matlab function for sum of n number of input? - matlab

I am new to matlab. This might be a silly question.
The problem says:
Write a function sum_var which takes variable number of scalar inputs & returns their sum
E.g.
sum_var(2,4,6)
ans =
16
I tried varargin,nargin however i cant manipulate those commands to get a desired output.

If you want to have a function that takes several scalar inputs and give you their sum, then do the following:
function result = sum_var(varargin)
result = sum(cell2mat(varargin));
end
The problem you have is that varargin is a cell array and you have to transform it to a matrix array (using cell2mat()) before using the sum() function on it.

Related

Vectorization of function in Matlab

I'm trying to vectorize one function in Matlab, but I have a problem with assigning values.
function [val] = clenshaw(coeffs,x)
b=zeros(1,length(coeffs)+2);
for k=length(coeffs):-1:2
b(k)=coeffs(k)-b(k+2)+2*b(k+1).*x;
end
val=coeffs(1)-b(3)+b(2).*x;
The purpose of this function is to use Clenshaw's algorithm to compute a value of one polynomial with coefficients "coeffs" at point x.
It work fine when x is a single value, but I'd like it to work with vector of arguments too.
When I try to pass a vector I get an error:
Unable to perform assignment because the left
and right sides have a different number of
elements.
Error in clenshaw (line 7)
b(k)=coeffs(k)-b(k+2)+2*b(k+1).*x;
I understand that there is a problem, because I'm trying to assign vector to a scalar variable b(k).
I tried making b a matrix instead of a vector, however I still cannot get the return output I'd like to have which would be a vector of values of this function at points from vector x.
Thank you for helping and sorry if something isn't entirely clear, because English is not my native language.
The vectorized version of your function looks like this:
function [val] = clenshaw(coeffs,x)
b=zeros(length(x),length(coeffs)+2);
for k=length(coeffs):-1:2
b(:,k)=coeffs(k)-b(:,k+2)+2*b(:,k+1).*transpose(x);
end
val=coeffs(1)-b(:,3)+b(:,2).*transpose(x);
end
b needs to be a matrix. In your loop, you have to perform every operation per row of b. So you need to write b(:,k) instead of b(k). Since b(:,k) is a vector and not a scalar, you also have to be careful with the dimensions when using the .* operator. To get the correct results, you need to transpose x. The same goes for the calculation of val. If you don't like the transposition, just swap the rows and cols of b and you get this:
function [val] = clenshaw(coeffs,x)
b=zeros(length(coeffs)+2, length(x));
for k=length(coeffs):-1:2
b(k,:)=coeffs(k)-b(k+2,:)+2*b(k+1,:).*x;
end
val=coeffs(1)-b(3,:)+b(2,:).*x;
end
However, the first version returns a column vector and the second a row vector. So you might need to transpose the result if the vector type is important.

Generalise calling of Matlab function with generic number of inputs

Suppose I have a pre-built Matlab function
function A=f(varagin)
...
end
I call f.m in a file main.m.
When calling f.m, the inputs to include depend on the number of columns of two matrices X and Y.
For example, if
d=2;
X=randn(4,d);
Y=randn(4,d);
then
A=f(X(:,1),X(:,2),Y(:,1),Y(:,2));
If
d=3;
X=randn(4,d);
Y=randn(4,d);
then
A=f(X(:,1),X(:,2),X(:,3),Y(:,1),Y(:,2),Y(:,3));
If
d=4;
X=randn(4,d);
Y=randn(4,d);
then
A=f(X(:,1),X(:,2),X(:,3),X(:,4),Y(:,1),Y(:,2),Y(:,3),Y(:,4));
Could you help me to generalise the calling of f.m in main.m with any d?
The answer is more or less identical to that of your previous question about indexing:
args = {arg1, arg2, arg3};
f(args{:});
args{:} generates a comma-separated list of its elements, which is thus equivalent to using each of its elements as an argument to the function.
To convert the columns of a numeric matrix to a cell array, use mat2cell.

MATLAB cell array of function handles - How does it work?

I am trying to understand the following commands of a MATLAB script :
global operatorObj
calcEVR_handles = operatorObj.calcEVR_handles;
m = operatorObj.nInputs
E = zeros(m,1);
V = zeros(m,1);
R = zeros(m,m);
for i=1:m
[E(i), V(i), R(i,i)] = calcEVR_handles{i}(t,x);
end
What can calcEVR_handles be, if t is a float and x is a vector?
calcEVR_handles (to me) looks like a cell array where each element is a handle to a function. Each element in calcEVR_handles is an anonymous function that takes in a single value t and a single vector x. As such, by doing calcEVR_handles{i}, you would access the corresponding function stored at the ith element in the cell array. Once you have access, you then pass your parameters to this function and it gives you those three outputs.
To show you an example of this working, consider the following cell array that works similarly to calcEVR_handles.
calcCellFunc = {#sin, #cos, #tan};
This is a three element cell array, where each element is a handle to a function. The # is a special character in MATLAB that denotes that you are creating a handle to a function. It's also used to create anonymous functions, but let's shelve that for this answer. You can read more about it here if you want to delve into more detail regarding this.
Back to our cell array of handles, we will make handles for sin, cos and tan. You can then iterate over your cell array by accessing the function you want by calcCellFunc{idx} where idx is the element you want in the cell array. This will ultimately give you the function stored at index idx. Once you do that, you can then call the function and specify whatever inputs you want (or none if it doesn't take any inputs). Here's a quick example for you. Let's create a random 5 x 5 matrix, and run through each function with this matrix serving as the input. We then take each of these outputs and store them into a corresponding slot in an output cell array. As such:
rng(123); %// Set seed for reproducibility
M = rand(5);
calcCellFunc = {#sin, #cos, #tan};
out = cell(1, numel(calcCellFunc)); %// To store the results for each function
for idx = 1 : numel(calcCellFunc)
out{idx} = calcCellFunc{idx}(M); %// Get the function, then pass
%// the matrix M to it
end
If you want to make things clear, you could split up the out statement to this instead:
func = calcCellFunc{idx}; %// Get access to the function
out{idx} = func(M); %// Pass M to this function
If you're new to handles / anonymous functions, you should probably use the above code first to make it explicitly clear on what MATLAB is doing. You are first getting access to the function you want that is stored in the cell array, and then you pass your arguments to this function.
If we display the output, we get:
>> celldisp(out)
out{1} =
0.6415 0.4106 0.3365 0.6728 0.5927
0.2823 0.8309 0.6662 0.1815 0.7509
0.2249 0.6325 0.4246 0.1746 0.6627
0.5238 0.4626 0.0596 0.5069 0.5737
0.6590 0.3821 0.3876 0.5071 0.6612
out{2} =
0.7671 0.9118 0.9417 0.7398 0.8054
0.9593 0.5564 0.7458 0.9834 0.6604
0.9744 0.7745 0.9054 0.9846 0.7489
0.8518 0.8866 0.9982 0.8620 0.8191
0.7522 0.9241 0.9218 0.8619 0.7502
out{3} =
0.8363 0.4503 0.3573 0.9094 0.7359
0.2942 1.4934 0.8932 0.1845 1.1370
0.2308 0.8167 0.4690 0.1773 0.8850
0.6149 0.5218 0.0597 0.5880 0.7004
0.8761 0.4135 0.4205 0.5884 0.8814
The first element of the output cell array has the output when you pass M to sin, the second when you pass M to cos, and the third when you pass M to tan.
So the next question you're asking... why is this useful?
Point #1 - Nix the copying and pasting
This kind of code writing is very useful because if you want to use the same inputs and supply them to many different functions, we would naturally be inclined to do some copying and pasting. Take each of your function names, and create a single line for each. Each line would call the corresponding function you want, followed by the input arguments. This can become quite tedious, and so one smart way to do it would be to place your function name as a handle into a cell array, and to write one for loop that goes over all of the functions dynamically. You could even explore cellfun and escape using the for loop to iterate over all of the function handles too, but I'll leave that for you to read up on.
In this way, you have very maintainable code and if you want to remove functions that don't need to be run, just remove the handles from the cell array rather than scrolling down to where the line that invokes this function is located and removing that.
This is actually a very common technique in computer science / software engineering in general. In fact, this is actually quite close to what are known as function pointers. This is MATLAB's cheap way of doing it, but the logic behind this is essentially the same.
Point #2 - Higher Order Functions
Another way this is useful is if you have a function where one (or more than one!) of the inputs is a function, and you also specify inputs into this function as additional parameters to this function. This is what is known as a higher order function. The outputs would be based on using this input function, and the additional inputs you specify to it and the outputs are based on using this input function and the inputs you specify for this function.
One very good example is the fzero function in MATLAB. The goal is to find the root of a non-linear function, and the first parameter is a handle to a function that you specify. The base behaviour behind how fzero works is the same no matter what the function is. All you have to do is specify the function you want to solve and the initial guess of where you think this root is.
All in all, anonymous functions are very useful.

Capture all possible outputs based on variable number of inputs.

I would like Matlab to return all the outputs from a variable input function. For instance,
[varargout]=cpd_intersect(varargin{:});
This only returns the last output but I know the function is defined to give multiple outputs.
Instead of defining dummy variables A, B , C etc in [A,B,C...]=pd_intersect(varargin{:}). I would like something like a cell to store all the output values based on the input number of values. I hope this makes sense. Many thanks in advance.
I know this is late, but I think this is what you want:
function [varargout] = myfun(f, varargin)
% apply f to args, and return all its outputs
[ x{1:nargout(f)} ] = f(varargin{:}); % capture all outputs into a cell array
varargout = x; % x{:} now contains the outputs of f
The insight here is that
NARGOUT can operate on functions and returns their maximum number of outputs
using [ X{1:2} ] = ...on the left hand side when X is undefined, is equivalent to doing [ X{1} X{2} ] = ..., and can capture 2 separate outputs into individual variables.
Two points to note:
this works for anonymous functions too! e.g. #(x)eig(x)
it won't work for functions that use varargout, i.e. functions with truly variable numbers of outputs. If this is the case then there should be a way to calculate how many outputs you are going to have, e.g. using nargin.
PS I learnt this from #gnovice, If a MATLAB function returns a variable number of values, how can I get all of them as a cell array?
You can do this by returning a cell array
I see you cannot force a variable comma separated output list in Matlab. Pity. It would be useful. It seems I have to explicitly assign each output. This sucks since I do not know beforehand the number of outputs I will get.

Do values passed into a function update outside the function in Matlab

I'm working in Matlab on using blockproc to process through an image and use NNMF to decompose it into two factor matrices. My question is that if I pass a variable into a function and modify it does this value modify outside the function
eg
function R = addOne (value, value2)
value2 = value2 + 1;
R = value + 1;
end
For example if I call the function above only value+1 will be passed back as the return. If i access the variable I passed in as value2 will it also have increased?
I ask this because blockproc only allows 1 matrix to be returned but I will need to modify two matrices.
In general, Matlab passes variables by value, and not by reference (see also here). This means that a variable passed into a function is basically an independent copy of the variable in the original workspace. Note that handle objects are an exception, but they won't solve your issue.
To solve your problem, you could catenate the two outputs along the third dimension, so that the first plane of the output out(:,:,1) corresponds to the first factor matrix, and the second plane of the output out(:,:,2) corresponds to the second factor matrix.