this is my collection structure :
coll{
id:...,
fieldA:{
fieldA1:[
{
...
}
],
fieldA2:[
{
text: "ciao",
},
{
text: "hello",
},
]
}
}
i want to extract all fieldA2 in my collection but if the fieldA2 is in two or more times i want show only one.
i try this
Db.runCommand({distinct:’coll’,key:’fieldA.fieldA2.text’})
but nothing. this return all filedA1 in the collection.
so i try
db.coll.group( {
key: { 'fieldA.fieldA2.text': 1 },
cond: { } },
reduce: function ( curr, result ) { },
initial: { }
} )
but this return an empty array...
How i can do this and see the execution time?? thank u very match...
Since you are running 2.0.4 (I recommend upgrading), you must run this through MR (I think, maybe there is a better way). Something like:
map = function(){
for(i in this.fieldA.fieldA2){
emit(this.fieldA.fieldA2[i].text, 1);
// emit per text value so that this will group unique text values
}
}
reduce = function(values){
// Now lets just do a simple count of how many times that text value was seen
var count = 0;
for (index in values) {
count += values[index];
}
return count;
}
Will then give you a collection of documents whereby _id is the unique text value from fieldA2 and the value field is of the amount of times is appeared i the collection.
Again this is a draft and is not tested.
I think the answer is simpler than a Map/Reduce .. if you just want distinct values plus execution time, the following should work:
var startTime = new Date()
var values = db.coll.distinct('fieldA.fieldA2.text');
var endTime = new Date();
print("Took " + (endTime - startTime) + " ms");
That would result in a values array with a list of distinct fieldA.fieldA2.text values:
[ "ciao", "hello", "yo", "sayonara" ]
And a reported execution time:
Took 2 ms
Related
Setup:
I got a large collection with the following entries
Name - String
Begin - time stamp
End - time stamp
Problem:
I want to get the gaps between documents, Using the map-reduce paradigm.
Approach:
I'm trying to set a new collection of pairs mid, after that I can compute differences from it using $unwind and Pair[1].Begin - Pair[0].End
function map(){
emit(0, this)
}
function reduce(){
var i = 0;
var pairs = [];
while ( i < values.length -1){
pairs.push([values[i], values[i+1]]);
i = i + 1;
}
return {"pairs":pairs};
}
db.collection.mapReduce(map, reduce, sort:{begin:1}, out:{replace:"mid"})
This works with limited number of document because of the 16MB document cap. I'm not sure if I need to get the collection into memory and doing it there, How else can I approach this problem?
The mapReduce function of MongoDB has a different way of handling what you propose than the method you are using to solve it. The key factor here is "keeping" the "previous" document in order to make the comparison to the next.
The actual mechanism that supports this is the "scope" functionality, which allows a sort of "global" variable approach to use in the overall code. As you will see, what you are asking when that is considered takes no "reduction" at all as there is no "grouping", just emission of document "pair" data:
db.collection.mapReduce(
function() {
if ( last == null ) {
last = this;
} else {
emit(
{
"start_id": last._id,
"end_id": this._id
},
this.Begin - last.End
);
last = this;
}
},
function() {}, // no reduction required
{
"out": { "inline": 1 },
"scope": { "last": null }
}
)
Out with a collection as the output as required to your size.
But this way by using a "global" to keep the last document then the code is both simple and efficient.
I have a collection called user, and I want to get cumulative frequency of number of users by date based on the _id field. The desired result should be something like that:
{
{_id: 2013-12-02, value: 10}, //upto 2013-12-02 there are 10 users
{_id: 2014-01-05, value: 20}, //upto 2014-01-05 there are totally 20 users
….
}
I try to get the above using the following mapReduce call:
db.user.mapReduce(
function(){var date = this._id.getTimestamp();
emit(new Date(date.getFullYear()+"-"+date.getMonth()+"-"+date.getDate()), 1)},
function(key, values) {cum = cum + Array.sum(values); return cum},
{out: "newUserAnalysis",
sort: {_id: 1},
scope: {cum: 0}})
But it seems that the cum variable reset to zero after the first return statement encountered in the reduce function. Why? Is there any other method to get what I want?
Many thanks.
cum should not be reset as it's a global variable in map, reduce and finalize functions during the whole mapReduce processing.
But reduce function has 3 requirements to be observed to assure processing correctly, particularly for bulky data handling since reduce function will be called repeatedly even on the same key. Normally the length of values in map function would not exceed 100. In a word, your design can't assure cum is called on the right sequence as you expect, which will produce incorrect statistics.
Following code for your reference:
// map and reduce per day then save to a collection.
db.user.mapReduce(function() {
var date = this._id.getTimestamp();
emit(new Date(date.getFullYear() + "-" + (date.getMonth() + 1) + "-"
+ date.getDate()), 1);
}, function(key, values) {
return Array.sum(values);
}, {
out : "newUserAnalysis",
sort : {
_id : 1
}
});
// Do accumulation one by one.
var cursor = db.newUserAnalysis.find().sort({_id:1});
var newValue = 0, first = true;
while (cursor.hasNext()) {
var doc = cursor.next();
newValue += doc.value;
if (first) {
first = false;
} else {
db.newUserAnalysis.update({_id:doc._id}, {$set:{value:newValue}});
}
}
I wrote a mapreduce function where the records are emitted in the following format
{userid:<xyz>, {event:adduser, count:1}}
{userid:<xyz>, {event:login, count:1}}
{userid:<xyz>, {event:login, count:1}}
{userid:<abc>, {event:adduser, count:1}}
where userid is the key and the remaining are the value for that key.
After the MapReduce function, I want to get the result in following format
{userid:<xyz>,{events: [{adduser:1},{login:2}], allEventCount:3}}
To acheive this I wrote the following reduce function
I know this can be achieved by group by.. both in aggregation framework and mapreduce, but we require a similar functionality for a complex scenario. So, I am taking this approach.
var reducefn = function(key,values){
var result = {allEventCount:0, events:[]};
values.forEach(function(value){
var notfound=true;
for(var n = 0; n < result.events.length; n++){
eventObj = result.events[n];
for(ev in eventObj){
if(ev==value.event){
result.events[n][ev] += value.allEventCount;
notfound=false;
break;
}
}
}
if(notfound==true){
var newEvent={}
newEvent[value.event]=1;
result.events.push(newEvent);
}
result.allEventCount += value.allEventCount;
});
return result;
}
This runs perfectly, when I run for 1000 records, when there are 3k or 10k records, the result I get is something like this
{ "_id" : {...}, "value" :{"allEventCount" :30, "events" :[ { "undefined" : 1},
{"adduser" : 1 }, {"remove" : 3 }, {"training" : 1 }, {"adminlogin" : 1 },
{"downgrade" : 2 } ]} }
Not able to understand where this undefined came from and also the sum of the individual events is less than allEventCount. All the docs in the collection has non-empty field event so there is no chance of undefined.
Mongo DB version -- 2.2.1
Environment -- Local machine, no sharding.
In the reduce function, why should this operation fail result.events[n][ev] += value.allEventCount; when the similar operation result.allEventCount += value.allEventCount; passes?
The corrected answer as suggested by johnyHK
Reduce function:
var reducefn = function(key,values){
var result = {totEvents:0, event:[]};
values.forEach(function(value){
value.event.forEach(function(eventElem){
var notfound=true;
for(var n = 0; n < result.event.length; n++){
eventObj = result.event[n];
for(ev in eventObj){
for(evv in eventElem){
if(ev==evv){
result.event[n][ev] += eventElem[evv];
notfound=false;
break;
}
}}
}
if(notfound==true){
result.event.push(eventElem);
}
});
result.totEvents += value.totEvents;
});
return result;
}
The shape of the object you emit from your map function must be the same as the object returned from your reduce function, as the results of a reduce can get fed back into reduce when processing large numbers of docs (like in this case).
So you need to change your emit to emit docs like this:
{userid:<xyz>, {events:[{adduser: 1}], allEventCount:1}}
{userid:<xyz>, {events:[{login: 1}], allEventCount:1}}
and then update your reduce function accordingly.
Here's a specific query I'm having trouble with. I'm using Lift-mongo-
records so that i can use Rogue. I'm happy to use Rogue specific
syntax , or whatever works.
While there are good examples for using javascript strings via java noted below, I'd like to know what the best practices might be.
Imagine here that there is a table like
comments {
_id
topic
title
text
created
}
The desired output is a list of topics and their count, for example
cats (24)
dogs (12)
mice (5)
So a user can see an list, ordered by count, of a distinct/group by
Here's some psuedo SQL:
SELECT [DISTINCT] topic, count(topic) as topic_count
FROM comments
GROUP BY topic
ORDER BY topic_count DESC
LIMIT 10
OFFSET 10
One approach is using some DBObject DSL like
val cursor = coll.group( MongoDBObject(
"key" -> MongoDBObject( "topic" -> true ) ,
//
"initial" -> MongoDBObject( "count" -> 0 ) ,
"reduce" -> "function( obj , prev) { prev.count += obj.c; }"
"out" -> "topic_list_result"
))
[...].sort( MongoDBObject( "created" ->
-1 )).skip( offset ).limit( limit );
Variations of the above do not compile.
I could just ask "what am I doing wrong" but I thought I could make my
confusion more acute:
can I chain the results directly or do I need "out"?
what kind of output can I expect - I mean, do I iterate over a
cursor, or the "out" param
is "cond" required?
should I be using count() or distinct()
some examples contain a "map" param...
A recent post I found which covers the java driver implies I should
use strings instead of a DSL :
http://blog.evilmonkeylabs.com/2011/02/28/MongoDB-1_8-MR-Java/
Would this be the preferred method in either casbah or Rogue?
Update: 9/23
This fails in Scala/Casbah (compiles but produces error {MapReduceError 'None'} )
val map = "function (){ emit({ this.topic }, { count: 1 }); }"
val reduce = "function(key, values) { var count = 0; values.forEach(function(v) { count += v['count']; }); return {count: count}; }"
val out = coll.mapReduce( map , reduce , MapReduceInlineOutput )
ConfiggyObject.log.debug( out.toString() )
I settled on the above after seeing
https://github.com/mongodb/casbah/blob/master/casbah-core/src/test/scala/MapReduceSpec.scala
Guesses:
I am misunderstanding the toString method and what the out.object is?
missing finalize?
missing output specification?
https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SCALA-43 ?
This works as desired from command line:
map = function (){
emit({ this.topic }, { count: 1 });
}
reduce = function(key, values) { var count = 0; values.forEach(function(v) { count += v['count']; }); return {count: count}; };
db.tweets.mapReduce( map, reduce, { out: "results" } ); //
db.results.ensureIndex( {count : 1});
db.results.find().sort( {count : 1});
Update
The issue has not been filed as a bug at Mongo.
https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SCALA-55
The following worked for me:
val coll = MongoConnection()("comments")
val reduce = """function(obj,prev) { prev.csum += 1; }"""
val res = coll.group( MongoDBObject("topic"->true),
MongoDBObject(), MongoDBObject( "csum" -> 0 ), reduce)
res was an ArrayBuffer full of coll.T which can be handled in the usual ways.
Appears to be a bug - somewhere.
For now, I have a less-than-ideal workaround working now, using eval() (slower, less safe) ...
db.eval( "map = function (){ emit( { topic: this.topic } , { count: 1 }); } ; ");
db.eval( "reduce = function(key, values) { var count = 0; values.forEach(function(v) { count += v['count']; }); return {count: count}; }; ");
db.eval( " db.tweets.mapReduce( map, reduce, { out: \"tweetresults\" } ); ");
db.eval( " db.tweetresults.ensureIndex( {count : 1}); ");
Then I query the output table normally via casbah.
I run an IRC bot and I have a function which returns 1 random url using Math.random at the moment, from my Mongodb collection.
I would like to refactor it to return x number of unique items, and for each subsequent invocation of the url fetching command .getlinks I would like that it keeps everything unique, so that a user doesn't see the same link unless all the possible links have been already returned.
Is there some algorithm or native mongodb function I could use for this?
Here's a sample scenario:
I have a total of 9 records in the collection. They have a _id and url field.
user a: .getlinks()
bot returns: http://unique-link-1, http://unique-link-2, http://unique-link-3, http://unique-link-4
user a: .getlinks()
bot returns: http://unique-link-5, http://unique-link-6, http://unique-link-7, http://unique-link-8
user a: .getlinks()
bot returns: http://unique-link-9, http://unique-link-6, http://unique-link-1, http://unique-link-3
Background information:
There's a total of about 200 links. I estimate that will grow to around 5000 links by the end of next year.
Currently the only thing I can think of is keeping an array of all returned items, and grabbing all items from the collection at once and getting a random one 4 times and making sure it's unique and hasn't been shown already.
var shown = [], amountToReturn = 4;
function getLinks() {
var items = links.find(), returned = [];
for ( var i = 0; i<amountToReturn; i++ ) {
var rand = randItem( items );
if ( shown.indexOf( rand.url ) == -1 && shown.length < items.length ) ) {
returned.push( rand.url );
}
}
message.say( returned.join(',') );
}
You should find a number of possible options to get random item(s) from Collection here ...
http://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SERVER-533
Another intersting method is documented here ...
http://cookbook.mongodb.org/patterns/random-attribute/
The method mentioned above basically creates a new key/value on the document using Math.random()
> db.docs.drop()
> db.docs.save( { key : 1, ..., random : Math.random() } )
> db.docs.save( { key : 1, ..., random : Math.random() } )
> db.docs.save( { key : 2, ..., random : Math.random() } )
... many more insertions with 'key : 2' ...
> db.docs.save( { key : 2, ..., random : Math.random() } )
...
Get random records form mongodb via map/reduce
// map
function() {
emit(0, {k: this, v: Math.random()})
}
// reduce
function(k, v) {
var a = []
v.forEach(function(x) {
a = a.concat(x.a ? x.a : x)
})
return {a:a.sort(function(a, b) {
return a.v - b.v;
}).slice(0, 3 /*how many records you want*/)};
}
// finalize
function(k, v) {
return v.a.map(function(x) {
return x.k
})
}