I have these three models:
public class Equipment
{
public int ID { get; set; }
public string title { get; set; }
}
[Table("Vessels")]
public class Vessel:Equipment
{
public string Size { get; set; }
}
[Table("Tubes")]
public class Tube : Equipment
{
public string Pressure{ get; set; }
}
I want to show a list of Equipments with 2 columns title and type.
for example:
Title Type
------ -------
101-1 vessel
101-2 vessel
102-3 tube
I don't know how to make a discriminator column in Equipments to show the type of each equipments.
EDITED
If I have a discriminator in Equipment entity like:
public class Equipment
{
public int ID { get; set; }
public string title { get; set; }
public string type{ get; set; } //as discriminator
}
I can get the query in controller or repository like this:
var equipments=from e in db.Equipments
select e;
You cannot make discriminator column in terms of EF mapping - TPT inheritance doesn't support it because the discriminator is a subtable. You can try to use something like:
public abstract class Equipment
{
public int ID { get; set; }
public string title { get; set; }
[NotMapped]
public abstract string Type { get; }
}
and override Type property in subtypes to get the correct name. You will not be able to use that property in Linq-to-Entities queries because it is not mapped.
Related
I want to add two properties from the city model:
after migration this error shows up:
Unable to determine the relationship represented by navigation
'City.Orders' of type 'ICollection'. Either manually configure
the relationship, or ignore this property using the '[NotMapped]'
attribute or by using 'EntityTypeBuilder.Ignore' in 'OnModelCreating'.
here is my code :
public class Order
{
public virtual City FromCity { get; set; }
public virtual City ToCity { get; set; }
}
public class City
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<Order> Orders { get; set; }
}
I suppose your model is more complicated than just FromCity and ToCity because I don't think it's a good idea to store such information in a different table. Yet, You can use inheritance in this case.
The table-per-hierarchy (TPH) pattern is used by default to map the inheritance in EF. TPH stores the data for all types in the hierarchy in a single table.
However, for your scenario, you can have a base class that holds all related attributes.
public class CityBase
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; } = string.Empty;
}
Then suppose you need two entities as per your scenario:
public class FromCity : CityBase
{
public virtual ICollection<Order> Orders { get; set; } = null!;
}
public class ToCity : CityBase
{
public virtual ICollection<Order> Orders { get; set; } = null!;
}
And the order entity:
public class Order
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string OrderTitle { get; set; } = string.Empty;
public virtual FromCity FromCity { get; set; } = null!;
public virtual ToCity ToCity { get; set; } = null!;
}
This approach can solve your problem with a One-to-Many relationship between Orders and FromCity, ToCity as per below diagram:
Quite new with LINQ. I am wondering how I would be able to achieve this.
I have the following table classes defined:
public partial class Cars
{
public long ID { get; set; }
public string CarName { get; set; }
public long CarModelID { get; set; }
public virtual CarModel CarModel { get; set; }
}
public partial class CarModel
{
public long ID { get; set; }
public string ModelName { get; set; }
public long StockID { get; set; }
}
public partial class Stock
{
public long ID { get; set; }
public string StockName { get; set; }
}
There's also a defined extension for the class Cars (Cars.extension.cs):
public partial class Cars
{
public List<Stock> StockList { get; set; }
}
I am trying to get all the Cars, CarModel and (List of) Stocks via the following query:
var query = (from cars in Context.Cars.Include("CarModel").Include("StockList")
select cars).FirstOrDefault();
It is giving me an error:
"A Specified Include Path is not Valid. The Entity Type Cars does not declare a Navigation Property with the name 'StockList'"
How would I be constructing my LINQ query such it would include possibly the list of Stocks based on a CarModel based off Cars?
The Include method is adhering to FluentAPI principles, that means further Include() calls are still in the context of the parent entity (Cars) and not in the previously included CarModel.
What you need is:
Cars.Include("CarModel.StockList")
Or
Cars.Include(x => x.CarModel.StockList)
I am using EF 6.1.1.
I am unable to figure out how to create One-to-One relationship between two classes/tables with both entities have their owns PKs. I originally posted question link but could not get much help on it OR i am not able to get it. So, here i am putting my question in simple way.
Appreciate if someone can share thoughts on it.
My Requirement:
I would like create One-To-One relationship between Principle and Dependant with 'Id' from Principle class acts as Foreign Key in dependant class.
Principle Class
public class Student
{
public string FullName {get; set;}
}
Dependant Class
public class StudentReport
{
public string RollNumber { get; set; }
public string StudentType { get; set; }
}
Add PKs – EF requires this:
public class Student
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string FullName { get; set; }
}
public class StudentReport
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string RollNumber { get; set; }
public string StudentType { get; set; }
}
Note that EF 5 and later supports naming conventions: Id indicates a primary key. Alternately, it also supports the name of the class followed by "Id", so the above keys could have been StudentId for Student and StudentReportId for StudentReport, if you wished.
Add the foreign relation as a navigation property to at least one of the tables – in this case, you stated that StudentReport is the dependent, so let's add it to that one:
public class Student
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string FullName { get; set; }
}
public class StudentReport
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string RollNumber { get; set; }
public string StudentType { get; set; }
public Student Student { get; set; }
}
Again – by naming convention – EF determines that a single Student property on StudentReport indicates that this is a navigational property associated with a foreign key. (By defining only the Student property, but no foreign key property, you are indicating that you don't care what EF names the associated FK ... basically, you're indicating you'll always access the related Student via the property.)
If you did care about the name of the FK property, you could add it:
public class Student
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string FullName { get; set; }
}
public class StudentReport
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string RollNumber { get; set; }
public string StudentType { get; set; }
public int StudentId { get; set; }
public Student Student { get; set; }
}
Again – by naming convention – EF determines that StudentId is the FK associated with the Student property because it has the class name, "Student", followed by "Id".
All of this, so far, has been using conventions as defined in Entity Framework Code First Conventions, but Data Annotations are also an option, if you wish:
public class Student
{
[Key]
public int Id { get; set; }
public string FullName { get; set; }
}
public class StudentReport
{
[Key]
public int Id { get; set; }
public string RollNumber { get; set; }
public string StudentType { get; set; }
[ForeignKey("Student")]
public int StudentId { get; set; }
public Student Student { get; set; }
}
Doing this is actually a good idea, because it makes clearer your intent to other programmers that might not be aware of EF Conventions – but can easily infer them from simply looking at EF Data Annotations – and is still less cumbersome than Fluent API.
UPDATE
I just realized, I left this as a one-to-many, with enforcement of the one-to-one relationship being left to do in the code using this model. To enforce the one-to-one in the model, you could add a navigation property to the Student class going the other way:
public class Student
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string FullName { get; set; }
public StudentReport StudentReport { get; set; }
}
public class StudentReport
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string RollNumber { get; set; }
public string StudentType { get; set; }
public Student Student { get; set; }
}
However, that's going to break, because EF doesn't know which entity to insert first on an add. To indicate which is dependent, you have to specific that the dependent class' PK is the FK to the principal class (this enforces one-to-one because – in order for a Student/StudentReport pair to be associated – their Id properties must be the exact same value):
public class Student
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string FullName { get; set; }
public StudentReport StudentReport { get; set; }
}
public class StudentReport
{
[ForeignKey("Student")]
public int Id { get; set; }
public string RollNumber { get; set; }
public string StudentType { get; set; }
public Student Student { get; set; }
}
or, using the full set of Data Annotations from earlier:
public class Student
{
[Key]
public int Id { get; set; }
public string FullName { get; set; }
public StudentReport StudentReport { get; set; }
}
public class StudentReport
{
[Key, ForeignKey("Student")]
public int Id { get; set; }
public string RollNumber { get; set; }
public string StudentType { get; set; }
public Student Student { get; set; }
}
I have a POCO class
public class Main
{
public int ExstraColumn{ get; set; }
}
public class User : Main
{
[Key]
public int Id { get; set; }
public int? Age { get; set; }
}
public class News : Main
{
[Key]
public int Id { get; set; }
public int? ReadCount { get; set; }
}
now i want entity framework inserts only age column in user. But it gives invalid column name ExstraColumn
how to tell entity framework that ExstraColumn field is only special usage?
You can use the [NotMapped] attribute in the System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations namespace.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.componentmodel.dataannotations.schema.notmappedattribute(v=vs.110).aspx
Denotes that a property or class should be excluded from database
mapping.
For all classes in my Entity I have a base class named CommonFields
public class CommonFields
{
public int Status { get; set; }
public DateTime CreatedOn { get; set; }
public int CreaedBy { get; set; }
public DateTime ModifiedOn { get; set; }
public int ModifiedBy { get; set; }
}
And, for eg. I have two classes like
public class Employee : CommonFields
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
//Other properties
}
public class User : CommonFields
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
//Other properties
}
How can I set relation from CreatedBy & ModifiedBy to User table. I just need only one directional mapping (I don't want FK to be created in my User Table).
I need to get User information when I write objEmployee.CreatedUser
Thanks.