Is there a way to specify the column order for a many-many table when EF Code first creates it? - entity-framework

I have the following mapping:
public webpages_RolesMap()
{
// Primary Key
this.HasKey(t => t.RoleId);
// Properties
this.Property(t => t.RoleName)
.IsRequired()
.HasMaxLength(256);
// Table & Column Mappings
this.ToTable("webpages_Roles");
this.Property(t => t.RoleId).HasColumnName("RoleId");
this.Property(t => t.RoleName).HasColumnName("RoleName");
// Relationships
this.HasMany(t => t.UserProfiles)
.WithMany(t => t.webpages_Roles)
.Map(m =>
{
m.ToTable("webpages_UsersInRoles");
m.MapLeftKey("RoleId");
m.MapRightKey("UserId");
});
}
When I use Code First then this forces EF to create a webpages_UsersInRoles table that looks like this:
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[webpages_UsersInRoles](
[RoleId] [int] NOT NULL,
[UserId] [int] NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[RoleId] ASC,
[UserId] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
However the SimpleMembership classes created by Microsoft perform inserts that do not specify the column names and it expects the first column to be UserID and the second RoleId.
INSERT INTO webpages_UsersInRoles VALUES (1,3);
How can I make the mapping above create a table where UserID is column 1 and RoleId is column 2 ?
Note that I already tried adding this:
public partial class UsersInRoles
{
[Key, Column(Order = 0)]
public int UserId { get; set; }
[Key, Column(Order = 1)]
public int RoleId { get; set; }
}
But is seems to ignore this and still create the many to many with column names in the wrong order.

I think you must configure the many-to-many relationship from the other side to change the column order:
// UserProfileMap derived from EntityTypeConfiguration<UserProfile>
public UserProfileMap()
{
// ...
this.HasMany(t => t.webpages_Roles)
.WithMany(t => t.UserProfiles)
.Map(m =>
{
m.ToTable("webpages_UsersInRoles");
m.MapLeftKey("UserId");
m.MapRightKey("RoleId");
});
}

Related

How to Eager Load associated data in EF Core?

I have a Gig Model as follows:
public class Gig
{
public int Id { get; set; }
[Required]
public ApplicationUser Artist { get; set; }
[Required]
public string ArtistId { get; set; }
public DateTime DateTime { get; set; }
[Required]
[StringLength(255)]
public string Venue { get; set; }
[Required]
public Genre Genre { get; set; }
[Required]
public byte GenreId { get; set; }
}
In EF6, I was able to Eager Load Artist and Genre using the following code
var gigs = _context.Attendances
.Where(a => a.AttendeeId == userId)
.Select(a => a.Gig)
.Include(a => a.Artist)
.Include(a => a.Genre)
.ToList();
But with EF Core, the Artist info or the Genre info is not getting loaded. SQL Profiler shows that there is no INNER JOIN being called on the projection tables.
SELECT [a.Gig].[Id], [a.Gig].[ArtistId], [a.Gig].[DateTime], [a.Gig].[GenreId], [a.Gig].[Venue]
FROM [Attendances] AS [a]
INNER JOIN [Gigs] AS [a.Gig] ON [a].[GigId] = [a.Gig].[Id]
WHERE [a].[AttendeeId] = #__userId_0',N'#__userId_0 nvarchar(450)',#__userId_0=N'469d8515-9a04-46af-9276-09c6fead9e10'
Can someone help me re-write the query for EF Core please to include the projection tables?
UPDATE:
added link to db schema scripts here. posting just the gigs table here:
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Gigs](
[Id] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[ArtistId] [nvarchar](450) NOT NULL,
[DateTime] [datetime2](7) NOT NULL,
[GenreId] [tinyint] NOT NULL,
[Venue] [nvarchar](255) NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_Gigs] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[Id] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Attendances] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_Attendances_AspNetUsers_AttendeeId] FOREIGN KEY([AttendeeId])
REFERENCES [dbo].[AspNetUsers] ([Id])
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Attendances] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_Attendances_AspNetUsers_AttendeeId]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Attendances] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_Attendances_Gigs_GigId] FOREIGN KEY([GigId])
REFERENCES [dbo].[Gigs] ([Id])
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Attendances] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_Attendances_Gigs_GigId]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Gigs] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_Gigs_AspNetUsers_ArtistId] FOREIGN KEY([ArtistId])
REFERENCES [dbo].[AspNetUsers] ([Id])
ON DELETE CASCADE
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Gigs] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_Gigs_AspNetUsers_ArtistId]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Gigs] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_Gigs_Genres_GenreId] FOREIGN KEY([GenreId])
REFERENCES [dbo].[Genres] ([Id])
ON DELETE CASCADE
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Gigs] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_Gigs_Genres_GenreId]
GO
If you turn on EF Core Logging, you'll see inside the log something like this:
The Include operation for navigation: 'a.Gig.Artist' was ignored because the target navigation is not reachable in the final query results.
and similar for a.Gig.Genre.
Looks like EF Core at this time cannot handle includes for such queries (that don't start from the resulting entity). The only workaround I can propose is to rewrite the query like this:
var gigs = _context.Gigs
.Where(g => g.Attendances.Any(a => a.AttendeeId == userId))
.Include(g => g.Artist)
.Include(g => g.Genre)
.ToList();
or this (translates to better SQL, although the SQL execution plan could be the same):
var gigs = (from g in _context.Gigs
from a in g.Attendances
where a.AttendeeId == userId
select g)
.Include(g => g.Artist)
.Include(g => g.Genre)
.ToList();

Entity Framework COde FIrst migration existing table

I have a (strange) situation.
I am using Entity Framework Code First but I have to attach to an existing Database.
I do not have to map every single table of the database in my object model. So I would like to migrate single Tables, whenever I need it.
I try to explain better. My database have about 100 tables, but I need to map in my model just 3 or 4. I have created my classes in c# and now I would like to map this classes with the tables I need.
Is it possible to do it? Do I have to do a migration?
UPDATE
Here my class:
public class PricePlan
{
public Guid Id { get; set; }
public String Name { get; set; }
public Double ActivationPrice { get; set; }
}
Here the context:
public class PublicAreaContext : DbContext
{
public DbSet<PricePlan> PricePlans { get; set; }
protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
modelBuilder.Entity<PricePlan>()
.HasKey(pp => new { pp.Id });
base.OnModelCreating(modelBuilder);
}
}
Here the table:
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[PricePlan](
[Id] [uniqueidentifier] NOT NULL,
[Name] [varchar](50) NULL,
[ActivationPrice] [decimal](5, 2) NULL,
... //Other columns
CONSTRAINT [PK_Price_Plans] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[Id] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY] TEXTIMAGE_ON [PRIMARY]
possible: yes
migration: no. If you need migration you may have problem as in this case you haven't the __migrationHistory table (as the db is "existing" by opposite to "created by EF").
But the answer is definitively yes.
Create your classes, create a DbContext comprising DbSet, "et voilĂ ".

Entity Framework with optional child navigation property creates extra columns

I've just noticed a rather strange behaviour with how Entity Framework creates a Code-First DB when you have a model with a parent that has a list of children, but also an optional navigation property to one particular child: I end up with an additional nullable foreign key column on the child that I'm not expecting. Can anyone please explain whether this column is actually necessary? And for that matter, can anyone suggest a better way of indicating that a particular child is Selected/Active.
To elaborate:
Given this model:
public class Parent
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public virtual List<Child> Children { get; set; }
// Optional navigation property to one of the child objects.
public int? ActiveChildId { get; set; }
public virtual Child ActiveChild { get; set; }
}
public class Child
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public int ParentId { get; set; }
public virtual Parent Parent { get; set; }
}
I end up with the following DB:
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Parents](
[Id] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[ActiveChildId] [int] NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_dbo.Parents] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[Id] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Parents] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_dbo.Parents_dbo.Children_ActiveChildId] FOREIGN KEY([ActiveChildId])
REFERENCES [dbo].[Children] ([Id])
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Parents] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_dbo.Parents_dbo.Children_ActiveChildId]
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Children](
[Id] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[ParentId] [int] NOT NULL,
[Parent_Id] [int] NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_dbo.Children] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[Id] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Children] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_dbo.Children_dbo.Parents_Parent_Id] FOREIGN KEY([Parent_Id])
REFERENCES [dbo].[Parents] ([Id])
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Children] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_dbo.Children_dbo.Parents_Parent_Id]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Children] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_dbo.Children_dbo.Parents_ParentId] FOREIGN KEY([ParentId])
REFERENCES [dbo].[Parents] ([Id])
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Children] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_dbo.Children_dbo.Parents_ParentId]
GO
i.e. there is both a ParentId (NOT NULL) column on the child AND a Parent_Id (NULL) column on the child.
It seems to me that since we've already got a 1:N foreign key relationship Parent to Child, then by adding a one-way 1:[0 or 1] Parent to Child relationship it shouldn't create another foreign key column on the child.
Add the InverseProperty attribute:
public class Child
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public int ParentId { get; set; }
[InverseProperty( "Children" )]
public virtual Parent Parent { get; set; }
}
Or map the relationship via Fluent API and specify the FK as ParentId:
modelBuilder.Entity<Parent>()
.HasMany( p => p.Children )
.WithRequired( c => c.Parent )
.HasForeignKey( c => c.ParentId );

Entity Framework - A null store-generated value was returned for a non-nullable member 'RowVersion' of type

I have the following SQL to create a table:
public const string dropCreate =
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
IF EXISTS (SELECT name FROM sys.objects WHERE name = 'Application' AND type = 'U')
DROP TABLE [dbo].[Application]
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Application] (
[ApplicationId] INT IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL,
[Name] NVARCHAR (50) Not NULL,
[RowVersion] [varbinary](max) NULL,
[ModifiedDate] [datetime] NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_dbo.Application] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED ([ApplicationId] ASC)
)";
Here's my class:
public partial class Application
{
public Application()
{
this.TestAccounts = new List<TestAccount>();
}
public int ApplicationId { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public byte[] RowVersion { get; set; }
public System.DateTime ModifiedDate { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<TestAccount> TestAccounts { get; set; }
}
Mapping:
public ApplicationMap()
{
// Primary Key
this.HasKey(t => t.ApplicationId);
// Properties
this.Property(t => t.Name)
.IsRequired()
.HasMaxLength(35);
this.Property(t => t.RowVersion)
.IsRequired()
.IsFixedLength()
.HasMaxLength(8)
.IsRowVersion();
// Table & Column Mappings
this.ToTable("Application");
this.Property(t => t.ApplicationId).HasColumnName("ApplicationId");
this.Property(t => t.Name).HasColumnName("Name");
this.Property(t => t.RowVersion).HasColumnName("RowVersion");
this.Property(t => t.ModifiedDate).HasColumnName("ModifiedDate");
}
I do an insert as follows:
new TestAccount
{
Application = app ,
Name = applicationName,
ModifiedDate = DateTime.Now
};
It's giving me the following exception
InnerException: System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DbUpdateException
HResult=-2146233087
Message=A null store-generated value was returned for a non-nullable member 'RowVersion' of type 'Relational.Mappings.Contexts.Application'.
Source=EntityFramework
Can someone give me some advice on this. As far as I know I have set everything up correctly.
looks like your mapping:
this.Property(t => t.RowVersion)
**.IsRequired()**
.IsFixedLength()
.HasMaxLength(8)
.IsRowVersion();
is different to your table:
[RowVersion] [varbinary](max) NULL,
They need to be consistent.
are you trying to set up a row version column as per http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms182776.aspx?
Change the RowVersion To TimeStamp
with my error. In my code, I have define a key, but database I have not a key in table. So I add a key in db same name in code. It worked fine.

Entity Framework HierarchyId Workarounds

EF 5.0
I am working on a prototype to test hierarchyid and entity framework together. I have the following schema:
Create Table dbo.Employee
(
EmployeeId int identity not null,
Name nvarchar(100) not null,
Node hierarchyid not null,
NodePath as Node.ToString() persisted,
Level AS Node.GetLevel() persisted,
ManagerNode as Node.GetAncestor(1) persisted,
ManagerNodePath as Node.GetAncestor(1).ToString() persisted
);
Alter Table dbo.Employee
Add Constraint EmployeePK Primary Key NonClustered (EmployeeId);
Go
--Enforce Hierarchy
Alter Table dbo.Employee
Add Constraint EmployeeManagerNodeNodeFK Foreign Key (ManagerNode) References Employee(Node);
Go
Create Unique Clustered Index EmployeeDepthFirstIndex on dbo.Employee(Node);
Go
Create NonClustered Index EmployeeBreathFirstIndex on dbo.Employee(Level, Node);
Go
From my reading, the hierarchyid datatype isn't currently supported in EF, but some have suggested workarounds such as creating calculated columns (Node.ToString()) which I have done above.
Is there a way to setup EF so that it recognizes the Parent/Child relationship so I can effectively have a subordinates collection? e.g.
Employee.Subordinates
The only thing I can think of is to create a ManagerId column w/ a FK, but then I am effectively storing the hierarchy in two places.
Thanks for any help!
EF6 is now open source, so it is easy to add HierarcyID support. I have added it, too.
You can download the modifed source and the complied/signed dlls from codeplex:
http://entityframework.codeplex.com/SourceControl/network/forks/zgabi/efhierarchyidrc1 (sometimes the fork name changes)
Or from NuGet: https://www.nuget.org/packages/EntityFrameworkWithHierarchyId/
Currenty EF6 is in RC1 state, but I'll merge the modifications to every later releases of EF6.
I have the following model:
public class Employee
{
public int EmployeeId { get; set; }
[Required, MaxLength(100)]
public string Name { get; set; }
[Required]
public HierarchyId Node { get; set; }
public IQueryable<Employee> GetSubordinates(MyContext context)
{
return context.Employees.Where(o => Node == o.Node.GetAncestor(1));
}
}
public class MyContextInitializer : CreateDatabaseIfNotExists<MyContext>
{
protected override void Seed(MyContext context)
{
context.Database.ExecuteSqlCommand(
"ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Employees] ADD [ManagerNode] AS ([Node].[GetAncestor]((1))) PERSISTED");
context.Database.ExecuteSqlCommand(
"ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Employees] ADD CONSTRAINT [UK_EmployeeNode] UNIQUE NONCLUSTERED (Node)");
context.Database.ExecuteSqlCommand(
"ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Employees] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [EmployeeManagerNodeNodeFK] " +
"FOREIGN KEY([ManagerNode]) REFERENCES [dbo].[Employees] ([Node])");
context.Employees.Add(new Employee { Name = "Root", Node = new HierarchyId("/") });
context.Employees.Add(new Employee { Name = "Emp1", Node = new HierarchyId("/1/") });
context.Employees.Add(new Employee { Name = "Emp2", Node = new HierarchyId("/2/") });
context.Employees.Add(new Employee { Name = "Emp3", Node = new HierarchyId("/1/1/") });
context.Employees.Add(new Employee { Name = "Emp4", Node = new HierarchyId("/1/1/1/") });
context.Employees.Add(new Employee { Name = "Emp5", Node = new HierarchyId("/2/1/") });
context.Employees.Add(new Employee { Name = "Emp6", Node = new HierarchyId("/1/2/") });
}
}
public class MyContext : DbContext
{
public DbSet<Employee> Employees { get; set; }
}
Generated database:
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Employees](
[EmployeeId] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[Name] [nvarchar](100) NOT NULL,
[Node] [hierarchyid] NOT NULL,
[ManagerNode] AS ([Node].[GetAncestor]((1))) PERSISTED,
CONSTRAINT [PK_dbo.Employees] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[EmployeeId] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY],
CONSTRAINT [UK_EmployeeNode] UNIQUE NONCLUSTERED
(
[Node] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Employees] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [EmployeeManagerNodeNodeFK] FOREIGN KEY([ManagerNode])
REFERENCES [dbo].[Employees] ([Node])
Example to get the child nodes of Emp1 employee:
using (var c = new MyContext())
{
var firstItem = c.Employees.Single(o => o.Node == new HierarchyId("/1/"));
foreach (var table1 in firstItem.GetSubordinates(c))
{
Console.WriteLine(table1.EmployeeId + " " + table1.Name);
}
}
result:
4 Emp3
7 Emp6
Using varbinary(892) instead of hierarchyid.
EF recognizes varbinary returning byte array.
You can convert byte array to SqlHierarchyid type and use hyrarchy pod functions.
With this workaround you can use hierarchyid functions even in other databases.
See http://www.casavillar.com.br/blog with more details and links to nugget and github where you will find samples including MySql