I have a SQL Select query that's embedded in a piece of C# code which I don't want to change. My problem is that the query executes fine on SQLServer 2008 but not 2012.
The offending line of code is:
Select code as SiteCode from TimeSheetContracts S order by S.SiteCode
Executed in a database on SQL2008 it works fine. The same database upgraded to SQLServer 2012 errors with the following...
Msg 207, Level 16, State 1, Line 2
Invalid column name 'SiteCode'.
If I edit the query to be
Select code as SiteCode from TimeSheetContracts S order by SiteCode
it works fine. Can anyone explain this?
There is no column in TimeSheetContracts called SiteCode, so a reference to s.SiteCode is not valid. Aliasing in ORDER BY is a little more strict since SQL Server 2000, when the syntax was a little more forgiving. The only way s.SiteCode would have worked on your SQL Server 2008 instance was if your database was in COMPATIBILITY_LEVEL = 80 (go ahead and try it on a different database that is 90 or greater). Once you move to SQL Server 2012, 80 is no longer an option. On a 2005, 2008 or 2008 R2 instance, try this:
CREATE DATABASE floob;
GO
USE floob;
GO
CREATE TABLE dbo.SalesOrderHeader(SalesOrderID INT);
GO
SELECT SalesOrderID AS ID FROM dbo.SalesOrderHeader AS h ORDER BY h.ID; -- fails
GO
ALTER DATABASE floob SET COMPATIBILITY_LEVEL = 80;
GO
SELECT SalesOrderID AS ID FROM dbo.SalesOrderHeader AS h ORDER BY h.ID; -- works
GO
USE master;
GO
DROP DATABASE floob;
If you want to use the column alias, you'll need to (and should always have been) just use the alias. If you want to use the table alias prefix, you'll need to use s.code.
Related
In the past I have changed SQL Server compatibility level using an Alter Database statement. Is there a way to do it for an individual query rather than setting it for the complete database?
Starting with later versions of SQL, (I believe SQL 2017 and afterward), you can add this as a query hint.
SELECT * FROM my_table QUERY_OPTIMIZER_COMPATIBILITY_LEVEL_100
for example, to run in 2008 mode. Or you could change the 100 to 150 to run in 2019 compatibility mode or anywhere in-between.
SELECT *
FROM FOO
OPTION(USE HINT('QUERY_OPTIMIZER_COMPATIBILITY_LEVEL_150'))
QUERY_OPTIMIZER_COMPATIBILITY_LEVEL hint docs
I installed the war file distribution using the install scripts in buildomatic. The installation is successful but when I boot tomcat server it shows some database exceptions
https://gist.github.com/shruti-palshikar/5ae801674dbd2a537518
I checked if the latest postgres driver exists in the tomcat/lib.
I also checked if the database 'jasperserver' has all the necessary tables
However these tables are empty , does anyone know which script loads data into tables?
Any help is appreciated
The actual error from PostgreSQL is:
relation "jiresourcefolder" does not exist
The query seems to be:
select this_.id as id5_0_, this_.version as version5_0_, this_.uri as uri5_0_, this_.hidden as hidden5_0_, this_.name as name5_0_, this_.label as label5_0_, this_.description as descript7_5_0_, this_.parent_folder as parent8_5_0_, this_.creation_date as creation9_5_0_, this_.update_date as update10_5_0_
from JIResourceFolder this_ where (this_.uri=?)
Typically ugly framework generated SQL.
There are only two possibilities:
There is no table "jiresourcefolder", "JIResourceFolder" or any other variation in capitals.
The table was created with quotes to preserve its case and the query is not using quotes.
The following will work:
CREATE TABLE JiReSoRrCeFoLdEr ...
SELECT * FROM jiresourcefolder...
SELECT * FROM JIRESOURCEFOLDER...
SELECT * FROM JIresourceFolder...
Any unquoted table (or column) names are internally mapped to lower-case so will all match.
If however you quote a created table:
CREATE TABLE "JIResourceFolder"
SELECT * FROM "JIResourceFolder" -- works
SELECT * FROM JIResourceFolder -- doesn't
Check your database schema and see if you have this table and whether it is all lower-case. Then, check the documentation for your java framework(s) and see if there is some flag that controls quoting of database tables. It seems likely that the flag is set in one place and not in another.
I just had the same issue in Jasper Studio.
My problem was that a wrong Data Adapter (a DB that did not have such a table) was assigned to the Report.
I had switch to the Design window and select the right Data Adapter in the upper right of that window right beside "Settings".
The following query works efficiently when run directly against Oracle 11 using TOAD (with native Oracle drivers)
select ... from ... where ...
and srvg_ocd in (
select ocd
from rptofc
where eff_endt = to_date('12/31/9999','mm/dd/yyyy')
and rgn_nm = 'Boston'
) ...
;
The exact same query "never" returns if passed from SQL Server 2008 to the same Oracle database via openquery(). SQL Server has a link to the Oracle database using an Oracle Provider OLE DB driver.
select * from openquery( servername, '
select ... from ... where ...
and srvg_ocd in (
select ocd
from rptofc
where eff_endt = to_date(''12/31/9999'',''mm/dd/yyyy'')
and rgn_nm = ''Boston''
) ...
');
The query doesn't return in a reasonable amount of time, and the user kills the query. I don't know if it would eventually return with the correct result.
This result where the direct TOAD query works efficiently and the openquery() version "never" returns is reproducible.
A small modification to the openquery() gives the correct efficient result: Change eff_endt to trunc(eff_endt).
That is well and good, but it doesn't seem like the change should be necessary.
openquery() is supposed to be pass through, so how can there be a difference between the TOAD and openquery() behavior?
The reason we care is because we frequently develop complex queries with TOAD directly accessing Oracle. Once we have the query functioning and optimized, we convert it to an openquery() string for use in a SQL Server application. It is extremely aggravating to have a query suddenly fail with openquery() when we know it worked as a direct query. Then we have to search for a work-around through trial and error.
I would like to see the Oracle trace files for the two scenarios, but the Oracle server is within another organization, and we are not getting cooperation from the Oracle DBAs.
Does anyone know of any driver, or TOAD, or ??? issues that could account for the discrepancy? Is there any way to eliminate the problem such that both methods always give the same result?
I know you asked this a while ago but I just came across your question.
I agree, they should be the same. Obviously there is a difference. We need to find out where the difference is.
I am thinking out loud as I type...
What happens if you specify just a few column instead of select * from openquery?
How many rows are supposed to be returned?
What if, in the oracle select, you limit the returned rows?
How quickly does the openquery timeout?
Are TOAD and SS on the same machine? Are you RDPing into the SS and running toad from there?
Are they using the same drivers? including bit? (32/64) version?
Are they using the same account on oracle?
It is interesting that using the trunc() makes a difference. I assume [eff_endt] is one of the returned fields?
I am wondering if SS is getting all the rows back but it is choking on doing the date conversions. The date type in oracle may need to be converted to a ss date type before ss shows it to you.
What if you insert the rows from the openquery into a table where the date field is just a (n)varchar. I am thinking ss might just dump the date it is getting back from oracle into that text field without trying to convert it.
something like:
insert into mytable(f1,f2,f3,datetimeX)
select f1,f2,f3,datetimeX from openquery( servername, '
select f1,f2,f3,datetimeX from ... where ...
and srvg_ocd in (
select ocd
from rptofc
where eff_endt = to_date(''12/31/9999'',''mm/dd/yyyy'')
and rgn_nm = ''Boston''
) ...
');
What if toad or ss is modifying the query statement before sending it to oracle. You could fire up wireshark and see what toad and ss are actually sending.
I would be very curious if you get this resolved. I link ss to oracle often and have not run into this issue.
Here are basic things you can check for to see what the database is doing after it receives the query. First, check that the execution plans are the same in TOAD as when the query runs using openquery. You could plan the query yourself in TOAD using:
explain plan set statement_id = 'openquery_test' for <your query here>;
select *
from table(dbms_xplan.display(statement_id => 'openquery_test';
then have someone initiate the query using openquery() and have someone with permissions to view v$ tables to run:
select sql_id from v$session where username = '<user running the query>';
(If there's more than one connection with the same user, you'll have to find an additional attribute to isolate the row representing the session running the query.)
select *
from table(dbms_xplan.display_cursor('<value from query above'));
If those look the same then I'd move on to checking database waits and see what it's stuck on.
select se.username
, sw.event
, sw.p1text
, sw.p2text
, sw.p3text
, sw.wait_time_micro/1000000 as seconds_in_wait
, sw.state
, sw.time_since_last_wait_micro/1000000 as seconds_since_last_wait
from v$session se
inner join
v$session_wait sw
on se.sid = sw.sid
where se.username = '<user running the query>'
;
(again, if there's more than one session with the same username, you'll need another attribute to whittle it down to the one you're interested in.)
If the plans are different, then you need to find out why, or if they're the same, look into what it's waiting on (e.g. SQL*Net message to client ?) and why.
I noticed a difference using OLEDB through MS Access (2013) connecting to Oracle 10g & 11g tables, in that it did not always recognize indexes or primary keys on the Oracle tables properly. The same query through an MS Access 2000 database (using odbc) worked fine / had no problem with indexes & keys. The only way I found to fix the OLEDB version was to include all of the key fields in the SELECT -- which was not a satisfying answer, but it's all I could find. This might be an option to try through SSMS / OpenQuery(...) as well.
Besides that... you can try some alternatives to OPENQUERY, such as:
4-part names: SELECT ... FROM Server..Schema.Table
Execute AT: EXEC ('select...') at linked server
But as for why the OLEDB provider works differently than the native Oracle Provider -- the providers are not identical, and the native provider would be more likely to pave-over Oracle quirks than the more generic OLEDB provider would.
I have a table called MyTable on which I have defined a trigger, like so:
CREATE TRIGGER dbo.trg_Ins_MyTable
ON dbo.MyTable
FOR INSERT
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
insert SomeLinkedSrv.Catalog.dbo.OtherTable
(MyTableId, IsProcessing, ModifiedOn)
values (-1, 0, GETUTCDATE())
END
GO
Whenever I try to insert a row in MyTable, I get this error message:
Msg 3910, Level 16, State 2, Line 1
Transaction context in use by another session.
I have SomeLinkedSrv properly defined as a linked server (for example, select * from SomeLinkedSrv.Catalog.dbo.OtherTable works just fine).
How can I avoid the error and successfully insert record+execute the trigger?
Loopback linked servers can't be used in a distributed transaction if MARS is enabled.
Loopback linked servers cannot be used in a distributed transaction.
Trying a distributed query against a loopback linked server from
within a distributed transaction causes an error, such as error 3910:
"[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]Transaction context in
use by another session." This restriction does not apply when an
INSERT...EXECUTE statement, issued by a connection that does not have
multiple active result sets (MARS) enabled, executes against a
loopback linked server. Note that the restriction still applies when
MARS is enabled on a connection.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms188716(SQL.105).aspx
I solve It.
I was using the same linked server to call the second procedure and then into the procedure I was using the same linked server.
It's very Easy, only we have to know the restricctions of linked servers.
I have resolved it by removing linked server used in the stored procedure and then called stored procedure by the same linked server. It wasnt working in DEV environement.
One of causes of this situation is a trigger that works for linked-sever database table. An also SQL version of SQL-Server which processes database matters. To avoid this ERROR during sql query execution we should temporarily disable and after execution enable triggers for tables updated. All with database name check. Here is an example:
Select * From People where PersonId In (#PersonId, #PersonIdRight)
IF 'DOUBLE' = DB_NAME()
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[PeopleSites] DISABLE TRIGGER [PeopleSites_ENTDB_UPDATE]
Update PeopleSites Set PersonId = #PersonIdRight Where PersonId = #PersonId
IF 'DOUBLE' = DB_NAME()
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[PeopleSites] ENABLE TRIGGER [PeopleSites_ENTDB_UPDATE]
Select * From PeopleSites where PersonId In (#PersonId, #PersonIdRight)
I also got the same error in our DEV environemnt, moving the linked databases to another sql instance resolved the issue. In our production environment these databases are already on separate instances
In my case I was using SQL 2005 and got "transaction context in use by another session" when running Insert....exec over a linked server. The fix for me was to patch from SP2 build 3161 to SP3. SP2 cumulative 5 is supposed to fix though.
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/947486
When remote database sits on the same server,configure the linked server without specifying the database server ip / hostname and port. Just the database name should be sufficient.
I was getting the same "transaction context in use by another session error" when trying to run an UPDATE query:
BEGIN TRAN
--ROLLBACK TRAN
--COMMIT TRAN
UPDATE did
SET did.IsProcessed = 0,
did.ProcessingLockID = NULL
FROM [proddb\production].DLP.dbo.tbl_DLPID did (NOLOCK)
WHERE did.dlpid IN ('bunch of GUIDs')
--WHERE did.DLPID IN (SELECT DLPID FROM #TableWithData)
However I didn't realize I was already trying to run this on the DLP database on the ProdDb\Production server. Once I removed that "[proddb\production].DLP.dbo." prefix from the query, it worked fine.
After much fiddling, I've managed to install the right ODBC driver and have successfully created a linked server on SQL Server 2008, by which I can access my PostgreSQL db from SQL server.
I'm copying all of the data from some of the tables in the PgSQL DB into SQL Server using merge statements that take the following form:
with mbRemote as
(
select
*
from
openquery(someLinkedDb,'select * from someTable')
)
merge into someTable mbLocal
using mbRemote on mbLocal.id=mbRemote.id
when matched
/*edit*/
/*clause below really speeds things up when many rows are unchanged*/
/*can you think of anything else?*/
and not (mbLocal.field1=mbRemote.field1
and mbLocal.field2=mbRemote.field2
and mbLocal.field3=mbRemote.field3
and mbLocal.field4=mbRemote.field4)
/*end edit*/
then
update
set
mbLocal.field1=mbRemote.field1,
mbLocal.field2=mbRemote.field2,
mbLocal.field3=mbRemote.field3,
mbLocal.field4=mbRemote.field4
when not matched then
insert
(
id,
field1,
field2,
field3,
field4
)
values
(
mbRemote.id,
mbRemote.field1,
mbRemote.field2,
mbRemote.field3,
mbRemote.field4
)
WHEN NOT MATCHED BY SOURCE then delete;
After this statement completes, the local (SQL Server) copy is fully in sync with the remote (PgSQL server).
A few questions about this approach:
is it sane?
it strikes me that an update will be run over all fields in local rows that haven't necessarily changed. The only prerequisite is that the local and remote id field match. Is there a more fine grained approach/a way of constraining the merge statment to only update rows that have actually changed?
That looks like a reasonable method if you're not able or wanting to use a tool like SSIS.
You could add in a check on the when matched line to check if changes have occurred, something like:
when matched and mbLocal.field1 <> mbRemote.field1 then
This many be unwieldy if you have more than a couple of columns to check, so you could add a check column in (like LastUpdatedDate for example) to make this easier.