I'm working on getting a test case working with Play 2.1.1 and Specs2 and am running into an interesting problem. I create a FakeRequest to send to a Controller, but the function in the controller never gets called.
Here's the test code (slightly simplified, but with all the moving parts):
"controller" should {
"do something" in new WithApplication {
val controller = new MyController()
controller.main() {
new FakeRequest(
PUT,
routes.MyController.main().toString,
new FakeHeaders(Seq("Content-Type" -> Seq("text/xml"))),
AnyContentAsXml(<xml>xml</xml>)
)
}
}
And here's the main function in the controller (well, at least just the start of it):
def main() = Action(BodyParsers.parse.xml) { request =>
println("main")
}
This code never hits main. Strangely enough, though, if I make the FakeHeader with no parameters, and remove AnyContentAsXml, just sending the Xml Element to the controller, then it works:
new FakeRequest(
PUT,
routes.MyController.main().toString,
new FakeHeaders,
<xml>xml</xml>
)
Does anyone have any idea why this would happen?
Here is your test little modified showing two ways testing the controller. The reason AnyContentAsXml is not working for you because your testing is mixing two approaches together.
"one way" in new WithApplication {
val action = controllers.Application.main
val req: FakeRequest[scala.xml.NodeSeq] = new FakeRequest(
PUT,
"some url",
new FakeHeaders(Seq("Content-Type" -> Seq("text/xml"))),
<xml>xml</xml>
)
val x = action(req)
status(x) should beEqualTo(200)
}
"2nd way" in new WithApplication {
val Some(result) = route(new FakeRequest("PUT",
"/",
new FakeHeaders(Seq("Content-Type" -> Seq("text/xml"))),
AnyContentAsXml(<xml>xml</xml>)))
status(result) should beEqualTo(200)
}
}
In the second approach Play is take care of unpacking the xml for the BodyParser to use. And here is the controller:
def main = Action(BodyParsers.parse.xml) { request =>
println(">>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> main")
Ok("")
}
Related
i am new to Scala and gatling. i need to run scenaio if previous scenario is passed using doIf.
My code is:
HttpRequest
object CompanyProfileRequest {
val check_company_profile: HttpRequestBuilder = http("Create Company
Profile")
.get(onboarding_url_perf + "/profile")
.headers(basic_headers)
.headers(auth_headers)
.check(status.is(404).saveAs("NOT_FOUND"))
val create_company_profile: HttpRequestBuilder = http("Create Company
Profile")
.post(onboarding_url_perf + "/profile")
.headers(basic_headers)
.headers(auth_headers)
.body(RawFileBody("data/company/company_profile_corporation.json")).asJson
.check(status.is(200))
.check(jsonPath("$.id").saveAs("id"))
}
Scenario class is:-
object ProfileScenarios {
val createProfileScenarios: ScenarioBuilder = scenario("Create profile
Scenario")
.exec(TokenScenario.getCompanyUsersGwtToken)
.exec(CompanyProfileRequest.check_company_profile)
.doIf(session => session.attributes.contains("NOT_FOUND")) {
exec(CompanyProfileRequest.create_company_profile).exitHereIfFailed
}
}
And Simulation is :-
private val createProfile = ProfileScenarios
.createProfileScenarios
.inject(constantUsersPerSec(1) during (Integer.getInteger("ramp", 1)
second))
setUp(createProfile.protocols(httpConf))
Whenever i am running this simulation, I am not able to check this condition:-
.doIf(session => session.attributes.contains("NOT_FOUND"))
Any help is much appreciated.
Regards,
Vikram
I was able to get your example to work, but here's a better way...
the main issue with using
.check(status.is(404).saveAs("NOT_FOUND"))
and
.doIf(session => session.attributes.contains("NOT_FOUND"))
to implement conditional switching is that you've now got a check that will cause check_company_profile to fail when it really shouldn't (when you get a 200, for example).
A nicer way is to use a check transform to insert a boolean value into the "NOT_FOUND" variable. This way, your check_company_profile action can still pass when the office exists, and the doIf construct can just use the EL syntax and be much clearer as to why it's executing.
val check_company_profile: HttpRequestBuilder = http("Create Company Profile")
.get(onboarding_url_perf + "/profile")
.headers(basic_headers)
.headers(auth_headers)
.check(
status.in(200, 404), //both statuses are valid for this request
status.transform( status => 404.equals(status) ).saveAs("OFFICE_NOT_FOUND") //if the office does not exist, set a boolean flag in the session
)
now that you've got a boolean session variable ("OFFICE_NOT_FOUND") you can just use that in your doIf...
.doIf("${OFFICE_NOT_FOUND}") {
exec(CompanyProfileRequest.create_company_profile).exitHereIfFailed
}
This drives me crazy, I have 2 http requests in a sample application:
open class RestController : Controller() {
val api = Rest()
init {
api.baseURI = "http://127.0.0.1:5059/"
}
}
class PendingCtlr : RestController() {
fun load(): ObservableList<PendingEntity> {
val txt = api.get("pendings").list()
val temp = txt.toModel<PendingEntity>()
return temp.observable()
}
}
class ConfirmedCtrl : RestController() {
fun load(id: Long): ObservableList<ConfirmedEntity> {
val li= api.get("confirmeds").list()
val temp = li.toModel<ConfirmedEntity>()
return temp.observable()
}
}
The first one works, the second one doesn't even hit the application level, it gets rejected with 400 BadRequest by my backend (Werkzeug).
I see absolutely no difference in both functions, and I can call both routes from my Swagger, as well as from python as well as from curl! Could someone please advise at least where to look for debug?
EDIT: The problem was on server side -_- Solved
I´m implementing my test framework using scalatest and I think I made a mistake using this framework instead of Cucumber
I´m trying to use some sort of features as Scenario outline of cucumber to avoid break DRY
here my problem
feature("Features of mus client") {
scenario("GET message with mus client") {
Given("a Musin message")
val config: Properties = new Properties
config.put("method", "POST")
config.put("encoding", "UTF-8")
config.put("uri", "http://localhost:9083/musClient")
When("I make a request to f2e")
val response = HttpClientTest.request(config, createJSON(READ))
Then("The message it´s returned successfully")
assert(response != null)
}
scenario("POST message with mus client") {
Given("a Musin message")
val config: Properties = new Properties
config.put("method", "POST")
config.put("encoding", "UTF-8")
config.put("uri", "http://localhost:9083/musClient")
When("I make a request to f2e")
val response = HttpClientTest.request(config, createJSON(CREATE))
Then("The message it´s returned successfully")
assert(response != null)
}
As you can see I have two scenarios where the 99% it´s the same steps but a variable that change the request.
Any idea how to do this elegant and efficient in scalatest
And I'm one of those too who chose scalatest over cucumber, cucumber was too much for me(ME) to write the feature file, and then come back to scala/java file and change accordingly. Maintain two files. I actually played cucumber java, scala cucumber might be more fluent. Anyway, I am liking scalatest so far for all my unit testing, component testing and the flow testing.
In case like yours if the properties are common for multiple scenarios and you won't mutate inside scenarios then defining as common property would be fine, as below.
class E2E extends FeatureSpec with GivenWhenThen {
feature("Features of mus client") {
Given("http config")
val config: Properties = new Properties(){{
put("method", "POST") //you are doing POST in both case by the way
put("encoding", "UTF-8")
put("uri", "http://localhost:9083/musClient")
}}
scenario("GET message with mus client") {
When("I make a request to f2e")
val response = HttpClientTest.request(config, createJSON(READ))
Then("The message it´s returned successfully")
assert(response != null)
}
scenario("POST message with mus client") {
When("I make a request to f2e")
val response = HttpClientTest.request(config, createJSON(CREATE))
Then("The message it´s returned successfully")
assert(response != null)
}
}
}
But, You might also want to use property based testing for the only part that changes, property based check was very fluent and readable in spock framework.
property based check in scalatest would look like below where I am testing for two different input parameters. (you neeed import org.scalatest.prop.TableDrivenPropertyChecks._)
class TestE2E extends FeatureSpec with GivenWhenThen {
val requestResponse =
Table(
("request", "response"),
( "GET", "GET-something"),
( "POST", "POST-something")
)
feature("testMe") {
forAll (requestResponse) { (givenRequestFromTable: String, expectedResponseFromTable: String) =>
scenario("for input " + givenRequestFromTable) {
When("input is " + givenRequestFromTable)
val output = testMe(input = givenRequestFromTable)
Then("responseFromTable has something appended to it")
assert(output == expectedResponseFromTable)
}
}
}
def testMe(input: String) : String = {
input + "-something"
}
}
There would be two scenarios based on two given properties,
And for you, the tests would be something as below with property based, hope there's no compile error :)
import org.scalatest.prop.TableDrivenPropertyChecks._
import org.scalatest.prop.Tables.Table
import org.scalatest.{FeatureSpec, GivenWhenThen}
class PaulWritesSpecs extends FeatureSpec with GivenWhenThen {
val requestResponse =
Table(
("httpMethod", "requestType"),
("GET", READ),
("POST", CREATE))
feature("Features of mus client") {
forAll(requestResponse) { (httpMethod: String, requestType: String) => {
scenario(s"$httpMethod message with mus client") {
Given("http config")
val config: Properties = new Properties() {{
put("method", httpMethod)
put("encoding", "UTF-8")
put("uri", "http://localhost:9083/musClient")
}}
When("I make a request to f2e")
val response = HttpClientTest.request(config, createJSON(requestType))
Then("The message it´s returned successfully")
assert(response != null)
}
}
}
}
}
Helo,
at the beginning i wold like to apologize for my english :)
akka=2.3.6
spray=1.3.2
scalatest=2.2.1
I encountered strange behavior of teting routes, which asks actors in handleWith directive,
I've route with handleWith directive
pathPrefix("firstPath") {
pathEnd {
get(complete("Hello from this api")) ~
post(handleWith { (data: Data) =>{ println("receiving data")
(dataCalculator ? data).collect {
case Success(_) =>
Right(Created -> "")
case throwable: MyInternalValidatationException =>
Left(BadRequest -> s"""{"${throwable.subject}" : "${throwable.cause}"}""")
}
}})
}
}
and simple actor wchich always responds when receive object Data and has own receive block wrapped in LoggingReceive, so I should see logs when message is receiving by actor
and i test it using (I think simple code)
class SampleStarngeTest extends WordSpec with ThisAppTestBase with OneInstancePerTest
with routeTestingSugar {
val url = "/firstPath/"
implicit val routeTestTimeout = RouteTestTimeout(5 seconds)
def postTest(data: String) = Post(url).withJson(data) ~> routes
"posting" should {
"pass" when {
"data is valid and comes from the identified user" in {
postTest(correctData.copy(createdAt = System.currentTimeMillis()).asJson) ~> check {
print(entity)
status shouldBe Created
}
}
"report is valid and comes from the anonymous" in {
postTest(correctData.copy(createdAt = System.currentTimeMillis(), adid = "anonymous").asJson) ~> check {
status shouldBe Created
}
}
}
}
}
and behavior:
When I run either all tests in package (using Intellij Idea 14 Ultimate) or sbt test I encounter the same results
one execution -> all tests pass
and next one -> not all pass, this which not pass I can see:
1. fail becouse Request was neither completed nor rejected within X seconds ( X up tp 60)
2. system console output from route from line post(handleWith { (data: Data) =>{ println("receiving data"), so code in handleWith was executed
3. ask timeout exception from route code, but not always (among failed tests)
4. no logs from actor LoggingReceive, so actor hasn't chance to respond
5. when I rerun teststhe results are even different from the previous
Is there problem with threading? or test modules, thread blocking inside libraries? or sth else? I've no idea why it isn't work :(
I'd like to test a Grails controller that is sending out emails using the grails Email plugin. I'm at a loss exactly how to mock the sendMail closure in order for interactions to work. Here's my latest version of the test code:
def 'controller should send a multipart email'() {
given: 'a mocked mailService'
controller.mailService = Mock(grails.plugin.mail.MailService)
controller.mailService.sendMail(*_) >> Mock(org.springframework.mail.MailMessage)
when:
controller.sendNow()
then:
1* _.multipart(true)
}
The controller code looks something like what you'd expect, e.g.:
def mailService
def sendNow() {
mailService.sendMail {
multipart true
to 'example#example.org'
from 'me#here.com'
subject 'a subject'
body 'a body'
}
}
If I run this test, I get 0 invocations of my multipart interaction instead of 1. The second line of the given: block seems suspicious to me, but if I try to mock a Closure instead of org.springframework.mail.MailMessage my test crashes. I should also mention that the controller itself works as expected (it couldn't wait for me to figure out the unit tests first).
Edited
Aha, looking at the code with a fresh mind a few hours later, I can see why the above code does not work; in order for me to catch multipart and other DSL calls, I would have to mock the closure itself, not the sendMail method (and I can't do that since the closure is defined inside the controller itself). What I probably can do is check the arguments to the sendMail method to see everything necessary was passed into it.
I was able to achieve this in Spock with the following:
def messageBuilder
def bodyParams
def setup(){
def mockMailService = new MockFor(MailService)
mockMailService.ignore.sendMail{ callable ->
messageBuilder = new MailMessageBuilder(null, new ConfigObject())
messageBuilder.metaClass.body = { Map params ->
bodyParams = params
}
callable.delegate = messageBuilder
callable.resolveStrategy = Closure.DELEGATE_FIRST
callable.call()
}
service.mailService = mockMailService.proxyInstance()
}
And an example test:
def "sendEmailReceipt_passesCorrectParams"(){
when:
def receiptItems = [] << [item: "item1", price: 100]
service.sendEmailReceipt(receiptItems, "some#email.com")
then:
messageBuilder.message.to[0] == "some#email.com"
messageBuilder.message.subject == "My subject"
bodyParams.view == "/mailtemplates/emailReceipt"
bodyParams.model.receiptItems == data
}
You can install the greenMail plugin, and use it in an integration test:
From the greenmail plugin home page:
import com.icegreen.greenmail.util.*
class GreenmailTests extends GroovyTestCase {
def mailService
def greenMail
void testSendMail() {
Map mail = [message:'hello world', from:'from#piragua.com', to:'to#piragua.com', subject:'subject']
mailService.sendMail {
to mail.to
from mail.from
subject mail.subject
body mail.message
}
assertEquals(1, greenMail.getReceivedMessages().length)
def message = greenMail.getReceivedMessages()[0]
assertEquals(mail.message, GreenMailUtil.getBody(message))
assertEquals(mail.from, GreenMailUtil.getAddressList(message.from))
assertEquals(mail.subject, message.subject)
}
void tearDown() {
greenMail.deleteAllMessages()
}
}
I'm not a Spock expert but you should be able to translate this junit test to spock style.
Source: http://grails.org/plugin/greenmail
Udpate, alternative by mocking sendMail
This is an answer to Gregor's update. In my opinion, you would have to mock the sendMail method, and inside this method have an stub that implements the different properties and methods that are used in the closure. Lets call it an evaluator. The you would initialize the closure's delegate to the evaluatro, and execute the closure. The evaluator should have the assertions. You see that I'm using more junit concepts here. I don't know how easily you can translate that into spock concepts. You probably would be able to us the behaviour checking facilities of spock.
class MailVerifier {
void multiPart(boolean v){
//...
}
void to(String address){
//...
}
boolean isVerified() {
//check internal state obtained by the appropriate invocation of the methods
}
}
def sendMail(Closure mailDefintion) {
def evaluator = createMailVerifier()
mailDefinition.delegate = evaluator
mailDefinition()
assert evaluator.verified
}
Take a look at plugin tests here: plugin integration test and here: plugin unit test. In my opinion it would be hard for you to mock all MailService dependencies - factory and builder that builds your mail message. I'd end up with testing only if my controller's sendNow is called.
Edit
I've found this answer. According to it you can try:
def 'controller should send a multipart email'() {
given: 'a mocked mailService'
def mockMailService = new Object()
def mockMessageBuilder = Mock(MessageBuilder)
mockMailService.metaClass.sendMail = { callable ->
callable.delegate = mockMessageBuilder
callable.resolveStrategy = Closure.DELEGATE_FIRST
callable.call()
}
controller.mailService = mockMailService
when:
controller.sendNow()
then:
1* mockMessageBuilder.multipart(true)
}
def mailService = Mock(MailService)
mockMailService.metaClass.sendMail = { ... your logic ... }
controller.mailService = mailService