In MSSMS you can create scripts for each object in a different file. That's awesome.
But if you want to actually run the scripts, you'll have to determine the order of the scripts or you will run into referential keys.
Is there a way to have the files generated with an ordering number so they can be executed alphabetically?
Alternatively: is there a way to automatically determine the order somehow?
Related
My apologies in advance if this question has already been asked, if so I cannot find it.
So, I have this huge data base divided by country where I need to import from each country data base individually and then, in Power Query, append the queries as one.
When I imported the US files, the Power Query automatically generated a Transform File folder with 4 helper queries:
Then I just duplicated the query US - Sales and named it as UK - Sales pointing it to the UK sales folder:
The Transform File folder didn't duplicate, though.
Everything seems to be working just fine right now, however I'd like to know if this could be problem in the near future, because I still have several countries to go. Should I manually import new queries as new connections instead of just duplicating them or it just doesn't matter?
Many thanks!
The Transform Files Folder group contains the code that is called to transform a list of files. It is re-usable code. You can see the Sample File, which serves as the template for the transform actions.
As long as the file that is arrived at for the Sample File has the same structure as the files that you are feeding into the command, then you can use any query with any list of files.
One thing you need to make sure is that the Sample File is not removed from your data source. You may want to create a new dummy file just for that purpose, make sure it won't be deleted, and then point the Sample File query to pull just that file.
The Transform Helper Queries are special queries that you may edit the queries, but you cannot delete and recreate your own manually. They are automatically created by PQ when combining list of contents and are inherently linked to the parent query.
That said, you cannot replicate them, and must use the Combine function provided by PQ to create the helper queries.
You may however, avoid duplicating the queries, instead replicate your steps in the parent query, and use table union to join the list before combining the contents with the same helper queries.
We have about 200 user define functions in DB2. These UDF are generated by datastudio into a single script file.
When we create a new DB, we need to run the script file several times because some UDF are dependent on other UDF and cannot be create until the precedent functions are created first.
Is there a way to generate a script file so that the order they are deployed take into account this dependency. Or is there some other technique to arrange the order efficiently?
Many thanks in advance.
That problem should only happen if the setting of auto_reval is not correct. See "Creating and maintaining database objects" for details.
Db2 allows to create objects in an "unsorted" order. Only when the object is used (accessed), the objects and its depending objects are checked. The behavior was introduced a long time ago. Only some old, migrated databases keep auto_reval=disabled. Some environments might set it based on some configuration scripts.
if you still run into issues, try setting auto_reval=DEFERRED_FORCE.
The db2look system command can generate DDL by by object creation time with the -ct option, so that can help if you don't want to use the auto_reval method.
Scenario: A computed property needs to available for RAW methods. The IsComputed property set in the model will not work as its value will not be available to RAW methods.
Attempted Solution: Create a computed column directly on the SQL table as opposed to setting the IsComputed property in the model. Specify that CodefluentEntities not overwrite the computed column. I would than expect the BOM to read the computed SQL field no differently than if it was a normal database field.
Problem: I can't figure out how to prevent Codefluent Entities from overwriting the computed column. I attempted to use the production flags as well as setting produce="false" for the property in the .cfp. Neither worked.
Question: Is it possible to prevent Codefluent Entities from overwriting my computed column and if so, how?
The solution youre looking for is here
You can execute whatever custom T-SQL scripts you like, the only premise is to give the script a specific name so the Producer knows when to execute it.
i.e. if you want your custom script to execute after the tables are generated, name your script
after_[ProjectName]_tables.
Save your custom t-sql file alongside the codefluent generated files and build the project.
In my specific case, i had to enable full-text index in one of my table columns, i wrote the SQL script for the functionality, saved it as
`after_[ProjectName]_relations_add`
Heres how they look in my file directory
file directory
Alternate Solution: An alternate solution is to execute the following the TSQL script after the SQL Producer finishes generating.
ALTER TABLE PunchCard DROP COLUMN PunchCard_CompanyCodeCalculated
GO
ALTER TABLE PunchCard
ADD PunchCard_CompanyCodeCalculated AS CASE
WHEN PunchCard_CompanyCodeAdjusted IS NOT NULL THEN PunchCard_CompanyCodeAdjusted
ELSE PunchCard_CompanyCode
END
GO
Additional Configuration Needed to Make Solution Work: In order for this solution to work one must also configure the BOM so that it does not attempt to save the data associated with the computed columns. This can be done through Model using the advanced properties. In my case I selected the CompanyCodeCalculated property. Went to advanced settings. And set the Save setting to False.
Question: Somewhere in the Knowledge Center there is a passing reference on how to automate the execution SQL Scripts after the SQL Producer finishes but I can not find it. Anybody now how this is done?
Post Usage Comments: Just wanted to let people know I implemented this approach and am so far happy with the results.
How to run two sub programs from a main program if both are db2-cobol programs?
My main program named 'Mainpgm1', which is calling my subprograms named 'subpgm1' and 'subpgm2' which are a called programs and I preferred static call only.
Actually, I am now using a statement called package instead of a plan and one member, both in 'db2bind'(bind program) along with one dbrmlib which is having a dsn name.
The main problem is that What are the changes affected in 'db2bind' while I am binding both the db2-cobol programs.
Similarly, in the 'DB2RUN'(run program) too.
Each program (or subprogram) that contains SQL needs to be pre-processed to create a DBRM. The DBRM is then bound into
a PLAN that is accessed by a LOAD module at run time to obtain the correct DB/2 access
paths for the SQL statements it contains.
You have gone from having all of your SQL in one program to several sub-programs. The basic process
remains the same - you need a PLAN to run the program.
DBA's often suggest that if you have several sub-programs containing SQL that you
create PACKAGES for them and then bind the PACKAGES into a PLAN. What was once a one
step process is now two:
Bind DBRM into a PACKAGE
Bind PACKAGES into a PLAN
What is the big deal with PACKAGES?
Suppose you have 50 sub-programs containing SQL. If you create
a DBRM for each of them and then bind all 50 into a PLAN, as a single operation, it is going
to take a lot of resources to build the PLAN because every SQL statement in every program needs
to be analyzed and access paths created for them. This isn't so bad when all 50 sub-programs are new
or have been changed. However, if you have a relatively stable system and want to change 1 sub-program you
end up reBINDing all 50 DBRMS to create the PLAN - even though 49 of the 50 have not changed and
will end up using exactly the same access paths. This isn't a very good apporach. It is analagous to compiling
all 50 sub-programs every time you make a change to any one of them.
However, if you create a PACKAGE for each sub-program, the PACKAGE is what takes the real work to build.
It contains all the access paths for its associated DBRM. Now if you change just 1 sub-program you
only have to rebuild its PACKAGE by rebinding a single DBRM into the PACKAGE collection and then reBIND the PLAN.
However, binding a set of PACKAGES (collection) into a PLAN
is a whole lot less resource intensive than binding all the DBRM's in the system.
Once you have a PLAN containing all of the access paths used in your program, just use it. It doesn't matter
if the SQL being executed is from subprogram1 or subprogram2. As long as you have associated the PLAN
to the LOAD that is being run it should all work out.
Every installation has its own naming conventions and standards for setting up PACKAGES, COLLECTIONS and
PLANS. You should review these with your Data Base Administrator before going much further.
Here is some background information concerning program preperation in a DB/2 environment:
Developing your Application
I have a directory having a number of .sql files.I am able to execute them.But, I want to execute them in certain order.So, for example if I have 4 files xy.sql,dy.sql,trim.sql and see.sql.I want to execute them in see.sql,dy.sql,trim.sql and xy.sql.What happens now is I get a list of files using DirectoryInfo object.Now, I need to sort them using my order.I am using C# 3.5
thanks
It might be better to rename your files so that they sort into the correct order natively. This prevents having to maintain a separate "execution order" list somewhere.
Using a common prefix for the sql file names is a bit self-documenting as well, e.g.
exec1_see.sql
exec2_dy.sql
exec3_trim.sql and
exec4_xy.sql
It's unclear what the ordering algorithm is for your filenames. It doesn't appear to be entirely dictated by the filename (such as alphabetical ordering).
If you have arbitrary order in which you must execute these scripts, I would recommend that you create an additional file which defines that order, and use that to drive the ordering.
If the list of filenames is known at compile time, you could just hard-code that order in your code. I'm assuming, from your question, however, that the set of files is likely to change, and new ones may be added. If that's the case, I refer you to my previous paragraph.
You can obtain a List<string> that consists of all your .sql files, and call the List<T>.sort function to sort it and then operate on the files based on the newly sorted sequence.
number them and use a tool like my SimpleScriptRunner or the Tarantino DB change tool