I've been creating a game that uses the input system for moving the player
_playerInput.actions["Move"].performed += x =>
{
// We're moving
_walking = true;
// Set the movement input to the value passed by the player
_movementInput = x.ReadValue<Vector2>();
// The angle that we need the player to rotate towards so the player look where he's moving and we change it to be in degree
_targetAngle = Mathf.Atan2(_movementInput.x, _movementInput.y) * Mathf.Rad2Deg + cam.eulerAngles.y;
};
Here is my code but when I use the Arrows to move like the right and up Arrow and I want to release them it detects the smallest difference between the release of the two buttons which is near impossible to avoid (difference between release)
before releasing "_movementInput" contains (0.71, 0.71) but after release it becomes (0, 1) or (1, 0).
I want it to stay (0.71, 0.71) as it was before releasing the two buttons
I am making my first 3d fps in Godot and I don't understand how to spawn enemies in a general area. If someone could show me a tutorial or something that would be great.
Make a scene with only your enemy character, Give it control scripts as needed (movement, etc), and save it as a scene (Ex: myEnemy.tscn).
In your main script (or wherever you're calling it from), load the enemy scene and store it as a variable by writing:
onready var loadedEnemy = preload("res://myEnemy.tscn")
Then in your _process() or _ready() function (depending on what you need it for):
Instance the enemy by writing
var enemy = loadedEnemy.instance()
Add the instance to the scene with
add_child(enemy)
3.Specify the location of the enemy placement. For a random placement somewhere in a 10 x 10 area on the ground level (Y=0) by writing
enemy.transform.origin = Vector3( rand_range(0,10), 0, rand_range(0,10) )
You can also specify rotation with
enemy.transform.basis = Vector3(90deg, 0, 0) (example)
You can add more enemies by repeating these steps beginning from var enemy = loadedEnemy.instance() (Ex: The next enemy would be var enemy2 = loadedEnemy.instance())
If you need them to appear at different times, add them in the on_timer_timeout() function of a different Timer nodes.
Good Luck
I'm using code from the pymunk index_video to create a generic function that creates multiple cars which race each other and if they reach the right extreme of the screen, they are removed from Space and re-generated on the left extreme of the screen.
The problem is, that in the example code, each part of the car (chassis, pin joint, motor, wheels) is added to Space separately. I wanted to treat the entire car as a single body whose coordinates I can keep track of by storing the reference of the entire car body in a List and add or delete it to the Space easily.
Also, if the wheels are too close to the chassis, they collide with each other. I presume using a ShapeFilter can help avoid such collisions, but for that I need all parts of the car as a single body.
Please bear with me. I'm completely new to this jargon.
def car(space):
pos = Vec2d(100,200)
wheel_color = 52,219,119
shovel_color = 219,119,52
mass = 100
radius = 25
moment = pymunk.moment_for_circle(mass, 20, radius)
wheel1_b = pymunk.Body(mass, moment)
wheel1_s = pymunk.Circle(wheel1_b, radius)
wheel1_s.friction = 1.5
wheel1_s.color = wheel_color
space.add(wheel1_b, wheel1_s)
mass = 100
radius = 25
moment = pymunk.moment_for_circle(mass, 20, radius)
wheel2_b = pymunk.Body(mass, moment)
wheel2_s = pymunk.Circle(wheel2_b, radius)
wheel2_s.friction = 1.5
wheel2_s.color = wheel_color
space.add(wheel2_b, wheel2_s)
mass = 100
size = (50,30)
moment = pymunk.moment_for_box(mass, size)
chassi_b = pymunk.Body(mass, moment)
chassi_s = pymunk.Poly.create_box(chassi_b, size)
space.add(chassi_b, chassi_s)
vs = [(0,0),(25,45),(0,45)]
shovel_s = pymunk.Poly(chassi_b, vs, transform = pymunk.Transform(tx=85))
shovel_s.friction = 0.5
shovel_s.color = shovel_color
space.add(shovel_s)
wheel1_b.position = pos - (55,0)
wheel2_b.position = pos + (55,0)
chassi_b.position = pos + (0,-25)
space.add(
pymunk.PinJoint(wheel1_b, chassi_b, (0,0), (-25,-15)),
pymunk.PinJoint(wheel1_b, chassi_b, (0,0), (-25, 15)),
pymunk.PinJoint(wheel2_b, chassi_b, (0,0), (25,-15)),
pymunk.PinJoint(wheel2_b, chassi_b, (0,0), (25, 15))
)
speed = 4
space.add(
pymunk.SimpleMotor(wheel1_b, chassi_b, speed),
pymunk.SimpleMotor(wheel2_b, chassi_b, speed)
)
So this question is actually two questions.
A. How to make a "car object" that consists of multiple parts
There is no built in support for this, you have keep track of it yourself.
One way to do it is to create a car class that contains all the parts of the car. Something like this (not complete code, you need to fill in the full car)
class Car():
def __init__(self, pos):
self.wheel_body = pymunk.Body()
self.wheel_shape = pymunk.Circle()
self.chassi_body = pymunk.Body()
self.chassi_shape = pymunk.Poly()
self.motor = pymunk.SimpleMotor(wheel_body, chassi_body, 0)
def add_to_space(self, space)
space.add(self.wheel_body, self.wheel_shape, self.chassi_body, self.chassi_shape, self.motor)
def set_speed(self, speed)
self.motor.rate = speed
def car_position(self)
return self.chassi_body.position
B. How to make parts of the car to not collide with each other
This is quite straight forward, just as you already found the ShapeFilter is the way to go. For each "car", create a ShapeFilter and set a unique non-zero group on it. Then set that ShapeFilter as the filter property on each shape that makes up the car. It doesnt matter if the shapes belong to the same body or not, any shape with a ShapeFilter with a group set will not collide to other shapes with the same group set.
This is the first time I'm trying to use Stencil Test but I have seen some examples using OpenGL and a few on Metal but focused on the Depth test instead. I understand the theory behind the Stencil test but I don't know how to set it up on Metal.
I want to draw irregular shapes. For the sake of simplicity lets consider the following 2D polygon:
I want the stencil to pass where the number of overlapping triangles is odd, so that I can reach something like this, where the white area is the area to be ignored:
I'm doing the following steps in the exact order:
Setting the depthStencilPixelFormat:
mtkView.depthStencilPixelFormat = .stencil8
mtkView.clearStencil = .allZeros
Stencil attachment:
let textureDescriptor = MTLTextureDescriptor.texture2DDescriptor(pixelFormat: .stencil8, width: drawable.texture.width, height: drawable.texture.height, mipmapped: true)
textureDescriptor.textureType = .type2D
textureDescriptor.storageMode = .private
textureDescriptor.usage = [.renderTarget, .shaderRead, .shaderWrite]
mainPassStencilTexture = device.makeTexture(descriptor: textureDescriptor)
let stencilAttachment = MTLRenderPassStencilAttachmentDescriptor()
stencilAttachment.texture = mainPassStencilTexture
stencilAttachment.clearStencil = 0
stencilAttachment.loadAction = .clear
stencilAttachment.storeAction = .store
renderPassDescriptor.stencilAttachment = stencilAttachment
Stencil descriptor:
stencilDescriptor.depthCompareFunction = MTLCompareFunction.always
stencilDescriptor.isDepthWriteEnabled = true
stencilDescriptor.frontFaceStencil.stencilCompareFunction = MTLCompareFunction.equal
stencilDescriptor.frontFaceStencil.stencilFailureOperation = MTLStencilOperation.keep
stencilDescriptor.frontFaceStencil.depthFailureOperation = MTLStencilOperation.keep
stencilDescriptor.frontFaceStencil.depthStencilPassOperation = MTLStencilOperation.invert
stencilDescriptor.frontFaceStencil.readMask = 0x1
stencilDescriptor.frontFaceStencil.writeMask = 0x1
stencilDescriptor.backFaceStencil = nil
depthStencilState = device.makeDepthStencilState(descriptor: stencilDescriptor)
and lastly, Im setting the reference value and the stencil state in the main pass:
renderEncoder.setStencilReferenceValue(0x1)
renderEncoder.setDepthStencilState(self.depthStencilState)
Am I missing something because the result I got is just like there is no stencil at all. I can see some differences when changing the settings of the depth test but nothing happens when changing the settings of the stencil ...
Any clue?
Thank you in advance
You're clearing the stencil texture to 0. The reference value is 1. The comparison function is "equal". So, the comparison will fail (1 does not equal 0). The operation for when the stencil comparison fails is "keep", so the stencil texture remains 0. Nothing changes for subsequent fragments.
I would expect that you'd get no rendering, although depending on the order of your vertexes and the front-face winding mode, you may be looking at the back faces of your triangles, in which case the stencil test is effectively disabled. If you don't otherwise care about front vs. back, just set both stencil descriptors the same way.
I think you need to do two passes: first, a stencil-only render; second, the color render governed by the stencil buffer. For the stencil only, you would make the compare function .always. This will toggle (invert) the low bit for each triangle that's drawn over a given pixel, giving you an indication of even or odd count. Because neither the compare function nor the operation involve the reference value, it doesn't matter what it is.
For the second pass, you'd set the compare function to .equal and the reference value to 1. The operations should all be .keep. Also, make sure to set the stencil attachment load action to .load (not .clear).
I'm trying to write an object oriented program (as a learning exercise, I know there may be simpler ways to do it) in which beads bounce around a 2D plane bounded by a ring. Each bead is an object defined by a class ball. In setting the initial positions of the balls I need to check that no other ball has already been placed at the same x and y coordinates.
#Class for the beads
class ball:
NumbBalls = 0
#Constructor
def __init__(self,Beads):
self.ball = sphere(pos = vector(0,0,0), radius = radiusBall,color=color.red)
ball.NumbBalls += 1
self.ball.pos = self.createInitialPosition(Beads)
#Assign ball its initial position
def createInitialPosition(self,other):
#CODE to compare self.ball.pos and other.ball.pos which returns a unique position coordinate
#Main program
NumbBeads = 100
Beads = []#Create empty list for all the beads
#create balls in random initial positions
Beads = [ball(Beads) for item in range(NumbBeads)]
I can get this to work if I create two objects bead1 and bead2 and then pass bead1 and bead2 as arguments ie bead2 = ball(bead1) but how do I do this if I am generating a list of beads and want all of them to be compared with self. Hopefully that makes sense.
Perhaps rather than the approach you are currently taking, you should consider something along these lines (of course, with the necessary changes to your class definition/methods):
N = 100
initialPositions = []
while len(initialPositions) <= N:
newPosition = generateRandomPosition()
if newPosition in initialPositions:
pass
else:
initialPositions.append(newPosition)
ballList = [ ball(p) for p in initialPositions ]
In other words, generate a list of initial positions outside of the creation of your objects, and do whatever validation/restriction you need during that creation. Then just create your objects from that list. If N is really large, you might want to consider a dictionary (or a mutable set of some sort) instead of a list for initialPositions, to help speed up the membership testing, but it's still the same concept...