Is Clone the only way for me to get my own repository to a different machine?
I have published my repository from my home PC and am trying to edit it from another.
I'm using Github for Windows but cannot see how to get the published repository to a second machine in order to edit the code and republish the changes so I can later use on the original PC.
The general approach for Distributed Version Control Systems is to:
Clone the repository (from the server)
Update your code (local, in your working directory)
Commit the code (local, in your working directory)
Push the commits (to the server)
Pull the new commits (from the server) to another development PC.
Typical development cycles iterate between steps 2 and 3. And sometimes 4 (to store your changes off-site) and 5 (to grab changed made by others).
As I suppose that 'Github for Windows' uses git(hub), it is also a DVCS and works also with these steps.
The proper way to do this is to clone the repository onto your second machine, straight from the source (Github). Sharing one clone between multiple machines is not recommended except in a few circumstances.
Resolved.
I had to delete the local repository. Github then prompted me with an error and the option to "Clone again", this clone again worked.
Thanks.
Related
We are trying to set up Eclipse so that two users can share the same project directory on our server. Is this possible? Every time we try, it creates a new folder and project.
Thanks!
Chris
No, this isn't possible. Eclipse only supports a single user accessing a workspace (not just a project) at a time.
Use a source control system such as Git or SVN to share code. Eclipse supports many such systems and has extensive sharing support in the 'Team' menus.
The best way to do this would be to use source control.
Sharing the actual workspace or the files with different eclipse instance is a recipe for trouble.
An easy way to do this would be to install git on your machine and also on his machine. Eclipse actually already has git in it ready to go so you probably dont need to install anything.
The one with the files locally will create a repo locally on his computer and commit the files to it.
Next you want to init a new empty repository on a shared folder and push your local chances to this as you would to github for example.
Your partner can then git clone from this repository to his machine and work locally.
Each of you will develop on your own copy and commit your changes locally. You will share your changes by pushing your commits in that central repo and pulling from it to get changes from your partner.
You could also just open an account on GitHub, GitLab or BitBucket (there are many others too) and use that instead of a shared folder. big advantage with these services is that they will be available from anywhere.
So, I have a desktop and a laptop. I use both very frequently. I keep my work files on a usb and that is how I get to switch so easily between the two. Now I am beginning a project in which I use android studio and github. I am new to github.
Can I use github in conjunction with this usb drive between two computers or should I commit to using one computer? Will this create problems?
The whole idea behind GitHub is to avoid file transfer manually like that. If you want to do a project on both machines. Then...
Create a GitHub Repository
Pull your project from your repo (Do this on both Systems)
Every time you do something on one machine, before you switch to the next, commit your changes and then push them.
If you are new to Git and dont know how it works, then feel free to check out GitHub Help.
I'm currently helping to maintain a project for a client remotely. I'm the only developer ergo some of my unorthodox approaches/thinking.
the problem
The client is using Visual Studio 2010 + Team Foundation Server for their source control. I am working on a Mac over VPN and have tried several approaches to make committing to their TFS workable. I've tried TFS plugin for Eclipse with no luck (VPN really hoses the connection to TFS). Currently I am having to do a full "checkout for edit" through a virtual machine to the TFS, then transferring the project over the VPN to overwrite those files. Not a sustainable solution to say the least.
the solution?
I'm wondering if there is a way to:
get a list of changed files from GIT (I think this is the solution
(How to list all the files in a commit?)
then use that list as a means to go in and fetch those file, maintaining their folder structure
from there I can do my dump over
VPN into the VM that has the project mapped in TFS.
Or if there is something I've overlooked or hadn't thought of, please do recommend them, I'm all ears.
First, I'm assuming you are running the VM on or near the TFS server, not on your Mac. If not, you can just share a directory using VMware/VirtualBox and edit away on your Mac...
It sounds like you could achieve what you want with plain old Git. If you:
Create a bare repository on the VM (git init --bare)
Add a post-receive hook to copy the files from the master branch (for example) into the TFS directory, overwriting merrily (http://git-scm.com/book/en/Customizing-Git-Git-Hooks)
Initialise your local copy of the source as a Git repository (git init)
Add the remote repository. Assuming it's a Windows box you can use an SMB shared folder over the VPN so your remote is "local" as far as Git is concerned. (git remote add tfsserver file:///Volumes/tfsmount/code
Your first push will be expensive (but you could prepopulate the remote repo to get around that), but subsequent pushes would be just the changesets. The post-receive hook would then take care of updating the files, and you're laughing.
Of course, you then get to impress them with how amazing Git is, get them to migrate, and your problem goes away forever :).
Update: Here's a link which describes these steps in more detail, under the guise of updating a remote website: http://toroid.org/ams/git-website-howto.
Ive been programming for a little while now and have built a little application which is now hosted on a dedicated server.
Now i have been rolling out different versions of my app with no real understanding on how to manage the process properly.
Is this the proper way to manage a build of an application when using a product like git hub ?
Upload my entire application onto github.
Each time i work on it, download it and install it on my dev server.
When im done working on it and it appears to be ok, do i then upload the changed files with the current project i am working on or am i meant to update the entire lot or am i mean to create a new version of the project?
once all my changes are updated, is there anyway of pushing these to a production machine from git hub or generating a listing of the newly changed files so i can update production machine easily with a checklist of some kind ?
My application has about 900 files associated with it and is stored in various folder structures and is a server based app (coldfusion to be precise) and as i work alone majority of the time, im struggling to understand how to manage the development of an app...
I also have no idea on using the command line and my desktop machine is a mac, with a VM running all my required server apps (windows server 2012, MSSQL 2012 etc)
I really want to make sure i can keep my dev process in order, but ive struggled with how to understand how to manage a server side apps development when im using a mac my dev machine is a windows machine i feel like im stuck in the middle.
You make it sound more complicated than it is.
Upload my entire application onto github.
Well, this is actually 2 steps: First, create a local git repo (git init), then push your repo up to github.
Each time i work on it, download it and install it on my dev server.
Well, you only need to "download" it once to a new dev box. After that, just git pull (or git fetch depending on workflow), which ensures any changes on the server are pulled down. Just the deltas are sent.
Git is a distributed version control system. That means every git repo has the full history of the entire project. So only deltas need to be sent. (This really helps when multiple people are hacking on a project).
When im done working on it and it appears to be ok, do i then upload the changed files with the current project i am working on or am i meant to update the entire lot or am i mean to create a new version of the project?
Hmm, you are using fuzzy terminology here. When you are done editing, you first commit locally (git add ...; git commit), then you push the changes to github (git push). Only the deltas are sent. Every commit is "a new version" if you squint.
Later on, if you want to think in terms of "software releases" (i.e. releasing "version 1.1" after many commits), you can use git tags. But don't worry about that right away.
once all my changes are updated, is there anyway of pushing these to a production machine from git hub or
generating a listing of the newly changed files so i can update production machine easily with a checklist of some kind ?
Never manually mess around with files manually on your server. The server should ONLY be allowed to run a valid, checked-out version of your software. If your production server is running random bits of code, nobody will be able to reproduce problems because they aren't in the version control system.
The super-simple way to deploy is to do a git clone on your server (one time), then git pull to update the code. So you push a change to github, then pull the change from your server.
More advanced, you will want something like capistrano that will manage the checkouts for you, and break up "checking out" from "deploying" to allow for easier rollback, etc. There may be windows-specific ways of doing that too. (Sorry, I'm a Linux guy.)
I am using MACOS for Developing the iPhone Application.
I have made the repository in to some Public Site that gives Functionality to build the Repository in their server and after that we can use the project to work simultaneously. But it uses internet connection that's why it becomes to slow to update and modification.
I have multiple Computers and I want to Use One PC as a Server and want to Create the Repository there and after from another multiple Computer, I want to use the Same Project to be done simultaneously.
How can i done that settings or that kind repository ?
Please help me regarding this.
I will suggest you to use mercurial rather than subversion. so any one can commit locally and once the server is up, just push the changes.
SVN is a centralised and
hg is a distributed control version system
The main difference b/w
Subversion uses one main directory to store the versionned version and can deploy (export) a specific revision at anytime.
whereas
Mercurial repository holds both the current public version and all the history. You do not have to deploy anything anywhere, just update your current repo with data from one of the revision.
and when you are using hg you do not really need to wait your server up, you can commit locally and push your changes once server up :)
To know more about look at HERE
If you are using osx, chances are svn is already installed on the computer you want to use as a host. You can configure svn to work with apache and use your local machine as the svn host. The following link has the details for setting it up:
http://mark-kirby.co.uk/2008/how-to-set-up-and-use-subversion-svn-on-os-x-leopard/