I use EFL library to develop applications for Tizen platform. I need to implement event handler for hardware button "Back".
In native Tizen API it is done pretty simple. But I have no idea how can I do this in EFL library.
I tried to do it using the following way:
evas_object_event_callback_add( obj, EVAS_CALLBACK_KEY_DOWN, on_key_down, NULL );
But it doesn't work.
Could anyone help me?
Instead of EVAS_CALLBACK_KEY_DOWNandevas_object_event_callback_add()`,
use ea_object_event_callback_add
use EA_CALLBACK_BACK for back button
and EA_CALLBACK_MORE for menu button
but you need to include one header file, unfortunately I forgot the header file name
some thing efl-util.h or something, you can make a search in header files
AFAIK the thing is that EFL uses queues for processing events. That means that callbacks are called one by one: the first should return PASS_ON (or something) for the next callback for the same event to be run.
So, there may be another callback that does not allow the dispatch of the event.
Try
Ecore_Event_Handler *handler;
handler = ecore_event_handler_add(ECORE_EVENT_KEY_DOWN, hardware_key_down_cb, NULL);
In hardware_key_down_cb() callback function, check for key name 'XF86Stop' Ecore_Event_Key to handle back key event.
use eext_object_event_callback_add(Evas_Object * obj,eext_callback_type type,callback_fun,NULL)
and in call back function you can write your requirement
Related
I have an issue with setting value of AutomationElement by using method ValuePattern.SetValue().
Everything works just fine until some dialog appears. When the dialog appears the code execution got stuck. No exception is thrown. After the dialog is confirmed, the code exection continues. Bellow is a sample of the code:
BasePattern basePattern = null;
ValuePattern valuePattern = null;
AutomationElement elementA = Window.GetElement(SearchCriteria.ByText(propertyName));
object patternObjectA = null;
elementA.TryGetCurrentPattern(ValuePattern.Pattern, out patternObjectA);
basePattern = (BasePattern)patternObjectA;
valuePattern = (ValuePattern)patternObjectA;
valuePattern.SetValue(optionToSet);
// Window.GetElement() is a method from TestStack.White framework
// The code execution got stuck on the last line until the dialog is confirmed
Is there any other way to set AutomationElement value?
Is somehow possible to avoid of getting stuck by dialog?
I'll by grateful for any help.
Thanks advance.
It could be that this dialog is not supporting UI Automation correctly or that you simply target the wrong element.
To verify that you may use Inspect.exe from Microsoft or similiar tools.
If it works, check if you really target the correct component with your code again.
If it does not work and:
if you are able to change the application
you can change the so called AutomationPeer of the UI component - here is a link for more infos
Or simply use another UI component that supports UI Automation correctly.
if you are not able to change the application, and also do not need to run in background, parallel, etc.. you might just focus the component (call setFocus() onto the AutomationElement, or expand it (via IsExpandCollapsePatternAvailable or simulated MouseClick onto the components coordinates)) and then use the SendKeys.SendWait("test") method.
EDIT: There is one more thing you should have a look at, and I wonder why I didn't mentioned it in the first place: Register to UI Automation Events
For example you could register a callback for the Structure change event type, and check if the dialog you talk about appeared.
If so --> click the confirmed button of the dialog.
Probably you will have to synchronize your execution, so that every further action in the UI Automation script waits until the registered callback got executed and the confirmed button got clicked.
I am trying to open a modal window during a click handler to verify the user action but the window doesn't appear until the handler completes. The window code can be as simple as the following and it still will not display so it isn't something to do with my abstract class.
Window w = new Window();
w.setModal(true);
w.setImmediate(true);
// Add components etc etc
UI.getCurrent().addWindow(w);
I could add the action code to the windows OK/Yes handler but that would stop me creating a generic Message class to simplify/stop code duplication.
I am guessing there is something I dont understand about how Vaadin/GWT works (still a newbie!), could someone point me in the right direction?
Cheers
For UI stuff, you have to stop thinking of sequencial programming,
better to think about event-driven concepts.
For Vaadin you could create a Dialog Window which asks the yes/no question.
In you app you create this dialog and display it.
And you attach a event-handler which is fired when the user clicks yes/no,
and inside this handler you then do the required actions in your code.
You can also look at this add-on
https://vaadin.com/de/directory#addon/confirmdialog
The right direction is architecture overview https://vaadin.com/book/vaadin7/-/page/architecture.html#architecture.overview
In other words your code makes only response from server side, but only client side can show "modal" window.
In your case you have to create handler for ok button click event and wait for this event
Can I do two way binding with an XML document in metro style apps (using WPF/C#)? I want my XML file to get updated as soon as I make a change on the UI
Sure. After update invoke your method that will update your xml file. It won`t work automaticly, you need to manage this yourself
You are asking about XAML's Mode=TwoWay binding (default is Mode=OneWay), but I think you really mean UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged (as in WPF) which in WinRT is a bit of a trick. Answer is here: “UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged” equivalent for a TextBox in WinRT-XAML
may be u can call the saveXML() method on 'textChanged' event of the textboxes or any other UI controls of your metro app...
I want to have a gtk_file_chooser_dialog that does not browse into a folder if it has a specific name. For this I hooked up my dialog with a callback when a current-folder-changed signal is emitted. In the callback function I successfully detect if the selected folder has the specific name. However, I can't figure out how to tell the dialog to close itself and return a specific response code (e.g. GTK_RESPONSE_OK).
I have unsuccessfully tried (among other things):
g_signal_emit_by_name(G_OBJECT(my_dialog), "response", GTK_RESPONSE_OK);
Has anyone a better idea ? I would appreciate any pointers into the right direction..
cheers
You're trying too hard. Just use:
gtk_dialog_response(GTK_DIALOG(my_dialog), GTK_RESPONSE_OK);
See the splendid documentation.
I'm trying to setup automated unit tests for an iPhone application. I'm using a UIWebView and need to simulate clicks on different links. I've tried doing this with JavaScript, but it doesn't produce the same result as when I manually click on the links. The main problem is with links that have their target property set.
When you manually click on a standard "popup" link (e.g. <a href="http://example.com" target="_blank">), the UIWebView will ignore the click event and won't navigate to anything. If you then try clicking on this very same link automatically via the JavaScript dispatchEvent() method, the UIWebView will completely ignore the target attribute and will open up the link normally in the current page.
I need an my automatic unit testing to produce the exact same results as when you manually click a link.
I believe the only way for this automated unit test to work correctly is to simulate a mouse click at a specific x/y coordinate (i.e. where the link is located). Since the unit testing will only be used internally, private API calls are fine.
It seems like this should be possible since the iPhone app isimulate seems to do something similar.
Is there any way to do this in the framework?
I found a similar question titled Simulate mouse click to window instead of screen, however I'm guessing this method is only valid for OS X, and not for iPhone OS.
I suppose you could simulate the touches by calling the touchesBegan/touchesEnded methods directly on the UIView (check the UIResponder class).
The proper way to do this would be to construct your own UIEvent and then post this event to your UIApplication instance via its -sendEvent: method.
However, there doesn't appear to be a public API for constructing a UIEvent, so you might be out of luck.
Could you store the locations of the clicks in a data structure that you use in your tests and then simulate standard touch events as described here described here
--- Just spotted that you didn't have much luck with the example on this link. The only other options I can suggest would be to manipulate the html when running from a test to replace any _target links (you know that UIWebView handles these properly when clicking manually, so I think a small bodge is ok for the unit test?).
Nice walkthrough in this answer
For your specific case, it may be sufficient to test in the simulator and use a MacOS event generator to make the clicks.
The private calls for recording and sending events are part of GraphicServices/GSEvent.h with the standard use at your own risk disclaimers. Every UIEvent is really a UIInternalEvent that has a reference to a __GSEvent, so for recording you can use the _gsEvent property to get the underlying event.
#property (nonatomic,assign) struct __GSEvent *_gsEvent;
I have not used any of this stuff, but it looks like GSSendSystemEvent would be a good place to start.