Im developing a chat application with openfire as xmpp server and strophe.js as client library and using ruby on rails on ubuntu.
Problem is that strophe.js connects to the openfire but gives AUTHFAIL status and donot create any users.It always return status 4 (AUTHFAIL).
openfire is running on >> localhost:9090
rails application running on >> localhost:3000
BOSH service running on >> localhost:7070/http-bind/
Code:-
<script>
var BOSH_SERVICE = 'http://localhost:7070/http-bind/';
var connection = null;
jQuery('#connect').click(function(){
connection = new Strophe.Connection(BOSH_SERVICE);
connection.connect($('#enter_id').get(0).value + "#localhost", null, onConnect);
});
function onConnect(status)
{
console.log("status is >> " + status);
if(status == 5){
console.log("inside if status is >> " + Strophe.Status.CONNECTED);
console.log("onConnect >> " + status);
connection.send($pres().tree());
connection.addHandler(notifyUser, null, 'message', "chat");
console.log("onConnect >> handler added");
}
}
function notifyUser(msg)
{
console.log("notifyUser >> " + msg);
// if (msg.getAttribute('from') == "testuser#127.0.0.1/pingstream") {
var elems = msg.getElementsByTagName('body');
var body = elems[0];
jQuery('#chat_msg').append(Strophe.getText(body));
// }
return true;
}
jQuery('#send_msg').click(function(){
var msg_to_send = $msg({
to: jQuery('#send_to').val() + "#localhost",
from: connection.jid,
type: "chat"
}).c("body").t("hi!");
connection.send(msg_to_send.tree());
});
</script>
Plz help.
#amirinder007 You provide wrong servername in your code. I have study your code and find that you provide localhost and 127.0.0.1 instead you write server name(Hostname) that is configured with openfire and you also see on home page of admin console of openfire and its name like Mycomputer-pc as name of personal computer.
The servername provided here is wrong, I guess. Try setting it as the hostname registered with openfire and not localhost.
Related
I am setting up a simple REST Service in ColdFusion 11. The web server is IIS 8.5 on Windows Server 2012R2.
This REST Service needs to be secured to prevent unauthorized users from accessing/writing data. For the time being, there will be only one authorized user, so I want to keep authentication/authorization as simple as possible. My initial thought is to use HTTP BASIC Authentication.
Here's the setup for the REST Service:
Source Directory: C:\web\site1\remoteapi\
REST path: inventory
To implement this, I configured the source directory of the REST Service in IIS to authorize only one user, disable Anonymous authentication, and enable Basic authentication.
When I call the source directory directly in a browser (i.e. http://site1/remoteapi/inventory.cfc?method=read), I am presented with the Basic authentication dialog.
However, when I attempt to request the REST path (http://site1/rest/inventory/), I am not challenged at all.
How can I implement HTTP BASIC authentication on the REST path?
So, due to the need to get this done without much delay, I went ahead and using some principles from Ben Nadel's website, I wrote my own authentication into the onRequestStart() method of the REST Service's Application.cfc. Here is the basic code, though it uses hard-coded values in the VARIABLES scope to validate the username and password and also does not include any actual "authorization" setting:
public boolean function onRequestStart(required string targetPage) {
LOCAL.Response = SUPER.onRequestStart(ARGUMENTS.targetpage);
if (!StructKeyExists(GetHTTPRequestData().Headers, "Authorization")) {
cfheader(
name="WWW-Authenticate",
value="Basic realm=""REST API Access"""
);
LOCAL.RESTResponse = {
status = 401,
content = {Message = "Unauthorized"}
};
restSetResponse(LOCAL.RESTResponse);
}
else {
LOCAL.IsAuthenticated = true;
LOCAL.EncodedCredentials =
GetToken( GetHTTPRequestData().Headers.Authorization, 2, " " );
// Credential string is not Base64
if ( !ArrayLen(
REMatch(
"^([A-Za-z0-9+/]{4})*([A-Za-z0-9+/]{4}|[A-Za-z0-9+/]{3}=|[A-Za-z0-9+/]{2}==)$",
LOCAL.EncodedCredentials
)
)
) {
LOCAL.IsAuthenticated = false;
}
else {
// Convert Base64 to String
LOCAL.Credentials =
ToString(ToBinary( LOCAL.EncodedCredentials ));
LOCAL.Username = GetToken( LOCAL.Credentials, 1, ":" );
LOCAL.Password = GetToken( LOCAL.Credentials, 2, ":" );
if ( LOCAL.Username != VARIABLES.CREDENTIALS.Username
|| LOCAL.Password != VARIABLES.CREDENTIALS.Password
) {
LOCAL.IsAuthenticated = false;
}
}
if (!LOCAL.IsAuthenticated) {
LOCAL.Response = {
status = 403,
content = {Message = "Forbidden"}
};
restSetResponse(LOCAL.Response);
}
}
return LOCAL.Response;
}
I have a cakephp2.3 based project with table name "user_master".
I am using ejabberd chat application and ejabberd user table name is "user".
I am using convers.js client.
Now i am facing problem to use my existing project user with XMPP ejabberd to authenticate , send friend request , chat with friends.
I tried using external auth but it allowed me to login even if I add wrong credentials on ejabberd server using http://localhost:5280/admin link.
I am using Ubuntu and i have add all types of setting.It is working fine if i use it as stand alone application but when i want use it for my existing user it stopped working.
Ejabberd Server : http://localhost:5280/admin
External authentication configuration in "ejabberd.cfg" file.
{auth_method, external}.
{extauth_program, "/etc/ejabberd/auth.php"}.
External authentication file "auth.php".
<?php
require 'ejabberd_external_auth.php';
class Auth extends EjabberdExternalAuth {
protected function authenticate($user, $server, $password) {
$stmt = $this->db()->prepare("SELECT username FROM users WHERE username = ? AND password = ? ");
$stmt->execute(array($user, $password));
if($stmt->rowCount() >= 0 )
{
return true;
}
else
{
return false;
}
}
protected function exists($user, $server) {
$stmt = $this->db()->prepare("SELECT username FROM users WHERE username = ? ");
$stmt->execute(array($user));
if($stmt->rowCount() >= 0 )
{
return true;
}
else
{
return false;
}
}
}
$pdo = new PDO('mysql:dbname=ejabberd;host=localhost', 'root', 'root');
new Auth($pdo, 'auth.log');
Thanks in advance
We have this project using Polymer as the FrontEnd and Node.js as the API being consumed by Polymer, and our Node API replies a really long time especially if you just leave the page alone for like 10 minutes. Upon further investigation by inserting a DATE calculation in the MySQL Query, I found out that MySQL responds a Really long time. The query looks like this:
var query = dataStruct['formed_query'];
console.log(query);
var now = Date.now();
console.log("Getting Data for Foobar Query============ "+Date());
console.log(query);
GLOBAL.db_foobar.getConnection(function(err1, connection) {
////console.log("requesting MySQL connection");
if(err1==null)
{
connection.query(query,function(err,rows,fields){
console.log("response from MySQL Foobar Query============= "+Date());
console.log("MySQL response Foobar Query=========> "+(Date.now()-now)+" ms");
if(err==null)
{
//respond.respondJSON is just a res.json(msg); but I've added a similar calculation for response time starting from express router.route until res.json occurs
respond.respondJSON(dataJSON['resVal'],res,req);
}else{
var msg = {
"status":"Error",
"desc":"[Foobar Query]Error Getting Connection",
"err":err1,
"db_name":"common",
"query":query
};
respond.respondError(msg,res,req);
}
connection.release();
});
}else{
var msg = {
"status":"Error",
"desc":"[Foobar Query]Error Getting Connection",
"err":err1,
"db_name":"common",
"query":query
};
respond.respondJSON(msg,res,req);
respond.emailError(msg);
try{
connection.release();
}catch(err_release){
respond.LogInConsole(err_release);
respond.LogInConsole(err_release.stack);
}
}
});
}
When Chrome Developer tools reports a LONG PENDING time for the API, this happens to my log.
SELECT * FROM `foobar_table` LIMIT 0,20;
MySQL response Foobar Query=========> 10006 ms
I'm dumbfounded as to why this is happening.
We have our system hosted in Google Cloud Services. Our MySQL is a Google SQL service with an activation policy of ALWAYS. We've also set that our Node Server, which is a Google Compute Engine, to keep alive TCP4 connections via:
echo 'net.ipv4.tcp_keepalive_time = 60' | sudo tee -a /etc/sysctl.conf
sudo /sbin/sysctl --load=/etc/sysctl.conf
I'm using mysql Pool from node-mysql
db_init.database = 'foobar_dbname';
db_init=ssl_set(db_init);
//GLOBAL.db_foobar = mysql.createConnection(db_init);
GLOBAL.db_foobar = mysql.createPool(db_init);
GLOBAL.db_foobar.on('connection', function (connection) {
setTimeout(tryForceRelease, mysqlForceTimeOut,connection);
});
db_init looks like this:
db_init = {
host : 'ip_address_of_GCS_SQL',
user : 'user_name_of_GCS_SQL[![enter image description here][1]][1]',
password : '',
database : '',
supportBigNumbers: true,
connectionLimit:100
};
I'm also forcing to release connections if they're not released in 2 minutes, just to make sure it's released
function tryForceRelease(connection)
{
try{
//console.log("force releasing connection");
connection.release();
}catch(err){
//do nothing
//console.log("connection already released");
}
}
This is really wracking my brains out here. If anyone can help please do.
I'll post the same answer here as I posted in node-mysql pool experiences ETIMEDOUT.
The questions are sufficiently different that I'm not sure it's worth duping them.
I suspect the reason is that keepalive is not enabled on the connection to the MySQL server.
node-mysql does not have an option to enable keepalive and neither does node-mysql2, but node-mysql2 provides a way to supply a custom function for creating sockets which we can use to enable keepalive:
var mysql = require('mysql2');
var net = require('net');
var pool = mysql.createPool({
connectionLimit : 100,
host : '123.123.123.123',
user : 'foo',
password : 'bar',
database : 'baz',
stream : function(opts) {
var socket = net.connect(opts.config.port, opts.config.host);
socket.setKeepAlive(true);
return socket;
}
});
I've got problem with RMI comunication between 2 machines (win 7 and win xp VM). The exception with I have problem is:
java.rmi.ConnectException: Connection refused to host: 169.254.161.21; nested exception is:
java.net.ConnectException: Connection timed out: connect
It's really weired because during connection I use address 192.168.1.4 (server), but exception somehow show sth different. I disabled firewall on both side. Ping working to both side. I tried telnet to server and use server port:
telnet 192.168.1.4 1099 and it's working... I can't figure out where the problem is.
If I run this on host side (eg server side) everything works fine.
How is it look from SERVER:
public class Server
{
public static void main(String args[])
{
InputStreamReader is = new InputStreamReader(System.in);
BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(is);
String portNum, registryURL;
try{
System.out.println("Enter the RMIregistry port number:");
portNum = (br.readLine()).trim();
int RMIPortNum = Integer.parseInt(portNum);
startRegistry(RMIPortNum); // Registry registry = LocateRegistry.createRegistry(RMIPortNum);
ServerSide_Impl exportedObj = new ServerSide_Impl();
registryURL = "rmi://localhost:" + portNum + "/callback";
//registryURL = "rmi://192.168.1.4:" + portNum + "/callback";
Naming.rebind(registryURL, exportedObj);
System.out.println("Callback Server ready.");
}// end try
catch (Exception re) {
System.out.println(
"Exception in HelloServer.main: " + re);
} // end catch
} // end main
//This method starts a RMI registry on the local host, if
//it does not already exists at the specified port number.
private static void startRegistry(int RMIPortNum) throws RemoteException
{
try
{
Registry registry = LocateRegistry.getRegistry(RMIPortNum);
registry.list( );
// This call will throw an exception
// if the registry does not already exist
}
catch (RemoteException e)
{
Registry registry = LocateRegistry.createRegistry(RMIPortNum);
}
} // end startRegistry
} // end class
Client side is look like:
try
{
this.serverAd = serverAddress.getText();
String path = System.getProperty("user.dir");
String pathAfter = path.replace("\\", "/");
String pathFile = "file:/"+pathAfter + "/wideopen.policy";
System.setProperty("java.security.policy", pathFile);
System.setSecurityManager(new RMISecurityManager());
this.hostName = hostNameTextField.getText();
this.portNum = hostPortNumberTextField.getText();
RMIPort = Integer.parseInt(this.portNum);
this.time = Integer.parseInt(timeTextField.getText());
//this.registryURL = "rmi://localhost:" + this.portNum + "/callback";
String registryURLString = "rmi://"+this.serverAd+":" + this.portNum + "/callback";
this.registryURL = registryURLString;
ConsoleTextField.append("\n"+ this.registryURL + "\n");
// find the remote object and cast it to an
// interface object
obj = (ServerSide_Interface)Naming.lookup(this.registryURL);
boolean test = obj.Connect();
if(test)
{
callbackObj = new ClientSide_Impl();
// register for callback
obj.registerForCallback(callbackObj);
isConnected = true;
ConsoleTextField.append("Nawiązano połaczenie z serwerem\n");
TableModel modelTemp = obj.Server_GenerateStartValues();
myDataTable.setModel(modelTemp);
myDataTable.setEnabled(true);
}
else ConsoleTextField.append("Brak połączenia z serwerem\n");
}
catch (Exception ex ){
ConsoleTextField.append(ex + "\n");
System.out.println(ex);
}
This connection is working fine if I run client on host side. If I use VM and try connect between 2 different machines, I can;t figure out what did I do bad
There is something wrong with your etc/hosts file or your DNS setup. It is providing the wrong IP address to the server as the server's external IP address, so RMI embeds the wrong address into the stub, so the client attempts to connect to the wrong IP address.
If you can't fix that, you can set the system property java.rmi.server.hostname to the correct IP address at the server JVM, before exporting any RMI objects (including Registries). That tells RMI to embed that address in the stub.
I am trying to pre-bind an XMPP session via XMPHP and pass the rid/sid/jid to a strophe client to attach to the session.
connection code here:
$conn = new CIRCUIT_BOSH('server.com', 7070, $username, $pass, $resource, 'server.com', $printlog=true, $loglevel=XMPPHP_Log::LEVEL_VERBOSE);
$conn->autoSubscribe();
try{
$conn->connect('http://xmpp.server.com/http-bind', 1, true);
$log->lwrite('Connected!');
}catch(XMPPHP_Exception $e){
die($e->getMessage());
}
I am getting the rid and sid but the fulljid in the $conn object stays empty and I cant see a session started on my openfire admin console.
If I create the jid manually by using the given resource and passing jid/rid/sid to strophe to use in attach, I get the ATTACHED status and I see calls from the client to the BOSH ip but I still dont see a session and I cant use the connection.
Strophe Client Code:
Called on document ready:
var sid = $.cookie('sid');
var rid = $.cookie('rid');
var jid = $.cookie('jid');
$(document).trigger('attach', {
sid: sid,
rid: rid,
jid: jid,
});
$(document).bind('attach', function (ev, data) {
var conn = new Strophe.Connection(
"http://xmpp.server.com/http-bind");
conn.attach(data.jid, data.sid, data.rid, function (status) {
if (status === Strophe.Status.CONNECTED) {
$(document).trigger('connected');
} else if (status === Strophe.Status.DISCONNECTED) {
$(document).trigger('disconnected');
} else if (status === Strophe.Status.ATTACHED){
$(document).trigger('attached');
}
});
Object.connection = conn;
});
I think the problem starts on the XMPPHP side which is not creating the session properly.
'attached' is triggered but never 'connected', is status 'connected' supposed to be sent?
What am I missing?
Ok, solved, I saw that XMPPHP lib didn't create a session at all on the openfire server, so I wrote a simple test for the XMPP class which was good and created the session, and for the XMPP_BOSH class that didn't manage create one. Then I saw the issue report here: http://code.google.com/p/xmpphp/issues/detail?id=47 comment no.9 worked, it fixed the issue by copying the processUntil() function from the XMLStream.php to BOSH.php, still can't figure out why this is working. Then I found I had an overlapping bug also with some of the passwords set for users on the openfire server. These passwords contained these ! # % ^ characters, for some reason the XMPP_BOSH is sending the password corrupted or changed so I got Auth Failed exception. Changing the password fixed the issue and I can now attach to the session XMPPHP created with the Strophe.js library.