This question already has answers here:
Compare version numbers in Objective-C
(15 answers)
Closed 9 years ago.
I have two strings, one contains the value "5.2.3" and another one contain a value like "5.2.32". My question is: how to compare these two strings?
if ([string1 integerValue] >= [sting2 integerValue])
{
NSLog(#"process");
}
I tried above line but not got it.
Well correct answer has been already given. Because I have spent my half an hour on it so I don't want to waste it.
-(BOOL)string:(NSString*)str1 isGreaterThanString:(NSString*)str2
{
NSArray *a1 = [str1 componentsSeparatedByString:#"."];
NSArray *a2 = [str2 componentsSeparatedByString:#"."];
NSInteger totalCount = ([a1 count] < [a2 count]) ? [a1 count] : [a2 count];
NSInteger checkCount = 0;
while (checkCount < totalCount)
{
if([a1[checkCount] integerValue] < [a2[checkCount] integerValue])
{
return NO;
}
else if([a1[checkCount] integerValue] > [a2[checkCount] integerValue])
{
return YES;
}
else
{
checkCount++;
}
}
return NO;
}
And you can call this method like this:-
if([self string:str1 isGreaterThanString:str2])
{
NSLog(#"str2 is lower than the str1");
}
else
{
NSLog(#"str1 is lower than the str2");
}
It would appear that what you have here are not really "float" values, but some kind of multi-part "number" (akin to software version numbering?) that is not going to be covered by any of the standard conversions, but will also not compare "correctly" as just simple strings.
First you need to specify exactly what your comparison rules are. For example, I suspect you want something like:
1.2 > 1.1
1.1.1 > 1.1
1.11 > 1.2
1.2.3 > 1.2.2
1.2.22 > 1.2.3
(in other words, split the string up by "."s, and do a numeric comparison on each component). You'll have to decide how you want to handle things like letters, other delimiters, etc. showing up in the input. For example is 1.0b1 > 1.01 ?
Once you settle on the rules, write a method (returning NSComparisonResult) to implement the comparison. If you want to get fancy, you can even define your comparison method in a category on NSString, so you could do things like
if ([string1 mySuperDuperCompareTo:string2] == NSOrderedAscending) {
NSLog(#"%# < %#", string1, string2);
} // ... etc ...
see also How to let the sortedArrayUsingSelector using integer to sort instead of String?
#The Tiger is correct. Sorry to misunderstood your question. I have already mark deleted as my older answer. Here is the updated one.
As there are multiple . (dots) available here is the new solution. This will check value first like 5.2.3 and 5.2.32 are there. Then,
check first value 5 - same
so check next 2 - same
check next 3 and 32 - 32 is larger
also check for the same string as well (Also one of the probability)
Here is the logic - I have not compiled but this is base idea - there might require some correction
// separate from "."
NSArray *arrString1 = [string1 componentSeparatedBy:#"."];
NSArray *arrString2 = [string1 componentSeparatedBy:#"."];
BOOL isString1Bigger = NO; // a variable to check
BOOL isString2Bigger = NO; // a variable to check
// check count to run loop accordingly
if ([arrString1 count] <= [arrString2 count]) {
for (int strVal=0; strVal<[arrString1 count]; strVal++) {
// compare strings value converted into integer format
// when you get larger then break the loop
if([[arrString1 objectAtIndex:strVal] intValue] > [[arrString2 objectAtIndex:strVal] intValue]) {
isString1Bigger = YES;
break;
}
}
if ([arrString1 count] > [arrString2 count]) {
// use arrString2 in loop and isString2Bigger as a mark
}
// if after running both the if condition still require to check if both are same or not, for that,
if ((isString1Bigger == NO) && (isString2Bigger == NO)) {
// same string values
}
There might some modification required to run over. But its the base concept to compare string value provided by you.
Related
This is a simple, odd question...
if(tableViewNum == #"One") {
if ([drinkArray objectAtIndex:0] == currentDate) {
[updatedArray addObject:drinkArray];
NSLog(#"MADE THE ELSE1");
}
NSLog(#"MADE THE ELSE2");
}
else if (tableViewNum == #"Two") {
if ([[drinkArray objectAtIndex:0] isEqualToString:yesterdayDate])
[updatedArray addObject:drinkArray];
} else {
NSLog(#"MADE THE ELSE %#",tableViewNum);
[updatedArray addObject:drinkArray];
}
In the very first if statement I ask if tableViewNum == #"One"
But I don't go in that section of the if statement even though tableViewNum actually does equal #"One"
As you can see the very last NSLog all ways comes out as
MADE THE ELSE One
But if tableViewNum really equaled One it would have gone through the if statement not the else statement code...?????
You can't compare strings with the == operator. Use isEqualToString instead:
if([tableViewNum isEqualToString:#"One"]) {
// etc.
… and the same for the rest of the conditions. You're already doing it right in the second block.
To be more specific, you shouldn't compare ANY objects using ==. This compares just the pointers. Use [obj isEqual: otherObj] or with NSStrings isEqualToString: as described above.
I have this code which works on numbers (distance) which allows me to sort by closest to farthest. However I would like to do something similar but instead sort alphabetically. So I need to sort self.names alphabetically essentially. Also, I'd like to eventually sort self.names alphabetically and if you have identical names then sort those by distance. Is this possible?
- (NSComparisonResult)sortByDistFromVor:(radiostations *)anObject
{
if ([self.distFromVor doubleValue] < [anObject.distFromVor doubleValue]) {
return NSOrderedAscending;
} else if ([self.distFromVor doubleValue] > [anObject.distFromVor doubleValue]) {
return NSOrderedDescending;
}
return NSOrderedSame;
}
String implements a comparison, so the radiostations class (whose name ought to be capitalized by convention) can implement it's name comparison like this:
- (NSComparisonResult)sortByName:(radiostations *)anObject {
return [self.name compare:anObject.name];
}
And to get a secondary sort as you described:
- (NSComparisonResult)sortByNameThenDistance:(radiostations *)anObject {
NSComparisonResult result = [self sortByName:anObject];
return (result == NSOrderedSame)? [self sortByDistFromVor:anObject] : result;
}
I have a string that is being generate from a formula, however I only want to use the string as long as all of its characters are numeric, if not that I want to do something different for instance display an error message.
I have been having a look round but am finding it hard to find anything that works along the lines of what I am wanting to do. I have looked at NSScanner but I am not sure if its checking the whole string and then I am not actually sure how to check if these characters are numeric
- (void)isNumeric:(NSString *)code{
NSScanner *ns = [NSScanner scannerWithString:code];
if ( [ns scanFloat:NULL] ) //what can I use instead of NULL?
{
NSLog(#"INSIDE IF");
}
else {
NSLog(#"OUTSIDE IF");
}
}
So after a few more hours searching I have stumbled across an implementation that dose exactly what I am looking for.
so if you are looking to check if their are any alphanumeric characters in your NSString this works here
-(bool) isNumeric:(NSString*) hexText
{
NSNumberFormatter* numberFormatter = [[[NSNumberFormatter alloc] init] autorelease];
NSNumber* number = [numberFormatter numberFromString:hexText];
if (number != nil) {
NSLog(#"%# is numeric", hexText);
//do some stuff here
return true;
}
NSLog(#"%# is not numeric", hexText);
//or do some more stuff here
return false;
}
hope this helps.
Something like this would work:
#interface NSString (usefull_stuff)
- (BOOL) isAllDigits;
#end
#implementation NSString (usefull_stuff)
- (BOOL) isAllDigits
{
NSCharacterSet* nonNumbers = [[NSCharacterSet decimalDigitCharacterSet] invertedSet];
NSRange r = [self rangeOfCharacterFromSet: nonNumbers];
return r.location == NSNotFound && self.length > 0;
}
#end
then just use it like this:
NSString* hasOtherStuff = #"234 other stuff";
NSString* digitsOnly = #"123345999996665003030303030";
BOOL b1 = [hasOtherStuff isAllDigits];
BOOL b2 = [digitsOnly isAllDigits];
You don't have to wrap the functionality in a private category extension like this, but it sure makes it easy to reuse..
I like this solution better than the others since it wont ever overflow some int/float that is being scanned via NSScanner - the number of digits can be pretty much any length.
Consider NSString integerValue - it returns an NSInteger. However, it will accept some strings that are not entirely numeric and does not provide a mechanism to determine strings which are not numeric at all. This may or may not be acceptable.
For instance, " 13 " -> 13, "42foo" -> 42 and "helloworld" -> 0.
Happy coding.
Now, since the above was sort of a tangent to the question, see determine if string is numeric. Code taken from link, with comments added:
BOOL isNumeric(NSString *s)
{
NSScanner *sc = [NSScanner scannerWithString: s];
// We can pass NULL because we don't actually need the value to test
// for if the string is numeric. This is allowable.
if ( [sc scanFloat:NULL] )
{
// Ensure nothing left in scanner so that "42foo" is not accepted.
// ("42" would be consumed by scanFloat above leaving "foo".)
return [sc isAtEnd];
}
// Couldn't even scan a float :(
return NO;
}
The above works with just scanFloat -- e.g. no scanInt -- because the range of a float is much larger than that of an integer (even a 64-bit integer).
This function checks for "totally numeric" and will accept "42" and "0.13E2" but reject " 13 ", "42foo" and "helloworld".
It's very simple.
+ (BOOL)isStringNumeric:(NSString *)text
{
NSCharacterSet *alphaNums = [NSCharacterSet decimalDigitCharacterSet];
NSCharacterSet *inStringSet = [NSCharacterSet characterSetWithCharactersInString:text];
return [alphaNums isSupersetOfSet:inStringSet];
}
Like this:
- (void)isNumeric:(NSString *)code{
NSScanner *ns = [NSScanner scannerWithString:code];
float the_value;
if ( [ns scanFloat:&the_value] )
{
NSLog(#"INSIDE IF");
// do something with `the_value` if you like
}
else {
NSLog(#"OUTSIDE IF");
}
}
Faced same problem in Swift.
In Swift you should use this code, according TomSwift's answer:
func isAllDigits(str: String) -> Bool {
let nonNumbers = NSCharacterSet.decimalDigitCharacterSet()
if let range = str.rangeOfCharacterFromSet(nonNumbers) {
return true
}
else {
return false
}
}
P.S. Also you can use other NSCharacterSets or their combinations to check your string!
For simple numbers like "12234" or "231231.23123" the answer can be simple.
There is a transformation law for int numbers: when string with integer transforms to int (or long) number and then, again, transforms it back to another string these strings will be equal.
In Objective C it will looks like:
NSString *numStr=#"1234",*num2Str=nil;
num2Str=[NSString stringWithFormat:#"%lld",numStr.longlongValue];
if([numStr isEqualToString: num2Str]) NSLog(#"numStr is an integer number!");
By using this transformation law we can create solution
to detect double or long numbers:
NSString *numStr=#"12134.343"
NSArray *numList=[numStr componentsSeparatedByString:#"."];
if([[NSString stringWithFormat:#"%lld", numStr.longLongValue] isEqualToString:numStr]) NSLog(#"numStr is an integer number");
else
if( numList.count==2 &&
[[NSString stringWithFormat:#"%lld",((NSString*)numList[0]).longLongValue] isEqualToString:(NSString*)numList[0]] &&
[[NSString stringWithFormat:#"%lld",((NSString*)numList[1]).longLongValue] isEqualToString:(NSString*)numList[1]] )
NSLog(#"numStr is a double number");
else
NSLog(#"numStr is not a number");
I did not copy the code above from my work code so can be some mistakes, but I think the main point is clear.
Of course this solution doesn't work with numbers like "1E100", as well it doesn't take in account size of integer and fractional part. By using the law described above you can do whatever number detection you need.
C.Johns' answer is wrong. If you use a formatter, you risk apple changing their codebase at some point and having the formatter spit out a partial result. Tom's answer is wrong too. If you use the rangeOfCharacterFromSet method and check for NSNotFound, it'll register a true if the string contains even one number. Similarly, other answers in this thread suggest using the Integer value method. That is also wrong because it will register a true if even one integer is present in the string. The OP asked for an answer that ensures the entire string is numerical. Try this:
NSCharacterSet *searchSet = [[NSCharacterSet decimalDigitCharacterSet] invertedSet];
Tom was right about this part. That step gives you the non-numerical string characters. But then we do this:
NSString *trimmedString = [string stringByTrimmingCharactersInSet:searchSet];
return (string.length == trimmedString.length);
Tom's inverted character set can TRIM a string. So we can use that trim method to test if any non numerals exist in the string by comparing their lengths.
I have two arrays. One is an array of names and the other is an array made up of strings titled "Yes" or "No". The index path of each name in the "name" array corresponds with the same index path in the "Yes/No" array. For example:
Names Array | Yes/No Array
Person 1 | Yes
Person 2 | No
Person 3 | Yes
What would be the easiest way to look up a person's name (possibly getting the index path of it) and check whether they are "Yes" or "No" in the "Yes/No" array?
Also, I'm not sure if "index path" is the right term to use. If it isn't, I mean the number that an object is in an array.
NSArray has a method called indexOfObject that will return either the lowest index whose corresponding array value is equal to anObject or NSNotFound if no such object is found. If your array of names is unsorted, then use this to get the index that you can then plug in to the Yes/No array. That is, something along these lines:
NSString *answer = nil;
NSUInteger index = [namesArray indexOfObject:#"John Smith"];
if (index != NSNotFound) {
answer = [yesNoArray objectAtIndex:index];
}
return answer;
Because Bavarious asks questions where I assume, here's a better way when the array of names is sorted alphabetically.
int index = [self findName:#"John Smith"];
NSString *answer = nil;
if (index >= 0) {
answer = [yesNoArray objectAtIndex:index];
}
return answer;
where the function findName is a simple binary search:
-(int)findName:(NSString *)name {
int min, mid, max;
NSComparisonResult comparisonResult;
min = 0;
max = [namesArray count]-1;
while (min <= max) {
mid = min + (max-min)/2;
comparisonResult = [name compare:[namesArray objectAtIndex:mid]];
if (comparisonResult == NSOrderedSame) {
return mid;
} else if (comparisonResult == NSOrderedDescending) {
min = mid+1;
} else {
max = mid-1;
}
}
return -1;
}
Trying to keep two arrays synchronized is just asking for trouble. It can be done, of course, but whenever you modify one array, you have to remember to make a corresponding change to the other. Do yourself a favor and avoid that entire class of bugs by rethinking the way you're storing data.
In this case, you've got a {person, boolean} pair. One option is to store each pair as a dictionary, and then keep an array of those dictionaries. This would be a particularly good plan if you might expand the number of pieces of data beyond the two that you have. Another option would be to just use a dictionary where keys are person names and the values are your yes/no values. This makes the answer to your question very simple:
NSString *yesOrNo = [personDictionary objectForKey:personName];
Getting back to your original question, where you still have the two arrays, the easiest thing to do is to iterate over the person array until you find the person you're looking for, get the index of that name, and then look up the corresponding value in the yes/no array:
for (person in peopleArray) {
if ([person isEqualToString:thePersonYoureLookingFor]) {
yesNoValue = [yesNoArray objectAtIndex:[peopleArray indexOfObject:person];
break;
}
}
That's fine if the number of people in the list isn't too large. If the list could be large, then you'll want to keep the person array sorted so that you can do a binary search. The trouble there, though, is that you're yes/no array is separate, so sorting the personArray while keeping the yes/no array in the right order becomes complicated.
You can also use below of the code, May its useful to you,
NSSortDescriptor *_lastDescriptor = [[NSSortDescriptor alloc] initWithKey:#"" ascending:YES];
NSArray *_lastArray = [NSArray arrayWithObject:_lastDescriptor];
firstCharacterArray = (NSMutableArray *)[[nameIndexesDictionary allKeys]
sortedArrayUsingDescriptors:_lastArray];
//firstCharacterArray = (NSMutableArray *)[[nameIndexesDictionary allKeys]
sortedArrayUsingSelector:#selector(localizedCaseInsensitiveCompare:)];
for (NSString *eachlastIndex in firstCharacterArray)
{
NSSortDescriptor *lastDescriptor = [[NSSortDescriptor alloc] initWithKey:#""
ascending:YES];
//selector:#selector(localizedCaseInsensitiveCompare:)] ;
NSArray *descriptorslast = [NSArray arrayWithObject:lastDescriptor];
[[nameIndexesDictionary objectForKey:eachlastIndex]
sortUsingDescriptors:descriptorslast];
[lastDescriptor release];
}
You can use indexOfObject method to get the index of element.
for example
This will give you index of your object
NSInteger index = [yourArray indexOfObject:objectName];
To see the corresponding element from another array
[anotherArray objectAtIndex:index];
This worked for me. Hope this helps.
How would I say that if a UITextField has #"-" in it, do something.
Right now my code is like this. It doesn't seem to work:
if (MyUITextField.text == #"-") {
NSRange range = {0,1};
[a deleteCharactersInRange:range];
MyUITextField.text = MyUILabel.text;
}
I know that I am doing something very wrong with the code. Please help.
try changing == to [MyUITextField.text isEqualToString:#"-"]
as == tests to see if they are the same object, while isEqualToString compares the contents of the strings.
Assuming your string is defined as:
NSString *str = #"foo-bar";
To check if your string contains "-" you can do the following:
if ([str rangeOfString:#"-"].length > 0)
{
NSLog(#"Contains -");
}
It looks like you wanted to delete the first character if a string starts with a given character. In this case you can do something like this:
if ([str hasPrefix:#"f"])
{
NSLog(#"Starts with f");
}