I would like to use the Matlab coder to create a C/C++ dynamic library. I have a bunch of m-files (functions), which all take a scalar struct with the same fields and some other simple parameters (scalar double etc.). As there are many m- files, I would like to use the ‘command-line workflow’ to use the ‘scalar struct argument definition’ for each m- file/function (basically use ‘programmatic’ code generation instructions).
Is anyone aware of a ‘matlab coder command-line workflow’ example with more than one m-file, which uses at least one struct definition?
I also tried to ‘export project setting’, in the believe that this will generate some text file that contains the ‘programmatic’ code generation instructions. Unfortunately, I cannot find this file after the export. It is not in the project related folder. Any ideas where it would be? Thanks.
I may delete this question actually. Made some progress in the meantime. See here:
SO Question
I leave this 'answer' for now, in case someone stumbles upon this.
Related
I have an .m file which I wish to share with my friends but I am not interested in giving .m file. Could someone help me with best possible ways to convert it to a file that is not decodable?
I tried converting it to .p file by simply typing pcode example.m
however I don't believe it is really protecting it. I was able to convert my .p file back to .m file with the following link. https://sites.google.com/site/sippeyfunlabs/matlab-hacks/please-do-not-secure-your-password-in-matlab-p-code
This actually confirms that my code is not protected.
It'll be nice if someone shares the best methodology to protect .m file and sharing.
Thanks
The link you provided yourself already indicates that it is very difficult to obfuscate MATLAB code:
In fact, MATLAB language is very difficult to be secured or even obfuscated.
This is due to the late binding (or dynamic binding) feature of
MATLAB. [...] The amount of meta information associated with this
feature basically forbid any attempt of adding code level security.
Simply put, if there is a MATLAB file, and it calls a function foo
inside it. Until the runtime, the MATLAB interpreter do not even know
if foo is a function stored in M file or a built-in function or a mex
function or even a workspace function handle. Thus, it must store foo
as is somewhere inside the generated P-code.
Also to best solution is already mentioned on that page:
If there is really a need to do this, using the good old binary is a
much better solution. Or you can put critical code on a server, away
from the user.
Create a binary, i.e. mex file (see the answer of Wolfie): Note that to some extent also binary code can be decompiled especially small ones.
Host your code on a server (and run the code server-side): This is the best method to protect your code. You should let the user upload the input for your script and return the result. You can also automatize this process using a matlab script to make this process transparent to the user.
You could build a mex file.
This will completely obfuscate your actual MATLAB code, since it will be written in C/C++/FORTRAN, but the algorithms will still be there if your friends are determined enough to look for them.
I'm developing a Modelica library and need to produce a document with source code listings. I'd like to be able to include the source of the Modelica models without annotations.
I could manually edit them out, but I'm looking for a more automated strategy. I'm guessing the most convenient and straightforward approach is to use some tool to save .mo files with no annotations and include those in my document (I'm using \lstinputlisting in LaTeX).
Is it possible to do this? I have access to Dymola, OpenModelica and JModelica. Dymola is obviously capable of producing such a listing, as it's able to include it in the automatically generated documentation (File > Export > HTML...). I've been looking into scripting with Dymola and OpenModelica, but haven't found a way to do this either.
JModelica seems like it could be a good option, but I don't have experience working with Python. If this is possible and someone gives me some pointers, I'm willing to look into it myself. I found a mention to a prettyprint function that might do the job, but I'm not sure where to start. I can't even find reference to that function in the latest documentation.
It would also be more convenient for me to find a way of doing it with Dymola/OpenModelica (whether through the UI or by using a script). Have I missed something?
I think you could use saveTotalModel("total.mo", MyModelName) in OpenModelica. This will strip most annotations (not ones used for code generation if I remember correctly) and pretty-print the source code including all dependencies. Then you just copy-paste the models/packages that you want to include in the listing. Or if you prefer, you can do something like the following to only include code for a particular model:
loadModel(Modelica);
loadFile("MyModel.mo");
saveTotalModel("total.mo", MyModel.A.B);
clear();
loadFile(MyModel);
str := list(MyModel.A.B);
writeFile("MyModel.A.B.listing", str);
mapminmax is a builtin Matlab function. I am trying to implement something that does autocomplete for functions/subfunctions like this.
I've done a quick search but haven't really come up with what it's called. mapminmax is the only function I know of that implements this feature. It looks like a field of a function (like how a field of a struct).
I've used edit mapminmax to see the insides of Matlab's function but I haven't found anything leading to how this is possible. getParamStructFromArgs looks like it might be able to explain what this is, but it looks like it's related to NNs.
Question: What is this feature called and is there any documentation on this?
Looks like what #hypfco said was right. This "feature" is related to Matlab's package system. I'm sure there's a way to do it by creating a package, but for those who don't want to create such a package there's a simple way of doing this.
If you have a function such as untitled.m, you can create a folder called +untitled in your Matlab directory.
Function's .m file
+Function folder
Then when you do untitled. and press tab in the console, you'll get the following pop-up.
If anyone's got a way to do this inside the .m file, I'll accept that answer instead.
I need to load experimental data into scicoslab, a (pretty badly designed) clone fork of scilab which happens to support graphical modeling. The documentation on the web is pretty poor, but it's reasonably similar to scilab and octave.
The data I need to process is contained into a certain number of text files: Data_005, Data_010, …, Data_100. Each of them can be loaded using the -ascii flag for the loadmatfile command.
The problem comes from the fact that loadmatfile("foo", "-ascii") loads the file foo.mat into a variable named foo. In order to to cycle on the data files, I would need to do something like:
for i = [5:5:100]
name = sprintf("Data_%02d", i);
loadmatfile(name, "-ascii");
x = read_var_from_name(name);
do_something(x);
end
where what I search for is a builtin read_var_from_name which would allow me to access the internal symbol table by string.
Do you know if there exist a similar function?
Notes:
There's no way of overriding this behavior if your file is in ascii format;
In this phase I could also use octave (no graphical modelling is involved), although it behaves in the same way.
>> foo = 3.14; name = 'foo'; eval(name)
foo =
3.1400
The above works in MATLAB, and Scilab's documentation says it also has an eval function. Not sure if I understood you correctly, though.
#arne.b has a good answer.
In your case you can also do that in matlab:
a=load('filename.mat')
x=a.('variable_name')
lets go through your points one by one:
"ScicosLab, a (pretty badly designed) clone of Scilab" This in my opinion is an inaccurate way of introducing the software. ScicosLab is not a clone of Scilab but a fork of it. The team behind ScicosLab (INRIA) are the ones who made scocos (now called xcos in Scilab development line). At some point (from Scilab v4) the Scilab team decided to move away from Tcl/tk towards Java, but the SciccosLab/scicos team departed, keep using the language (Tcl) and it's graphical user interface design package (tk). Giving the ScocosLab community the credit that the whole Scilab documentation and support is not very good in general. :) (more about Scilab and the forks here)
Regarding the technical question I'm not sure what you are trying to achieve here, Scilab/ScicosLab still have the eval function which basically does what you want. However this function is to be deprecated in favor of evstr. There is also the execstr function which worth studying.
The loadmatfile, as far as I have understood, "tries" to load the variables defined in a MATLAB .mat file (MATLAB's proprietary tabular format) into the Scilab workspace. For example if there is a variable foo it will "try" to create the variable foo and loads its value from the MATLAB script. Check this example. I would create a variable x(i) = foo in the for loop. again your question is not completely clear.
As a side note maybe you could consider exporting your data as CSV instead of .mat files.
Do you use table-of-contents for listing all the functions (and maybe variables) of a class in the beginning of big source code file? I know that alternative to that kind of listing would be to split up big files into smaller classes/files, so that their class declaration would be self-explanatory enough.. but some complex tasks require a lot of code. I'm not sure is it really worth it spending your time subdividing implementation into multiple of files? Or is it ok to create an index-listing additionally to the class/interface declaration?
EDIT:
To better illustrate how I use table-of-contents this is an example from my hobby project. It's actually not listing functions, but code blocks inside a function.. but you can probably get the idea anyway..
/*
CONTENTS
Order_mouse_from_to_points
Lines_intersecting_with_upper_point
Lines_intersecting_with_both_points
Lines_not_intersecting
Lines_intersecting_bottom_points
Update_intersection_range_indices
Rough_method
Normal_method
First_selected_item
Last_selected_item
Other_selected_item
*/
void SelectionManager::FindSelection()
{
// Order_mouse_from_to_points
...
// Lines_intersecting_with_upper_point
...
// Lines_intersecting_with_both_points
...
// Lines_not_intersecting
...
// Lines_intersecting_bottom_points
...
// Update_intersection_range_indices
for(...)
{
// Rough_method
....
// Normal_method
if(...)
{
// First_selected_item
...
// Last_selected_item
...
// Other_selected_item
...
}
}
}
Notice that index-items don't have spaces. Because of this I can click on one them and press F4 to jump to the item-usage, and F2 to jump back (simple visual studio find-next/prevous-shortcuts).
EDIT:
Another alternative solution to this indexing is using collapsed c# regions. You can configure visual studio to show only region names and hide all the code. Of course keyboard support for that source code navigation is pretty cumbersome...
I know that alternative to that kind of listing would be to split up big files into smaller classes/files, so that their class declaration would be self-explanatory enough.
Correct.
but some complex tasks require a lot of code
Incorrect. While a "lot" of code be required, long runs of code (over 25 lines) are a really bad idea.
actually not listing functions, but code blocks inside a function
Worse. A function that needs a table of contents must be decomposed into smaller functions.
I'm not sure is it really worth it spending your time subdividing implementation into multiple of files?
It is absolutely mandatory that you split things into smaller files. The folks that maintain, adapt and reuse your code need all the help they can get.
is it ok to create an index-listing additionally to the class/interface declaration?
No.
If you have to resort to this kind of trick, it's too big.
Also, many languages have tools to generate API docs from the code. Java, Python, C, C++ have documentation tools. Even with Javadoc, epydoc or Doxygen you still have to design things so that they are broken into intellectually manageable pieces.
Make things simpler.
Use a tool to create an index.
If you create a big index you'll have to maintain it as you change your code. Most modern IDEs create list of class members anyway. it seems like a waste of time to create such index.
I would never ever do this sort of busy-work in my code. The most I would do manually is insert a few lines at the top of the file/class explaining what this module did and how it is intended to be used.
If a list of methods and their interfaces would be useful, I generate them automatically, through a tool such as Doxygen.
I've done things like this. Not whole tables of contents, but a similar principle -- just ad-hoc links between comments and the exact piece of code in question. Also to link pieces of code that make the same simplifying assumptions that I suspect may need fixing up later.
You can use Visual Studio's task list to get a listing of certain types of comment. The format of the comments can be configured in Tools|Options, Environment\Task List. This isn't something I ended up using myself but it looks like it might help with navigating the code if you use this system a lot.
If you can split your method like that, you should probably write more methods. After this is done, you can use an IDE to give you the static call stack from the initial method.
EDIT: You can use Eclipse's 'Show Call Hierarchy' feature while programming.