I have created a chart using YUI and want to display axis labels. The x axis is fine, but the y axis label appears inside of the data.
Here is what is happening:
10 |
9 |
8 |
7 l |
6 a |
5 b | CHART
4 e |
3 l |
2 |
1 |
0 |_____________________________
Here is what I want to happen:
10 |
9 |
8 |
l 7 |
a 6 |
b 5 | CHART
e 4 |
l 3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |_____________________________
Here is my code for the chart axes:
var chartaxes = {
timeelapsed:{
position:"bottom",
type:"category",
title:"label"
},
kWh:{
position:"left",
type:"numeric",
title:"label",
}
};
Is there any way to fix this?
You need to set the series that is associated with the axes to display the title correctly using the keys variable.
var chartaxes = {
timeelapsed:{
position:"bottom",
type:"category",
title:"Time Elapsed (minutes)",
keys: ["category"],
and so on.
Related
I have two columns in my InfluxDB database : Values and Iterator count
I want visualise this on Grafana where my x axis is iterator count and value on y axis is basically corresponding to each iterator count.
EXAMPLE
Iterator Count(X) | Value
1 | 46
2 | 64
3 | 32
4 | 13
5 | 12
6 | 11
7 | 10
8 | 9
9 | 12
10 | 25.
Is it possible to achieve visualisation for the same, having no aspect of time
You can use plot.ly plugin
You just need to specify Iterator Count(X) as the x-axis in the trace section and Value as the y-axis.
I am having difficulty combining datasets for a project. Our primary dataset is organized by individual judges. It is an attribute dataset.
judge
j | x | y | z
----|----|----|----
1 | 2 | 3 | 4
2 | 5 | 6 | 7
The second dataset is a case database. Each observation is a case and judges can appear in one of three variables.
case
case | j1 | j2 | j3 | year
-----|----|----|----|-----
1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2002
2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1997
We would like to merge the case database into the attribute database, matching by judge. So, for each case that a judge appears in j1, j2, or j3, an observation for that case would be added creating a dataset that looks like below.
combined
j | x | y | z | case | year
---|----|----|----|-------|--------
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2002
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1997
2 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 2002
2 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 1997
My best guess is to use
rename j1 j
merge 1:m j using case
rename j j1
rename j2 j
merge 1:m j using case
However, I am unsure that this will work, especially since the merging dataset has three possible variables that the j identification can occur in.
Your examples are clear, but even better would be present them as code that would not require engineering edits to remove the scaffolding. See dataex from SSC (ssc inst dataex).
It's a case of the missing reshape, I think.
clear
input j x y z
1 2 3 4
2 5 6 7
end
save judge
clear
input case j1 j2 j3 year
1 1 2 3 2002
2 2 3 1 1997
end
reshape long j , i(case) j(which)
merge m:1 j using judge
list
+-------------------------------------------------------+
| case which j year x y z _merge |
|-------------------------------------------------------|
1. | 1 1 1 2002 2 3 4 matched (3) |
2. | 2 3 1 1997 2 3 4 matched (3) |
3. | 2 1 2 1997 5 6 7 matched (3) |
4. | 1 2 2 2002 5 6 7 matched (3) |
5. | 2 2 3 1997 . . . master only (1) |
|-------------------------------------------------------|
6. | 1 3 3 2002 . . . master only (1) |
+-------------------------------------------------------+
drop if _merge < 3
list
+---------------------------------------------------+
| case which j year x y z _merge |
|---------------------------------------------------|
1. | 1 1 1 2002 2 3 4 matched (3) |
2. | 2 3 1 1997 2 3 4 matched (3) |
3. | 2 1 2 1997 5 6 7 matched (3) |
4. | 1 2 2 2002 5 6 7 matched (3) |
+---------------------------------------------------+
I'm interested in the value of result that is in the same row as the min value of each column (and I have many columns, so I would like to loop over them, or do rowfun but I do not know how to get 'result' then).
Table A
+----+------+------+----+------+------+--------+
| x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | result |
+----+------+------+----+------+------+--------+
| 1 | 4 | 10 | 3 | 12 | 2 | 8 |
| 10 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 12 | 3 | 10 |
| 5 | 10 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 12 |
+----+------+------+----+------+------+--------+
Solution
8 10 12 10 12 8
I know that I can apply rowfun, but then I don't know how to get result.
And then, I can do this, but cannot loop over all the columns:
A(cell2mat(A.x1) == min(cell2mat(A.x1)), 7)
and I have tried several ways of making this into a variable but I can't make it work, so that:
A(cell2mat(variable) == min(cell2mat(variable)), 7)
Thank you!
Assuming your data is homogeneous you can use table2array and the second output of min to index your results:
% Set up table
x1 = [1 10 5];
x2 = [4 2 10];
x3 = [10 8 5];
x4 = [3 1 4];
x5 = [12 12 2];
x6 = [2 3 10];
result = [8 10 12];
t = table(x1.', x2.', x3.', x4.', x5.', x6.', result.', ...
'VariableNames', {'x1', 'x2', 'x3', 'x4', 'x5', 'x6', 'result'});
% Convert
A = table2array(t);
% When passed a matrix, min finds minimum of each column by default
% Exclude the results column, assumed to be the last
[~, minrow] = min(A(:, 1:end-1));
solution = t.result(minrow)'
Which returns:
solution =
8 10 12 10 12 8
From the documentation for min:
M = min(A) returns the smallest elements of A.
<snip>
If A is a matrix, then min(A) is a row vector containing the minimum value of each column.
I am trying to identify if a value is repeated sequentially in a vector N times. The challenge I am facing is that it could be repeated sequentially N times several times within the vector. The purpose is to determine how many times in a row certain values fall above the mean value. For example:
>> return_deltas
return_deltas =
7.49828129642663
11.5098198572327
15.1776644881294
11.256677995536
6.22315734182976
8.75582103474613
21.0488849115947
26.132605745393
27.0507649089989
...
(I only printed a few values for example but the vector is large.)
>> mean(return_deltas)
ans =
10.50007490258002
>> sum(return_deltas > mean(return_deltas))
ans =
50
So there are 50 instances of a value in return_deltas being greater than the mean of return_deltas.
I need to identify the number of times, sequentially, the value in return_deltas is greater than its mean 3 times in a row. In other words, if the values in return_deltas are greater than its mean 3 times in a row, that is one instance.
For example:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
| `return_delta` value | mean | greater or less | sequence |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
| 7.49828129642663 |10.500074902 | LT | 1 |
| 11.5098198572327 |10.500074902 | GT | 1 |
| 15.1776644881294 |10.500074902 | GT | 2 |
| 11.256677995536 |10.500074902 | GT | 3 * |
| 6.22315734182976 |10.500074902 | LT | 1 |
| 8.75582103474613 |10.500074902 | LT | 2 |
| 21.0488849115947 |10.500074902 | GT | 1 |
| 26.132605745393 |10.500074902 | GT | 2 |
| 27.0507649089989 |10.500074902 | GT | 3 * |
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The star represents a successful sequence of 3 in a row. The result of this set would be two because there were two occasions where the value was greater than the mean 3 times in a row.
What I am thinking is to create a new vector:
>> a = return_deltas > mean(return_deltas)
that of course contains ones where values in return_deltas is greater than the mean and using it to find how many times sequentially, the value in return_deltas is greater than its mean 3 times in a row. I am attempting to do this with a built in function (if there is one, I have not discovered it) or at least avoiding loops.
Any thoughts on how I might approach?
With a little work, this snippet finds the starting index of every run of numbers:
[0 find(diff(v) ~= 0)] + 1
An Example:
>> v = [3 3 3 4 4 4 1 2 9 9 9 9 9]; # vector of integers
>> run_starts = [0 find(diff(v) ~= 0)] + 1 # may be better to diff(v) < EPSILON, for floating-point
run_starts =
1 4 7 8 9
To find the length of each run
>> run_lengths = [diff(run_starts), length(v) - run_starts(end) + 1]
This variables then makes it easy to query which runs were above a certain number
>> find(run_lengths >= 4)
ans =
5
>> find(run_lengths >= 2)
ans =
1 2 5
This tells us that the only run of at least four integers in a row was run #5.
However, there were three runs that were at least two integers in a row, specifically runs #1, #2, and #5.
You can reference where each run starts from the run_starts variable.
I am creating an iphone app where I have a grid view of 25 images as:
0 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24
Now when any 5 consecutive images are selected it should say bingo, like if 0,6, 12, 18, 24 are selected it should say Bingo.
How will i do that, please help me.
Many Thanks for your help.
Rs
iPhone Developer
-----------------------------------
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
-----------------------------------
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
-----------------------------------
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
-----------------------------------
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
-----------------------------------
| 24 |
-----------------------------------
Hope this is how your grid looks like.
Associate each column with an array. The array will contain the list of all neighbour elements of that column,
For example, the neighbor array of the column [ 6 ] will ollk like array(0, 7, 12), which are all the immediate neighbors of [ 6 ].
Set counter = 0;
Now, when someone clicks an element, increment the counter (Now counter = 1)
When he clicks the second element, check if the element is in the neighbor list of the previous element OR the 1st element.
If the element clicked is in the neighbor list, increment the counter (now counter = 2)
ELSE
If the element clicked is not in the neighbor array, reset the counter (counter = 0) and start over.
Check if the value of counter = 5. If it is, Say Bingo!
The algorithm is not fully correct, but I hope you got the idea :)