OpenJPA orphan removal not working - jpa

I am trying out a master child test case with a OneToMany unidirectional relationship.
I have a scenario where I want to update the master by removing some entries from the children list. When I do a merge, I want these child entries to be automatically deleted.
I have tried in vain to get this working. I tried orphanremoval too, but that too didn't help. There were some suggestions to add equals and hashcode, which didn't work either.
Any hint or help in this regard is highly appreciated. Thank you.
I am using JPA2.0 with OpenJPA 2.1.0
Here is my code.
//Parent class
public class Account {
private String accountId;
private String accountNumber;
private List<SubAccount> subAccounts;
//followed by getters/setters
}
//Child class
public class SubAccount {
private String subAccountId;
private String subAccountNumber;
//followed by getters/setters
}
My orm.xml is as follows.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<entity-mappings version="2.0"
xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/orm" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/orm http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/orm_2_0.xsd">
<entity name="Account" class="test.data.Account">
<table name="ACCOUNT" />
<sequence-generator name="AccountSeq"
sequence-name="ACCOUNT_TEST_SEQ" />
<attributes>
<id name="accountId">
<column name="ACCOUNT_ID" />
<generated-value strategy="SEQUENCE" generator="AccountSeq" />
</id>
<basic name="accountNumber">
<column name="ACCOUNT_NO" />
</basic>
<one-to-many name="subAccounts" fetch="EAGER"
target-entity="test.data.SubAccount" orphan-removal="true" >
<join-column name="ACCOUNT_ID" referenced-column-name="ACCOUNT_ID" nullable="false" updatable="true"/>
<cascade>
<cascade-all />
</cascade>
</one-to-many>
</attributes>
</entity>
<entity name="SubAccount" class="test.data.SubAccount">
<table name="SUBACCOUNT" />
<sequence-generator name="SubAccountSeq"
sequence-name="SUBACCOUNT_TEST_SEQ" />
<attributes>
<id name="subAccountPK">
<column name="SUBACCOUNT_ID" />
<generated-value strategy="SEQUENCE" generator="AccountSeq" />
</id>
<basic name="subAccountNumber">
<column name="SUBACCOUNT_NO" />
</basic>
</attributes>
</entity>
</entity-mappings>
And this is what I am trying to do.
Account acc = (Account)entityMgr.find(Account.class, "1100")
acc.getSubAccounts().remove(0);
entityMgr.merge(acc)
I expect the subaccount to be deleted.

OpenJPA overrides the orphan-removal behavior if the cascade type is set to cascade-all or cascade-remove.
Instead of cascade-all, I had to configure cascade-type with cascade-persist, cascade-merge, cascade-refresh and cascade-detach.

Related

Dynamic Servicefabric Settings and Overrides

Is there a way to not tell the service about the settings at all and just provide them at the application level?
I am still unhappy with how servicefabric configuration seems to work.
Near as I can tell I have to specify in the service’s settings.xml all of the possible configuration values. Then I can override those in the application’s ApplicationParameters. Per documentation this looks like it holds true for environment variables also.
The complication that creates is that our configuration is used to hydrate options in many cases with arrays.
For example consider the json:
{
"AuthorizationOptions": {
"Policies": [
{
"Name": "User",
"Groups": [ "Domain Users" ]
}
]
}
}
There are 2 arrays; that are necessary and useful. To express this in the service fabric configuration it translates to:
<Section Name="AuthorizationOptions">
<Parameter Name="Policies:0:Name" Value="User"/>
<Parameter Name="Policies:0:Groups:0" Value="Domain Users"/>
</Section>
While the translation is not pleasant in comparison to the structured object it is completely usable.
However, If I don’t specify the section and parameters in the service, I can’t seem to override them in the application. So in this case I would have to define the exact number of policies and groups per policy in the service and the application could modify the policy name, or the group values, but not the number of policies total or number of groups total.
Is there a way to not tell the service about the settings at all and just provide them at the application level?
If not what alternatives exist to make the service reusable across applications that I may want to use to provide this type of dynamic configuration differently?
The last part of the puzzle that may assist in answering this question is I am using some pre-release code to translate the service fabric settings into Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.IConfiguration. However, that is just taking the settings it finds; it isn't the cause of the override issue I am running into.
Example Service Settings.xml:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<Settings xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2011/01/fabric">
<Section Name="AuthorizationOptions">
<!-- I should not have to provide these at the application level!
However, it fails to deploy if I don't. -->
<Parameter Name="Policies:0:Name" Value="User"/>
<Parameter Name="Policies:0:Groups:0" Value="Domain Users"/>
</Section>
</Settings>
Example Application ApplicationManifest.xml:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<ApplicationManifest xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" ApplicationTypeName="ServiceFabric.ExampleType" ApplicationTypeVersion="1.0.0" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2011/01/fabric">
<Parameters>
<Parameter Name="Service.Example_ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT" DefaultValue="" />
<Parameter Name="Service.Example_InstanceCount" DefaultValue="-1" />
<Parameter Name="Service.Example_AuthorizationOptions_Policies_0_Name" DefaultValue="Users" />
<Parameter Name="Service.Example_AuthorizationOptions_Policies_0_Groups_0" DefaultValue="Domain Users" />
</Parameters>
<ServiceManifestImport>
<ServiceManifestImport>
<ServiceManifestRef ServiceManifestName="Service.ExamplePkg" ServiceManifestVersion="1.0.0" />
<ConfigOverrides>
<ConfigOverride Name="Config">
<Settings>
<Section Name="AuthorizationOptions">
<Parameter Name="Policies:0:Name" Value="[Service.Example_AuthorizationOptions_Policies_0_Name]" />
<Parameter Name="Policies:0:Groups:0" Value="[Service.Example_AuthorizationOptions_Policies_0_Groups_0]" />
</Section>
</Settings>
</ConfigOverride>
</ConfigOverrides>
<EnvironmentOverrides CodePackageRef="code">
<EnvironmentVariable Name="ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT" Value="[Service.Example_ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT]" />
</EnvironmentOverrides>
</ServiceManifestImport>
<DefaultServices>
<Service Name="Service.Example" ServicePackageActivationMode="ExclusiveProcess">
<StatelessService ServiceTypeName="Service.ExampleType" InstanceCount="[Service.Example_InstanceCount]">
<SingletonPartition />
</StatelessService>
</Service>
</DefaultServices>
</ApplicationManifest>
Example Application ApplicationParameters (Local.1Node.xml):
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Application xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" Name="fabric:/ServiceFabric.Example" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2011/01/fabric">
<Parameters>
<Parameter Name="Service.Example_ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT" Value="Development" />
<Parameter Name="Service.Example_InstanceCount" Value="-1" />
<Parameter Name="Service.Example_AuthorizationOptions_Policies_0_Name" Value="Users" />
<Parameter Name="Service.Example_AuthorizationOptions_Policies_0_Groups_0" Value="Domain Users" />
</Parameters>
</Application>
Example Application PublishProfiles (Local.1Node.xml):
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<PublishProfile xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2015/05/fabrictools">
<ClusterConnectionParameters />
<ApplicationParameterFile Path="..\ApplicationParameters\Local.1Node.xml" />
</PublishProfile>
Should be unrelated, but example consumption of the settings:
internal sealed class Example : StatelessService
{
public Example(StatelessServiceContext context)
: base(context)
{ }
protected override IEnumerable<ServiceInstanceListener> CreateServiceInstanceListeners()
{
return new ServiceInstanceListener[]
{
new ServiceInstanceListener(serviceContext =>
new HttpSysCommunicationListener(serviceContext, "ServiceEndpoint", (url, listener) =>
{
ServiceEventSource.Current.ServiceMessage(serviceContext, $"Starting HttpSys on {url}");
return new WebHostBuilder()
.UseHttpSys(options =>
{
options.Authentication.Schemes = AuthenticationSchemes.Negotiate; // Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.HttpSys
options.Authentication.AllowAnonymous = false;
}).ConfigureServices(services => services.AddSingleton<StatelessServiceContext>(serviceContext))
.UseContentRoot(Directory.GetCurrentDirectory())
.ConfigureAppConfiguration((hostingContext, config) =>
{
config.SetBasePath(Directory.GetCurrentDirectory());
config.AddServiceFabricConfiguration(FabricRuntime.GetActivationContext(), options => {
options.IncludePackageName=false;
});
})
.UseStartup<Startup>()
.UseServiceFabricIntegration(listener, ServiceFabricIntegrationOptions.None)
.UseUrls(url)
.Build();
}))
};
}
}
From that point forward everything is in the IConfiguration object as expected.
There are many ways to configure a service fabric application, and each approach will bring you to a different challenges.
SF team recommend the approach in the docs, because you can have a better version control of configurations, and makes harder to commit mistakes, as it is explicitly declared in a file, I've used a few different approaches because of limitations like yours, the follwoing approach might solve your problem:
Configure like the original approach, but with complex types stored as JSON values: it is the closest solution to the recommended design and you still can keep control of the configuration versions on source control.
It would be something like:
Settings.xml:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<Settings xmlns... namespaces here...>
<Section Name="AuthorizationOptions">
<Parameter Name="Policies"/>
</Section>
</Settings>
ApplicationManifest.xml:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<ApplicationManifest ApplicationTypeName="ServiceFabric.ExampleType" ApplicationTypeVersion="1.0.0" xmlns:...namespaces....>
<Parameters>
<Parameter Name="Service.Example_ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT" DefaultValue="" />
<Parameter Name="Service.Example_InstanceCount" DefaultValue="-1" />
<Parameter Name="Service.Example_AuthorizationOptions_Policies" DefaultValue="[]" />
</Parameters>
<ServiceManifestImport>
<ServiceManifestImport>
<ServiceManifestRef ServiceManifestName="Service.ExamplePkg" ServiceManifestVersion="1.0.0" />
<ConfigOverrides>
<ConfigOverride Name="Config">
<Settings>
<Section Name="AuthorizationOptions">
<Parameter Name="Policies" Value="[Service.Example_AuthorizationOptions_Policies]" />
</Section>
</Settings>
</ConfigOverride>
</ConfigOverrides>
<EnvironmentOverrides CodePackageRef="code">
<EnvironmentVariable Name="ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT" Value="[Service.Example_ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT]" />
</EnvironmentOverrides>
</ServiceManifestImport>
<DefaultServices>
<Service Name="Service.Example" ServicePackageActivationMode="ExclusiveProcess">
<StatelessService ServiceTypeName="Service.ExampleType" InstanceCount="[Service.Example_InstanceCount]">
<SingletonPartition />
</StatelessService>
</Service>
</DefaultServices>
</ApplicationManifest>
ApplicationParameters.xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Application Name="fabric:/ServiceFabric.Example" xmlns:...namespaces....>
<Parameters>
<Parameter Name="Service.Example_ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT" Value="Development" />
<Parameter Name="Service.Example_InstanceCount" Value="-1" />
<Parameter Name="Service.Example_AuthorizationOptions_Policies" Value="[{'Name': 'User','Groups': ['Domain Users']}, {'Name': 'Admin','Groups': ['Administrators']}]" />
</Parameters>
</Application>
In your service code:
public class Policy
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public string[] Groups { get; set; }
}
var settings = this.Context.CodePackageActivationContext.GetConfigurationPackageObject("Config").Settings;
var authOptions = settings.Sections["AuthorizationOptions"].Parameters["Policies"].Value;
var obj = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<Policy[]>(authOptions);
You could go a level further and store the entire
AuthorizationOptions as a JSON, but like said previously, more
generic it become, easier will be to commit mistakes and harder to find
configuration issues.

Hibernate exception javassist

I need some help as I'm stumped on an Hibernate 4/Struts 2 project. This is my first Hibernate 4 (4.3.11) project, as I worked for years with Hibernate 3. The database is MySQL 5.
All mapping classes were produced with Hibernate Tools provided by JBoss Tools 4.3.5, on Eclipse Mars 2. No problem was encountered, it worked fine.
But when testing, I faced this exception :
2017-02-16 17:23:45 ERROR Dispatcher:38 - Exception occurred during processing request: metier.Ville_$$_javassist_2 cannot be cast to javassist.util.proxy.Proxy
java.lang.ClassCastException: metier.Ville_$$_javassist_2 cannot be cast to javassist.util.proxy.Proxy
at org.hibernate.proxy.pojo.javassist.JavassistLazyInitializer.getProxy(JavassistLazyInitializer.java:147)
at org.hibernate.proxy.pojo.javassist.JavassistProxyFactory.getProxy(JavassistProxyFactory.java:75)
at org.hibernate.tuple.entity.AbstractEntityTuplizer.createProxy(AbstractEntityTuplizer.java:771)
I read that post but I don't understand what's happening.
Two classes are involved : Salle and Ville. Here's the Hibernate XML files : Salle.hbm.xml & Ville.hbm.xml
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE hibernate-mapping PUBLIC "-//Hibernate/Hibernate Mapping DTD 3.0//EN"
"http://www.hibernate.org/dtd/hibernate-mapping-3.0.dtd">
<!-- Generated 2 f?vr. 2017 11:28:16 by Hibernate Tools 4.3.5.Final -->
<hibernate-mapping>
<class name="metier.Salle" table="salle" catalog="aevbadherents" optimistic-lock="version">
<id name="idSalle" type="int">
<column name="idSALLE" />
<generator class="assigned" />
</id>
<many-to-one name="ville" class="metier.Ville" fetch="select">
<column name="idVilleSalle" />
</many-to-one>
<property name="adresse1" type="string">
<column name="Adresse1" length="80" />
</property>
<property name="adresse2" type="string">
<column name="Adresse2" length="80" />
</property>
<property name="description" type="string">
<column name="Description" length="500" />
</property>
<set name="courses" table="cours" inverse="true" lazy="true" fetch="select">
<key>
<column name="IdSalle" not-null="true" />
</key>
<one-to-many class="metier.Cours" />
</set>
<set name="passagegrades" table="passagegrade" inverse="true" lazy="true" fetch="select">
<key>
<column name="IdSalle" />
</key>
<one-to-many class="metier.Passagegrade" />
</set>
</class>
</hibernate-mapping>
The second file :
<hibernate-mapping>
<class name="metier.Ville" table="ville" catalog="aevbadherents" optimistic-lock="version">
<id name="idVille" type="int">
<column name="idVILLE" />
<generator class="assigned" />
</id>
<many-to-one name="departement" class="metier.Departement" fetch="select">
<column name="idDepartement" not-null="true" />
</many-to-one>
<property name="nom" type="string">
<column name="Nom" length="60" not-null="true" />
</property>
<property name="codepostal" type="string">
<column name="codepostal" length="6" not-null="true" />
</property>
<property name="gpslat" type="string">
<column name="GPSLat" length="12" not-null="true" />
</property>
<property name="gpslon" type="string">
<column name="GPSLon" length="12" not-null="true" />
</property>
<set name="adherentsForIdVilleResid" table="adherent" inverse="true" lazy="true" fetch="select">
<key>
<column name="IdVilleResid" />
</key>
<one-to-many class="metier.Adherent" />
</set>
<set name="clubs" table="club" inverse="true" lazy="true" fetch="select">
<key>
<column name="idville" not-null="true" />
</key>
<one-to-many class="metier.Club" />
</set>
<set name="salles" table="salle" inverse="true" lazy="true" fetch="select">
<key>
<column name="idVilleSalle" />
</key>
<one-to-many class="metier.Salle" />
</set>
<set name="adherentsForIdVilleNais" table="adherent" inverse="true" lazy="true" fetch="select">
<key>
<column name="IdVilleNais" />
</key>
<one-to-many class="metier.Adherent" />
</set>
</class>
</hibernate-mapping>
I read that this exception may be caused by a JAR conflict, but I did not find anything.I don't use Maven (maybe I should ?), so let me show you the JARs included :
antlr-2.7.7.jar
commons-fileupload-1.3.jar
commons-io-2.0.1.jar
commons-lang3-3.1.jar
commons-logging-1.2-javadoc.jar
commons-logging-1.2.jar
dom4j-1.6.1.jar
freemarker-2.3.19.jar
hibernate-commons-annotations-4.0.5.Final.jar
hibernate-core-4.3.11.Final.jar
hibernate-jpa-2.1-api-1.0.0.Final.jar
jandex-1.1.0.Final.jar
javassist-3.18.1-GA.jar
jboss-logging-3.1.3.GA.jar
jboss-logging-annotations-1.2.0.Beta1.jar
jboss-transaction-api_1.2_spec-1.0.0.Final.jar
log4j-1.2.15.jar
mysql-connector-java-5.1.40-bin.jar
ognl-3.0.6.jar
struts2-core-2.3.15.3.jar
truc.txt
xwork-core-2.3.15.3.jar
Please help me, as I'm stumped...
One of the possible cause for this problem is that you have in your classpath several versions of the same class.
I have been looking in java2s.com and, none of the jar you listed, seems to contain the class javassist.util.proxy.Proxy, so I will try to find if any other jar contains that class using jarscan with the following command:
jarscan -d PATH_TO_YOUR_CLASSPATH_DIR -j javassist.util.proxy.Proxy
You can download jarscan from here https://java.net/projects/jarscan/downloads
If you found that several packages contains the same class, you are done.
Malaguna,
Thanks for your help. Here's the result of jarscan :
D:\temp\java\jarscan>jarscan -j javassist.util.proxy.Proxy
......................
+javassist-3.18.1-GA.jar
javassist-3.18.1-GA.jar\javassist/util/proxy/Proxy.class
javassist-3.18.1-GA.jar\javassist/util/proxy/ProxyFactory$1.class
javassist-3.18.1-GA.jar\javassist/util/proxy/ProxyFactory$2.class
javassist-3.18.1-GA.jar\javassist/util/proxy/ProxyFactory$3.class
javassist-3.18.1-GA.jar\javassist/util/proxy/ProxyFactory$ClassLoaderProvide
r.class
javassist-3.18.1-GA.jar\javassist/util/proxy/ProxyFactory$Find2MethodsArgs.c
lass
javassist-3.18.1-GA.jar\javassist/util/proxy/ProxyFactory$ProxyDetails.class
javassist-3.18.1-GA.jar\javassist/util/proxy/ProxyFactory$UniqueName.class
javassist-3.18.1-GA.jar\javassist/util/proxy/ProxyFactory.class
javassist-3.18.1-GA.jar\javassist/util/proxy/ProxyObject.class
javassist-3.18.1-GA.jar\javassist/util/proxy/ProxyObjectInputStream.class
javassist-3.18.1-GA.jar\javassist/util/proxy/ProxyObjectOutputStream.class
----------------------------------------------
Scanned archives: 22
Errors: 0
Archives with hits: 12
So, it means that no other jar contains that class.

openjpa enhancer fails on one-to-many, but only if its after one-to-one?

I get the following exception when I have my open JPA entity mapping set up with a one-to-many mapping listed after a one-to-one mapping. When I switch the order, I don't get the exception.
I'm assuming that there is an XSD rule being applied, but what is the purpose of that rule?
Failed to execute goal
org.apache.openjpa:openjpa-maven-plugin:2.2.2:enhance (enhancer) on
project: Execution enhancer of goal
org.apache.openjpa:openjpa-maven-plugin:2.2.2:enhance failed:
org.xml.sax.SAXException: Invalid content was found starting with
element 'one-to-many'. One of
'{"http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/orm":one-to-one,
"http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/orm":many-to-many,
"http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/orm":element-collection,
"http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/orm":embedded,
"http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/orm":transient}' is expected.
<!-- FAILED -->
<entity class="com.test.comm">
<table schema="dbo" name="tbl_comm_data"/>
<attributes>
<id name="commId">
<column name="comm_id"/>
</id>
<basic name="commName">
<column name="comm_name"/>
</basic>
<one-to-one name="CommType" target-entity="com.test.TblCommType" mapped-by="TblComm" fetch="LAZY">
<cascade>
<cascade-merge/>
</cascade>
</one-to-one>
<one-to-many name="CommDtls" target-entity="com.test.TblCommDtl" mapped-by="tblCommFreq">
<cascade>
<cascade-merge/>
</cascade>
</one-to-many>
</attributes>
</entity>
<!-- WORKED -->
<entity class="com.test.comm">
<table schema="dbo" name="tbl_comm_data"/>
<attributes>
<id name="commId">
<column name="comm_id"/>
</id>
<basic name="commName">
<column name="comm_name"/>
</basic>
<one-to-many name="CommDtls" target-entity="com.test.TblCommDtl" mapped-by="tblCommFreq">
<cascade>
<cascade-merge/>
</cascade>
</one-to-many>
<one-to-one name="CommType" target-entity="com.test.TblCommType" mapped-by="TblComm" fetch="LAZY">
<cascade>
<cascade-merge/>
</cascade>
</one-to-one>
</attributes>
</entity>

Sakai Hibernate lazy initialize

I'm having some issues building my database. I have this two hbm mappings:
<class name="br.unicamp.iel.model.Module" table="readinweb_modules">
<id name="id" type="java.lang.Long">
<generator class="increment" />
</id>
<many-to-one name="course" class="br.unicamp.iel.model.Course"
column="course_id" fetch="select" />
<property name="position" type="integer" />
<property name="module_grammar" type="text" />
</class>
<class name="br.unicamp.iel.model.Course" table="readinweb_courses">
<id name="id" type="java.lang.Long">
<generator class="increment" />
</id>
<property name="title" length="255" not-null="true" type="string" />
<property name="idiom" length="255" not-null="true" type="string" />
<property name="description" type="text" />
<set name="courseModules" table="readinweb_modules"
inverse="true" lazy="true" fetch="select">
<key column="id" not-null="true" />
<one-to-many class="br.unicamp.iel.model.Module" />
</set>
</class>
and when I try to access data on my logic bean as:
List modules = new ArrayList(dao.findById(Course.class,
course).getCourseModules());
it gives me a
org.hibernate.LazyInitializationException: failed to lazily initialize
a collection of role: br.unicamp.iel.model.Course.courseModules, no
session or session was closed
We need to see the complete code of the
List modules = new ArrayList(dao.findById(Course.class, course).getCourseModules())
Do you open and close a Session (or a EntityManager) inside the dao.findById method? The session must still be open to resolve lazy relationships

JPA Secondary Table XML Config

I am working on a project where I need to store an Entity, which is unmodifiable (from library), so I am using XML entity mappings entity object is like:
public abstract class BaseModel{
Long uid;
//getters/setters
}
public abstract class LocaleBaseModel{
String locale;
//Other properties, getter/setters
}
public class Article extends LocaleBaseModel{
private Long authorId;
privaet String text;
//Other properties
}
<mapped-superclass class="package.BaseModel">
<attributes>
<id name="uid">
<column name="UID" nullable="false" />
<generated-value strategy="AUTO" />
</id>
</attributes>
</mapped-superclass>
<mapped-superclass class="package.LocaleBaseModel">
<secondary-table name="STableName">
<primary-key-join-column name="MID" referenced-column-name="UID" />
</secondary-table>
<attributes>
<basic name="locale">
<column name="LOCALE" updatable="false" nullable="false" />
</basic>
<basic name="text">
<column name="Text" updatable="false" nullable="false" table="STableName" />
</basic>
</attributes>
</mapped-superclass>
<entity class="package.child.Article" name="Hadith">
<table name="TableName" />
<attributes>
</attributes>
</entity>
but as soon as I add <secondarytable> I get an error which is quiet explanatory in itself:
14:58:47,379 ERROR ErrorLogger:57 - Error parsing XML (2) :
cvc-complex-type.3.1: Value '2.0' of attribute 'version' of element
'entity-mappings' is not valid with respect to the corresponding
attribute use. Attribute 'version' has a fixed value of '1.0'.
14:58:47,379 ERROR ErrorLogger:57 - Error parsing XML (2) :
cvc-complex-type.2.4.a: Invalid content was found starting with
element 'element-collection'. One of
'{"http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/orm":basic,
"http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/orm":version,
"http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/orm":many-to-one,
"http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/orm":one-to-many,
"http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/orm":one-to-one,
"http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/orm":many-to-many,
"http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/orm":embedded,
"http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/orm":transient}' is expected.
14:58:47,379 ERROR ErrorLogger:57 - Error parsing XML (2) :
cvc-complex-type.2.4.a: Invalid content was found starting with
element 'secondary-table'. One of
'{"http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/orm":description,
"http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/orm":id-class,
"http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/orm":exclude-default-listeners,
"http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/orm":exclude-superclass-listeners,
"http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/orm":entity-listeners,
"http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/orm":pre-persist,
"http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/orm":post-persist,
"http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/orm":pre-remove,
"http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/orm":post-remove,
"http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/orm":pre-update,
"http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/orm":post-update,
"http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/orm":post-load,
"http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/orm":attributes}' is expected.
I have following on path, with others from spring 3.0.5
hibernate-entitymanager-3.6.2
hibernate-jpa-2.0-api
hibernate-core-3.6.2.Final
according to the orm-schema
the secondary-table elements likes to be placed
withing the
entity element after the table tag
<pre> alike <entity>
<table/>
<secondary-table/>
...
agreed the error message is noisy but that is
the glorious schema spec.
ys.