MutableCopy AllocLeak MemoryLeak - iphone

I have an NSTimer that fires once per second.
And every second I have an NSString that needs to be changed.
I've never tried to deal with memory management before so I'm not sure if what I'm doing is right but instruments is saying under "alloc" that the line of code with stringByReplacingOccurrencesOfString has 45MB of "Live Bytes" after about a minute...
(and the live byte count keeps on rising with every second and eventually crashes the app).
I think my issue lies somewhere with the MutableCopy code?
Here is my code:
-(void)myTimer {
if (testedit) {
[testedit release];
[withString1a release];
[forString1a release];
}
testedit = [[NSString alloc] init];
withString1a = [[NSString alloc] init];
forString1a = [[NSString alloc] init];
testedit = [[NSString alloc] initWithFormat:#"example"];
withString1a = [[NSString alloc] initWithFormat:#"e"];//this string gets its values randomly from an array in my real code
forString1a = [[NSString alloc] initWithFormat:#"flk34j"];//this string gets its values randomly from an array in my real code
testedit = [[testedit stringByReplacingOccurrencesOfString:withString1a withString:forString1a] mutableCopy];//memory leak /:
}

You are allocating memory for each object twice. When you alloc the second time and assign it to the same variable, the first piece of alloc'd memory becomes inaccessible and unreleasable.
Then you make a mutableCopy of testedit and assign the copy to the original's variable. Again, you leave a piece of inaccessible memory floating around.
The rule with non-ARC memory management is - for every alloc, new, copy or retain you need to have a corresponding release. You have 6 allocs, one copy, and only 3 releases.
Here are some suggestions.
Remove these duplicated allocations:
testedit = [[NSString alloc] init];
withString1a = [[NSString alloc] init];
forString1a = [[NSString alloc] init];
Presumably testedit, withString1a and forString1a are all iVars. (Please declare your iVars as autosynthesized properties and refer to them as self.testedit ... etc. that will make your code so much clearer to stack overflowers).
Take out all of this:
if (testedit) {
[testedit release];
[withString1a release];
[forString1a release];
}
Assuming these are all iVars, the correct place to release them is in your object's dealloc method
In fact withString1a and forString1a can be local variables, as you get their content from elsewhere:
NSString* withString1a = [[[NSString alloc] initWithFormat:#"e"] autorelease];
NSString* forString1a = [[[NSString alloc] initWithFormat:#"flk34j"] autorelease];
You can autorelease them as you don't need them to hang around after the method has finished.
These lines can also be written:
NSString* withString1a = [NSString stringWithFormat:#"e"];
NSString* forString1a = [NSString stringWithFormat:#"flk34j"];
(-stringWithFormat is a convenience method that returns an autoreleased object)
That leaves us with these two lines.
testedit = [[NSString alloc] initWithFormat:#"example"];
testedit = [[testedit stringByReplacingOccurrencesOfString:withString1a
withString:forString1a] mutableCopy];
It's not clear why you are treating testedit as an immutable string in the first line and a mutable string in the second. You don't need a mutable string here at all, as you are replacing testedit with a new string.
self.testedit = [[NSString alloc] initWithFormat:#"example"];
self.testedit = [[testedit stringByReplacingOccurrencesOfString:withString1a
withString:forString1a] copy];
(you need copy as stringByReplacingOccurrencesOfString:withString: returns an autoreleased object, and here you want to keep hold of it)
THE last piece of the jigsaw is getting rid of your _testedit iVar memory allocation. You do this in the dealloc method of your object:
- (void) dealloc {
[_testEdit release];
[super dealloc];
}
(Note that init, accessor, and dealloc methods are the three places where you should not refer to an iVar using property syntax.)
All good, but really, you should be using ARC! You are _far_more likely to introduce memory bugs this way than if you rely on the compiler to manage memory for you.

I would suggest you to make use of #property here.
In .h file declare the properties as:
#property (nonatomic, retain) NSString *testedit;
#property (nonatomic, retain) NSString *withString1a;
#property (nonatomic, retain) NSString *forString1a; //if required write the #synthesize as well in .m class
You can write your timer method as:
-(void)myTimer {
self.testedit = #"example";
self.withString1a = #"e";//this string gets its values randomly from an array in my real code
self.forString1a = #"flk34j";//this string gets its values randomly from an array in my real code
self.testedit = [self.testedit stringByReplacingOccurrencesOfString:self.withString1a withString:self.forString1a];
}
In dealloc method, you can set all the above properties as nil (self.testedit = nil;) or do a release on them([testedit release];).
If possible, try to switch to ARC, you dont have to worry about the memory management. The problem with your code was that you are using a lot of alloc/init statements without releasing the variable before doing it. This causes it to lose the reference of that variable and you will leak it. You dont need that many allocation statements. For every allocation or retain, there should be a corresponding release/auto-release statement.

If you're using ARC you shouldn't have an issue. If you aren't using ARC you can try adding autorelease:
testedit = [[[testedit stringByReplacingOccurrencesOfString:withString1a withString:forString1a] mutableCopy] autorelease];

You are getting a memory leak because you never de-allocate testedit. Whenever you call alloc, that means you need to deallocate it. This usually just means calling release.
Do something like this instead, then be sure to free up the memory you've allocated:
NSString* newString = [[testedit stringByReplacingOccurrencesOfString:withString1a withString:forString1a] mutableCopy];

Related

Memory leak of an NSMutableArray using Instruments

According to the leak instrument in XCode it's saying this line is giving a memory leak (100%)?
self.unsentPatients = [[NSMutableArray alloc] initWithArray:[defaults arrayForKey:UNSENT]];
I'm correctly releasing etc. on dealloc (which is definitely being ran) so I don't understand where I am going wrong?
It's only a small leak and Analysis doesn't come up with anything, but nonetheless it's still a leak.
Kind regards,
Dominic
There are many things wring with this code.
I'm assuming that the property is retaining the value, then you should not assign the value the way you are doing now, but more like:
NSMutableArray *temp = [[NSMutableArray alloc] initWithArray:[defaults arrayForKey:UNSENT]];
self.unsentPatients = temp;
[temp release], temp = nil;
or
self.unsentPatients = [[[NSMutableArray alloc] initWithArray:[defaults arrayForKey:UNSENT]] autorelease];
You should also avoid using the self. syntax in dealloc or init, which will call a mutator.
In multithreaded environment this could give problems.
So the correct dealloc would be:
- (void) dealloc {
[unsentPatients release], unsentPatients = nil;
[super dealloc][;
}

Dealloc objects of another class

Hi I generally create objects of another classes. can you please tel me if this wil be in the auto release pool? or should we release it manually.
if you init copy or new them you'll have to deallocate them if you put an autorlease with the allocation then they will be autoreleased
for example
Foo *foo = [[Foo alloc] init]; //you'll have release it somewhere yourself
And
Foo *foo = [[[Foo alloc] init] autorelease];// this will be autreleased
The simple case is : if you use init, you are responsible for releasing it, either by calling release or by calling autorelease.
e.g.
NSString *myString = [NSString alloc] init]; // You need to release this
...
[myString release]; // Now it's released - don't use it again!
or if you are going give it to someone else
NSString *myString = [NSString alloc] init]; // This needs releasing
...
return [myString autorelease]; // You are finished with it but someone else might want it
However, there's a few other cases.
NSString *myString = [NSString stringWithFormat:#"hi"];
This object is in the autorelease pool already - don't release it!
NSString *secondString = [myString copy];
This object needs releasing - it is not autoreleased.
Rule of thumb : Anything with init, copy or new in the name - you made it, you release it. Anything else will be autoreleased.

iPhone memory management (with specific examples/questions)

Hey all. I know this question's been asked but I still don't have a clear picture of memory management in Objective-C. I feel like I have a pretty good grasp of it, but I'd still like some correct answers for the following code. I have a series of examples that I'd love for someone(s) to clarify.
Setting a value for an instance variable:
Say I have an NSMutableArray variable. In my class, when I initialize it, do I need to call a retain on it?
Do I do
fooArray = [[[NSMutableArray alloc] init] retain];
or
fooArray = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init];
Does doing [[NSMutableArray alloc] init] already set the retain count to 1, so I wouldn't need to call retain on it? On the other hand, if I called a method that I know returns an autoreleased object, I would for sure have to call retain on it, right? Like so:
fooString = [[NSString stringWithFormat:#"%d items", someInt] retain];
Properties:
I ask about the retain because I'm a bit confused about how #property's automatic setter works.
If I had set fooArray to be a #property with retain set, Objective-C will automatically create the following setter, right?
- (void)setFooArray:(NSMutableArray *)anArray {
[fooArray release];
fooArray = [anArray retain];
}
So, if I had code like this: self.fooArray = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init]; (which I believe is valid code), Objective-C creates a setter method that calls retain on the value assigned to fooArray. In this case, will the retain count actually be 2?
Correct way of setting a value of a property:
I know there are questions on this and (possibly) debates, but which is the right way to set a #property?
This?
self.fooArray = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init];
Or this?
NSMutableArray *anArray = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init];
self.fooArray = anArray;
[anArray release];
I'd love to get some clarification on these examples. Thanks!
According to Apple's Object Ownership Policy, any method that begins with the words alloc or new, or contains copy is owned by the caller.
To obtain ownership of an object, you must retain it.
So, in your first example, the retain is unnecessary because you already own the object.
The correct way to do this:
fooArray = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init];
Since autoreleased objects are owned by the current autorelease pool, you must call retain on them to gain ownership of them, so this example is correct:
fooString = [[NSString stringWithFormat:#"%d items", someInt] retain];
This would work fine as well:
self.fooString = [NSString stringWithFormat:#"%d items", someInt]; //retained by property setter
And for your last example using the property setter, this would be the correct way to do it:
NSMutableArray *anArray = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init];
self.fooArray = anArray;
[anArray release];
Instead of having to do the above, I'd suggest the following solution:
self.fooArray = [NSMutableArray arrayWithCapacity:10];
arrayWithCapacity: will return an autoreleased NSMutableArray, which is the retain-ed by the property setter method. :)
Ideally you would want to use the accessors whenever possible, especially when dealing with objects as they help avoid many memory issues. So even for instance variables, you should do:
self.fooArray = ...;
instead of
fooArray = ...;
The reason why you should declare properties for object instance variables is because the memory management is slightly more complicated, and recreating it by hand each time is tricky. The correct setter for a nonatomic, retained property would look like:
- (void)setFoo:(NSArray *)aFoo {
if (foo == aFoo) {
return;
}
NSArray *oldFoo = foo;
foo = [aFoo retain];
[oldFoo release];
}
You are right about the instance variable having a retain count of 2 when you do something like this (assuming foo is retained):
self.foo = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init];
The first retain count is coming from alloc, and the second one from your synthesized setter. Any of these should work:
// longer, explicit version, releases immediately (more efficient)
NSMutableArray *aFoo = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init];
self.foo = aFoo;
[aFoo release];
// autoreleased, not so bad unless you're a memory management freak
self.foo = [[[NSMutableArray alloc] init] autorelease];
// an even shorter version of the above
self.foo = [NSMutableArray array];
To create private properties, you can declare them as a class extension in the .m implementation file. To give an example, consider a simple Person object, which has a name, and a boolean property didSave which simply indicates whether the object has been saved to some database or not. Since we don't want to expose this to the outside world, but still keep the benefits of properties inside the implementation file, we can create the header file will all instance variables (public, private, protected) and only public properties:
// Person.h
#interface Person {
NSString *name;
#private
BOOL didSave;
}
#property (nonatomic, retain) NSString *name;
#end
But declare private properties inside the implementation:
// Person.m
// property is declared as a class extension, making it
// invisible to the outside world.
#interface Person ()
#property BOOL didSave;
#end
#implementation
// synthesize as normal
#synthesize name, didSave;
#end
First of all, with this line:
fooArray = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init];
fooArray will automatically have a retain count of 1.
Second, yes, it's 2. And your guess on the setter implementation is correct.
Third, the latter one is right

Memory Management in Objective C

I have a question about reference counting.
This is my constructor:
- (id)initWithId:(NSString *)graphId;
In another class I make an object in the following way:
GraphViewController *graph =
[[GraphViewController alloc] initWithId:[[NSString alloc] initWithFormat:#"%s", current_ID];
My question is: how do I correctly release the string object?
Is it correct to release the string passed as a parameter?
Any of these ways will work:
(1)
GraphViewController *graph = [[GraphViewController alloc] initWithId:
[[[NSString alloc] initWithFormat:#"%s", current_ID] autorelease]];
(2)
GraphViewController *graph = [[GraphViewController alloc] initWithId:
[NSString stringWithFormat:#"%s", current_ID]];
(3)
NSString *aString = [[NSString alloc] initWithFormat:#"%s", current_ID];
GraphViewController *graph = [[GraphViewController alloc] initWithId: aString];
[aString release];
And, of course, graph needs to be released or autoreleased somewhere.
Never pass ownership around. I.e., in your call to initWithId: you create a string. Make sure it's released in the exact same place. Do not hand the ownership over, burdening another function with the task of releasing what you created (or retained, ...).
If you're not calling initWithId: an unusually high number of times per second, do an autorelease. Even better, use a convenience function. Do not let people talk you into "avoiding the autorelease pool". Because a) it's not so easy to avoid and b) you have more important things to worry about.
In code:
NSString* graphID = [NSString stringWithFormat: #"%s", current_ID];
GraphViewController* graph = [[[GraphViewController alloc] initWithId: graphID] autorelease];
In the constructor, you will simply retain the ID and in the dealloc you will release it again. And please... use (private) #property declarations for this. You can then completely remove the ivar "graphID" from your public interface (if it's private, of course).
#interface GraphViewController ()
#property (copy, nonatomic) NSString* graphID; // copy instead of retain for potentially mutable objects
#end
Then, in initializer and dealloc, boilerplate stuff like:
#synthesize graphID;
- (id)initWithId:(NSString*) ID;
{
self = [super init];
self.graphID = ID;
return self;
}
- (void) dealloc
{
self.graphID = nil; // controversial, Apple policy is [graphID release]; graphID = nil;
[super dealloc];
}
Using this style will make you sleep better at night. Delighted users will raise statues in your name.

iPhone Memory Management

I'm working on an app and I'd like to make sure that I'm managing memory properly and releasing everything that I should. In my viewDidLoad method I allocate some variables in determining which background to apply to the view (for internationalization) and the app works fine if I don't release them.
The problem is that if I release the variables the app will crash. Code from viewDidLoad is below:
// Set the background image based on the phone's preferred language
NSString *language = [[NSLocale preferredLanguages] objectAtIndex:0];
NSString *backgroundImageName = [[NSString alloc] init];
backgroundImageName = [NSString stringWithFormat:#"background-%#.png",language];
self.view.backgroundColor = [[UIColor alloc] initWithPatternImage:[UIImage imageNamed:backgroundImageName]];
... do some more initialization stuff ...
// IF THE FOLLOWING ARE RELEASED THE APP WILL CRASH!!!
//[backgroundImageName release];
//[language release];
Why would releasing the backgroundImageName and language variables cause the app to crash?
NSString *language = [[NSLocale preferredLanguages] objectAtIndex:0];
Here, language does not need to be released because objectAtIndex: autoreleases it for you. By convention, you own an object if you've alloced, newed, or copyed it, otherwise you don't.
self.view.backgroundColor = [[UIColor alloc] initWithPatternImage:[UIImage imageNamed:backgroundImageName]];
Here, the UIColor object does need to be released (because you alloced it).
NSString *backgroundImageName = [[NSString alloc] init];
backgroundImageName = [NSString stringWithFormat:#"background-%#.png",language];
Here the string returned by [[NSString alloc] init] does need to be released (because you've alloced it). However, the next line changes backgroundImageName to point to that a new autoreleased string, losing the last reference to the original string without releasing it (a memory leak). backgroundImageName should not be released because it is already autoreleased.
You can avoid the leaks by releasing the UIColor and eliminating the unused string. For example:
NSString *backgroundImageName = [NSString stringWithFormat:#"background-%#.png",language];
... and ...
UIColor* backgroundColor = [[UIColor alloc] initWithPatternImage:[UIImage imageNamed:backgroundImageName]];
self.view.backgroundColor = backgroundColor;
[backgroundColor release];
short answer :
when you create an object using constructors that dont have the word init then you are not responsible for releasing it
see this for more explanation
also the memory management guide is an excellent resource to know more about memory management in objective c
You're not creating the language string; you're just getting back a reference. Only methods that have "new", "copy", or "alloc" in them (by convention) return non-autoreleased objects. For all other methods, it's assumed that you'll discard the variable, so if you want to keep it around, you MUST retain it. The flip side of this is: you should not release these returned objects unless YOU retained them.
The other problem in this code is that backgroundImageName is being assigned twice. The first initialization is being lost. Get rid of it, and just keep the second one, and get rid of both -release calls, they're not needed.