I am using the edmgen.exe tool like this:
"%windir%\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\edmgen.exe" /mode:fullgeneration
/c:"Data Source=%datasourceserver%; Initial Catalog=School; Integrated Security=SSPI"
/project:School /entitycontainer:SchoolEntities /namespace:SchoolModel /language:CSharp
above code includes the views in the ef model. I don't want any views to be included, similar to screenshot below. How can this be done?
Looks like there is no way to do this using edmgen. Using reflector, I found that edmgen uses System.Data.Entity.Design.dll to do its work, and you can exclude the db views & functions programatically like this:
var essg = new EntityStoreSchemaGenerator("System.Data.SqlClient", ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["MST"].ConnectionString, "EFModel");
essg.GenerateForeignKeyProperties = true;
var filter1 = new EntityStoreSchemaFilterEntry(null, null, null, EntityStoreSchemaFilterObjectTypes.Table, EntityStoreSchemaFilterEffect.Allow);
var filter2 = new EntityStoreSchemaFilterEntry(null, null, null, EntityStoreSchemaFilterObjectTypes.View, EntityStoreSchemaFilterEffect.Exclude);
var filter3 = new EntityStoreSchemaFilterEntry(null, null, null, EntityStoreSchemaFilterObjectTypes.Function, EntityStoreSchemaFilterEffect.Exclude);
var filters = new EntityStoreSchemaFilterEntry[] { filter1, filter2, filter3 };
var errors1 = essg.GenerateStoreMetadata(filters);
Related
I am trying to retrieve data from my smartsheet using SmartsheetClient. But when I try to access comments against a row, the comments are null. Following is my code:
string accessToken = "accesstokenvalue";
long sheetId = 121212221;
SmartsheetClient smartSheetClient = new SmartsheetBuilder().SetAccessToken(accessToken).Build();
IEnumerable<SheetLevelInclusion> inclusion = new SheetLevelInclusion[] { SheetLevelInclusion.ATTACHMENTS, SheetLevelInclusion.COLUMN_TYPE, SheetLevelInclusion.OBJECT_VALUE, SheetLevelInclusion.ROW_WRITER_INFO, SheetLevelInclusion.CONTACT_REFERENCES, SheetLevelInclusion.CROSS_SHEET_REFERENCES, SheetLevelInclusion.DISCUSSIONS, SheetLevelInclusion.FILTERS, SheetLevelInclusion.FILTER_DEFINITIONS, SheetLevelInclusion.FORMAT, SheetLevelInclusion.OWNER_INFO, SheetLevelInclusion.ROW_PERMALINK, SheetLevelInclusion.ROW_WRITER_INFO, SheetLevelInclusion.SOURCE };
Sheet sheet = smartSheetClient.SheetResources.GetSheet(sheetId, inclusion, null, null, null, null, null, null);
Reference Image:
Thanks
I could be wrong but I believe you'll have to list discussions on the row for that:
PaginatedResult<Discussion> discussions = smartsheet.SheetResources.RowResources.DiscussionResources.ListDiscussions(sheetId, sheet1.Rows[0].Id.Value, new DiscussionInclusion[] { DiscussionInclusion.COMMENTS }, null);
I have written code for search fields in ui5 controllers files, But the search field is not giving expected output when I pasted particular column value in input search field. Instead if I type the value in search field it is giving exact output.
I have used livechange event. I also tried with search event but unable to get the output.
I am using odata services.
Below is the controller file code:
onSearch: function(oEvt) {
// add filter for search
var aFilters = [];
var sQuery = oEvt.getSource().getValue();
if (sQuery && sQuery.length > 0) {
var filter = new Filter("UNIQUE_ID", sap.ui.model.FilterOperator.EQ, sQuery);
aFilters.push(filter);
}
// update list binding
var list = this.byId("orderTable");
var binding = list.getBinding("items");
binding.filter(aFilters);
}
View code:
Label class="sapUiMediumMarginTop" text="Unique Id"
SearchField width="150px" class="sapUiSmallMargin" liveChange="onSearch"
Please suggest me if I am missing anything.
Maybe this example can help you out? I tested your code with some random data and it worked for me.
onSearch: function(oEvent) {
var sQuery = oEvent.getParameter("query");
var oFilter1 = new Filter("Name", FilterOperator.Contains, sQuery);
var oFilter2 = new Filter("Age", FilterOperator.Contains, sQuery);
var arrFilter = new Filter([oFilter1, oFilter2], false);
// filter binding
var oList = this.byId("idList");
var oBinding = oList.getBinding("items");
oBinding.filter(arrFilter);
},
I have created SAPUI5 application, in that I have loaded data from external .xml file into a table, it was fine. Now, I am trying to delete a specific row from that table.
For this purpose, I use this code:
var oModel = new sap.ui.model.xml.XMLModel();
oModel.loadData("Deployments.xml", "", false);
sap.ui.getCore().setModel(oModel);
oTable.bindRows("/service"); // here "service" is the root element of xml file
var oTable = new sap.ui.commons.Button({
text: "Delete Service",
press: function() {
var idx = oTable.getSelectedIndex();
if (idx !== -1) {
var m = oTable.getModel();
var data = m.getData();
var removed = data.splice(idx, 1); // error showing at this line
m.setData(data);
sap.m.MessageToast.show(JSON.stringify(removed[0]) + 'is removed');
} else {
sap.m.MessageToast.show('Please select a row');
}
}
});
But, I am getting error at the line: var removed = data.splice(idx, 1);. However, the same code is good for when model is JSON. How can I delete a specific row from a table when model XMLModel?
It is a lot easier an more reliable to use a Bindings BindingPath to manipulate data belonging to a particular binding. Here is your adapted sample for a XMLModel:
press: function() {
var iIdx = oTable.getSelectedIndex();
var sPath = oTable.getContextByIndex(iIdx).getPath();
var oObj = oTable.getModel().getObject(sPath);
oObj.remove();
oTable.getModel().refresh();
}
This way you save the hazzle of dealing with the XML structure and furthermore this will scale with any change in the binding path you might introduce in the future.
BR
Chris
var data = m.getData();
data is not an Array. It is a XML document.
To remove an entry from the document:
var root = data.childNodes[0];
var aEntry = root.getElementsByTagName("entry");
root.removeChild(aEntry[idx]);
SO follow this example
example and how make a fake DBContex For test my test using just this work fine
[Test]
public void CiudadIndex()
{
var ciudades = new FakeDbSet<Ciudad>
{
new Ciudad {CiudadId = 1, EmpresaId =1, Descripcion ="Santa Cruz", FechaProceso = DateTime.Now, MarcaBaja = null, UsuarioId = 1},
new Ciudad {CiudadId = 2, EmpresaId =1, Descripcion ="La Paz", FechaProceso = DateTime.Now, MarcaBaja = null, UsuarioId = 1},
new Ciudad {CiudadId = 3, EmpresaId =1, Descripcion ="Cochabamba", FechaProceso = DateTime.Now, MarcaBaja = null, UsuarioId = 1}
};
//// Create mock unit of work
var mockData = new Mock<IContext>();
mockData.Setup(m => m.Ciudades).Returns(ciudades);
// Setup controller
var homeController = new CiudadController(mockData.Object);
// Invoke
var viewResult = homeController.Index();
var ciudades_de_la_vista = (IEnumerable<Ciudad>)viewResult.Model;
// Assert..
}
Iam tryign now to use Autofixture-Moq
to create "ciudades" but I cant. I try this
var fixture = new Fixture();
var ciudades = fixture.Build<FakeDbSet<Ciudad>>().CreateMany<FakeDbSet<Ciudad>>();
var mockData = new Mock<IContext>();
mockData.Setup(m => m.Ciudades).Returns(ciudades);
I get this error
Cant convert System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable(FakeDbSet(Ciudad)) to System.Data.Entity.IDbSet(Ciudad)
cant put "<>" so I replace with "()" in the error message
Implementation of IContext and FakeDbSet
public interface IContext
{
IDbSet<Ciudad> Ciudades { get; }
}
public class FakeDbSet<T> : IDbSet<T> where T : class
how can make this to work?
A minor point... In stuff like:
var ciudades_fixture = fixture.Build<Ciudad>().CreateMany<Ciudad>();
The second type arg is unnecessary and should be:
var ciudades_fixture = fixture.Build<Ciudad>().CreateMany();
I really understand why you need a FakeDbSet and the article is a bit TL;DR... In general, I try to avoid faking and mucking with ORM bits and instead dealing with interfaces returning POCOs to the max degree possible.
That aside... The reason the normal syntax for initialising the list works is that there is an Add (and IEnumerable) in DBFixture. AutoFixture doesn't have a story for that pattern directly (after all it is compiler syntactic sugar and not particularly amenable to reflection or in line with any other conventions) but you can use AddManyTo as long as there is an ICollection in play. Luckily, within the impl of FakeDbSet as in the article, the following gives us an in:-
public ObservableCollection<T> Local
{
get { return _data; }
}
As ObservableCollection<T> derives from ICollection<T>, you should be able to:
var ciudades = new FakeDbSet<Cuidad>();
fixture.AddManyTo(ciudades.Local);
var mockData = new Mock<IContext>();
mockData.Setup(m => m.Ciudades).Returns(ciudades);
It's possible to wire up a customization to make this prettier, but at least you have a way to manage it. The other option is to have something implement ICollection (or add a prop with a setter taking IEnumerable<T> and have AF generate the parent object, causing said collection to be filled in.
Long superseded side note: In your initial question, you effectively have:
fixture.Build<FakeDbSet<Ciudad>>().CreateMany()
The problem becomes clearer then - you are asking AF to generate Many FakeDbSet<Ciudad>s, which is not what you want.
I haven't used AutoFixture in a while, but shouldn't it be:
var ciudades = new FakeDbSet<Ciudad>();
fixture.AddManyTo(ciudades);
for the moment I end doing this, I will keep reading about how use automoq, cause I'm new in this
var fixture = new Fixture();
var ciudades_fixture = fixture.Build<Ciudad>().CreateMany<Ciudad>();
var ciudades = new FakeDbSet<Ciudad>();
foreach (var item in ciudades_fixture)
{
ciudades.Add(item);
}
var mockData = new Mock<IContext>();
fixture.Create<Mock<IContext>>();
mockData.Setup(r => r.Ciudades).Returns(ciudades);
I'm trying to call a stored procedure from EntityFramework which uses Table-value parameter.
But when I try to do function import I keep getting a warning message saying -
The function 'InsertPerson' has a parameter 'InsertPerson_TVP' at
parameter index 0 that has a data type 'table type' which is currently
not supported for the target .NET Framework version. The function was
excluded.
I did a initial search here and found few posts which says It's possible in EntityFrameWork with some work arounds and few saying it's not supported in current versions.
Does any one know a better approach or solution for this problem?
I ended up doing this, Please note we are working on EF DataContext(not ObjectContext)
Executing a Stored procedure with output parameter
using (DataContext context = new DataContext())
{
////Create table value parameter
DataTable dt = new DataTable();
dt.Columns.Add("Displayname");
dt.Columns.Add("FirstName");
dt.Columns.Add("LastName");
dt.Columns.Add("TimeStamp");
DataRow dr = dt.NewRow();
dr["Displayname"] = "DisplayName";
dr["FirstName"] = "FirstName";
dr["LastName"] ="LastName";
dr["TimeStamp"] = "TimeStamp";
dt.Rows.Add(dr);
////Use DbType.Structured for TVP
var userdetails = new SqlParameter("UserDetails", SqlDbType.Structured);
userdetails.Value = dt;
userdetails.TypeName = "UserType";
////Parameter for SP output
var result = new SqlParameter("ResultList", SqlDbType.NVarChar, 4000);
result.Direction = ParameterDirection.Output;
context.Database.ExecuteSqlCommand("EXEC UserImport #UserDetails, #ResultList OUTPUT", userdetails, result);
return result == null ? string.Empty : result.Value.ToString();
}
My Table-Value-Parameter (UDT Table) script looks like this:
CREATE TYPE [dbo].[UserType] AS TABLE (
[DisplayName] NVARCHAR (256) NULL,
[FirstName] NVARCHAR (256) NULL,
[LastName] NVARCHAR (256) NULL,
[TimeStamp] DATETIME NULL
)
And my store procedure begins like
CREATE PROCEDURE UserImport
-- Add the parameters for the stored procedure here
#UserDetails UserType Readonly,
#ResultList NVARCHAR(MAX) output
AS
For Stored procedure without output parameter we don't need any ouput parameter added/passed to SP.
Hope it helps some one.
Perhaps we could also consider the SqlQuery method:
[Invoke]
public SomeResultType GetResult(List<int> someIdList)
{
var idTbl = new DataTable();
idTbl.Columns.Add("Some_ID");
someIdList.ForEach(id => idTbl.Rows.Add(id));
var idParam = new SqlParamter("SomeParamName", SqlDbType.Structured);
idParam.TypeName = "SomeTBVType";
idParam.Value = idTbl;
// Return type will be IEnumerable<T>
var result = DbContext.Database.SqlQuery<SomeResultType>("EXEC SomeSPName, #SomeParamName", idParam);
// We can enumerate the result...
var enu = result.GetEnumerator();
if (!enu.MoveNext()) return null;
return enu.Current;
}
var detailTbl = new DataTable();
detailTbl.Columns.Add("DetailID");
detailTbl.Columns.Add("Qty");
txnDetails.ForEach(detail => detailTbl.Rows.Add(detail.DetailID, detail.Qty));
var userIdParam = new System.Data.SqlClient.SqlParameter("#UserID", SqlDbType.Int);
userIdParam.Value = 1;
var detailParam = new System.Data.SqlClient.SqlParameter("#Details", SqlDbType.Structured);
detailParam.TypeName = "DetailUpdate";
detailParam.Value = detailTbl;
var txnTypeParam = new System.Data.SqlClient.SqlParameter("#TransactionType", SqlDbType.VarChar);
txnTypeParam.Value = txnType;
var result = await db.Database.ExecuteSqlCommandAsync("MySP #UserID, #Details, #TransactionType", userIdParam, detailParam, txnTypeParam);
if(result >= 0)
return StatusCode(HttpStatusCode.OK);
else
return StatusCode(HttpStatusCode.InternalServerError);