I want to implement a automatic service restarting for several tomcat applications, applications that do take a lot of time to start, even over 10 minutes.
Mainly the test would check if the application is responding on HTTP with a valid response.
Still, this is not the problem, the problem is how to prevent this uptime check to fail while the service is under maintenance, scheduled or not.
I don't want for this service to be started if it was stopped manually, with `service appname stop".
I considered creating .maintenance files on stop or restart actions of the daemon and checking for them before triggering an automated restart.
So far the only problem that I wasn't able to properly solve was, how to detect that the app finished starting up and remove the .maintenance file, so the automatic restart would work properly.
Note, an init.d script is not supposed to wait, so the daemon should start a background command that solves this problem.
Related
I have a BE service in NestJS that is deployed in Vercel.
I need several schedulers, so I have used #nestjs/schedule lib, which is super easy to use.
Locally, everything works perfectly.
For some reason, the only thing that is not working in my production environment is those schedulers. Everything else is working - endpoints, data base access..
Does anyone has an idea why? is it something with my deployment? maybe Vercel has some issue with that? maybe this schedule library requires something the Vercel doesn't have?
I am clueless..
Cold boot is the process of starting a computer from shutdown or a powerless state and setting it to normal working condition.
Which means that the code you deployed in a serveless manner, will run when the endpoint is called. The platform you are using spins up a virtual machine, to execute your code. And keeps the machine running for a certain period of time, incase you get another API hit, it's cheaper and easier on them to keep the machine running for lets say 5 minutes or 60 seconds, than to redeploy it on every call after shutting the machine when function execution ends.
So in your case, most likely what is happening is that the machine that you are setting the cron on, is killed after a period of time. Crons are system specific tasks which run in the kernel. But if the machine is shutdown, the cron dies with it. The only case where the cron would run, is if the cron was triggered at a point of time, before the machine was shut down.
Certain cloud providers give you the option to keep the machines alive. I remember google cloud used to follow the path of that if a serveless function is called frequently, it shifts from cold boot to hot start, which doesn't kill the machine entirely, and if you have traffic the machines stay alive.
From quick research, vercel isn't the best to handle crons, due to the nature of the infrastructure, and this is what you are looking for. In general, crons aren't for serveless functions. You can deploy the crons using queues for example or another third party service, check out this link by vercel.
I have a process running on a server.
FYI I'm trying to solve the same problem for both nodejs and Python - I don't really think the specific server/languages matters as the question is more about approach to deployment.
The work the the process does might take anywhere from seconds to hours to run.
I'm trying to work out how to deploy updated code for the process.
I don't want to just stop the process in the middle of what it is doing for fear of losing all the work done so far in the long running process.
So what's a good way to get the process to gracefully exit and restart when new code has arrived?
I use systemd for running the nodejs service.
I use Ansible to deploy updates, not that this is really relevant.
I thought maybe at the end of each execution of the long running process the server could check to see if some file has been placed on the disk as some sort of flag to indicate it should exit and restart, but that seems kinda brittle and hacky.
Anyone got any better mechanisms for this sort of thing?
I'd like to be able to gracefully restart the Minion worker I am working on developing (i.e.: without gong back to the command line, killing it and restarting it, which is what I do now).
Is that possible? I'm hoping for something similar to what one can do with a Plack server, i.e.: sending a HUP signal restarts the server.
See this proposed feature - though nobody has worked on it yet.
I have a node app in bluemix which holds some transaction cache in memory and I would like to flush this cache to DB before the application goes down. So I have the appropriate event handlers to intercept SIGTERM/SIGINT signals and all works fine from my laptop, however, it seems like the cf stop command does not perform graceful shutdown.
Unfortunately, there is no clear documentation around this topic, at one place in the cloudfoundary app-lifecycle doc they do mention that first SIGTERM is issued and then wait for 10 secs etc but Im not seeing this happening. Probably a bug on their side. https://docs.cloudfoundry.org/devguide/deploy-apps/app-lifecycle.html
Has anyone noticed this issue and probably have a workaround pls?
CF is sending the SIGTERM first but because of how the app is started by other processes, it's not being correctly propagated to your app.
As a workaround, disable App Management by setting the CF environment variable BLUEMIX_APP_MGMT_INSTALL=false and prefix your app's start command in your package.json file with 'exec' (e.g. exec node app.js).
I have already read the thread:
Wakanda Server scripted clean shutdown
This does not address my question.
We are running Wakanda Server 11.197492.
We want an automated, orderly, ensured shut-down of Wakanda Server - no matter which version we are running.
Before we give the "shutdown" command, we will stop inbound traffic for 1 to 2 minutes, to ensure that no httpHandlers are running when we shut-down.
We have scripted a single SharedWorker process to look for the "shutdown" command, and execute solution.quitServer().
At this time no other ShareWorker processes are running, and no active threads should be executing. This will likely not always be the case.
When this is executed, is a "solution quit" guaranteed?
Is solution.quitServer() the best way to initiate an automated solution shutdown?
Will there be a better way?
Is there a way to know of any of the Solution's Projects are currently executing threads prior to shutting down?
If more than 1 Project issues a solution.quitServer() method, within a few seconds of eachother, will that be a problem?
solution.quitServer() is probably not the best way to shutdown your server as it will be deprecated in the next major release.
I would recommend to send a sigkill as you point out in your question.
Wakanda Server scripted clean shutdown
Some fix have been done on v1.1.0 to safely close wakanda server after a kill.