Can anyone help me get this to run? I'm aiming for a custom Actor. (I have only just started hacking with Vala in the last few days and Clutter is a mystery too.)
The drawme method is being run (when invalidate is called) but there doesn't seem to be any drawing happening (via the Cairo context).
ETA: I added one line in the constructor to show the fix - this.set_size.
/*
Working from the sample code at:
https://developer.gnome.org/clutter/stable/ClutterCanvas.html
*/
public class AnActor : Clutter.Actor {
public Clutter.Canvas canvas;
public AnActor() {
canvas = new Clutter.Canvas();
canvas.set_size(300,300);
this.set_content( canvas );
this.set_size(300,300);
//Connect to the draw signal.
canvas.draw.connect(drawme);
}
private bool drawme( Cairo.Context ctx, int w, int h) {
stdout.printf("Just to test this ran at all: %d\n", w);
ctx.scale(w,h);
ctx.set_source_rgb(0,0,0);
//Rect doesn't draw.
//ctx.rectangle(0,0,200,200);
//ctx.fill();
//paint doesn't draw.
ctx.paint();
return true;
}
}
int main(string [] args) {
// Start clutter.
var result = Clutter.init(ref args);
if (result != Clutter.InitError.SUCCESS) {
stderr.printf("Error: %s\n", result.to_string());
return 1;
}
var stage = Clutter.Stage.get_default();
stage.destroy.connect(Clutter.main_quit);
//Make my custom Actor:
var a = new AnActor();
//This is dodgy:
stage.add_child(a);
//This works:
var r1 = new Clutter.Rectangle();
r1.width = 50;
r1.height = 50;
r1.color = Clutter.Color.from_string("rgb(255, 0, 0)");
stage.add_child(r1);
a.canvas.invalidate();
stage.show_all();
Clutter.main();
return 0;
}
you need to assign a size to the Actor as well, not just the Canvas.
the size of the Canvas is independent of the size of the Actor to which the Canvas is assigned to, as you can assign the same Canvas instance to multiple actors.
if you call:
a.set_size(300, 300)
you will see the actor and the results of the drawing.
Clutter also ships with various examples, for instance how to make a rectangle with rounded corners using Cairo: https://git.gnome.org/browse/clutter/tree/examples/rounded-rectangle.c - or how to make a simple clock: https://git.gnome.org/browse/clutter/tree/examples/canvas.c
Related
When I run the following programme:
//compile: valac --pkg gtk+-3.0 sample.vala
using Gtk;
public class Main : Object
{
private Window window;
private Gdk.Pixbuf pixbuf;
private DrawingArea da1;
public Main()
{
window = new Window();
window.destroy.connect (main_quit);
pixbuf = new Gdk.Pixbuf.from_file("sample.jpg");
var box = new Box (Orientation.VERTICAL, 5);
da1 = new DrawingArea();
da1.set_hexpand(true);
da1.set_vexpand(true);
da1.draw.connect((context) => draw_picture(context, pixbuf));
box.pack_start (da1, true, true, 0);
window.add (box);
window.show_all();
}
bool draw_picture(Cairo.Context cr, Gdk.Pixbuf pixbuf)
{
print("draw_picture\n");
int width = da1.get_allocated_width();
int height = da1.get_allocated_height();
var temp = pixbuf.scale_simple(width, height, Gdk.InterpType.BILINEAR);
Gdk.cairo_set_source_pixbuf (cr, temp, 0, 0);
cr.paint ();
return false;
}
static int main(string[] args)
{
Gtk.init(ref args);
var app = new Main();
Gtk.main();
return 0;
}
}
after start I can see 'draw_picture' printed 2 times. When I switch window to terminal, it's displayed additional 7 times. Can anyone explain why and recommend some good book explaining the details?
In order to answer that question for sure, you would need to look at how your window manager works. Probably the redraws that occur when you switch to another window are due to the widget gaining the :backdrop pseudoclass when its window ceases to be the active window.
In general a widget's draw signal is invoked whenever the window manager needs to redraw a portion of the window that includes the widget, and also whenever the widget's active style changes.
If your widget is expensive to redraw then you can avoid drawing the whole thing when it's not necessary. The Cairo context's clip region will be set to the portion which needs redrawing.
I'm using Screenshot code to take a screenshot of the screen which is working fine but its also taking the arcore models with it. Is there a way to take a screenshot before models are rendered?
I tried to SetActive(false) then take a screenshot then SetActive(true), it does work but there's a noticeable difference i.e. model disappears than reappears.
Update: This is a script applied on ScreenShotCamera and it is updated after removing all the bugs (thanks to #Shingo), feel free to use it it's working properly
using GoogleARCore;
using OpenCVForUnitySample;
using System.Collections;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using UnityEngine;
using UnityEngine.XR;
[RequireComponent(typeof(Camera))]
public class SnapshotCamera : MonoBehaviour
{
Camera snapCam;
public UnityEngine.UI.Text text;
public RenderTexture mRenderTexture;
int resWidth=480;
int resHeight=800;
// Start is called before the first frame update
public void initialize(ARBackgroundRenderer background, Material material)
{
background = new ARBackgroundRenderer();
snapCam = GetComponent<Camera>();
background.backgroundMaterial = material;
background.camera = snapCam;
background.mode = ARRenderMode.MaterialAsBackground;
if (snapCam.targetTexture == null)
{
snapCam.targetTexture = new RenderTexture(resWidth, resHeight, 24);
}
else
{
snapCam.targetTexture.height = resHeight;
snapCam.targetTexture.width = resWidth;
//resHeight = snapCam.targetTexture.height;
//resWidth = snapCam.targetTexture.width;
}
background.camera.cullingMask = LayerMask.NameToLayer("Default");
//snapCam.CopyFrom(background.camera);
snapCam.gameObject.SetActive(false);
}
public void TakeSnapShot()
{
snapCam.gameObject.SetActive(true);
}
void LateUpdate()
{
if (snapCam.gameObject.activeInHierarchy)
{
snapCam.cullingMask = LayerMask.NameToLayer("Default");
if (ARCoreBackgroundRenderer.screenShot == null)
ARCoreBackgroundRenderer.screenShot = new Texture2D(resWidth, resHeight, TextureFormat.RGB24, false);
snapCam.Render();
RenderTexture.active = snapCam.targetTexture;
ARCoreBackgroundRenderer.screenShot.ReadPixels(new Rect(0, 0, resWidth, resHeight), 0, 0);
ARCoreBackgroundRenderer.screenShot.Apply();
snapCam.gameObject.SetActive(false);
HandPoseRecognition.captureTexture = false;
//string name = string.Format("{0}_Capture{1}_{2}.png", Application.productName, "{0}", System.DateTime.Now.ToString("yyyy-MM-dd_HH-mm-ss"));
//UnityEngine.Debug.Log("Permission result: " + NativeGallery.SaveImageToGallery(ARCoreBackgroundRenderer.screenShot, Application.productName + " Captures", name));
}
}
}
Perhaps I was a little ambiguous, what u mentioned in the comment has already been resolved thanks to you but the problem now is.
I'll show you the images:
These are the 2 cameras I have:
This is what my Main (ARCore Camera) shows
And this is what the (ScreenShot Camera) Shows
You can use layer, put every arcore models in one layer (eg. ARLAYER), then set camera's culling mask to avoid these models.
Pseudo code:
// Set models' layer
foreach (GameObject arcoreModel in arcoreModels)
arcoreModel.layer = ARLAYER;
// Set camera's culling mask
camera.cullingMask = ~(1 << ARLAYER);
camera.Render();
Create screenshot camera from another camera
var go = new GameObject("screenshotcamera");
// Copy transform
go.transform.position = mainCamera.transform.position.
...
// Copy camera
var screenshotcamera= go.AddComopnent<Camera>();
screenshotcamera.CopyFrom(mainCamera);
Update with your script
snapCam = GetComponent<Camera>();
The exercise is as follows:
Rewrite programming exercise 3 from lecture 6 by
creating a class called Button to replace the arrays.
a) Create the class and define class variables that
hold information about position, dimensions and
color. In addition a class variable should be made,
which contains the title of the particular button.
Use the constructor to set the initial values of the
class variables.
So basically, I have to convert a previous exercise I have done into a class.
This is how I made the previous exercise in case you need it: http://pastebin.com/RqM6hj6K
So I tried to convert it into class, but apparently it gives me an error and I cannot see how to fix it.
My teached also said that I don't have to keep it as an array, and could instead make many variables instead of the data in the array.
The language is processing and gives error code NullPointerException
class Button
{
int[] nums;
Button(int n1, int n2, int n3, int n4)
{
nums[0] = n1;
nums[1] = n2;
nums[2] = n3;
nums[3] = n4;
}
void display()
{
fill(255, 0, 0);
rect(nums[0], nums[1], nums[2], nums[3]);
}
};
void setup()
{
size(800, 800);
Button butt = new Button(75, 250, 200, 200);
butt.display();
}
You're only declared nums, but not initialized it.
This results in a NullPointerException: in the constructor you're accessing nums[0], but nums doesn't have a length yet. Try this:
class Button
{
//remember to initialize/allocate the array
int[] nums = new int[4];
Button(int n1, int n2, int n3, int n4)
{
nums[0] = n1;
nums[1] = n2;
nums[2] = n3;
nums[3] = n4;
}
void display()
{
fill(255, 0, 0);
rect(nums[0], nums[1], nums[2], nums[3]);
}
};
void setup()
{
size(800, 800);
Button butt = new Button(75, 250, 200, 200);
butt.display();
}
In the future, always make sure the variables you try to access properties of(arrays/objects) are initialized/allocated first(otherwise you'll get the NullPointerException again and it's no fun)
As #v.k. so nicely points out, it's better to have readable code and remove some of the redundancy.
Before the x,y,width and height of your button were stored in an array. That is all the array could do: store data and that's it! Your class however can not only store the same data as individual easy to read properties, but can also do more: functions! (e.g. display())
So, the more readable version:
class Button
{
//remember to initialize/allocate the array
int x,y,width,height;
Button(int x,int y,int width,int height)
{
this.x = x;
this.y = y;
this.width = width;
this.height = height;
}
void display()
{
fill(255, 0, 0);
rect(x,y,width,height);//why don't we use this.here or everywhere ?
}
};
void setup()
{
size(800, 800);
Button butt = new Button(75, 250, 200, 200);
butt.display();
}
Yeah, it's sorta easier to read, but what's the deal with this you may ask ?
Well, it's a keyword that allows you to gain access to the object's instance (which ever that may be in the future when you choose to instantiate) and therefore it's properties (classes version of variables) and methods (classes version of functions). There's quite a lot of neat things to learn in terms of OOP in Java, but you can take one step at a time with a nice and visual approach in Processing.
If you haven't already, check out Daniel Shiffman's Objects tutorial
Best of luck learning OOP in Processing!
Flash AS3:
I just need to know how to check a condition for roll over effect on similar colour movieclips which is near by in a group of random colours movieclips in a grid whereas it is using 2D Array in flash AS3.or
I just need roll over event which i wrote is onBoxOver event function, in that the object which i am targetting is only getting rollover or getting alpha changes. But i need to know how to make rollover for similar colour which are all nearby.
The code which i wrote is below for your reference.
Flash AS3::
package
{
import flash.display.MovieClip;
import flash.events.MouseEvent;
public class playGame extends MovieClip
{
public static var totalRowBoxes:Number = 13;
public static var totalColumnBoxes:Number = 12;
public static var rowGap:Number = 30;
public static var columnGap:Number = 30;
public static var totalColorBoxes:Number = 8;
public static var boxCollection:Array = new Array();
public static var boxCollection1:Array = new Array();
public function playGame(theGame:main)
{
// constructor code
addBoxOnStage();
}
private function addBoxOnStage():void
{
var borderCont:Banner = new Banner();
var scoreclipCont:scoreclip = new scoreclip();
addChild(borderCont);
addChild(scoreclipCont);
scoreclipCont.x = 0;
scoreclipCont.y = 0;
createLevel(1);
for (var i:Number = 0; i<totalRowBoxes; i++)
{
boxCollection[i] = new Array(i);
for (var j:Number = 0; j<totalColumnBoxes; j++)
{
var squareCont:square = new square();
squareCont.x = 30 + (i * rowGap);
squareCont.y = 30 + (j * columnGap);
squareCont.name = i + "_" + j;
var boxCollection1:Array = new Array();
boxCollection1[0] = Math.round(Math.random() * 8);
boxCollection1[1] = squareCont;
var boxColour:Number = new Number();
boxColour = boxCollection1[0];
boxCollection[i][j] = boxCollection1[1];
addChild(squareCont);
squareCont.gotoAndStop(boxCollection1[0]);
squareCont.addEventListener(MouseEvent.MOUSE_OVER, onBoxOver); squareCont.addEventListener(MouseEvent.MOUSE_OUT, onBoxOut);
squareCont.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, onBoxClick);
}
}
}
private function onBoxClick(eve:MouseEvent):void
{
}
private function onBoxOver(eve:MouseEvent):void
{
for (var i:Number=0; i< totalRowBoxes; i++)
{
for (var j:Number=0; j<totalColumnBoxes; j++)
{
eve.target.alpha = 0.3;
// trace(boxCollection[i][j].currentFrame)
trace(eve.target);
}
}
}
private function onBoxOut(eve:MouseEvent):void
{
eve.target.alpha = 1;
}
private function createLevel(lvl):void
{
}
}
}
![My Game screenshot here colourbox][1]
Thanks in Advance. Greatly Appreciable for the reply.
Hi this is the image or screenshot of my project. In that image there are 8 colours randomly arranged. whenever i make mouse position or rollover on any box , the condition should check whether the same colour occurs around the box(eg.top, down, left, right) which i am making rollover.
1.If the same colour occur on the top of the box which i am pointing the cursor , the top box and the box which i am pointing both should get less alpha, else only the pointing box should get less alpha. this is my concept friends. please go through the image and let me know if u have any doubts.
I am still unsure what you mean by 'nearby'. (neighbour tiles? adjacent of similar colour?...)
If 'nearby' means adjacent, you need to read about flood fill algorithms. There is a good wiki article about this. You would use that to crawl through the list of tiles similar enough to trigger the effect you want.
I also don't know what 'similar' colour means in your project. You will need a method to determine weather two colours are similar. There is a stackoverflow question re: similar colour detection. It has a good answer to start you out in your research. look here.
I'm a beginner of ActionScript 3.0. I'm making a simple memory game, the tool I'm using is Eclipse with flexsdk plugin. Right now I've done the shuffle and display images, and the cover of the images as well.
My idea is when clicking on the image, the cover will remove and show the image behind of it. After 2 covers are gone, the game will compare and check whether the selected images are match or not, if match both of the images will remain, otherwise the cover will reappear and the game keeps going on. If all of the images are match, a winning line will appear.
The problem I'm facing is I got no idea on how to deal with the images comparison part. I wanted to compare with the index number of array or the name of the images, but I really don't have any idea. I've refer some examples but all of them are develop in CS3 and uses the timeframe which is not exist in pure ActionScript.
package {
import flash.display.Sprite;
import flash.events.MouseEvent;
import myclasses.Cover;
public class Prototype extends Sprite {
protected static const WIDTH:int=3;
protected static const HEIGHT:int=2;
protected static const SPACINGX:int=100;
protected static const SPACINGY:int=74;
protected static const OFFSETX:int=96;
protected static const OFFSETY:int=100;
protected static const SIZE:Number=100;
protected static const COLOUR:uint=0x999999;
[Embed(source="images/pic1.jpg")]
protected static const PIC1:Class;
[Embed(source="images/pic2.jpg")]
protected static const PIC2:Class;
[Embed(source="images/pic3.jpg")]
protected static const PIC3:Class;
protected var imagesList:Array=[PIC1,PIC1,PIC2,PIC2,PIC3,PIC3];
protected var X:int;
protected var Y:int=27;
protected var count:int;
//protected var firstTap:Class;
//protected var secondTap:Class;
public function Prototype() {
var shuffled:Array = shuffleList(imagesList.length);
for(var i:int; i<imagesList.length; i++) {
//var colour:uint;
//colour=0x999999;
var j:int = shuffled[i];
var thing:Sprite=new Sprite();
thing.addChild(new imagesList[j]());
thing.x=X;
thing.y=Y;
addChild(thing);
new Cover(this,X,Y,SIZE,COLOUR);
X=X+SPACINGX+OFFSETX;
count++;
if(count == WIDTH){
Y=Y+SPACINGY+OFFSETY;
X=0;
}
addEventListener(MouseEvent.MOUSE_DOWN,selectImages);
}
}
public function selectImages(event:MouseEvent):void {
//(P/S: this is not the actual code)
var target:Sprite = Sprite(event.target)
if(firstTap == null){
firstTap = ; //1st selected image
removeChild(target);
}else if(secondTap == null){
secondTap = ; //2nd selected image
if(firstTap == secondTap){
firstTap = null;
secondTap = null;
}else{
//firstTap = ; //cover back
//secondTap = ; //cover back
secondTap = null;
firstTap = ; //selected another image
}
}
}
protected function shuffleList(n:Number):Array {
var startList:Array = new Array(n);
var endList:Array = new Array(n);
var i:Number, j:Number;
for (i=0; i<n; i++) {
startList[i] = i;
}
for (i=0; i<n; i++) {
j = Math.floor(Math.random()*startList.length);
endList[i] = startList.splice(j,1)[0];
}
return(endList);
}
}
}
Please help me figure out. Thanks.
Well I didn't really go through your code in details, but from looking at it, it seems you are making things really complex. So let me give you a hint in how I would do it...
1) First I would make a 'card' class, which extends sprite or bitmap, mainly containing the image of that card, image of the cover/mask, some animtion methods like hide/show e.t.c, and possibly an 'id' variable to recognize it later, though that is not needed. You can also get away with the array you have, and in that case, skip step 2.
2) Now push two copies of each card in an array.
example [new card('c1'),new card('c1'),new card('c2'),new card('c2'),.....].
3) Now comes the part where you made it most complex, that is, the shuffling of the array. Let's write a custom function for it, shall we?
function shuffleArr(arr):Array
{
var len:int = arr.length();
for(var i:int=0; i<len; i++)
{
//Swap the value at i with a random value within the array;
var tmp_pos:int = Math.floor(Math.random()*len);
while(tmp_pos==i)
{
tmp_pos = Math.floor(Math.random()*len);
}
var tmp_var:card = arr[tmp_pos];
arr[tmp_pos] = arr[i];
arr[i] = tmp_var;
}
}
4) Now that the array is shuffled, you simply have to lay them out in a grid.
for(var row:int=0; row<6; row++)
{
for(var col:int=0; col<6; col++)
{
card_arr[i].x = card_arr[i].width*cols+5;
card_arr[i].y = card_arr[i].height*row+5;
stage.addChild(card[i]);
}
}
5) Now you have to check for user click and take action, and there are many ways to do it, but I will tell one of them...
a) Give the cards a click event handler, this becomes easy if the cards are a class, or you can look into event.target property and use a general click handler. it's up to you.
b) On click, push the card's id in an array. If you did make them into a class, their ids should now be, c1, c2, e.t.c, and you can do
holder_arr.push(this);
this.removeCover();
6) Now you have to make sure, that the holder array can only hold two values at a time. Then do the checking. I am writing a semi-pseudo code with a lot of assumed functions and values:
//Insert
if(holder_arr.length()==2)
{
//flip back the cards and empty the array
holder_arr[0].showCover();
holder_arr[1].showCover();
holder_arr = [];
}
holder_arr.push(this);
...
..
7) For checking make a function and run it every time a card is clicked, and also when a timer ends, to flip back the cards.
function checkCards()
{
if(holder_arr.length==2)
{
if(holder_arr[0].id==holder_arr[1].id)
{
//the cards match
holder_arr[0].vanishAnim();
holder_arr[1].vanishAnim();
holder_arr=[];
}
else
{
holder_arr[0].showCover();
holder_arr[1].showCover();
holder_arr=[];
}
}
}
Obviously you will remove the cards from the actual card_arr too, but when to do that is up to you to figure out ;)
Personally , I find the problem has more to do with the way you shuffle your cards as it makes it a bit more difficult to identify what card is what.
Let's say for instance that instead of shuffling your embed assets , you were first creating your cards , naming them after the image they add , then creating an Array ( or Vector ) of cards and shuffle that Array ( or Vector ), identifying the cards would be fairly easy since you'd only have to compare their name property.
//PSEUDO CODE
- create Array ( Vector ) of embed assets [PIC1, PIC2 , PIC3]
- create cards and use Array ( Vector ) index to identify
each card with the name property
- create a set of six cards
- shuffle set