I'm interested in using the intuit-partner-platform rest API to automatically generate invoices into our QuickBooks Online account, from an in house database. Although it would be interesting to eventually create an application that I could sell to other parties, I'm mainly trying to get my feet wet with this specific internal need.
Is there any problem with using the Intuit-partner-platform in this way?
Would my company be able to continue to use this application even if it is not sold to other consumers?
IPP Intuit Anywhere is the new platform only for SaaS applications.
Ref - https://developer.intuit.com/docs/0025_quickbooksapi/0058_faq#What_types_of_applications_are_supported_with_QuickBooks_API.3F
Dev docs - https://developer.intuit.com/docs/0025_quickbooksapi/0010_getting_started
QBO API docs - https://developer.intuit.com/docs/0025_quickbooksapi/0050_data_services/v2/0400_quickbooks_online
Intuit still provides the traditional QBSDK SDK v12, which is useful if you are creating a custom integration for one company, or focused entirely on desktop scenarios only.
QBSDK Ref - https://developer.intuit.com/docs/0025_quickbooksapi/0055_devkits/0250_qb
Thanks
Related
I'm developing an ecommerce website.
It's for a "ground-based" clothing store that is used to sells only via third party platform.
And now want a own website.
I started with Wordpress+Woocommerce.
Then i tried a ZeitNow+Next+Graphql+React version.
It connects itself to Wordpress+Woocomerce database via GraphQL Queries.
It uses ZeitNow to avoid implementing a real Node+Express server on my machine.
Which path to choose to complete the website and publish it ? My doubts are related mainly to COSTS.
If i choose the classic WP+Woocommerce way i need :
0-20 EUR /year for Domain Name.
120EUR / year approximately for a classic web server (with PHP+MySQL) hosting plan where to place the Wordpress+Woocommerce.
If i'd like to choose second option, based on what i know actually i need :
0-20 EUR /year for Domain Name.
120EUR / year approximately for a classic web server (with PHP+MySQL) hosting plan where to place the Wordpress+Woocommerce "head" part of my project, .
0EUR /year for serveless ZeitNow (free plan).
But where i need to place the "App" (ZeitNow+Next+GraphQl+React)?
An other Web server (with Node) ?
So an other 120EUR/ year plan ?
Or beacuse it's serverless i can only "deploy" to zeitNow and only link my domain to ZeitNow?
Its not clear to me.
I found on the web things like "Netifly", "Firebase", "Heroku", "AWS" ...
Are they all equivalent to Zeit Now?
I would like to publish a website with benefits of WooCommerce CMS system.
Like adding products, managing stocks, handling discounts plans, access to PayPal and Stripe payment methods integrations (i don't trust my self enough to build integration on my own due to security risks).
I wolud like also the keep benefits of using React for front End like performance (at least perceived) for Final User, or no need of Ajax request to update Cart and Wishlist.
And what about calculating if my project needs a "payed plan" of ZeitNow/Netifly/AWS to manage the request? How i can calculate them?
Sorry for the high number of question, but for me, understand the co-existence of these things is overwhelming!
Thanks.
You will always need a paid plan on any platform if you are running a for-profit endeavor.
You may need ZEIT Now to host your frontend and another server for the GraphQL API unless you really want to go DevOps-less by using serverless functions.
Here are very relevant pages for calculating costs:
ZEIT Now pricing page. Notice the "Serverless Execution" and also "BandWidth" prices.
Netlify.
AWS.
In the end, you will need to deploy a "Proof-of-Concept" and be really careful with the metrics. It is impossible to pinpoint an exact number with a custom solution because depending on your implementation, it can be more or less expensive to make API calls. Solutions like Shopify may be the best approach for your type of app. I only recommend that you develop your own stack if you want to customize, scale, and prepare the base for a team of developers later.
Disclaimer: I work for ZEIT at the moment.
I need to develop a chatbot with these properties:
Platform - Skype for Business On-Premise
Function - Replies to user queries by looking in various knowledgebases (Multiple Platforms - Databases, Web APIs, etc.)
Basic textual conversation to begin with and will gradually evolve to send attachments
No calls/videos, just chat
Will be hosted on an external server with organisation VPN
A simple sip will be created for the chatbot which can be pinged by any user. I should be able to get this through to our IT dept.
Limited time for development
Scalability is an essential requirement but the organisation is fairly new to this, so they might be patient and allow me to make mistakes
My research has led me to these possible approaches:
SfB SDK - I have rejected this approach because it requires the client to be running at all times and doesn't seem to be scalable
UCMA with Application Endpoint - Haven't rejected this approach, but seems like I'll not go ahead with this because creation of Application Platforms seems tedious and requires me to make a lot of SfB server related IT requests
UCMA with User Endpoint - Great affinity towards this. I have experimented Tom Morgan's (thoughtstuff.co.uk) stuff and this seems like something I can start off right away
UCWA with Application Endpoint - Rejected this approach, because UCWA (from my research) appears unsuitable for On-premise and the setup also seems time consuming
UCWA with User Endpoint - Haven't rejected this approach, but I'm not sure if the Web API way is really a good approach for On-premise platform
I'd like to ask how am I doing so far, but that seems too vague
What would you suggest is a good way to achieve this?
Also, can someone be patient enough to reply the drawbacks and advantages of each approach for my use case. I'd like to make an informed decision and not reject any approach, just because of a misunderstood overhead
I have been asking around in my organisation and other circles.
And since I am not receiving any quick responses, I'll keep adding what I have learnt.
This way a person in the dev community will have a log of how I went with this.
UCWA is better suited for S4B online (compared to on premise) and is generally used by people who are comfortable with RESTful and have low familiarity with .NET development
UCMA is apparently THE WAY to go and for any on-premise bot requirements, preferably with an application endpoint.
So for our development, we are starting with UCMA user endpoint so that we can deliver a basic start as a version-one
And meanwhile we shall also get in touch with the IT department and Lync administrators for creation of Application Endpoints
Once we have this the same functionality that we had with the user endpoint will be copied over to the Application Endpoint version
Keep watching this space for further updates
There are a ton of online CMS services out there. And a ton of (new) backend-as-a-service products too. But I can't seem to find what I am looking for.
I am building an app for a client. The app contains data about shops, products, and more. The client must be able to update this data (and not just one person: each shop manager needs to be able to log in and edit the data for their own shop). And of course the app must be able to access this data.
Client edits data online
This has to be extremely user-friendly and completely online. I don't want to sell my client something where they need to install stuff on their server. I don't want to sell them something that's accessible online but looks like phpMyAdmin.
I want a shop owner to be able to go to a webpage, log in, and then see a pretty UI where they can edit the data for their shop. The back-end needs to have a pretty front-end that's auto-generated for whatever data this particular shop owner is allowed to edit.
So there are two bits: storing data in the cloud in such a way that it can be accessed by the app (which I am building with Titanium), and allowing the client to log into the backend and edit the data in a non-tech, user-friendly way.
Here's a list of things I tried...
Backend-as-a-service
Services with a great back-end, but without easy auto-generated data editing website:
Appcelerator (Titanium) Cloud Service
Amazon EC2
Stackmob
BackBeam
WebVanta
Parse
API o Mat
ShepHertz Cloud42
Kii
Online CMS
Services that provide a nice way for clients to edit data, but no easy way for apps to connect:
CloudCMS
(and many others I'm sure)
It's insane that no-one seems to be providing the cross-breed of BaaS and online CMS. So many people are building apps for clients, and so many clients are not tech-savvy and are reluctant to get a special server and host database software they don't understand. Why does this not exist? What am I missing?
With apiOmat it's easy to create your own data-editing app for e.g. with JavaScript SDK and HTML. Or you send a feature request so that they build a module for your preferred CMS.
As you mentioned, Cloud CMS is a really good option (disclaimer: I'm one of the founders). The product provides an enterprise content management backend and an API that lets you plug in some really powerful features right into your mobile apps.
This month, we released a brand new user interface which provides much of what you're asking about. Instant forms, document libraries, search and workflow all in one place.
You can check out Cloud CMS here: http://www.cloudcms.com
I completely agree with your assessment particularly with respect to the last mile (getting the final app built). It's kind of the wild west out there and the strong technologies are still proving out.
You mentioned Titanium - that's a good choice. I also quite like the Ionic Framework (http://www.drifty.com/). It's a step in the right direction.
I'm looking to interact with my Microsoft Dynamics CRM system from my iPhone, performing tasks such as pulling down, updating, creating and deleting records.
Is this possible? If so, can anyone link me to any good resources on the matter or provide me with any information you feel would be relevant?
Many thanks,
Jack
Yes this will be possible and there are at least some relevant pointers in the CRM SDK (Development from Non-.NET Clients in Microsoft Dynamics CRM) however general support and anecdotal information is sparse (in fact the referenced topic and it's links are all that exist in an official sense).
You will be accessing via the SOAP endpoint and the link to the WSDL for that is exposed via the CRM UI (Settings > Customizations > Developer Resources).
I'd start with downloading the CRM SDK and reading the topics I linked to.
Caveat - I know nothing of Objective-C or IOS
I don't know anything about this, but maybe that'll help: http://www.cwrmobility.com/
If your looking to develop something yourlself, this might help: http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=13621
It is possible, you'll need to use the web services API.
MSDN web services API docs
It uses JScript, so on the iPhone, you should use NSURLRequest and NSURLConnection to retrieve the data coming back.
Here is another link for using JSON, as iOS has a JSON parser built in now
MS CRM using JSON
We are in the early stage of overhauling a multi-brand website built using a custom developed java mvc framework to enable web 2.0 features. Built-in features we are looking at are: i18n, sso, content search and indexing, personalization, mashup support, ajax support, rich media content storage and management support, friendly to search engine optimizations, bookmarkable URLs, support for social networking sites, support for page composition and decoration using templates.
A combination of these features are supported by many portal and cms software.
Any insights will be very helpful in using a portal/cms combination to address this requirements!
This is a follow-up on this post focusing on the portal/cms angle
we are developing the same sort of thing, we are using Umbraco, open source, by far the best opensource we have come across
Joomla comes to mind. The ability to skin and implement templates is a core strength of the product. You can create channels of content as well as enable varying levels of user customization via roles.
Another nice feature is that you can export your changes to your template. that way you can port your changes easily from QA to a customer site.
Finally, there is a very active community of extension developers with customizations, as well as numerous template designers.
If you require a Portal that does integrate with your CRM such as Salesforce and yet allows you to build a Mobile-Optimized branded portal for Customers, Partners or any other groups of users you can check out Magentrix:
www.magentrix.com