Ejb 3 lookup not working in Jboss AS 6 - jboss

I have migrated my app from Glassfish 2.2.1 to JBoss AS 6.
Previously i have a generic class for lookup the ejbs, Below is the code:
public class BeanUtil {
private static InitialContext ctx;
public static <T> T create(Class<T> type){
try {
ctx = new InitialContext();
return (T)ctx.lookup(type.getName());
} catch (NamingException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
return null;
}
}
The above class works fine for lookup in glassfish.
But after migrating the code to JBoss AS 6. I always get javax.naming.NameNotFoundException
Below is one of my ejb class.
#Remote
public interface OperationPerformed {
public void addRandomNo(String randomNos);
}
#Stateless
#Remote(OperationPerformed.class)
public class OperationPerformedImpl implements OperationPerformed {
public void addRandomNo(String randomNos) {
}
}
If i give the complete jndi name which jboss made during deployment of my app, then i can easily lookup the same. But i want generic code for lookup.
Below is the code which i invoke for lookup a bean:
OperationPerformed operationPerformed =
BeanUtil.create(OperationPerformed.class);
Please suggest if i am doing something wrong.

I think you can convert class name to jndi name and look it up normally

Some suggestions:
It's quite unusual to use #Remote annotation on interface and implementation at the same time. Remove this annotation from your stateless bean, it's redundant.
I agree with other posters:
don't use remote interface for local lookups and injections, create another interface and mark it with #Local.
when it comes to JVM-local operations #EJB injection is vastly supperior comparing to manual JNDI lookup (see responses to http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12681436/ejb-annotation-vs-jndi-lookup and similar questions on SO).
To sum it all:
create OperationPerformedLocal.java :
#Local
public interface OperationPerformedLocal {
public void addRandomNo(String randomNos);
}
modify your SLSB:
#Stateless
public class OperationPerformedImpl implements OperationPerformedLocal, OperationPerformed {
public void addRandomNo(String randomNos) {
}
}
and use injection rather than jndi lookup whenever possible:
#EJB
private OperationPerformedLocal operationPerformed;
In case of WAR modules some CDI #Injection magic should work, but I haven't got any real experience with it yet.
Now, if you insist on using plain JNDI lookups and want them to be as generic as possible, I came up with this solution:
public class BeanUtil {
private static InitialContext ctx;
public static <T, C> T create(Class<C> implType, Class<T> interfaceType) {
try {
ctx = new InitialContext();
return (T)ctx.lookup(implType.getSimpleName()+"/local");
} catch (NamingException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
return null;
}
}
you can use it this way:
try {
OperationPerformedLocal operationPerformed =
BeanUtil.create(OperationPerformedImpl.class, OperationPerformedLocal.class);
operationPerformed.addRandomNo("123");
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
It's ugly I know, I'm kind of embarassed posting it.
It's not portable, forces you to know interface and implementation classes and "/local" part is hardcoded making it even more ugly ::sigh::.
Placing EJB-JAR(s) into EAR can complicate things a little bit further, jndi-name will be prefixed with EAR name:
return (T)ctx.lookup("earName/" + implType.getSimpleName() + "/local");
Moreover, it'll probably break if SLSB has changed name i.e. #Stateless(name="someNewName").

Related

Run method after deploying and save the result with to database

I have started a Quarkus project and i have there 2 tables, i am trying to run a Method immediately after deploying, In the method i use Entitymanger to save some results in the database.
In pure Jakarta EE, you could an EJB and annotate it with #Startup. But Since quarkus uses CDI.
#ApplicationScoped
public class StartApp {
private static final String PERSISTENCE_UNIT_NAME = "Employee";
public void init(#Observes #Initialized(ApplicationScoped.class) Object init) {
EntityManagerFactory factory =
Persistence.createEntityManagerFactory(PERSISTENCE_UNIT_NAME);
EntityManager em = factory.createEntityManager();
Directory directory = new Directory("/some/info", true, false, ".xml");
em.persist(directory);
em.close();
}
}
How can i do that!? some guess !
I think what you need is this:
#ApplicationScoped
class StartApp {
void startup(#Observes StartupEvent event) {
// Do whatever needs to be done.
}
}
More information and options can be found on the very well documented quarkus pages. https://quarkus.io/guides/cdi-reference#startup-event
Ps. don't forget about your transactions and maybe take a look at Hibernate ORM.

Spring Boot Hibernate Postgresql #Transactional does not rollback [duplicate]

I want to read text data fixtures (CSV files) at the start on my application and put it in my database.
For that, I have created a PopulationService with an initialization method (#PostConstruct annotation).
I also want them to be executed in a single transaction, and hence I added #Transactional on the same method.
However, the #Transactional seems to be ignored :
The transaction is started / stopped at my low level DAO methods.
Do I need to manage the transaction manually then ?
Quote from legacy (closed) Spring forum:
In the #PostConstruct (as with the afterPropertiesSet from the InitializingBean interface) there is no way to ensure that all the post processing is already done, so (indeed) there can be no Transactions. The only way to ensure that that is working is by using a TransactionTemplate.
So if you would like something in your #PostConstruct to be executed within transaction you have to do something like this:
#Service("something")
public class Something {
#Autowired
#Qualifier("transactionManager")
protected PlatformTransactionManager txManager;
#PostConstruct
private void init(){
TransactionTemplate tmpl = new TransactionTemplate(txManager);
tmpl.execute(new TransactionCallbackWithoutResult() {
#Override
protected void doInTransactionWithoutResult(TransactionStatus status) {
//PUT YOUR CALL TO SERVICE HERE
}
});
}
}
I think #PostConstruct only ensures the preprocessing/injection of your current class is finished. It does not mean that the initialization of the whole application context is finished.
However you can use the spring event system to receive an event when the initialization of the application context is finished:
public class MyApplicationListener implements ApplicationListener<ContextRefreshedEvent> {
public void onApplicationEvent(ContextRefreshedEvent event) {
// do startup code ..
}
}
See the documentation section Standard and Custom Events for more details.
As an update, from Spring 4.2 the #EventListener annotation allows a cleaner implementation:
#Service
public class InitService {
#Autowired
MyDAO myDAO;
#EventListener(ContextRefreshedEvent.class)
public void onApplicationEvent(ContextRefreshedEvent event) {
event.getApplicationContext().getBean(InitService.class).initialize();
}
#Transactional
public void initialize() {
// use the DAO
}
}
Inject self and call through it the #Transactional method
public class AccountService {
#Autowired
private AccountService self;
#Transactional
public void resetAllAccounts(){
//...
}
#PostConstruct
private void init(){
self.resetAllAccounts();
}
}
For older Spring versions which do not support self-injection, inject BeanFactory and get self as beanFactory.getBean(AccountService.class)
EDIT
It looks like that since this solution has been posted 1.5 years ago developers are still under impression that if a method,
annotated with #Transactional, is called from a #PostContruct-annotated method invoked upon the Bean initialization, it won't be actually executed inside of Spring Transaction, and awkward (obsolete?) solutions get discussed and accepted instead of this very simple and straightforward one and the latter even gets downvoted.
The Doubting Thomases :) are welcome to check out an example Spring Boot application at GitHub which implements the described above solution.
What actually causes, IMHO, the confusion: the call to #Transactional method should be done through a proxied version of a Bean where such method is defined.
When a #Transactional method is called from another Bean, that another Bean usually injects this one and invokes its proxied (e.g. through #Autowired) version of it, and everything is fine.
When a #Transactional method is called from the same Bean directly, through usual Java call, the Spring AOP/Proxy machinery is not involved and the method is not executed inside of Transaction.
When, as in the suggested solution, a #Transactional method is called from the same Bean through self-injected proxy (self field), the situation is basically equivalent to a case 1.
#Platon Serbin's answer didn't work for me. So I kept searching and found the following answer that saved my life. :D
The answer is here No Session Hibernate in #PostConstruct, which I took the liberty to transcribe:
#Service("myService")
#Transactional(readOnly = true)
public class MyServiceImpl implements MyService {
#Autowired
private MyDao myDao;
private CacheList cacheList;
#Autowired
public void MyServiceImpl(PlatformTransactionManager transactionManager) {
this.cacheList = (CacheList) new TransactionTemplate(transactionManager).execute(new TransactionCallback(){
#Override
public Object doInTransaction(TransactionStatus transactionStatus) {
CacheList cacheList = new CacheList();
cacheList.reloadCache(MyServiceImpl.this.myDao.getAllFromServer());
return cacheList;
}
});
}
The transaction part of spring might not be initialized completely at #PostConstruct.
Use a listener to the ContextRefreshedEvent event to ensure, that transactions are available:
#Component
public class YourService
implements ApplicationListener<ContextRefreshedEvent> // <= ensure correct timing!
{
private final YourRepo repo;
public YourService (YourRepo repo) {this.repo = repo;}
#Transactional // <= ensure transaction!
#Override
public void onApplicationEvent(ContextRefreshedEvent event) {
repo.doSomethingWithinTransaction();
}
}
Using transactionOperations.execute() in #PostConstruct or in #NoTransaction method both works
#Service
public class ConfigurationService implements ApplicationContextAware {
private static final Logger LOG = LoggerFactory.getLogger(ConfigurationService.class);
private ConfigDAO dao;
private TransactionOperations transactionOperations;
#Autowired
public void setTransactionOperations(TransactionOperations transactionOperations) {
this.transactionOperations = transactionOperations;
}
#Autowired
public void setConfigurationDAO(ConfigDAO dao) {
this.dao = dao;
}
#PostConstruct
public void postConstruct() {
try { transactionOperations.execute(new TransactionCallbackWithoutResult() {
#Override
protected void doInTransactionWithoutResult(final TransactionStatus status) {
ResultSet<Config> configs = dao.queryAll();
}
});
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
LOG.trace(ex.getMessage(), ex);
}
}
#NoTransaction
public void saveConfiguration(final Configuration configuration, final boolean applicationSpecific) {
String name = configuration.getName();
Configuration original = transactionOperations.execute((TransactionCallback<Configuration>) status ->
getConfiguration(configuration.getName(), applicationSpecific, null));
}
#Override
public void setApplicationContext(ApplicationContext applicationContext) throws BeansException {
}
}

Repository autowired returning null

I want to make a application with Spring boot on back-end and Swing on front-end. I need to use a repository autowired on my service class, how to make it when i need to instantiate the service class?
I already tried change the repository to BeanFactory, tried to change the location of the files but i can't escape! I need to instantiate the Service class and autowired doesn't work with this.
I have a Model called Permission.
Repository (PermissionRepository.java):
#Repository
public interface PermissionRepository extends JpaRepository<Permission, Long>{
Optional<Permission> findByDescription(String description);
}
Service (PermissionService.java):
#Autowired
BeanFactory beanFactory;
public List<Permission> loadAll() {
return this.beanFactory.getBean(PermissionRepository.class).findAll();
}
Use (BasicOperations.java):
public static void initialPermission() {
try {
if (new PermissionService().loadAll().isEmpty()) {
//logics
}
} catch(Exception e) {
...
}
}
I expect a List, java.util.List but, the error is a nullPointer on my autowired repository
Stack:
Exception in thread "AWT-EventQueue-0" java.lang.NullPointerException
at com.riTrap.service.PermissionService.loadAll(PermissionService.java:20)
You should use autowired instead of new PermissionService. You use loadAll to check if the database contains elements. If the database is big, this approach can damage your application. Suggestion : use count instead
#Service
public class PermissionService {
#Autowired
PermissionRepository permissionRepository;
public List<Permission> loadAll() {
return permissionRepository.findAll();
}
public boolean isEmpty() {
return permissionRepository.count() == 0L;
}
}
If you need to initialize the bean before usage, you can use the constructor :
#Service
public class BasicOperations {
#Autowired
public BasicOperations(PermissionService permissionService){
if(permissionService.isEmpty()){
//DO STUFF
}
}
}

EJB not initializing in Wildfly 9.0.0 using #EJB

I'm trying to migrate from EJB2.x to EJB3.x and i'm using Wildfly 9.0.0.
The old EJB2.x is working in JBoss 4.2.2 and this is how it looks like:
public interface WUFFacadeRemote extends EJBObject {
public ClientData getItems(ClientData data);
public ClientData save(ClientData data);
}
public interface WUFFacadeHome extends EJBHome {
public WUFFacadeRemote create();
}
public class WUFFacade {
public ClientData getItems(ClientData data) {
//code here
}
public ClientData save(ClientData data) {
//code here
}
}
public class WUFAction extends HttpServlet implements IAction {
public void doPost(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response) {
...
Object objRef = ic.lookup("java:comp/env/wUF");
com.wuf.WUFFacadeHome home = (com.wuf.WUFFacadeHome) PortableRemoteObject.narrow(objRef, com.wuf.WUFFacadeHome.class);
engine = home.create();
//engine gets the reference, and I can use it normally.
...
}
}
I also have the ejb-jar.xml and it's working. Now, the solution I was thinking to EJB3.x and Wildfly 9.0.0 is as below:
#WebServlet(urlPatterns = "windows/wUF.do", loadOnStartup = 1)
public class WUFAction extends HttpServlet implements IAction {
#EJB
private WUFFacadeRemote engine;
public void doPost(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response) {
//Here I should be able to use my engine.
//Wildfly starts and I call the page, engine is not null at this moment,
//but after I call the page again, it becomes null and remains null.
}
}
#Stateless
#Remote(WUFFacadeRemote.class)
public class WUFFacade extends RootFacade implements WUFFacadeRemote, Serializable {
public WUFFacade() { }
#EJB
FUFHome home;
public ClientData getItems(ClientData data) {
//code here
}
public ClientData save(ClientData data) {
//code here
}
private Col load(ClientData data,InitialContext ic) {
//here i'm calling home.
// but home is always null. It was supposed to have the #EJB reference initialized.
//But instead I get a null pointer...
home.findByFilter(loader);
}
}
#Remote(FUFHome.class)
public interface FUFHome {
FUF create(FUFValue fUFValue);
FUF findByPrimaryKey(FUFPK pk);
Collection findByFilter(FacadeLoader loader);
}
public interface WUFFacadeRemote{
public ClientData getItems(ClientData data);
public ClientData save(ClientData data);
}
I don't have ejb-jar.xml anymore, the deploy is sucessfully done and Wildfly starts with no errors. Then the first time I call the page in question, it seems that #EJB is working (Debug is "Proxy for remote EJB StatelessEJBLocator for "bus-facade/WUFFacade", view is interface com.wuf.WUFFacadeRemote, affinity is None"), the value is not null, but for all subsequent calls, my variable is null and I got a NullPointerException.
I really don't know what i'm doing wrong (maybe i'm completely lost), but to me, #EJB should be working correctly like that. What am I missing? Thanks.
As i'm using EJB3.x i'm just using annotations now, (this seems to be ok).
JNDIs:
JNDI bindings for session bean named FUF in deployment
java:global/fumo/bus-entities-fumo/FUF!apyon.components.fumo.fuf.FUF
java:app/bus-entities-fumo/FUF!apyon.components.fumo.fuf.FUF
java:module/FUF!apyon.components.fumo.fuf.FUF
java:global/fumo/bus-entities-fumo/FUF
java:app/bus-entities-fumo/FUF
java:module/FUF
JNDI bindings for session bean named WUFFacade
java:global/fumo/bus-facade-fumo/WUFFacade!apyon.fumo.wuf.WUFFacadeRemote
java:app/bus-facade-fumo/WUFFacade!apyon.fumo.wuf.WUFFacadeRemote
java:module/WUFFacade!apyon.fumo.wuf.WUFFacadeRemote
java:jboss/exported/fumo/bus-facade-fumo/WUFFacade!apyon.fumo.wuf.WUFFacadeRemote
java:global/fumo/bus-facade-fumo/WUFFacade
java:app/bus-facade-fumo/WUFFacade
java:module/WUFFacade
I think I found a possible solution to the problem. I'll still try to find another one, but this is good so far.
After changing to a .war and keeping my other projects in .ears it's working. Maybe the problem was because I have a RootController servlet im my main.ear, which is the starting point of the aplication. The context starts there and then it redirects to fumo.ear (now fumo.war).
For some reason, I always was getting a null in my EJB after entering a page. It was always hapening when I first entered a JSP and tried to call the page again. My solution to this is:
#WebServlet(urlPatterns = "windows/wUF.do", loadOnStartup = 1)
public class WUFAction extends HttpServlet {
private WUFFacadeRemote engine;
public void doGet(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse resp) {
doPost(req, resp);
}
public void doPost(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response) {
if(engine == null) {
InitialContext ic;
try {
ic = new InitialContext();
engine = (WUFFacadeRemote) ic.lookup("java:global/fumo/WUFFacade!fumo.wuf.WUFFacadeRemote");
} catch (NamingException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
//here I always have the context now.
}
}
And as a .war my structure now looks like this:
So other annotations like #Inject and #EJB are now working. Always when i'm being redirect from a JSP calling a Servlet or some action, I first check if the context is not null, otherwise I lookup it. My #Stateless are working and the #PersistenceContext and #Remote are working too.
#Stateless
public class WUFFacade implements WUFFacadeRemote {
#Inject
private FUFRules rules;
#EJB
private FUFHome home;
private Col load(ClientData data, InitialContext ic) throws InterfaceException {
try {
// home here is nor null anymore.
Collection res = (Collection) home.findByFilter(loader);
...
} catch (InterfaceException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
...
return data;
}
}
So I'd like to thank everyone who helped in the thread. It was a good way to understand and see the problem or to find a workaround. As I said, I'll still try the .ear in the future, but as a simplified packaging it definitely works.

Getting TinyIoc current container in a Nancy project

I'm building a small Nancy web project.
In a method of one of my classes (not a nancy module), I would like to basically do:
var myThing = TinyIoC.TinyIoCContainer.Current.Resolve<IMyThing>();
However, there is only one registration in .Current (non public members, _RegisteredTypes) which is:
TinyIoC.TinyIoCContainer.TypeRegistration
Naturally, in my above code, I'm getting:
Unable to resolve type: My.Namespace.IMyThing
So, I guess I'm not getting the same container registered in my bootstrapper?
Is there a way to get at it?
EDIT
To flesh out a bit more of what I'm trying to do:
Basically, my url structure looks something like:
/{myType}/{myMethod}
So, the idea being, going to: /customer/ShowAllWithTheNameAlex would load the Customer service, and execute the showAllWithTheNameAlex method
How I do this is:
public interface IService
{
void DoSomething();
IEnumerable<string> GetSomeThings();
}
I then have an abstract base class, with a method GetService that returns the service.
It's here that i'm trying to use the TinyIoC.TinyIoCContainer.Current.Resolve();
In this case, it would be TinyIoC.TinyIoCContainer.Current.Resolve("typeName");
public abstract class Service : IService
{
abstract void DoSomething();
abstract IEnumerable<string> GetSomeThings();
public static IService GetService(string type)
{
//currently, i'm doing this with reflection....
}
}
Here's my implementation of the service.
public class CustomerService : Service
{
public void DoSomething()
{
//do stuff
}
public IEnumerable<string> GetSomeThings()
{
//return stuff
}
public IEnumerable<Customer> ShowAllWithTheNameAlex()
{
//return
}
}
Finally, I have my Nancy Module, that looks like:
public class MyModule : NancyModule
{
public MyModule()
{
Get["/{typeName}/{methodName}"] = p => ExecuteMethod(p.typeName, p.methodName);
}
private dynamic ExecuteMethod(string typeName, string methodName)
{
var service = Service.GetService(typeName);
var result = service.GetType().GetMethod(methodName).Invoke(service, null);
//do stuff
return result; //or whatever
}
}
#alexjamesbrown - The short answer is, you don't. Nancy was specifically designed so that you did not deal with the container directly. You mention that the class, that you want to take a dependency on IMyThing, is not a NancyModule. Well this is not an issue, as long as one of your modules has a reference to it, then those dependencies can also have their own dependencies that will be satisfied at runtime.
public interface IGreetingMessageService
{
string GetMessage();
}
public class GreetingMessageService: IGreetingMessageService
{
public string GetMessage()
{
return "Hi!";
}
}
public interface IGreeter
{
string Greet();
}
public class Greeter
{
private readonly IGreetingMessageService service;
public Greeter(IGreetingMessageService service)
{
this.service = service;
}
public string Greet()
{
return this.service.GetMessage();
}
}
public class GreetingsModule : NancyModule
{
public GreetingModule(IGreeter greeter)
{
Get["/"] = x => greeter.Greet();
}
}
The above will work just fine and Greeter will have it's dependency on IGreetingMessageService satisfied at runtime
I have had a very similar issue, needing to "share" the container. The reason this is an issue is that my program runs as a service using Nancy self hosting to provide a REST API. My modules have dependencies which are injected by Nancy itself, but the other parts of the app which are not referenced from modules also need dependencies injected.
Multiple containers are not a sensible option here (or anywhere really), I need to share the container between Nancy and the rest of the app.
I simply did the following
(I'm using Autofac but I suspect that TinyIoC in similar)
public class Bootstrapper : AutofacNancyBootstrapper
{
private static readonly Lazy<ILifetimeScope> container = new Lazy<ILifetimeScope>(RegisterTypes);
public static ILifetimeScope Container => container.Value;
protected override ILifetimeScope GetApplicationContainer()
{
return container.Value;
}
// Create container and register my types
private static ILifetimeScope RegisterTypes()
{
var builder = new ContainerBuilder();
// Register all my own types.....
return builder.Build();
}
}
Then, in my main code, I can use the container myself
public class Program
{
public static void Main(string[] args)
{
// Resolve main service with all its dependencies
var service = Bootstrapper.Container.Resolve<Service>();
service.Run();
}
}
As my NancyHost is within the Service, the container is constructed (once) upon its first use in main, this static is then used when Nancy gets round to creating the Bootstrapper itself.
In an ideal world, I wouldn't really want a globally accessible container, normally it would be local to the main function.
In this particular case "not dealing with the container directly" is highly problematic:
public interface IFoo {}
public class Foo : IFoo { public Foo(string bar) {} }
Assume IFoo already is a constructor dependency of a Nancy module.
Note the Foo constructor's string dependency. I need to communicate to the container to use that constructor for an IFoo singleton, when encountered as a Nancy module dependency. I need to register that on the TinyIoC instance NancyFx uses, and pass in the actual value of bar.