in one of my scene I have
<div id='MenuList'></div>
then I add list to it like this:
$('#MainListTitles').sfList({
data : [ 'AAA', 'BBBB', 'CCC']
});
How can I customize colors and height of each list item ?? I tried in css like this:
#MenuList.sf-ui-list {height: 333px; text-align: right; background-color:#ffffff} - works
#MenuList.sf-ui-list-item {background-color:#000000} - not working
First of all, "#MenuList.sf-ui-list-item" would never work, because you don't have the same element with id "MenuList" and class "sf-ui-list-item". This is basic css. Correct usage would be "#MenuList .sf-ui-list-item".
On the other hand, Samsung does a very lousy job with it's SmartTV SDK. It's so bad that it looks like they don't even want people to develop apps for it.
According to the API doc, you should indeed style class "sf-ui-list-item", but if you run your project with "Debug Samsung Smart TV App using Web Inspector" you can see that they use class "sf-ui-list-blured".
So, logical step would be to style:
#MenuList .sf-ui-list-blured { ... }
I would recommend that you maybe create your own styles and pass them as 3 parameters in ".sfList" command (classes: focusCssClass, blurCssClass and selectCssClass as stated in API doc).
Related
The browser version is Chrome 87.0.4280.88
Here is how I accidentally detected this bug:
There are two independent divs on the page and both are position: fixed;
One of them has a hover effect with which its mix-blend-mode is changed.
The other one has glassmorphism style on it with backdrop-filter: blur(...px);
The filter works only when the other element on the page is set to mix-blend-mode: normal; otherwise it looks like as if it was not supported.
I am going to quit using that hover effect for now anyway but if there is a trick then it would be nice to let the world know about it.
Came across this bug as well (Chrome 90).
Quick Fix:
Add any backdrop-filter rule to the same element that has the mix-blend-mode rule applied.
Example:
.blend {
mix-blend-mode: difference;
backdrop-filter: opacity(1); /* fixes the chrome-bug */
}
The previous solution also worked for me (Chrome 93). Although I've had to wrap my element inside another and apply the mix-blend-mode to it to make it work like so:
.wrapper {
mix-blend-mode: multiply;
}
.blend {
backdrop-filter: opacity(1);
}
Save me a lot of hours. Thanks a bunch!
I'm creating an electron-app that uses Microsoft fluent-ui lib. I have added the reference #fluentui/react": "^7.107.1 to the package.json file. When I then create a Dropdown like this
<Dropdown
label='Time zone'
onChange={(e, option) => this.updateTimeZone(..)}
/>
The caret with the drop down icon is missing.
When inspecting the element, it seems as the i-tag is empty and does not have the right font applied in the css-class, when compared to examples in the documentation.
Could someone see what I'm doing wrong?
By default, the Fabric icons are not added to your bundle, in order to save bytes for scenarios where you don't care about icons, or you only care about a subset.
To make them available, you may initialize them as such:
import { initializeIcons } from 'office-ui-fabric-react/lib/Icons';
initializeIcons(/* optional base url */);
Is there currently any way I can create an extension that applies a text decorator above or below the specified range which I can use to supply any HTML/CSS visual I want?
I'm still working through the API and my guess is either no, or not directly via the extensions API.
It depends on what types of decorations you are talking about. Since you used the words "text decorator" then I'm going to assume you're talking about the decoration API described here.
As you can see, there are several css properties that they officially support, but none of them "arbitrary css".
What I've done, though, in my vscode dimmer extension, is apply an opacity style using this technique:
dimDecoration = vscode.window.createTextEditorDecorationType(<vscode.DecorationRenderOptions> {
textDecoration: `none; opacity: ${opacity / 100}`
});
When vscode sees this, it basically adds text-decoration: none; opacity: 1 to the stylesheet.This allows me to use arbitrary styling.
The above snippet creates a "Decoration" which can then be applied to ranges as shown below.
function dimEditor(editor: vscode.TextEditor) {
if (!dimDecoration) return;
let startPosition = new vscode.Position(0, 0)
let endPosition = new vscode.Position(editor.document.lineCount, Number.MAX_VALUE);
editor.setDecorations(dimDecoration, [new vscode.Range(startPosition, endPosition)]);
}
Disclaimer: Of course, this isn't officially supported and they could change the way they process the arguments to stop at the first ; and anybody using this workaround would have a broken extension.
Edit:
If you're wanting to have a "hover" behavior, there is the HoverProvider api. It can take a "marked string" which is essentially markdown, and display it. This extension uses it to display img previews on hover.
If markdown will meet your needs you can try that, otherwise you can try with arbitrary HTML and see if it accepts that.
Hi I have several js/mootools code in a coffee file that I want to combine together as in
$$("#head").setStyle('border-right-color','#e64626');
$$("#head").setStyle('background','#e64626');
$$("#console").setStyle('border-right-color','#e64626');
$$("#console").setStyle('background','#e64626');
Is it possible to combine this into one line?
Although what #sergio gave you is the correct answer and what you wanted, it's probably the wrong thing to do (though his answer is not at fault, its the question that is off).
Setting element inline styles in JavaScript for effects is just not a very good practice. It has its uses in animation/fx but this does not seem to be the case. The reason is that it breaks cascading due to the high specificity and makes it much more difficult to revert, control or change afterwards. It also makes it harder to skin and restyle your app as there's a clear lack of separation of concerns, style in code is rigid.
You need to solve this via CSS
scenario 1: static, non mutable - not very good due to use of ID rather than classes but:
#head, #console {
border-right-color: #e6426;
background-color: #e6426;
}
scenario 2: dynamic, need to differentiate elements on some event such as click, focus, mouseover - though you can solve most of these with pseudos like :focus or :hover, then abstract this into a class:
css:
.highlight-red {
border-right-color: #e6426;
background-color: #e6426;
}
javascript:
var els = $$('#head,#console');
// on whatever event...
els.addClass('highlight-red');
// ... later
els.removeClass('highlight-red');
you will thank yourself later or your successor will or your client, whatever. this has the added benefit that next time you need to change styling or add more rules to differentiate, you have one place to go to. you can even add transitions / animation effects for evergreen browsers.
You can use setStyles() and pass it a object. You can also use , in the string you pass to $$ to select multiple elements. So it would result into:
$$("#head, #console").setStyles({
'border-right-color': '#e64626',
'background': '#e64626'
});
jsFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/sevvtsx0/
React Developer Tools give a lot of power to inspect the React component tree, and look at props, event handlers, etc. However, what I'd really like to do is to be able to inspect those data structures in the browser console.
In chrome I can play with the currently selected DOM element in the console using $0. Is there a way to extract React component info from $0, or is it possible to do something similar with the React Dev Tools?
Using React Developer Tools you can use $r to get a reference to the selected React Component.
The following screenshot shows you that I use React Developer Tools to select a component (Explorer) which has a state-object callednodeList. In the console I can now simply write $r.state.nodeList to reference this object in the state. Same works with the props (eg.: $r.props.path)
An answer to your question can be found here in a similar question I asked:
React - getting a component from a DOM element for debugging
I'm providing an answer here because I don't have the necessary reputation points in order to mark as duplicate or to comment above.
Basically, this is possible if you are using the development build of react because you can leverage the TestUtils to accomplish your goal.
You need to do only two things:
Statically store the root level component you got from React.render().
Create a global debug helper function that you can use in the console with $0 that accesses your static component.
So the code in the console might look something like:
> getComponent($0).props
The implementation of getComponent can use React.addons.TestUtils.findAllInRenderedTree to search for match by calling getDOMNode on all the found components and matching against the passed in element.
Open console (Firefox,Chrome) and locate any reactjs rendered DOM element or alternatively execute js script to locate it:
document.getElementById('ROOT')
Then check for element properties in object property viewer for attributes with name beginning like '__reactInternalInstace$....' expand _DebugOwner and see stateNode.
The found stateNode will contain (if it has) 'state' and 'props' attributes which is used heavily in reactjs app.
Though the accepted answer works, and is a great method, in 2020 you can now do a lot of inspection without using the $r method. The Components tab of React DevTools will show you props and detailed state when you select the relevant component (make sure you're on the right level), as well as let you do other things like suspend it or inspect the matching DOM element (little icons in the top right).
Assign the state or prop object to the window object:
window.title = this.state.title
And then from the dev tools console you can try different methods on the exposed object such as:
window.title.length
8
You can attach a reference to the window object like
import { useSelector } from "react-redux";
function App() {
// Development only
window.store = useSelector((state) => state);
return (
<div className="App">
</div>
);
}
export default App;
Then access it from the console
store
{states: {…}}
states:
someProperty: false
[[Prototype]]: Object
[[Prototype]]: Object
[Console][1]
[1]: https://i.stack.imgur.com/A4agJ.png