sql joins The multi-part identifier could not be found - tsql

here`s my query
SELECT cont.FILTER_VALUE as filter,
o.[OBJECT_ID] as Id, o.[OBJECT_NAME] as Name, o.DESCRIPTION as Description, o.CREATED as Created,
o.MODIFIED as Modified, u.[LOGIN] as LastModifiedByLogin, o.[OBJECT_NAME] as ObjectName, t.[TEMPLATE_NAME] as TemplateName--,p.[PAGE_NAME] as PageName
FROM
[OBJECT] AS o
LEFT OUTER JOIN [CONTAINER] as cont
on cont.[OBJECT_ID] = o.[OBJECT_ID]
LEFT JOIN [OBJECT_VALUES] AS ov ON
ov.[OBJECT_ID] = o.[OBJECT_ID]
LEFT JOIN [PAGE] AS p ON o.[PAGE_ID] = p.[PAGE_ID]
INNER JOIN [USERS] as u on u.[USER_ID] = o.LAST_MODIFIED_BY INNER JOIN [PAGE_TEMPLATE] as t
on o.[PAGE_TEMPLATE_ID] = t.[PAGE_TEMPLATE_ID] INNER JOIN [site] as s on t.SITE_ID = s.SITE_ID
WHERE
s.SITE_ID = '34' --AND сont.[FILTER_VALUE] is null--like '%fff%'
And it works nice, until I remove the comment.
Here's a mess of joins, still it has sense. I inner join main table with couple of others, and left join with optional, so, that I have a column, that contains cont.FILTER_VALUE as filter, its null in some records, I can get it, but I cant filter by this field.
I get The multi-part identifier "сont.FILTER_VALUE" could not be bound.
I've looked through similar topics, but found no useful information. I don't use any old SQL dialects: everywhere I use INNER/LEFT joins, tried group by and order by, tried to re-order joins - nothing helped. I guess I just don't understand something important about joins, could you tell me, please.
Thanx.

if you wrote it like this:
s.SITE_ID = '34' AND сont.[FILTER_VALUE] is null like '%fff%'
its just wrong syntax. you're missing a column for the LIKE function (in which column does the query suppose to look for the pattern?). if you didnt write it like that, please post what you did write

I don't know why you're getting your error, but try this just in case, while we wait for a better answer:
SELECT FILTER_VALUE as filter
, o.[OBJECT_ID] as Id
, o.[OBJECT_NAME] as Name
, o.DESCRIPTION as Description
, o.CREATED as Created
, o.MODIFIED as Modified
, u.[LOGIN] as LastModifiedByLogin
, o.[OBJECT_NAME] as ObjectName
, t.[TEMPLATE_NAME] as TemplateName
FROM [OBJECT] AS o
INNER JOIN [USERS] as u
ON u.[USER_ID] = o.LAST_MODIFIED_BY
INNER JOIN [PAGE_TEMPLATE] as t
ON o.[PAGE_TEMPLATE_ID] = t.[PAGE_TEMPLATE_ID]
INNER JOIN [site] as s
ON t.SITE_ID = s.SITE_ID
LEFT JOIN [CONTAINER] as cont
ON cont.[OBJECT_ID] = o.[OBJECT_ID]
LEFT JOIN [OBJECT_VALUES] AS ov
ON ov.[OBJECT_ID] = o.[OBJECT_ID]
LEFT JOIN [PAGE] AS p
ON o.[PAGE_ID] = p.[PAGE_ID]
WHERE s.SITE_ID = '34' AND FILTER_VALUE IS NULL

Well, I solved this problem, using CTE, still I wonder, why did I have problems without cte.
This way it works good
with query_CTE
AS
(
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY o.[OBJECT_ID] asc) as rowNum,
o.[OBJECT_ID] as Id, o.[OBJECT_NAME] as Name, o.DESCRIPTION as Description, o.CREATED as Created,
o.MODIFIED as Modified, u.[LOGIN] as LastModifiedByLogin, o.[OBJECT_NAME] as ObjectName, t.[TEMPLATE_NAME] as TemplateName,p.[PAGE_NAME] as PageName,
s.SITE_ID, t.PAGE_TEMPLATE_ID, p.PAGE_ID, ov.VARIABLE_NAME, ov.VARIABLE_VALUE, cont.FILTER_VALUE, cont.DYNAMIC_CONTENT_VARIABLE, cont.SELECT_START,
cont.SELECT_TOTAL
FROM [OBJECT] AS o
INNER JOIN [USERS] as u
ON u.[USER_ID] = o.LAST_MODIFIED_BY
INNER JOIN [PAGE_TEMPLATE] as t
ON o.[PAGE_TEMPLATE_ID] = t.[PAGE_TEMPLATE_ID]
INNER JOIN [site] as s
ON t.SITE_ID = s.SITE_ID
LEFT JOIN [CONTAINER] as cont
ON cont.[OBJECT_ID] = o.[OBJECT_ID]
LEFT JOIN [OBJECT_VALUES] AS ov
ON ov.[OBJECT_ID] = o.[OBJECT_ID]
LEFT JOIN [PAGE] AS p
ON o.[PAGE_ID] = p.[PAGE_ID]
)
select rowNum,
Id, Name,[Description], Created, Modified, LastModifiedByLogin, ObjectName, TemplateName,PageName
from query_CTE

Related

Strange Behaviour on Postgresql query

We created a view in Postgres and I am getting strange result.
View Name: event_puchase_product_overview
When I try to get records with *, I get the correct result. but when I try to get specific fields, I get wrong values.
I hope the screens attached here can explain the problem well.
select *
from event_purchase_product_overview
where id = 15065;
select id, departure_id
from event_puchase_product_overview
where id = 15065;
VIEW definition:
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW public.event_puchase_product_overview AS
SELECT row_number() OVER () AS id,
e.id AS departure_id,
e.type AS event_type,
e.name,
p.id AS product_id,
pc.name AS product_type,
product_date.attribute AS option,
p.upcomming_date AS supply_date,
pr.date_end AS bid_deadline,
CASE
WHEN (pt.categ_id IN ( SELECT unnest(tt.category_ids) AS unnest
FROM ( SELECT string_to_array(btrim(ir_config_parameter.value, '[]'::text), ', '::text)::integer[] AS category_ids
FROM ir_config_parameter
WHERE ir_config_parameter.key::text = 'trip_product_flight.product_category_hotel'::text) tt)) THEN e.maximum_rooms
WHEN (pt.categ_id IN ( SELECT unnest(tt.category_ids) AS unnest
FROM ( SELECT string_to_array(btrim(ir_config_parameter.value, '[]'::text), ', '::text)::integer[] AS category_ids
FROM ir_config_parameter
WHERE ir_config_parameter.key::text = 'trip_product_flight.product_category_flight'::text) tt)) THEN e.maximum_seats
WHEN (pt.categ_id IN ( SELECT unnest(tt.category_ids) AS unnest
FROM ( SELECT string_to_array(btrim(ir_config_parameter.value, '[]'::text), ', '::text)::integer[] AS category_ids
FROM ir_config_parameter
WHERE ir_config_parameter.key::text = 'trip_product_flight.product_category_bike'::text) tt)) THEN e.maximum_bikes
ELSE e.maximum_seats
END AS departure_qty,
CASE
WHEN now()::date > pr.date_end AND po.state::text = 'draft'::text THEN true
ELSE false
END AS is_deadline,
pl.product_qty::integer AS purchased_qty,
pl.comments,
pl.price_unit AS unit_price,
rp.id AS supplier,
po.id AS po_ref,
po.state AS po_state,
po.date_order AS po_date,
po.user_id AS operator,
pl.po_state_line AS line_status
FROM event_event e
LEFT JOIN product_product p ON p.related_departure = e.id
LEFT JOIN product_template pt ON pt.id = p.product_tmpl_id
LEFT JOIN product_category pc ON pc.id = pt.categ_id
LEFT JOIN purchase_order_line pl ON pl.product_id = p.id
LEFT JOIN purchase_order po ON po.id = pl.order_id
LEFT JOIN purchase_order_purchase_requisition_rel prr ON prr.purchase_order_id = po.id
LEFT JOIN purchase_requisition pr ON pr.id = prr.purchase_requisition_id
LEFT JOIN res_partner rp ON rp.id = po.partner_id
LEFT JOIN ( SELECT p_1.id AS product_id,
pav.name AS attribute
FROM product_product p_1
LEFT JOIN product_attribute_value_product_product_rel pa ON pa.prod_id = p_1.id
LEFT JOIN product_attribute_value pav ON pav.id = pa.att_id
LEFT JOIN product_attribute pat ON pat.id = pav.attribute_id
WHERE pat.name::text <> ALL (ARRAY['Date'::character varying, 'Departure'::character varying]::text[])) product_date ON product_date.product_id = p.id
WHERE (p.id IN ( SELECT DISTINCT mrp_bom_line.product_id
FROM mrp_bom_line)) AND p.active
ORDER BY e.id, pt.categ_id, p.id;
If I add new event_event or new product_product I'll get a new definition of row_number in my view, then the column ID of my view is not stable.
at least you can't use row_number as Id of the view,
If you insist to use row_number, you can use the Order By "creation DATE" by this way all new records will be as last lines in the view and this will not change the correspondency between ID (row_number) and other columns.
Hope that helps !
Very likely the execution plan of your query depends on the columns you select. Compare the execution plans!
Your id is generated using the row_number window function. Now window functions are executed before the ORDER BY clause, so the order will depend on the execution plan and hence on the columns you select.
Using row_number without an explicit ordering doesn't make any sense.
To fix that, don't use
row_number() OVER ()
but
row_number() OVER (ORDER BY e.id, pt.categ_id, p.id)
so that you have a reliable ordering.
In addition, you should omit the ORDER BY clause at the end.

understanding the logic of AND and WHERE in t-sql

I am working on Transact-SQL, Microsoft Azure.
I am trying to understand why in some join queries WHERE and AND both can be used and give the same result (or at least it seemed like the same result in my data base) and in other queries where doesn't work and and does.
Here, I am joining 2 tables:
select c.customerID, ca.addressID, ca.addressType
from salesLT.customer as c
join salesLT.customerADdress as ca
on c.customerID = ca.customerID
WHERE ca.addressType = 'Main Office'; --WHERE or AND works the same
This gives me what I was looking for = only the rows from customerAddress table where the type is 'Main Office'. Changing the word WHERE to AND gives the exact same result.
Now, the query is based on the previous, but I am trying to join 3 tables. Here the WHERE doesn't work and I have to put an AND:
select c.customerId, c.companyName, ca.addressID, ca.addressType, a.addressLine1, a. city
from salesLT.customer as c
join salesLT.customerAddress as ca
on c.customerID = ca.customerID
WHERE ca.addressType = 'Main Office' -- error: incorrect syntax near 'join'
join salesLT.address as a
on ca.addressId = a.addressID;
If I change the WHERE to AND it works. Why? What is the difference between the join of 2 tables and 3?
Thanks
If I change the WHERE to AND it works. Why?
Because using and is adding the condition to the on clause, but using where is a new clause.
Here is the full explanation: The basic syntax of a select statement when using multiple joins is:
SELECT <columns>
FROM <table 1>
JOIN <table 2> ON <condition>
JOIN <table 3> ON <condition>
WHERE <condition>
This means your second query should look like this:
select c.customerId, c.companyName, ca.addressID, ca.addressType, a.addressLine1, a.city
from salesLT.customer as c
join salesLT.customerAddress as ca on c.customerID = ca.customerID
join salesLT.address as a on ca.addressId = a.addressID
WHERE ca.addressType = 'Main Office';
If you will go to the link, you will see that a select statement syntax can get much more complicated - but for now, that basic syntax should be enough to get you started.
The second JOIN should be before the WHERE clause
select c.customerId, c.companyName, ca.addressID, ca.addressType, a.addressLine1, a. city
from salesLT.customer as c
join salesLT.customerAddress as ca
on c.customerID = ca.customerID
join salesLT.address as a
on ca.addressId = a.addressID
WHERE ca.addressType = 'Main Office'
;

PostgreSQL Inner Join Where Get IDs of 3 Products

I have these 5 tables which is sale_order directly connected to sale_order_line that has the products of the order of course which is connected to product_product that is connected to product_template where a table called mrp_bom can connect to product template and a table connected to it which is bom_line. I am trying to Output the products that contain the word 836g
Here is what I have so far:
Select so.name,
pt.name,
sol.name
From sale_order so
Inner Join sale_order_line sol
On so.id = sol.order_id
Inner Join product_template pt
On sol.product_id = pt.id
Inner Join mrp_bom bom
On pt.id = bom.product_tmpl_id
Inner Join mrp_bom_line boml
On bom.id = boml.bom_id
Where boml.product_id = (Select id From product_template Where name Like '%836g%'
Order By so.name
This code outputs an error because I have 3 items with 836g. I tried changing the = in the condition into IN so it will grab all the ids it will return. But still it's giving me an error. This is the best I have so far, I have tried so many times, but I can't figure it out.
I have the feeling that something along these lines is what you actually want:
SELECT so.name,
pt.name,
sol.name
FROM sale_order so
INNER JOIN sale_order_line sol
ON so.id = sol.order_id
INNER JOIN product_template pt
ON sol.product_id = pt.id
INNER JOIN mrp_bom bom
ON pt.id = bom.product_tmpl_id
INNER JOIN mrp_bom_line boml
ON bom.id = boml.bom_id
WHERE pt.name LIKE '%836g%' -- just add a WHERE condition directly in your query
ORDER BY so.name
OMG! I just had the answer. I don't think this will help anyone but i'll post the answer i have
SELECT so.name,
pt.name PT,
sol.name SOL,
(Select pp1.name_template From product_product pp1 Where boml.product_id = pp1.id) BOML,
boml.product_id
FROM sale_order so
INNER JOIN sale_order_line sol
ON so.id = sol.order_id
INNER JOIN product_template pt
ON sol.product_id = pt.id
INNER JOIN mrp_bom bom
ON pt.id = bom.product_tmpl_id
INNER JOIN mrp_bom_line boml
ON bom.id = boml.bom_id
WHERE (Select pp1.name_template From product_product pp1 Where boml.product_id = pp1.id) LIKE '%836g%'
ORDER BY so.name
Thank you all for the effort of helping me! Great community we got here! :D

Why does not adding distinct in this query produce duplicate rows?

This query was taken from a Rails application log...I'm trying to edit a massive postgresql statement I didn't write....If I don't add a distinct keyword after the SELECT, 2 duplicate rows appear for each braintree account. Why is this and is there another way to avoid having to use the distinct to avoid duplicates?
EDIT: I understand what distinct is supposed to do, the reason I'm asking is that it doesn't generate duplicates for other toy lines. By other toy lines, this query is building a "table" for a particular toy id (this specific example toys.id = 12). How do I figure out where the duplicate rows are being generated?
SELECT accounts.braintree_account_id as braintree_account_id,
accounts.braintree_account_id as braintree_account_id, format('%s %s', addresses.first_name,
addresses.last_name) as shipping_address_full_name,
users.email as email, addresses.line_1 as shipping_address_line_1,
addresses.line_2 as shipping_address_line_2, addresses.city as
shipping_address_city, addresses.state as shipping_address_state,
addresses.zip as shipping_address_zip_code, addresses.country
as shipping_address_country, CASE WHEN xy_shirt IS NULL THEN '' ELSE xy_shirt END, plans.name as plan_name, toys.sku as sku, to_char(accounts.created_at, 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MM:SS') as
account_created_at,
to_char(accounts.next_assessment_at, 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MM:SS') as account_next_assessment_at,
accounts.account_status as account_status FROM \"accounts\" INNER JOIN \"addresses\" ON
\"addresses\".\"id\" = \"accounts\".\"shipping_address_id\" AND \"addresses\".\"type\" IN
('ShippingAddress') LEFT OUTER JOIN shipping_methods ON
shipping_methods.account_id = accounts.id LEFT OUTER JOIN plans ON
accounts.plan_id = plans.id
LEFT OUTER JOIN users ON
accounts.user_id = users.id LEFT OUTER JOIN toys ON plans.toy_id = toys.id
LEFT OUTER JOIN account_variations ON accounts.id =
account_variations.account_id LEFT OUTER JOIN variations ON
account_variations.variation_id = variations.id
LEFT OUTER JOIN
choice_value_variations ON variations.id =
choice_value_variations.variation_id
LEFT OUTER JOIN choice_values ON
choice_value_variations.choice_value_id = choice_values.id LEFT OUTER
JOIN choice_types ON choice_values.choice_type_id = choice_types.id
LEFT
OUTER JOIN choice_type_toys ON choice_type_toys.toy_id = toys.id
AND choice_type_toys.choice_type_id = choice_types.id
LEFT OUTER JOIN
(SELECT * FROM crosstab('SELECT accounts.id, choice_types.id,
choice_values.presentation FROM accounts\n
LEFT JOIN account_variations ON
accounts.id=account_variations.account_id\n
LEFT JOIN variations ON account_variations.variation_id=variations.id\n
LEFT JOIN choice_value_variations ON
variations.id=choice_value_variations.variation_id\n
LEFT JOIN choice_values ON
choice_value_variations.choice_value_id=choice_values.id\n
LEFT JOIN choice_types ON choice_values.choice_type_id=choice_types.id
ORDER BY 1,2',\n 'select distinct choice_types.id
from choice_types JOIN choice_values ON choice_values.choice_type_id =
choice_types.id JOIN choice_value_variations ON
choice_value_variations.choice_value_id = choice_values.id JOIN
variations ON choice_value_variations.variation_id = variations.id JOIN choice_type_toys ON choice_type_toys.choice_type_id = choice_types.id JOIN toys ON toys.id = choice_type_toys.toy_id
where toys.id=12 ORDER
BY choice_types.id ASC')\n
AS (account_id int, xy_shirt
VARCHAR)) account_variation_view\n ON
accounts.id=account_variation_view.account_id WHERE
\"accounts\".\"account_status\" = 'active' AND
\"addresses\".\"flagged_invalid_at\" IS NULL AND \"toys\".\"id\" = 12
AND (NOT EXISTS (SELECT \"account_skipped_months\".* FROM
\"account_skipped_months\" WHERE
\"account_skipped_months\".\"month_year\" = 'JUL2016' AND
(account_skipped_months.account_id = accounts.id)))"
The purpose of using DISTINCT in a SELECT statement is to eliminate duplicate rows.

sql, group a query with no aggregations and multiple tables

I need to group the query below by dda.LA and need to display all the columns listed in the select but almost none of them are aggregated. i don't know what the syntax to get around this is and i can not find a post that shows this syntax (most examples only have one table, two at tops).
Select dda.a,
dda.b,
dda.c,
dda.d,
dda.e,
dda.f,
dda.g,
dda.h,
dda.i,
dda.j,
dda.k,
dda.l,
dda.m,
dda.n,
dda.o,
dda.p,
dda.r,
dda.u,
dda.LA,
dd.aa,
coalesce(apn.apn,Pt.z) as abc,
coalesce(apn.v,Pt.y) as def,
'RFN' RowFocusIndicator ,
'SRI' SelectRowIndicator ,
'Y' Expanded ,
Convert(Int, Null) SortColumn
From dda (NoLock)
Inner Join dd (NoLock) On dda.d = dd.q and dda.e = dd.e
Left Outer Join apn (nolock) on dda.r = apn.r
Left Outer Join Pt (nolock) on dda.s = Pt.t
Where 1 = 1
And dda.u = (Select Min(c.w)
From c (NoLock)
Where c.x = dda.s)
Thanks!
Just add this to any column that you want to aggregate by:
AggregatedColumnName = Aggregation(fieldToAggregate) Over (Partition By dda.LA)
ex.
aCount = Count(dda.a) Over (Partition By dda.LA)