I'm automating an app that shows some overlay messages anywhere on the app for several scenarios, such as app installed for the first time etc. (I'm fairly new to Robotium too.)
The overlay displays a text that goes away by swiping or clicking on it. Also, there are different types of these overlays with different unique text on it. (let's call it Activity A)
I wanted to create a robust test case that handles this case gracefully. From the test's perspective we won't know that the activity A will be present all the time. But I want to recover from the scenario if it does, by writing a method that I can call any time. Currently, the tearDown method gets called since my expected activity name doesn't match.
Also, even if the activity A exists, there are other predefined overlay texts too. So, if I use solo.waitForText("abc") to check for text "abc", I may see the overlay 2 with the text "pqr" instead.
So I was looking for a way to automate this, and I can't use solo.assertCurrentActivity() or solo.waitForActivity methods as they just stop the execution after the first failure.
So any guidance is appreciated!
All the waitFor methods return a boolean. So you can use waitForActivity() exactly as you want to. If the Activity doesn't exist it will return false.
You can check which Activity is current:
Activity current = solo.getCurrentActivity();
Related
I have a game app that, once completed, gives the option to restart. Instead of restarting each method, variable, class, etc separately, I was hoping I could just restart the whole app with the click of a button. Is there a method in swift/xcode to do this?
Thanks!
No, there's not. Best way is to set up an architecture where it's easy to reset everything because all of your state is stored in one place.
For example, inside your AppDelegate/SceneDelegate (whichever architecture you're using), you could have a GameState object that controls all aspects of the game, either by directly holding all of the properties or at least being the common ancestor of everything. Then, when it's time to reset, just create a new instance of GameState().
I want to use an editor to display a log from a program, I just need a very basic text field:
With a vertical scrollbar
With a contextual menu for copy/paste
Prevent the user from changing the text
In order to activate the copy/paste menu, I use the class racket:text% from framework rather than the basic one.
How to prevent the user from changing the text?
I read the documentation, as far as I understand the closest thing I found is lock method:
https://docs.racket-lang.org/gui/editor___.html?q=lock#%28meth._%28%28%28lib._mred%2Fmain..rkt%29._editor~3c~25~3e%29._lock%29%29
But it is not convenient, as it also prevent my program to write the data.
I also find get-read-write? but cannot find set-read-write.
Use the lock method, and just unlock the editor around any modifications that you want to do. You may find it useful to write a call-with-unlock helper function or with-unlock macro.
If you do your updates from the eventspace's handler thread (and you probably should; use queue-callback if they originate from another thread), then as long as you re-lock the editor at the end of an update, the user will never be able to interact with the unlocked editor.
I'm still pretty new to scripting in Unity3D, and I'm following along with a tutorial that uses GUI.Button() to draw a button on the screen.
I am intrigued by how this function works. Looking through the documentation, the proper use of GUI.Button is to invoke the function in an if statement and put the code to be called when the button is pushed within the if statement's block.
What I want to know is, how does Unity3D "magically" delay the code in the if statement until after the button is clicked? If it was being passed in as a callback function or something, then I could understand what was going on. Perhaps Unity is using continuations under the hood to delay the execution of the code, but then I feel like it would cause code after the if statement to be executed multiple times. I just like to understand how my code is working, and this particular function continues to remain "magical" to me.
I don't know if it's the right term, but I usually refer to such system as immediate mode GUI.
how does Unity3D "magically" delay the code in the if statement until
after the button is clicked?
GUI.Button simply returns true if a click event happened inside the button bounds during last frame. Basically calling that function you are polling: every frame for every button asking the engine if an event which regards that button (screen area) is happened.
If it was being passed in as a callback function or something, then I
could understand what was going on
You are probably used to an MVC like pattern, where you pass a controller delegate that's called when an UI event is raised from the view. This is something really different.
Perhaps Unity is using continuations under the hood to delay the
execution of the code, but then I feel like it would cause code after
the if statement to be executed multiple times.
No. The function simply returns immediately and return true only if an event happened. If returns false the code after the if won't be executed at all.
Side notes:
That kind of system is hard to maintain, especially for complex structured GUI.
It has really serious performance implications (memory allocation, 1 drawcall for UI element)
Unless you are writing an editor extension or custom inspector code, I'd stay away from it. If you want to build a menu implement your own system or use an external plugin (there are several good ones NGUI, EZGUI,..).
Unity has already announced a new integrated UI System, it should be released soon.
Good question. The unity3d gui goes through several event phases, or in the documentation
Events correspond to user input (key presses, mouse actions), or are UnityGUI layout or rendering events.
For each event OnGUI is called in the scripts; so OnGUI is potentially called multiple times per frame. Event.current corresponds to "current" event inside OnGUI call."
In OnGUI you can find out which event is currently happening with >Event.current
The following events are processed link:
Types of UnityGUI input and processing events.
-MouseDown
-MouseUp,mouse button was released
-MouseMove,Mouse was moved (editor views only)
-MouseDrag,Mouse was dragged
-KeyDown, A keyboard key was pressed
-KeyUp A keyboard key was released.
-ScrollWheel The scroll wheel was moved.
-Repaint A repaint event. One is sent every frame.
-Layout A layout event.
-DragUpdated Editor only: drag & drop operation updated.
-DragPerform Editor only: drag & drop operation performed.
-DragExited Editor only: drag & drop operation exited.
-Ignore Event should be ignored.
-Used Already processed event.
-ValidateCommand Validates a special command (e.g. copy & paste).
-ExecuteCommand Execute a special command (eg. copy & paste).
-ContextClick User has right-clicked (or control-clicked on the mac).
Unity GUI has much improved lately and is quite usefull if you want to handle things programmatically. If you want to handle things visually, i recommend looking at the plugins heisenbug refers to.
If you decide to use unity gui, i recommend using only one object with ongui, and let this object handle all your gui.
I am working on a large (>30k lines) event-driven app. I have a sequence of inputs that produces a bug. What I want to do is to break as soon as the final input enters my code.
Is there a general way to do that?
I understand that for any specific sequence of inputs, I can find out where that last input is going to enter my code, then set a breakpoint there. What I would like to do is take out the step of "find out where that last input enters my code." In other words, I am running the app in the simulator, and I want to set a flag somewhere that says "break the next time you are going to enter non-system Objective C code." Then I send the event that causes the problem.
I understand what you are asking, but have you tried using an Exception Breakpoint? This will basically act like an auto-inserted breakpoint on the piece of code that throws the exception. If that doesn't work for you, try a symbolic breakpoint
If you want to intercept UI events, you can try subclassing UIWindow and overriding its sendEvent: method, then setting this class as the class of the UIWindow object in your main XIB file. sendEvent: will be called each time the user generates a touch event. Unfortunately, at this point you cannot yet know which UI object will finally consume the event (read: which event handler code will be ultimately called) since that depends on the actual state of the responder chain. But anyway, you can use this method to inject events into the system.
My application is using workflow designer rehosting to let end-users develop workflows. I have an Activity available that requires the user set some state. To accomplish this, in the designer I override Initialize(Activity) and show a form which I then use to set values in my Activity. This is for setting the state when the Activity is initially added. I also have a double click event handler in the designer in case they need to edit that state later.
I now have a situation where, depending on the values in the form, I may need to add or remove a child activity. I've been successful in adding the activity, but not always in getting it to show up in the designer.
When Initialize is called, there are no child activities. I may need to add a child Activity. At this point, it works fine and shows up in the designer. The problem happens when they edit it later by double clicking. In my designer, I override OnActivityChanged to detect this. I make the same call to add a child, however the designer is not getting updated. Oddly enough, when the situation is such that the child is removed, the view updates fine.
Stepping through with the debugger shows that I am adding a child activity to the Activities collection. Normally when I have problems updating the view, I can make a call to IComponentChangeService.OnComponentChanged, but I can't seem to find a way to make this work.
Any suggestions?
It looks like I needed to use RemoveActivities and InsertActivities in the designer. It seems as if the designer doesn't listen to list change events on the Activities list. Does anyone know if this is how it's supposed to work?
Have you tried this in your OnActivityChanged event handler?
TypeDescriptor.Refresh(e.Activity);
For my situation, I determined I needed to use RemoveActivities and InsertActivities.