width expands to fit the text or whose lineCount is set to zero, meaning that its vertical will grow based the number of lines needed to fit all the text); with auto layout you can establish dependencies between controls so that, for example, as one control changes its own size/location, others can move/resize accordingly (e.g. to stay aligned with or make room for the other control); and
automatically update contentSize for UIScrollView objects.
Auto layout requires a little time to gain proficiency, but for dynamic, complex user interfaces, it can save you from having to write code to manually change layouts of views programmatically. But if you don't find yourself doing this sort of code, then you don't necessarily have to use auto layout.
I should acknowledge that there are some tasks that are trivial in a non-autolayout environment (e.g. animation of moving views), doing the same task in auto layout can be frustratingly complicated. But if you have complex interdependencies between views (either between the superview and its subviews or between sibling views), auto layout can be useful.
Autolayout simply provides rules for the views how they appear in all orientation.It is upto the user to define how to use it or you may follow the struct and spring model .
The major difference between the two is that there no dimensions involeve in the struct and springs while autolayout says the dimensions and values in whch views should be rearranged
An excellent beginner tutorial fo autolayout
To clarify the purpose of this question: I know HOW to create complicated views with both subviews and using drawRect. I'm trying to fully understand the when's and why's to use one over the other.
I also understand that it doesn't make sense to optimize that much ahead of time, and do something the more difficult way before doing any profiling. Consider that I'm comfortable with both methods, and now really want a deeper understanding.
A lot of my confusion comes from learning how to make table view scroll performance really smooth and fast. Of course the original source of this method is from the author behind twitter for iPhone (formerly tweetie). Basically it says that to make table scrolling buttery smooth, the secret is to NOT use subviews, but instead do all the drawing in one custom uiview. Essentially it seems that using lots of subviews slows rendering down because they have lots of overhead, and are constantly re-composited over their parent views.
To be fair, this was written when the 3GS was pretty brand spankin new, and iDevices have gotten much faster since then. Still this method is regularly suggested on the interwebs and elsewhere for high performance tables. In fact it's a suggested method in Apple's Table Sample Code, has been suggested in several WWDC videos (Practical Drawing for iOS Developers), and many iOS programming books.
There are even awesome looking tools to design graphics and generate Core Graphics code for them.
So at first I'm lead to believe "there’s a reason why Core Graphics exists. It’s FAST!"
But as soon as I think I get the idea "Favor Core Graphics when possible", I start seeing that drawRect is often responsible for poor responsiveness in an app, is extremely expensive memory wise, and really taxes the CPU. Basically, that I should "Avoid overriding drawRect" (WWDC 2012 iOS App Performance: Graphics and Animations)
So I guess, like everything, it's complicated. Maybe you can help myself and others understand the When's and Why's for using drawRect?
I see a couple obvious situations to use Core Graphics:
You have dynamic data (Apple's Stock Chart example)
You have a flexible UI element that can't be executed with a simple resizable image
You are creating a dynamic graphic, that once rendered is used in multiple places
I see situations to avoid Core Graphics:
Properties of your view need to be animated separately
You have a relatively small view hierarchy, so any perceived extra effort using CG isn't worth the gain
You want to update pieces of the view without redrawing the whole thing
The layout of your subviews needs to update when the parent view size changes
So bestow your knowledge. In what situations do you reach for drawRect/Core Graphics (that could also be accomplished with subviews)? What factors lead you to that decision? How/Why is drawing in one custom view recommended for buttery smooth table cell scrolling, yet Apple advises drawRect against for performance reasons in general? What about simple background images (when do you create them with CG vs using a resizable png image)?
A deep understanding of this subject may not be needed to make worthwhile apps, but I don't love choosing between techniques without being able to explain why. My brain gets mad at me.
Question Update
Thanks for the information everyone. Some clarifying questions here:
If you are drawing something with core graphics, but can accomplish the same thing with UIImageViews and a pre-rendered png, should you always go that route?
A similar question: Especially with badass tools like this, when should you consider drawing interface elements in core graphics? (Probably when the display of your element is variable. e.g. a button with 20 different color variations. Any other cases?)
Given my understanding in my answer below, could the same performance gains for a table cell possibly be gained by effectively capturing a snapshot bitmap of your cell after your complex UIView render's itself, and displaying that while scrolling and hiding your complex view? Obviously some pieces would have to be worked out. Just an interesting thought I had.
Stick to UIKit and subviews whenever you can. You can be more productive, and take advantage of all the OO mechanisms that should things easier to maintain. Use Core Graphics when you can't get the performance you need out of UIKit, or you know trying to hack together drawing effects in UIKit would be more complicated.
The general workflow should be to build the tableviews with subviews. Use Instruments to measure the frame rate on the oldest hardware your app will support. If you can't get 60fps, drop down to CoreGraphics. When you've done this for a while, you get a sense for when UIKit is probably a waste of time.
So, why is Core Graphics fast?
CoreGraphics isn't really fast. If it's being used all the time, you're probably going slow. It's a rich drawing API, which requires its work be done on the CPU, as opposed to a lot of UIKit work that is offloaded to the GPU. If you had to animate a ball moving across the screen, it would be a terrible idea to call setNeedsDisplay on a view 60 times per second. So, if you have sub-components of your view that need to be individually animated, each component should be a separate layer.
The other problem is that when you don't do custom drawing with drawRect, UIKit can optimize stock views so drawRect is a no-op, or it can take shortcuts with compositing. When you override drawRect, UIKit has to take the slow path because it has no idea what you're doing.
These two problems can be outweighed by benefits in the case of table view cells. After drawRect is called when a view first appears on screen, the contents are cached, and the scrolling is a simple translation performed by the GPU. Because you're dealing with a single view, rather than a complex hierarchy, UIKit's drawRect optimizations become less important. So the bottleneck becomes how much you can optimize your Core Graphics drawing.
Whenever you can, use UIKit. Do the simplest implementation that works. Profile. When there's an incentive, optimize.
The difference is that UIView and CALayer essentially deal in fixed images. These images are uploaded to the graphics card (if you know OpenGL, think of an image as a texture, and a UIView/CALayer as a polygon showing such a texture). Once an image is on the GPU, it can be drawn very quickly, and even several times, and (with a slight performance penalty) even with varying levels of alpha transparency on top of other images.
CoreGraphics/Quartz is an API for generating images. It takes a pixel buffer (again, think OpenGL texture) and changes individual pixels inside it. This all happens in RAM and on the CPU, and only once Quartz is done, does the image get "flushed" back to the GPU. This round-trip of getting an image from the GPU, changing it, then uploading the whole image (or at least a comparatively large chunk of it) back to the GPU is rather slow. Also, the actual drawing that Quartz does, while really fast for what you are doing, is way slower than what the GPU does.
That's obvious, considering the GPU is mostly moving around unchanged pixels in big chunks. Quartz does random-access of pixels and shares the CPU with networking, audio etc. Also, if you have several elements that you draw using Quartz at the same time, you have to re-draw all of them when one changes, then upload the whole chunk, while if you change one image and then let UIViews or CALayers paste it onto your other images, you can get away with uploading much smaller amounts of data to the GPU.
When you don't implement -drawRect:, most views can just be optimized away. They don't contain any pixels, so can't draw anything. Other views, like UIImageView, only draw a UIImage (which, again, is essentially a reference to a texture, which has probably already been loaded onto the GPU). So if you draw the same UIImage 5 times using a UIImageView, it is only uploaded to the GPU once, and then drawn to the display in 5 different locations, saving us time and CPU.
When you implement -drawRect:, this causes a new image to be created. You then draw into that on the CPU using Quartz. If you draw a UIImage in your drawRect, it likely downloads the image from the GPU, copies it into the image you're drawing to, and once you're done, uploads this second copy of the image back to the graphics card. So you're using twice the GPU memory on the device.
So the fastest way to draw is usually to keep static content separated from changing content (in separate UIViews/UIView subclasses/CALayers). Load static content as a UIImage and draw it using a UIImageView and put content generated dynamically at runtime in a drawRect. If you have content that gets drawn repeatedly, but by itself doesn't change (I.e. 3 icons that get shown in the same slot to indicate some status) use UIImageView as well.
One caveat: There is such a thing as having too many UIViews. Particularly transparent areas take a bigger toll on the GPU to draw, because they need to be mixed with other pixels behind them when displayed. This is why you can mark a UIView as "opaque", to indicate to the GPU that it can just obliterate everything behind that image.
If you have content that is generated dynamically at runtime but stays the same for the duration of the application's lifetime (e.g. a label containing the user name) it may actually make sense to just draw the whole thing once using Quartz, with the text, the button border etc., as part of the background. But that's usually an optimization that's not needed unless the Instruments app tells you differently.
I'm going to try and keep a summary of what I'm extrapolating from other's answers here, and ask clarifying questions in an update to the original question. But I encourage others to keep answers coming and vote up those who have provided good information.
General Approach
It's quite clear that the general approach, as Ben Sandofsky mentioned in his answer, should be "Whenever you can, use UIKit. Do the simplest implementation that works. Profile. When there's an incentive, optimize."
The Why
There are two main possible bottlenecks in an iDevice, the CPU and GPU
CPU is responsible for the initial drawing/rendering of a view
GPU is responsible for a majority of animation (Core Animation), layer effects, compositing, etc.
UIView has a lot of optimizations, caching, etc, built in for handling complex view hierarchies
When overriding drawRect you miss out on a lot of the benefits UIView's provide, and it's generally slower than letting UIView handle the rendering.
Drawing cells contents in one flat UIView can greatly improve your FPS on scrolling tables.
Like I said above, CPU and GPU are two possible bottlenecks. Since they generally handle different things, you have to pay attention to which bottleneck you are running up against. In the case of scrolling tables, it's not that Core Graphics is drawing faster, and that's why it can greatly improve your FPS.
In fact, Core Graphics may very well be slower than a nested UIView hierarchy for the initial render. However, it seems the typical reason for choppy scrolling is you are bottlenecking the GPU, so you need to address that.
Why overriding drawRect (using core graphics) can help table scrolling:
From what I understand, the GPU is not responsible for the initial rendering of the views, but is instead handed textures, or bitmaps, sometimes with some layer properties, after they have been rendered. It is then responsible for compositing the bitmaps, rendering all those layer affects, and the majority of animation (Core Animation).
In the case of table view cells, the GPU can be bottlenecked with complex view hierarchies, because instead of animating one bitmap, it is animating the parent view, and doing subview layout calculations, rendering layer effects, and compositing all the subviews. So instead of animating one bitmap, it is responsible for the relationship of bunch of bitmaps, and how they interact, for the same pixel area.
So in summary, the reason drawing your cell in one view with core graphics can speed up your table scrolling is NOT because it's drawing faster, but because it is reducing the load on the GPU, which is the bottleneck giving you trouble in that particular scenario.
I am a game developer, and I was asking the same questions when my friend told me that my UIImageView based view hierarchy was going to slow down my game and make it terrible. I then proceeded to research everything I could find about whether to use UIViews, CoreGraphics, OpenGL or something 3rd party like Cocos2D. The consistent answer I got from friends, teachers, and Apple engineers at WWDC was that there won't be much of a difference in the end because at some level they are all doing the same thing. Higher-level options like UIViews rely on the lower level options like CoreGraphics and OpenGL, just they are wrapped in code to make it easier for you to use.
Don't use CoreGraphics if you are just going to end up re-writing the UIView. However, you can gain some speed from using CoreGraphics, as long as you do all your drawing in one view, but is it really worth it? The answer I have found is usually no. When I first started my game, I was working with the iPhone 3G. As my game grew in complexity, I began to see some lag, but with the newer devices it was completely unnoticeable. Now I have plenty of action going on, and the only lag seems to be a drop in 1-3 fps when playing in the most complex level on an iPhone 4.
Still I decided to use Instruments to find the functions that were taking up the most time. I found that the problems were not related to my use of UIViews. Instead, it was repeatedly calling CGRectMake for certain collision sensing calculations and loading image and audio files separately for certain classes that use the same images, rather than having them draw from one central storage class.
So in the end, you might be able to achieve a slight gain from using CoreGraphics, but usually it will not be worth it or may not have any effect at all. The only time I use CoreGraphics is when drawing geometric shapes rather than text and images.
I have an infinite scrollview in which I add images as the user scrolls. Those images have varying heights and I've been trying to come up with the best way of finding a clear space inside the current bounds of the view that would allow me to add the image view.
Is there anything built-in that would make my search more efficient?
The problem is I want the images to be sort of glued to one another with no blank space between them. Making the search through 320x480 pixels tends to be quite a CPU hog. Does anyone know an efficient method to do it?
Thanks!
It seems that you're scrolling this thing vertically (you mentioned varying image heights).
There's nothing built in to UIScrollView that will do this for you. You'll have to track your UIImageView subviews manually. You could simply maintain the max y coordinate occupied by you images as you add them.
You might consider using UITableView instead, and implementing a very customized tableView:heightForRowAtIndexPath: in your delegate. You would probably need to do something special with the actual cells as well, but it would seem to make your job a little easier.
Also, for what it's worth, you might find a way to avoid making your solution infinite. Be careful about your memory footprint! iOS will shut your app off if things get out of hand.
UPDATE
Ok, now I understand what you're going for. I had imagined that you were presenting photographs or something rectangular like that. If I were trying to cover a scroll view with UILeafs (wah wah) I would take a statistical approach. I would 'paint' leaves randomly along horizontal/vertical strips as the user scrolls. Perhaps that's what you're doing already? Whatever you're doing I think it looks good.
Now I guess that the reason you're asking is to prevent the little random white spots that show through - is that right? If I may suggest a different solution: try to color the background of your scroll view to something earthy that looks good if it shows through here and there.
Also, it occurred to me that you could use a larger template image -- something that already has a nice distribution of leaves -- with transparency all along the outside outline of the leaves but nowhere else. Then you could tile these, but with overlap, so that the alpha just shows through to the leaves below. You could have a number of these images so that it doesn't look obvious. This would take away all of the uncertainty and make your retiling very efficient.
Also, consider learning about CoreAnimation (CALayer in particular) and CoreGraphics/Quartz 2D ). Proper use of these libraries will probably yield great improvements in rendering speed.
UPDATE 2:
If your images are all 150px wide, then split your scrollview into columns and add/remove based on those (as discussed in chat).
Good luck!