Forgive me if this is considered reposting, but I've been advised I might have given a bad format.
I'm trying to solve the two linear, second order differential equations. I want to break them into single order equations, but I can't see how as both variables have second order derivatives in both problems.
(m*a)u” + (I + m*a^2 )θ” + (d*a^2 )θ’ + (K - m*g*a)θ = 0
(M + m)u” + (m*a)θ” = -F
I've gone to some lengths with both dsolve and ode45
This is my dsolve code:
M =70-5.876;
m =5.876;
a =(((0.05)^2)+((0.13^2))^0.5);
IG = 0.0233;
d = 500;
k = 500;
g = 9.81;
f = 628;
%y is u, x is theta
syms M m a IG d k g y(t) x(t)
Dy = diff(y);
Dx = diff(x);
eqn1 = (M+m)*diff(y,2) + M*diff(x,2) == -f;
eqn2 = m*a*diff(y,2) + (IG + m*a*a)*diff(x,2) + (d*a*a)*diff(x) + (k - m*g*a)*x == 0;
t=0:0.01:10;
z = dsolve(eqn1,eqn2, y(0)==0, Dy(0)==0, x(0)==0, Dx(0)==0, 't');
z.x
z.y
It does give me very, very long equations that I can't seem to plot with respect to time and I don't know why. If anyone can advise me I'd be very grateful. Thanks for looking!
In this case u" can be replaced out of the general equation with simple algebraic manipulation. The resulting equation will be of the order:
Eq1: K1*θ” + K2*θ’ + K3*θ = -F
u can be solved directly with the solution of Eq1. Try to avoid placing u in the equation. If you must, you'll need to rewrite the equations so as to solve with the third differential of θ.
Related
Introduction
NOTE IN CODE AND DISUSSION:
A single d is first derivative A double d is second derivative
I am using Matlab to simulate some dynamic systems through numerically solving the governing LaGrange Equations. Basically a set of Second Order Ordinary Differential Equations. I am using ODE45. I found a great tutorial from Mathworks (link for tutorial below) on how to solve a basic set of second order ordinary differential equations.
https://www.mathworks.com/academia/student_center/tutorials/source/computational-math/solving-ordinary-diff-equations/player.html
Based on the tutorial I simulated the motion for an elastic spring pendulum by obtaining two second order ordinary differential equations (one for angle theta and the other for spring elongation) shown below:
theta double prime equation:
M*thetadd*(L + del)^2 + M*g*sin(theta)*(L + del) + M*deld*thetad*(2*L + 2*del) = 0
del (spring elongation) double prime equation:
K*del + M*deldd - (M*thetad^2*(2*L + 2*del))/2 - M*g*cos(theta) = 0
Both equations above have form ydd = f(x, xd, y, yd)
I solved the set of equations by a common reduction of order method; setting column vector z to [theta, thetad, del, deld] and therefore zd = [thetad, thetadd, deld, deldd]. Next I used two matlab files; a simulation file and a function handle file for ode45. See code below of simulation file and function handle file:
Simulation File
%ElasticPdlmSymMainSim
clc
clear all;
%Define parameters
global M K L g;
M = 1;
K = 25.6;
L = 1;
g = 9.8;
% define initial values for theta, thetad, del, deld
theta_0 = 0;
thetad_0 = .5;
del_0 = 1;
deld_0 = 0;
initialValues = [theta_0, thetad_0, del_0, deld_0];
% Set a timespan
t_initial = 0;
t_final = 36;
dt = .01;
N = (t_final - t_initial)/dt;
timeSpan = linspace(t_final, t_initial, N);
% Run ode45 to get z (theta, thetad, del, deld)
[t, z] = ode45(#OdeFunHndlSpngPdlmSym, timeSpan, initialValues);
Here is the function handle file:
function dz = OdeFunHndlSpngPdlmSym(~, z)
% Define Global Parameters
global M K L g
% Take output from SymDevFElSpringPdlm.m file for fy1 and fy2 and
% substitute into z2 and z4 respectively
% z1 and z3 are simply z2 and z4
% fy1=thetadd=z(2)= -(M*g*sin(z1)*(L + z3) + M*z2*z4*(2*L + 2*z3))/(M*(L + z3)^2)
% fy2=deldd=z(4)=((M*(2*L + 2*z3)*z2^2)/2 - K*z3 + M*g*cos(z1))/M
% return column vector [thetad; thetadd; deld; deldd]
dz = [z(2);
-(M*g*sin(z(1))*(L + z(3)) + M*z(2)*z(4)*(2*L + 2*z(3)))/(M*(L + z(3))^2);
z(4);
((M*(2*L + 2*z(3))*z(2)^2)/2 - K*z(3) + M*g*cos(z(1)))/M];
Question
However, I am coming across systems of equations where the variables can not be solved for explicitly as is the case with spring pendulum example. For one case I have the following set of ordinary differential equations:
y double prime equation
ydd - .5*L*(xdd*sin(x) + xd^2*cos(x) + (k/m)*y - g = 0
x double prime equation
.33*L^2*xdd - .5*L*ydd*sin(x) - .33*L^2*C*cos(x) + .5*g*L*sin(x) = 0
L, g, m, k, and C are given parameters.
Note that x'' term appears in y'' equation and y'' term appears in x'' equation so I am not able to use reduction of order method. Can I use Matlab ODE45 to solve the set of ordinary differential equations in the second example in a manner similar to first example?
Thanks!
This problem can be solved by working out some of the math by hand. The equations are linear in xdd and ydd so it should be straightforward to solve.
ydd - .5*L*(xdd*sin(x) + xd^2*cos(x)) + (k/m)*y - g = 0
.33*L^2*xdd - .5*L*ydd*sin(x) - .33*L^2*C*cos(x) + .5*g*L*sin(x) = 0
can be rewritten as
-.5*L*sin(x)*xdd + ydd = -.5*L*xd^2*cos(x) - (k/m)*y + g
.33*L^2*xdd - .5*L*sin(x)*ydd = .33*L^2*C*cos(x) - .5*g*L*sin(x)
which is the form A*x=b.
For more complex systems, you can look into the fsolve function.
Hi I am very new to MATLAB. I was trying to solve these equations to either get an analytical solution or solve them numerically. For the analytical solution, I get the following error:
Warning: Cannot solve symbolically. Returning a numeric approximation instead.
In solve (line 305)
Here is my code:
syms A B Ph Pl
delta = 0.1;
mu = 0.02;
sigma = 0.2;
w = 1;
k = 3;
l = 2;
beta = (0.5 - mu/sigma^2) + ((mu/sigma^2 - 0.5)^2 + 2*delta/sigma^2)^0.5;
alpha = -((0.5 - mu/sigma^2) - ((mu/sigma^2 - 0.5)^2 + 2*delta/sigma^2)^0.5);
eqn1 = (A*(Ph^(-alpha)) + (Ph/delta-mu)) -(B*Ph^beta)-k;
eqn2 = (A*Pl^(-alpha) + Pl/(delta-mu) -w/delta) - B*Pl^beta + l;
eqn3 = -alpha*A*(Ph^(-alpha-1)) + 1/(delta-mu) - (beta*B*Ph^(beta-1));
eqn4 = alpha*A*Pl^(-alpha-1)- (beta*B*Pl^(beta-1));
sol = solve([eqn1==0, eqn2==0, eqn3==0, eqn4==0], [A, B, Ph, Pl]);
Matlab is telling you it can't find an analytic solution, but it is definitely finding numerical solutions when I run it, however, they're all complex. Type:
sol.A
in your command window to see what A looks like, same with B, Ph and Pl.
I'm trying to implement a RK implicit 2-order to convection-diffusion equation (1D) with fdm_2nd and gauss butcher coefficients: 'u_t = -uu_x + nu .u_xx' .
My goal is to compare the explit versus implcit scheme. The explicit rk which works well with a little number of viscosity. The curve of explicit schem show us a very nice shock wave.
I need your help to implement correctly the solver of the k(i) coefficient. I don't see how implement the newton method for all k(i).
do I need to implement it for all time-space steps ? or just in time ? The jacobian is maybe wrong but i don't see where. Or maybe i use the jacobian in wrong direction...
Actualy, my code works, but i think it's was wrong somewhere ... also the implicit curve does not move from the initial values.
here my function :
function [t,u] = burgers(t0,U,N,dx)
nu=0.01; %coefficient de viscosité
A=(diag(zeros(1,N))-diag(ones(1,N-1),1)+diag(ones(1,N-1),-1)) / (2*dx);
B=(-2*diag(ones(1,N))+diag(ones(1,N-1),1)+diag(ones(1,N-1),-1)) / (dx).^2;
t=t0;
u = - A * U.^2 + nu .* B * U;
the jacobian :
function Jb = burJK(U,dx,i)
%Opérateurs
a(1,1) = 1/4;
a(1,2) = 1/4 - (3).^(1/2) / 6;
a(2,1) = 1/4 + (3).^(1/2) / 6;
a(2,2) = 1/4;
Jb(1,1) = a(1,1) .* (U(i+1,1) - U(i-1,1))/ (2*dx) - 1;
Jb(1,2) = a(1,2) .* (U(i+1,1) - U(i-1,1))/ (2*dx);
Jb(2,1) = a(2,1) .* (U(i+1,2) - U(i-1,2))/ (2*dx);
Jb(2,2) = a(2,2) .* (U(i+1,2) - U(i-1,2))/ (2*dx) - 1;
Here my newton-code:
iter = 1;
iter_max = 100;
k=zeros(2,N);
k(:,1)=[0.4;0.6];
[w_1,f1] =burgers(n + c(1) * dt,uu + dt * (a(1,:) * k(:,iter)),iter,dx);
[w_2,f2] =burgers(n + c(2) * dt,uu + dt * (a(2,:) * k(:,iter)),iter,dx);
f1 = -k(1,iter) + f1;
f2 = -k(1,iter) + f2;
f(:,1)=f1;
f(:,2)=f2;
df = burJK(f,dx,iter+1);
while iter<iter_max-1 % K_newton
delta = df\f(iter,:)';
k(:,iter+1) = k(:,iter) - delta;
iter = iter+1;
[w_1,f1] =burgers(n + c(1) * dt,uu + dt * (a(1,:) * k(:,iter+1)),N,dx);
[w_2,f2] =burgers(n + c(2) * dt,uu + dt * (a(2,:) * k(:,iter+1)),N,dx);
f1 = -k(1,iter+1) + f1;
f2 = -k(1,iter+1) + f2;
f(:,1)=f1;
f(:,2)=f2;
df = burJK(f,dx,iter);
if iter>iter_max
disp('#');
else
disp('ok');
end
end
I'm a little rusty on exactly how to implement this in matlab, but I can walk your through the general steps and hopefully that will help. First we can consider the equation you are solving to fit the general class of problems that can be posed as
du/dt = F(u), where F is a linear or nonlinear function
For a Runge Kutta scheme you typically recast the problem something like this
k(i) = F(u+dt*a(i,i)*k(i)+ a(i,j)*k(j))
for a given stage. Now comes the tricky part, you you need to make 1-D vector constructed by stacking k(1) onto k(2). So the first half of the elements of the vector are k(1) and the second half are k(2). With this new combined vector you can then change F So that it operates on the two k's separately. This results in
K = FF(u+dt*a*K) where FF is F for the new double k vector, K
Ok, now we can implement the Newton's method. You will do this for each time step and until you have converged on the right answer and use it across all spatial points at the same time. What you do is you guess a K and compute the jacobian of G(K,U) = K-FF(FF(u+dt*a*K). G(K,U) should be only valued at zero when K is at the right solution. So in other words, do you Newton's method on K and when looking for convergence you need to see that it is converging at all spots. I would run the newton's method until max(abs(G(K,U)))< SolverTolerance.
Sorry I can't be more help on the matlab implementation, but hopefully I helped with explaining how to implement the newton's method.
I am trying to solve a differential equation with the ode solver ode45 with MATLAB. I have tried using it with other simpler functions and let it plot the function. They all look correct, but when I plug in the function that I need to solve, it fails. The plot starts off at y(0) = 1 but starts decreasing at some point when it should have been an increasing function all the way up to its critical point.
function [xpts,soln] = diffsolver(p1x,p2x,p3x,p1rr,y0)
syms x y
yp = matlabFunction((p3x/p1x) - (p2x/p1x) * y);
[xpts,soln] = ode45(yp,[0 p1rr],y0);
p1x, p2x, and p3x are polynomials and they are passed into this diffsolver function as parameters.
p1rr here is the critical point. The function should diverge after the critical point, so i want to integrate it up to that point.
EDIT: Here is the code that I have before using diffsolver, the above function. I do pade approximation to find the polynomials p1, p2, and p3. Then i find the critical point, which is the root of p1 that is closest to the target (target is specified by user).
I check if the critical point is empty (sometimes there might not be a critical point in some functions). If its not empty, then it uses the above function to solve the differential equation. Then it plots the x- and y- points returned from the above function basically.
function error = padeapprox(m,n,j)
global f df p1 p2 p3 N target
error = 0;
size = m + n + j + 2;
A = zeros(size,size);
for i = 1:m
A((i + 1):size,i) = df(1:(size - i));
end
for i = (m + 1):(m + n + 1)
A((i - m):size,i) = f(1:(size + 1 - i + m));
end
for i = (m + n + 2):size
A(i - (m + n + 1),i) = -1;
end
if det(A) == 0
error = 1;
fprintf('Warning: Matrix is singular.\n');
end
V = -A\df(1:size);
p1 = [1];
for i = 1:m
p1 = [p1; V(i)];
end
p2 = [];
for i = (m + 1):(m + n + 1)
p2 = [p2; V(i)];
end
p3 = [];
for i = (m + n + 2):size
p3 = [p3; V(i)];
end
fx = poly2sym(f(end:-1:1));
dfx = poly2sym(df(end:-1:1));
p1x = poly2sym(p1(end:-1:1));
p2x = poly2sym(p2(end:-1:1));
p3x = poly2sym(p3(end:-1:1));
p3fullx = p1x * dfx + p2x * fx;
p3full = sym2poly(p3fullx); p3full = p3full(end:-1:1);
p1r = roots(p1(end:-1:1));
p1rr = findroots(p1r,target); % findroots eliminates unreal roots and chooses the one closest to the target
if ~isempty(p1rr)
[xpts,soln] = diffsolver(p1x,p2x,p3fullx,p1rr,f(1));
if rcond(A) >= 1e-10
plot(xpts,soln); axis([0 p1rr 0 5]); hold all
end
end
I saw some examples using another function to generate the differential equation but i've tried using the matlabFunction() method with other simpler functions and it seems like it works. Its just that when I try to solve this function, it fails. The solved values start becoming negative when they should all be positive.
I also tried using another solver, dsolve(). But it gives me an implicit solution all the time...
Does anyone have an idea why this is happening? Any advice is appreciated. Thank you!
Since your code seems to work for simpler functions, you could try to increase the accuracy options of the ode45 solver.
This can be achieved by using odeset:
options = odeset('RelTol',1e-10,'AbsTol',1e-10);
[T,Y] = ode45(#function,[tspan],[y0],options);
Solving coupled non linear differential equation by Mat-lab or by calculations
equation 1: x'(t) = -a* x(t) /(x(t) + y(t))
equation 2: y'(t) = -b* y(t) /(x(t) + y(t))
I tried in mathematica but got a very comlicated solution.
Solve[{x'[t] == -a* x[t] /(x[t] + y[t]), y'[t] == -b* y[t] /(x[t] + y[t])}, {x, y}, t]
How can I plot it?
My initial conditions are
x(0) = xo
y(0) = yo
Also, a and b are constants.
I have to plot x and y wrt t after inserting values of a and b . ( a= 2 , b =5 say )
A lot of things to note in this situation:
You need to create a function that contains both a and b:
function dy =soProblem(t,y,a,b)
dy=[-a*y(1)/(y(1)+y(2)); -b*y(2)/(y(1)+y(2))];
end
Call the standard ode function:
a = 2;
b = 5; tend = 10; x0 = 1; y0 = 2;
[T,Y] = ode45(#(t,y)soProblem(t,y,a,b),[0 tend],[x0 y0]);
plot (T,Y)
Realize you may have a stiff equation on your hands.
Have fun identifying the ideal function call:
[T15,Y15] = ode15s(#(t,y)soProblem(t,y,a,b),[0 tend],[x0 y0]);
[T23t,Y23t] = ode23t(#(t,y)soProblem(t,y,a,b),[0 tend],[x0 y0]);
[T23tb,Y23tb] = ode23tb(#(t,y)soProblem(t,y,a,b),[0 tend],[x0 y0]);
%note ode23s doesn't converge (or at least takes forever)
plot (T,Y,T15,Y15,T23t,Y23t,T23tb,Y23tb)
Understand why mathematica becomes restless
In mathematica:
Try ndsolve
In matlab:
Create a function file yourfunction.m:
function [Y_prime]=yourfunction(t, Y)
Y_prime=[-2*Y(1)./(Y(1) + Y(2)) -5*Y(2)./(Y(1) + Y(2))];
end
and then
[T,Y] = ode45(yourfunction,[0 t_end],[x0 y0]);
plot(T,Y(:,1));
hold on
plot(T,Y(:,2));