I have a question regarding azure deploys. My specific scenario is that I would like to deploy N projects on the same WebRole / WebSite.
The solution (don't think only as a visual studio way of organizing projects) will involve 1 web service (that could be scaled-out later) and N web sites (that also could be scaled-out later)
Because right now my traffic is very low I was planning to deploy the web app on port 80 (of course) and the web services on say port 5000 of the same instance to save some money.
What i can't figure out right now is how to do this... in the end i have 2 questions:
-1: Can I deploy multiple projects in a single instance? (this question is similar but is not straighfoward... I was hoping for a more direct answer...)
-2: How?
EDIT: Don't get this question wrong! I do not want to create a azure web role project in VS 2012 and "Add" the 2 minor projects... i want to create 2 projects completaly independent... 2 separated solutions... separated deploys (ex: I want to correct a bug in the service without updating the web-site!)
Am I being clear? if not just say and I will re-explain...
Based on the edits to your question, the short answer is no, you can't have two completely different solutions that deploy to the same instance without overwriting the other. For Azure one role is the smallest unit of deployment.
You might be able to write your own auto updating code, but you'd be on your own there, there's nothing baked into the service to help you with this.
Related
I have an issue with a service worker, I have two different projects that are in the same server but in different folders, and I want to precache the files on project number 2 using my service worker (My service worker is already working on project number 1). My question is, is it possible to do this? is there any other way I can attack this? Any help is very much appreciated.
In general, yes, as long as the service worker is hosted at a URL that is at the same level (or "higher") than the root of each of those projects. That would ensure that each project will be within scope of the service worker.
I'm assuming that one of the challenges you're asking about relates to creating a precache manifest within that service worker that contains build artifacts from both projects. There are a few different ways to tackle that, but I think the most straightforward would be to ensure that you always run the build process for each project at the same time, and then when you use Workbox's build tooling to create the precache manifest, you ensure that you grab all the assets that were output by each of the projects.
The specifics of configuring that build process depends on what you're currently using. You mention that there's a service worker (presumably using Workbox's precaching) already in place for the first project, so I think just using the same build setup, with tweaks to pick up the additional assets, would be easiest.
This post is not for a specific coding issue. Rather, what would be the overall, best practice file structure in a Visual Studio solution of microservices in Azure Service Fabric as well as test and debug?
This may be an obvious question with simple answer. However, I couldn't find an explicit answer in MSDNs or other articles.
Two questions which are also tied together:
I currently have a couple of Visual Studio solutions with each solution containing multiple projects (services). My concern is how decoupled these services are in terms of publish, deployment and versioning in the Service Fabric environment. I hope I am wrong in thinking that these services are now tied together in terms of deployments and versioning. Hopefully each individual service can be deployed and published independently onto Service Fabric.
A lot of times these multiple services in multiple Visual Studio solutions work in chain in achieving end to end business flow. I literally have to open multiple Visual Studio instances to debug and test. I almost thought of merging them into a single solution to make debugging more convenient. I wish there was a more effective and convenient way to test and debug without having to combine them all into single solution or running 10 Visual Studio solutions.
Yes, services are individually versioned. Even the elements that make up a service are versioned (code, data, config). Everything can be updated independently.
When you deploy an application to a (dev) cluster, you don't have to delete it after debugging. You can just leave it running. This way, you can debug a single service, while the others are running without a debugger.
I'm working on a website using PhpStorm. For a long time I developed it locally, but then I got hosting and a remote ftp server.
I created a new project in PhpStorm with the settings for remote host, and I found that deploying code takes long time (over a minute) before I can see the result, which is quite uncomfortable when debugging.
Is there any possibility to work with code on a local server, and, when I think that the project is ready for deploy, just send it to the server.
I understand, that I can just work in two different projects and just deploy the "ready" version to server via FTP, but maybe there is some more comfortable way?
There is several answers to this question, and most of them opinion based but i will try and keep it objective.
Case 1
A big corporation gives every developer a sandbox, to test their code from, the corp requires every developer to keep their code on the sandbox.
Using mounted drives could be extremely slow. Especially when PhpStorm is indexing.
Case 2
An easy way to keep an auto backup of your code it to use the build in (s)ftp(s) upload/deploy.
Solution
In both cases you could use the auto deploy feature that saves every changes to the server, that way the deploy doesn't take over a minute, but is usually already there before you know it.
I cannot recommend to use the deployment for Production as it will not pass through your version control, SAT, security setups etc. In that case I would suggest something like rocketeer etc.
EDIT:
As for 2 projects, well you can define 2 different deployment servers, and use the default one for your testing, with auto upload or something, and then the other one can be selected from the deployment menu.
I currently have a VS2015 solution that comprises of 6 applications, Web site, DB, Web Service, Console Apps.
This solution is deployed multiple times to different servers internally. At the moment i have only 5 working instances. Potentially i could end up with 10 - 20 50 etc.
I'm struggling to understand how Release Management could help me deploy this solution n number of times. Is there something else that i could perhaps use to orchestrate the deployment?
A release definition is a collection of environments. An environment is a logical entity that represents where you want to deploy a release. You can add environment in build definition to achieve multiple deployments.
More information, check https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/vs/alm/release/overview
I have introduced branching/merging to my team and have talked before about how it would be great to automatically build and deploy code checked into the staging/master branches, but I'm a junior dev, not very ops-y.
The trouble I'm having, is that we create intranet applications and store them on our own VM's which we have access to, but we also have load balancing which is causing me grief!
I can get a build to automate (well, I haven't got all the bugs figured out but I'm working my way through them) - and I can even get the build to automatically create a zip file ready for deployment.
Is it possible to configure several servers for deployment?
I.E
1) I check in some code to stage
***Automatically***
2) Code builds
3) Build completes, Unit tests run and they complete
4) Code is packaged into a .zip
5) .Zip is deployed across the three load balancing servers (all with the same file path).
***
Maybe worth noting we currently have our TFS server running Visual Studio so the code is built on the same server it is all stored, but this is not the server we run live code from.
Any help or tutorials specific to my setup would be GREATLY appreciated, I really want to turn this departments releasing strategies around!
I am going to address only the deployment aspect. There are a lot of different ways that this can be handled, such as:
Customizing the build template
Writing custom .Net code and inserting it into the build template (which would also involve customizing the template)
Creating a Batch or Powershell script set to run after the build completes
Using a separate tool such as OctoDeploy or Release Manager to handle the deployments
The first thing you need to do is separate the build and deployment steps in your head. While they are tightly coupled in your model, they are two totally different tasks that need to be handled different ways.
The second thing is to stop thinking like a developer when it comes to the deployment portion. While there will likely be a programmatic solution, you'll need to identify the manual steps first.
You stated that you're not very ops-y, by which I assume you mean you're more Developer and not Systems Analyst. If that is the case, then the third thing you'll need to do is get someone who is involved, such as your current release team.
There are 3 major things that need to be done then:
EVERYTHING needs to be standardized. If you can't standardize something, then standardize the way that it's non-standard (example: You have a bulk list of servers you need to deploy to, and you need to figure out which ones to deploy to based on their name, which can be anything. In that case, a rule needs to be put in place that all QA servers need to have QA in their name, User Acceptance servers need UAT, Production need PROD, etc.).
Figure out how you're going to communicate from the build to the deployment, which builds are going to deployed, to which servers, and where the code is going to be picked up from
You need to document every manual step, and every exception to those steps, and every exception to those exceptions.
Once you have all those pieces in place, you need to then go through each manual step and automate it, whether that's through Batch, Powershell, or a custom-built application. Once you have all the steps automated, you'll have both the build and deploy pieces complete.
After you're able to execute a single "manual" automatic deployment to a single environment, you're then ready to figure out how you want to run it for multiple environments. This can be as complex as an XML file that is iterated through, to simply calling the same command multiple times with different parameters.
A quick summary of how I've done this at my current job (where using a third-party deployment tool was not an option):
Created a tool using .Net WinForms to allow us to "manually" run automated builds (We use the interface to determine the input parameters, and the custom classes under the hood do all the heavy lifting. These custom classes are in a separate project that builds to their own dll. This also allows us to test tweaks and changes to the process in a testing environment before we roll it out to our production build server)
Set up an XML file for each set of environment (QA, UAT, Prod, etc.) that contains all of the servers that need to be deployed to in that environment, including destination paths, scheduled tasks, and Windows Services
Customize the TFS build template and include the custom classes created for the custom tool, which will read the XML file and iterate through each server entry to perform the deployments
I'm more than happy to help with more specific examples and assistance, I look at things a bit different than most people and it helps when it comes to release management.