I am trying to log the request bodies for REST services(POST request body) that fail when there is some kind of internal server error. I don't want to log all the request bodies as that will take a lot of memory on my disc.
The exception is happening somewhere in the dao layer (like a Key constraint or some kind of unhandled exception), where I don't have the access to the entire request.
I tried using some aop advices(after-throws) but I was not able to log the required information.
Can someone suggest an approach that needs to be followed to log the request body.
I use RESTful(javax.ws.rs) webservices.
Since no response was given, I ended up using a filter http://static.springsource.org/spring-framework/docs/3.2.0.M2/api/org/springframework/web/filter/AbstractRequestLoggingFilter.html
Related
Is it possible to intercept the request going through Charles and immediately return 500 error code without sending this request to the server?
Can't find any information on this. All resources suggest to wait for the response and then change HTTP response code to 500.
I assume you have already tried adding a rewrite rule to make the request to be returned with the 500 status. Have you tried combining this with a map local, to an empty file on your disk, for instance? It may work.
If this doesn't work too, I think I would do a Map Remote to another path on my localhost (for instance: http://localhost:8081/exected-response-500) and make that URL to return the 500 status error (in my case I would use a basic Spring Boot app to achieve this).
My org is trying to use JMeter as part of a test automation suite to test some back end REST APIs. Currently one of them supports using JSON queries as a way to get filtered results back from a GET request.
We are using the JMeter UI to create these tests and since all the other API calls work under the HttpClient3.1 HTTP Request implementation that is the implementation that I am currently using to get this to work. With this implementation I get the following when looking at the failure in the results tree (response data portion) I have made the error slightly more generic to protect some IP:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid uri 'https://server:port/restservice/v1/users?firstname_query={"in":["User1FirstName","User2FirstName"]}': Invalid query
at org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpMethodBase.(HttpMethodBase.java:222)
at org.apache.commons.httpclient.methods.GetMethod.(GetMethod.java:89)
at org.apache.jmeter.protocol.http.sampler.HTTPHC3Impl.sample(HTTPHC3Impl.java:229)
at org.apache.jmeter.protocol.http.sampler.HTTPSamplerProxy.sample(HTTPSamplerProxy.java:74)
at org.apache.jmeter.protocol.http.sampler.HTTPSamplerBase.sample(HTTPSamplerBase.java:1146)
at org.apache.jmeter.protocol.http.sampler.HTTPSamplerBase.sample(HTTPSamplerBase.java:1135)
at org.apache.jmeter.threads.JMeterThread.process_sampler(JMeterThread.java:434)
at org.apache.jmeter.threads.JMeterThread.run(JMeterThread.java:261)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
I have also tried the same request using the Java implementation and get a similar result.
If anyone has any ideas or if you need more information let me know and thank you again in advance for any help you may be able to provide.
Your HTTP Request configuration is a little bit incorrect. JSON entities contain braces {} which are not allowed in URLs so you need to encode them.
Configure your HTTP Request sampler like:
Make sure "Encode" box is ticked.
And this way you will be able to send JSON with HTTP GET Requests. You can use View Results Tree listener to inspect request and response details:
You might also need to add HTTP Header Manager to your Test Plan and configure it to send Content-Type header with the value of application/json. See Testing SOAP/REST Web Services Using JMeter article for more details on properly configuring JMeter for testing REST APIs.
I am developing RESTful Services to CREATE operations. In my use case, it is enough to tell the clients whether the transaction is success or fail. And if fail, we need to send them back error code.
Is it possible to send only these information back without sending xml response or JSON response. If so, how to do it.
We have existing error code in 5 digits, we wont be changing this for this api. If this is not possible.
Will JSON response better than XML response.? We are accepting XML request.
Requesting your comments.
I'm going to assume this service will be called over HTTP, since that's what most people mean when they say "RESTful service."
Generally speaking, most people map "create" type functionality to POST methods (though you can also do it with PUT).
If you just need to indicate that the record was created, the answer is "None of the above" (i.e., you don't need a response body at all). Usually a 201 Created is returned with a Location header which specifies the URL of the newly-created resource. In theory, you could also return a 204 No Content since you don't need to pass anything other than the status code (though this would be more appropriate for a PUT, otherwise there is no way to communicate to the client the identifier of the newly-created resource).
For failures, usually a 400-series error is returned if the request message is bad (i.e., it's the client's fault) and a 500-series error is returned if a system error occurs when processing (i.e., it's the server's fault). If you need to convey additional information in the response body, consider returning a response that uses a media type of something like application/vnd.error which allows you to express context information about where the error occurred.
I am using WCF REST Service for my silverlight application. When I throw a webfault exception with error code 500. The silver light displays the error message:'Error:404 File not found'. I did some research and found that it is the problem with browser i.e. the browser stack can only pass two response codes, 200 and 404 to any plugin here in my case its silverlight. That means when ever there is a webfault exception at the server side the SL will only display the message 'File not found'. I want the error message to be passed to the client. One such solution is to pass the response code 200 and send the error message to the client attached to the return object of some similar logic like this.
I want know if there is anything else that is possible so that I dont have to change my class structure. Also I am returning JSON objects from the server. I basically need to SilverLight to get response codes other than 200 and 400 series.
Microsoft added a separate HTTP stack for your purpose when they released Silverlight 3.
Specifying the HTTP stack is easy. You simply call the
WebRequest.RegisterPrefix method, passing the ClientHttp object to
specify client HTTP handling or a BrowserHttp object to specify
browser HTTP handling. You do this before you make any web requests.
The new stack has less limitations than the old one in that it can handle more HTTP methods and it can handle any HTTP return code. See the chart in the linked blog post for a more extensive comparison.
I've been looking at examples of REST API's like Netflix http://developer.netflix.com/docs/REST_API_Reference#0_59705 and Twitter and they seem to place error messages in the statusText header response instead of the responseText. We're developing an internal RESTful api and I am arguing for sending custom statusText messages and ignoring the responseText.
For the scope of our app, we're returning error 400 when the user has tried doing something they aren't supposed to, and the only error messages that will be updated in the UI for the user will be delivered with 400. I am of the belief that the message should be sent as a modified statusText but one of the engineers (who knows a bit less about REST than me) is arguing for sending it in the responseText.
What's the best way to go?
HTTP defines that you should put a descriptive error message in the response entity body, aka responseText.
statusText is not rendered or processed by any client.
I'd use the status text for the error message type, aka 400 Client Error, and the body for a description of the problem that can be rendered to the user, in whatever the format the client may be able to process.
Edit: Note that since then, a new standardised format exists to communicate in a standard fashion error details back to the client, which you can find at https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7807 and which I would recommend.
I think you're right, the general approach is use the existing error mechanism built into HTTP.
In general, try to map your errors to existing HTTP errors, for example if they request something they don't have permission to, return a 403 error.
If they request something that doesn't exist, return a 404.
Alex
According to the HTTP specification (rfc2616): "HTTP status codes are extensible"
However I don't think that creating new statuses for every different error message is the correct approach:
I would say choose HTTP Status appropriately (HTTP Status Code Definitions) if you can't find any category which matches your requirement create a custom one (but I'm sure you will) and put error messages in the HTTP response body.
Picking appropriate status code for your responses is extremely important as it is a key enabler of self-descriptive messages.
The entity body should be a representation of the resource's state and ideally contain hyperlinks to available next states in your application
Http Status Codes are pretty self explanatory and should be used as such. Returning 200 OK with validation errors is pretty Soap-y and misleading. Any REST Client implementation 4xx and 5xx errors go into a error block and it really depends on case to case basis if you really want to use the response body for non 2xx responses.