Simple scala question. Consider the below.
scala> var mycounter: Int = 0;
mycounter: Int = 0
scala> mycounter += 1
scala> mycounter
res1: Int = 1
In the second statement I increment my counter. But nothing is returned. How do I increment and return something in one statement.
Using '+=' return Unit, so you should do:
{ mycounter += 1; mycounter }
You can too do the trick using a closure (as function parameters are val):
scala> var x = 1
x: Int = 1
scala> def f(y: Int) = { x += y; x}
f: (y: Int)Int
scala> f(1)
res5: Int = 2
scala> f(5)
res6: Int = 7
scala> x
res7: Int = 7
BTW, you might consider using an immutable value instead, and embrace this programming style, then all your statements will return something ;)
Sometimes I do this:
val nextId = { var i = 0; () => { i += 1; i} }
println(nextId()) //> 1
println(nextId()) //> 2
Might not work for you if you need sometime to access the value without incrementing.
Assignment is an expression that is evaluated to Unit. Reasoning behind it can be found here: What is the motivation for Scala assignment evaluating to Unit rather than the value assigned?
In Scala this is usually not a problem because there probably is a different construct for the problem you are solving.
I don't know your exact use case, but if you want to use the incrementation it might be in the following form:
(1 to 10).foreach { i =>
// do something with i
}
Related
In order to use infix notation, I have the following example of scala code.
implicit class myclass(n:Int ){
private def mapCombineReduce(map : Int => Double, combine: (Double,Double) => Double, zero: Double )(a:Int, b:Double): Double =
if( a > b) zero else combine ( map(a), mapCombineReduce(map,combine,zero)(a+1,b) )
var default_value_of_z : Int = 0
def sum( z : Int = default_value_of_z) = mapReduce( x=>x , (x,y) => x+y+z, 0)(1,n)
def ! = mapCombineReduce( x=> x, (x,y) => x*y, 1)(1,n)
}
4 !
4 sum 1 //sum the elements from 1 to 7 and each time combine the result, add 1 to the result.
4 sum
Is there any way in scala 2.12 to run 4 sum without have a double declaration of the sum method inside myclass ?
No, because default arguments are only used if argument list is provided
def f(x: Int = 1) = x
f // interpreted as trying to do eta-expansion
In fact starting Scala 3 it will indeed eta-expand
scala> def f(x: Int = 1) = x
def f(x: Int): Int
scala> f
val res1: Int => Int = Lambda$7473/1229666909#61a1990e
so in your case you will have to write 4.sum() with argument list present.
I am taking the Functional Programming in Scala course on Coursera and I am having a hard time understanding this code snippet -
def sqrtStream(x: Double): Stream[Double] = {
def improve(guess: Double): Double = (guess+ x/ guess) / 2
lazy val guesses: Stream[Double] = 1 #:: (guesses map improve)
guesses
}
This method would find 10 approximate square root of 4 in increasing order of accuracy when I would do sqrtSteam(4).take(10).toList.
Can someone explain the evaluation strategy of guesses here? My doubt is what value of guesses in substituted when the second value of guesses is picked up?
Let's start from simplified example:
scala> lazy val a: Int = a + 5
a: Int = <lazy>
scala> a
stack overflow here, because of infinite recursion
So a is recalculating til it gets some stable value, like here:
scala> def f(f:() => Any) = 0 //takes function with captured a - returns constant 0
f: (f: () => Any)Int
scala> lazy val a: Int = f(() => a) + 5
a: Int = <lazy>
scala> a
res4: Int = 5 // 0 + 5
You may replace def f(f:() => Any) = 0 with def f(f: => Any) = 0, so a definition will look like it's really passed to the f: lazy val a: Int = f(a) + 5.
Streams use same mechanism - guesses map improve will be passed as parameter called by name (and lambda linked to the lazy a will be saved inside Stream, but not calculated until tail is requested), so it's like lazy val guesses = #::(1, () => guesses map improve). When you call guessess.head - tail will not be evaluated; guesses.tail will lazily return Stream (improve(1), ?), guesses.tail.tail will be Stream(improve(improve(1)), ?) and so on.
The value of guesses is not substituted. A stream is like a list, but its elements are evaluated only when they are needed and then they stored, so next time you access them the evaluation will not be necessary. The reference to the stream itself does not change.
On top of the example Αλεχει wrote, there is a nice explanation in Scala API:
http://www.scala-lang.org/api/current/index.html#scala.collection.immutable.Stream
You can easily find out what's going on by modifying the map function, as described in the scaladoc example:
scala> def sqrtStream(x: Double): Stream[Double] = {
| def improve(guess: Double): Double = (guess + x / guess) / 2
| lazy val guesses: Stream[Double] = 1 #:: (guesses map {n =>
| println(n, improve(n))
| improve(n)
| })
| guesses
| }
sqrtStream: (x: Double)Stream[Double]
The output is:
scala> sqrtStream(4).take(10).toList
(1.0,2.5)
(2.5,2.05)
(2.05,2.000609756097561)
(2.000609756097561,2.0000000929222947)
(2.0000000929222947,2.000000000000002)
(2.000000000000002,2.0)
(2.0,2.0)
(2.0,2.0)
(2.0,2.0)
res0: List[Double] = List(1.0, 2.5, 2.05, 2.000609756097561, 2.0000000929222947, 2.000000000000002, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0)
In OCaml, the let...in expression allows you to created a named local variable in an expression rather than a statement. (Yes I know that everything is technically an expression, but Unit return values are fairly useless.) Here's a quick example in OCaml:
let square_the_sum a b = (* function definition *)
let sum = a + b in (* declare a named local called sum *)
sum * sum (* return the value of this expression *)
Here's what I would want the equivalent Scala to look like:
def squareTheSum(a: Int, b: Int): Int =
let sum: Int = a + b in
sum * sum
Is there anything in Scala that I can use to achieve this?
EDIT:
You learn something new every day, and this has been answered before.
object ForwardPipeContainer {
implicit class ForwardPipe[A](val value: A) extends AnyVal {
def |>[B](f: A => B): B = f(value)
}
}
import ForwardPipeContainer._
def squareTheSum(a: Int, b: Int): Int = { a + b } |> { sum => sum * sum }
But I'd say that is not nearly as easy to read, and is not as flexible (it gets awkward with nested lets).
You can nest val and def in a def. There's no special syntax; you don't need a let.
def squareTheSum(a: Int, b: Int): Int = {
val sum = a + b
sum * sum
}
I don't see the readability being any different here at all. But if you want to only create the variable within the expression, you can still do that with curly braces like this:
val a = 2 //> a : Int = 2
val b = 3 //> b : Int = 3
val squareSum = { val sum = a + b; sum * sum } //> squareSum : Int = 25
There is no significant difference here between a semicolon and the word "in" (or you could move the expression to the next line, and pretend that "in" is implied if it makes it more OCaml-like :D).
val squareSum = {
val sum = a + b // in
sum * sum
}
Another, more technical, take on this: Clojure's 'let' equivalent in Scala. I think the resulting structures are pretty obtuse compared to the multi-statement form.
This pretty much applies to any language, but since i'm learning scala and my prog is in scala...
I'm learning functional programming and have an equation whereby i need to go through a range of numbers and alternate between plus and minus foreach num. I've been using a procedural type function to do it, but wonder if anyone can think of a better way?
var s = 1;
def sign : Double =
{
if(s == 1)
s = -1;
else if(s == -1)
s = 1;
return s;
}
Thanks
Addendum:
I've changed to this as it's more succinct:
var s = -1;
def sign : Int =
{
s *= -1;
return s;
}
You're returning a value that you're also changing, which doesn't look like a good idea at the first glance. I'd go for pure function here, to avoid silly mistakes and such.
Now, I'm not quite sure what you're trying to do here. Are you trying to just flip the sign?
If so, the method would be... Trivial:
scala> def flipSign(d : Double) = -d
flipSign: (d: Double)Double
scala> flipSign(3)
res3: Double = -3.0
scala> flipSign(-11)
res4: Double = 11.0
If you're trying to determine the sign (-1 for negative, 1 for positive, 0 for, well, zero), then:
scala> def sign(d : Double) = {
| d match {
| case x if x > 0 => 1
| case x if x < 0 => -1
| case _ => 0
| }
| }
sign: (d: Double)Int
scala> sign(-3)
res0: Int = -1
scala> sign(212)
res1: Int = 1
scala> sign(0)
res2: Int = 0
[EDIT]
As #senia noticed in the comments, the sign can also have a very straightforward implementation:
def sign(d : Double) = d compareTo 0
If there is any way to call a def from a block
def factor (n: Int) : Int = if (n == 0 ) 1 else n * factor(n-1)
val i = 1000
i.toString.foreach ( x => sum += factor(x.toInt) )
at the end I want to get the sum of factorial of every digit
But it seems like def doesn't return a value, everytime is 0
How to fix it?
Thanks!
The problem actually has nothing to do with Scala per se; your code and your def are fine. The issue is with toInt:
scala> '3'.toInt
res7: Int = 51
toInt doesn't actually convert it as a decimal digit, but as a unicode (ish?) character value. These are producing very large numbers which go beyond what factor can handle:
scala> factor(6)
res8: Int = 720
scala> factor(20)
res9: Int = -2102132736
scala> factor(100)
res10: Int = 0
So instead use (thanks to Luigi)
x.asDigit