I have spent all day trying various things and made no progress whatsoever.
I am compiling an rpm package for my application (MyApp.rpm), for RHEL6 64-bit, which requires a third party, 32-bit driver package called aksusbd.rpm. Now, aksusbd.rpm in turn requires compatibility mode, provided on RHEL6 by glibc.i686.rpm.
So somewhere in my spec file for MyApp.rpm I have:
MyApp.spec
Requires: glibc(x86-32)
Requires: aksusbd >= 1.14
What it does during installation (yum install MyApp) is, installs aksusbd first, which fails with no 32-bit compatibility installed. Then just to tease me, immediately after installs glibc. So when its all over I can type
yum install aksusbd
and it works this time because glibc is now installed.
How on earth do I teach it to do better than this!
(growl)
You can follow Aaron's suggestion and tweak the third party RPM you have with rpmrebuild. It allows you to modify the requires spec of the RPM package:
rpmrebuild --package -n --edit-requires <your third party rpm package>
It's a hack but just for the requires tags in the RPM I would not be concerned.
First off I'd suggest putting the requires on the same line. Just separate them with a comma, they should then go in the order you've specified. If it doesn't and you're on RPM version 4.3 or below, you can use the PreReq tag as specified in the rpm.org docs about half way down the page.
If neither of those solutions works, or you are on a version of RPM greater than or equal to 4.4 I would imagine something else is going on that is causing a problem. I'd start by creating a new spec for some 'fake' project that specifically targets the issue of glibc not being installed before aksusbd. If that works we know it's something with your MyApp.spec, if it doesn't work then I'd suggest reviewing the naming convention of glibc, perhaps there is some kind of issue with how it's interpreting your (x86-32).
Sounds like the aksusbd RPM is what needs to be fixed - they need a Requires or Requires(pre) set. File a bug with the driver vendor.
I had exactly the same problem (and same in YUM groups). If Forrest suggestion to put requires in same line works for you, please let us know.
Otherwise, you can try to add an RPM that only requires aksusbd and add it to requires list. If YUM installs dependencies in an Alpha-beta order, name it something between aksusbd and glibc and it might work.
Related
This question is somewhat similar to the one here, but I cannot make it work.
So suppose that I have a set of packages (say 2) to install and I want to use pipenv. If I do pipenv install on the directory with a suitable Pipfile the installation fails because there is some metadata issue when installing one of the libraries (say libX) contained in install_requirements of one of the packages. It seems that the problem can be fixed by downgrading the version of setuptools to <=58.0.0.
OK. Now, if I first install that version of setuptools<=58.0.0 in the venv and then install my packages, everything works fine. The issue is that the Pipenvfile does not respect the order when installing, so something like
[packages]
setuptools = "<=58.0.0"
pckg1 = {<github path 1>}
pckg2 = {<github path 2>}
is not ensured to work. Also, by default the seed packages added to the venv include setuptools==65.6.3.
So the idea is to be able to restrict the version of setuptools that is used to check the metadata of the libraries in libX, to mimic the above scenario in which setuptools was installed first. Is there a way to do that?
I have tried placing setuptools<=58.0.0 at the top of the requirements.txt that defines the install_requirements of the problematic package, but it does not work.
If have also tried to fix or restrict the version of libX contained in that requirements.txt file but, surprisingly, pipenvdoes not seem to care: a verbose install shows that it keeps downgrading libX well below the restriction - "using cached libX-vX.X.X"- until it uses a version for which the metadata generation fails (why on earth does it do that, even if I call it with pipenv --clear install?).
I am a bit lost about what could be the best solution here. Any help would be very appreciated.
Debian Jessie, as well as sid, have a mercurial-git package which contains the hg-git plugin. However, this package was (auto-)removed from Debian Stretch to to a release-critical bug.
But - I need it installed and running. Surely this should be possible, right?
Well, I followed the installation instructions on the plugin page:
I ran apt-get install python-setuptools python-setuptools-git python4-setuptools python3-setuptools-git
I ran easy_install hg-git and it seemed to work
But still, when I run various mercurial operations I get, as the first line, the error message:
*** failed to import extension hgext.git: No module named git
(regardless of whether I'm doing anything git-related or not.)
My questions:
Why is this happening?
What do I need to do in order to make the error message go away while having hggit working?
Now,
How do I correctly install dulwich to get hg-git working on Windows?
Apparently, that critical bug doesn't manifest always (and perhaps only under very specific circumstances), so you can try installing the Debian sid version of the mercurial-git package (that is, version 0.8.11-1 at the time of writing). There's a SuperUser question about how to do this:
https://linuxaria.com/howto/how-to-install-a-single-package-from-debian-sid-or-debian-testing
my personal opinion in this case is to simply install the .deb file, which you can get from here (it's not platform-specific; at the link you'll need to choose a mirror.) That makes the error message go away, at least assuming you have:
[extensions]
hgext.bookmarks =
hggit =
in your ~/.hgrc file.
I can't seem to find anything useful in the man pages etc for this, but it seems like it should be straightforward..?
Our servers are running CentOS 6.8 but also have the Atomic repository for some package versions. The most recent version of one of the packages that Atomic provides seems to be broken, so we've had to do a yum downgrade of that package.
Problem now is that we're running Plesk, which performs automatic Yum updates on a schedule, and the next time this happens, the broken package will just drag back in again!
All I want to do is tell Yum to ignore this specific package version so that it updates the next time there's a newer version, but skips the current.
I found that I can add exclude= lines to yum.conf but I can't seem to find how to define a specific version number in this exclude. It looks like I can only exclude entire package names?
I'm more familiar with Gentoo where we can tell Portage to mask specific versions when problems like this occur. Is this not an option in CentOS?
Much appreciated.
I have created a relocatable RPM using the instructions in this website:
http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/rpm-relocatable-packages/
This means that I can install the package into its default location, /opt/app, using
rpm -ivh mypackage.rpm
However, if I decide that I weant the package to be installed into /usr/local/bin instead, I can install it using:
rpm -ivh --prefix=/usr/local/bin mypackage.rpm
All of this works perfectly. However, I need to install the package via Yum. How do I pass the --prefix argument to Yum?
I don't believe this is possible and a quick online search seems to concur. Including this mailing list thread from 2007. The point that Seth Vidal makes in his reply is, I think, the main one. Relocations cause problems for file-based dependency tracking which, at least at the time, nothing bothered to handle.
That being said I think the utility of relocatable RPMs is likely not very high as building one that functions correctly is difficult as not being able to depend on file locations makes many (normally trivial) programmatic operations quite difficult.
I was using ubuntu 12.04 until 12.10 was released. I used ubuntu for software development and after installing 12.10, i noticed that the perl version (5.14) shipped with 12.10 does not include the Switch.pm module needed while building WebKiT-GTK.
Looking around on the internet i found few suggestions indicating that i should install something call p5-switch from something called ports. I have looked around and was not able to get this done. I am not a perl guy and have no idea where i can get this package.
Can someone please help me as to
1. Where to download the package for ubuntu 12.10
2. In case it is not a .deb, How do i install it.
OR
1. At least be able to downgrade the perl installation to something lower than 5.14
Thanks and Regards
~Sameer
sudo apt-get install libswitch-perl
will install it for you.
"ports" is a *BSD packaging system of sorts, not what you should be looking for.
You can find what package has a particular perl module by going to packages.ubuntu.com, entering Module/Name.pm (in this case, Switch.pm) in the "Search the contents of packages" form and checking "packages that contain files whose names end with the keyword" and selecting the desired distribution, then making sure you ignore false hits like CGI/Switch.pm in the results. Debian has the identical search for its packages at packages.debian.org.
(Note that Switch.pm has serious limitations, was never really intended to be used in production, and should certainly not be used in new code.)
Do make sure you've checked properly that there isn't the Switch module available via apt. If it is available, that's the one you want.
No, then you've two options the longer, correct way and a shorter way that's not quite as clean.
1. Longer
Install cpanm and perlbrew with apt. The perlbrew tool lets you install a complete version of Perl from scratch in a separate directory. Set up a user for your webkit building, run perlbrew as that user, install your perl. Then, use cpanm to install required modules and you are done. A bit of googling will get you step-by-step examples of how to use these tools. If anything goes badly wrong, you can just delete all the files in that user's home directory and start again - all you waste is a little time.
The reason experienced Perl people prefer this is that it keeps the perl you want for webkit-gtk separate from your system perl that ubuntu's packages will expect to be unchanged from the one they ship.
2. Shorter
Install cpanm with apt. As root, run "cpanm Switch" and it will install the Switch.pm package and any dependencies. It will also upgrade any already installed packages it thinks it needs to. This last step is why this option isn't ideal. In the (rare) case when the update isn't compatible with something else on your system uninstalling is fiddly.