I've created a small design in Verilog and now i want to run timing simulation. Since I know how to do it for VHDL files, I figured I'll do it (almost) the same way. Unfortunately, it's not that easy.
I've compiled my design and received .sdo and .vho files. But when I'm trying to run testbench, I receive error:
> vsim work.Sdesign_tb
# vsim work.Sdesign_tb
# Loading work.Sdesign_tb
# ALTERA version supports only a single HDL
# ** Fatal: (vsim-3039) C:/Users/K_impl/Sdesign_tb.v(17): Instantiation of 'sdesign' failed.
# Time: 0 ps Iteration: 0 Instance: /Sdesign_tb File: C:/Users/K_impl/Sdesign_tb.v
# FATAL ERROR while loading design
# Error loading design
It looks like Quartus 12.1 created VHDL files, while I want to simulate Verilog design (and Quartus supports only one VHDL at the same time). So I've tried another way, by adding .sdo files as SDF and then run simulation through "start simulation". But it also showed error (almost the same as above). So how can I bypass it? Or maybe there is another way of running timing simulation for Verilog designs?
You seem to be compiling more than one HDL, probably VHDL and Verilog.
If you go to your project settings in Quartus and make sure it's generating a Verilog netlist, it may solve your problem. Instructions are here.
To run timing simulation you may need to add altera_ver and your device libraries.
Related
I am a beginner in Twincat and is trying to run a sample program on my system(not on target).
I did all the steps mentioned here and did get the system up and running my sample code once. However, when I tried to run it again after a system restart, I get an error message.
I tried creating a new empty solution and another one with test code, both of them throws the same error code. Also, when I click on the green Restart TwinCat system button, I get the following error.
How do I solve this?
You need to enable AMD-V in your BIOS.
The procedure is explained here:
https://youtu.be/P9uUgT8EhUM?t=1029
(This is done for an Intel system, while you seem to have an AMD system, but it's the same procedure).
Also make sure to run this file in CMD (as Administrator):
C:\TwinCAT\3.1\System\win8settick.bat
And then reboot your computer.
If this doesn't do the trick, then do core isolation and run your TwinCAT task on an isolated core. Maybe that was what you were doing before but not now? It's described quite well in this video: https://youtube.com/watch?v=q7iRvDuAOFQ
I have C/C++ application and I am trying to run cov-build and getting a warning “ NO FILES EMITTED”. Can you please help me as we doing the POC on Coverity for static code analysis.
C:\Users\Master\bamboo-agent-home\xml-data\build-dir\DEC-L11PROJ-JOB1>cov-build --dir cov-int IarBuild.exe MainApplication\EWARM\L11_P4_uC1.ewp -build *
Coverity Build Capture (64-bit) version 2019.03 on Windows 10 Enterprise, 64-bit (build 18362)
Internal version numbers: 2c0f9c8cf4 p-pacific1-push-35439.872
IAR Command Line Build Utility V8.4.8.6680
Copyright 2002-2020 IAR Systems AB.
Total number of errors: 0
Total number of warnings: 0
[WARNING] No files were emitted. This may be due to a problem with your configuration
or because no files were actually compiled by your build command.
Please make sure you have configured the compilers actually used in the compilation.
For more details, please look at:
C:/Users/Master/bamboo-agent-home/xml-data/build-dir/DEC-L11PROJ-JOB1/cov-int/build-log.txt
First, if you are involved in a pre-sales Proof of Concept (POC), then there should be a Coverity Sales Engineer assigned to help with the POC. That person's role includes providing instructions and information similar to what I'll offer below, as well as answering technical questions such as yours. There may have been a miscommunication somewhere. Get in contact with the Sales Engineer, as they will be able to help more reliably and completely than I can.
Now, what's going on? The primary purpose of cov-build is to watch the build process for invocations of compilers, and when one is found, compile the same code using the Coverity compiler (called cov-emit). But in order to recognize a compiler, cov-build needs to know its command line name, what kind of compiler it is, where its include files are stored, etc. This is accomplished by a helper tool called cov-configure that must be run before cov-build. If cov-configure has not been run, then no compiler invocations will be recognized, which appears to be the case for you, as indicated by "No files were emitted".
Synopsys has a page called CLI Integration Cheat sheet that gives these commands for use with IAR:
cov-configure --comptype iar:arm --compiler iccarm --template
cov-build --dir <intermediate directory> "c:\Program Files (x86)\IAR Systems\Embedded Workbench 6.5\common\bin\IarBuild.exe" sample_project.ewp -build Debug -log all
I can't personally vouch for these commands (I don't have IAR, nor access to the Coverity tools anymore; I'm a former employee), but something like that will be needed. Again, your assigned Sales Engineer should be able to help.
Finally, for new Coverity users, I recommend using the cov-wizard tool. cov-wizard is a graphical front-end to the command line tools, and has help text explaining the concepts and procedures, along with a convenient interface for performing them. There are several steps even after cov-build, and cov-wizard will walk you through all of them. Its final screen shows exactly what command lines it used in case you want to script them.
I've recently switched to using PlatformIO for developing for STM32 using the following workflow:
Create a .ioc file using the CubeMX utility
Generate source code and the PlatformIO configuration from that .ioc file from the stm32pio command line utility
Edit, build, and debug using the PlatformIO plug-in for VSCode (Mac)
Overall, this works very well. However, I was previously using the CubeMX code generation in ST's CubeMX IDE, which placed a .s file in the source directory that (as I understand it) defined the NVIC, as well as the default function that was used for exceptions/interrupts that are not explicitly defined (i.e., those handled by their default weak implementations.) I don't see where this is defined in the new workflow. Is this generated dynamically as part of the build process?
The reason I'm asking is (beside wanting a better understanding of the process overall), I'd like to write an interrupt handler for EXTI0, but trigger it as a software interrupt, and not assign a pin to it. If that is not possible, then perhaps the entire point is moot.
I was able to find the answer. These steps might be useful to somebody else who comes across this question. This was done on MacOS, but should be similar to the process for other operating systems.
During the build process, the filename can be seen. It will be prefaced with startup_, followed by the name of the particular chip you're developing for. In my case, the line is
Compiling .pio/build/disco_f072rb/FrameworkCMSISDevice/gcc/startup_stm32f072xb.o
Searching in the .platformio folder of my user directory, I found the matching .s file, which in my case was .platformio/packages/framework-stm32cube/f0/Drivers/CMSIS/Device/ST/STM32F0xx/Source/Templates/gcc/startup_stm32f072xb.s
The structure of the path leading to the file indicates the particulars of the hardware and frameworks I'm using: STM32Cube framework, a F0 series chip, and the GCC compiler. The easiest way to find this file, and how I was able to find it, is using the find command from the terminal to search the PlatformIO directory.
Reading this file gives the lines I was looking for, defining the names of the functions to be used for exception and interrupt handling, such as the following:
.weak EXTI0_1_IRQHandler
.thumb_set EXTI0_1_IRQHandler,Default_Handler
It seems like, while I am using the CubeMX HAL for some drivers, the basic startup code is done using CMSIS, so it should be the same for HAL, LL, or CMSIS based builds.
I want to run a Simulink model in real time. So I need the Real time sync block in "Simulink desktop real time" (sldrt) toolbox working. It seems to be correctly installed, also in path. But I always get the error:
Error in S-function 'real_time_test/Real-Time Synchronization': Unable to acquire handle to MATLAB function 'sldrtsync'
Component:Simulink | Category:Blockerror
This error occurs also with the Desktop real time example _sldrtex_vdp_ also see my minimal example that I cannot get working..
In the sldrt directory there are two files:
sldrtsync.mexw64
sldrtsync.tlc
This path is also included in Matlab Path.
API: Win7 64bit
Matlab R2016b
Windows SDK 7.1
Where to look for the solution?
I am following this MathWorks File Exchange Link. I am having problem while running the myarduino_blink.slx demo.
My MATLAB version is R2015a, and I am using an Arduino Uno. I ran the file setup_custom_target_arduino.m after changing the relevant directory listing and the arduino version in the m file, and I got the output of Arduino on COM 3, which was correct.
After this, I checked the Simulink Library Browser and I had the Custom C/C++ Target Arduino Library will all its modules. Now when I simulate the model, I get the following error:
Error in S-function 'myarduino_blink/Digital Output':
S-Function 'sfunar_digitalOutput' does not exist
Kindly help me out, what could I have done wrong?
Update 1
Ok, I solved the "does not exist" problem. Apparently, no MEX compiler was installed. So I installed the Windows SDK, then re-ran the m file and now I am able to generate the .mex64 files. Now I run into another problem, when I build the simulink model, it gives this error:
Build procedure for model: 'myarduino_blink' aborted due to an error
How to solve this?
setup_custom_target_arduino.m calls build_all_sfunctions.m which should compile all of the S-Functions in the blocks directory. It looks as if that hasn't occurred for some reason. Check in the blocks directory that each of the S-Functions has a .c, .tlc (both of which come with the package) and a .mex64 (which is the compiled version of the .c generated by build_all_sfunctions.m) file.
If they are not there then the setup hasn't executed correctly, and you'll need to compile all of the S-Functions.
If they are there then you most likely have some sort of path issue (although since you say you can see the library in the library browser this seems unlikely).