All in the title : do we need 2 mongos per shard in MongoDB ? I am not sure to understand exactly what mongos are for and if my website will communicate with them or if it is something internal to MongoDB.
If you have cluster set up (with shards, not to be confused with replica set), then you have to have mongos instances deployed. It's a router process. It knows which data resides where. Application talks to mongos, it routes the request to corresponding shard. Talking to shards directly is strongly discouraged.
You must have at least one mongos process. You can have more, they have small resource footprint. I usually deploy one mongos per application server.
A mongos is basically nothing more than a router which gathers a configuration of your cluster from config servers, caches that config, and uses it to route targeted and scatter and gather operations within a cluster of shards. It can also be used for aggregation as such if aggregation queries are common in your app the mongos can take some CPU and memory, however, for the most part they have no weight and can run on the smallest server.
You do not require 2 mongos, the number depends upon the operations being sent through that router. You can in theory do with one, however, that isn't very redundant and cerates a single point of failure, 2 makes that less possible.
Related
We want to create a MongoDB shard (v. 2.4). The official documentation recommends to have 3 config servers.
However, the policies of our company won't allow us to get 3 extra servers for this purpose. Since we have already 3 application servers (1 web node, 2 process nodes) we are considering to put the configuration servers in the same application servers, with the mongos. Availability is not critical for us.
What do you think about this configuration? Can we face some problem or is it discouraged for some reason?
Given that Availability is not critical for your use case, I would say it should be fine to place the config servers in the same application servers and mongos.
If one of the process nodes is down, you will lose: 1 x mongos, 1 application server and 1 config server. During this down time, the other two config servers will be read-only , which means there won't be balancing of shards, modification to cluster config etc. Although your other two mongos should still be operational (CRUD wise). If your web-node is down, then you have a bigger problem to deal with.
If two of the nodes are down (2 process nodes, or 1 web server and process node), again, you would have bigger problem to deal with. i.e. Your applications are probably not going to work anyway.
Having said that, please consider the capacity of these nodes to be able to handle a mongos, an application server and a config server. i.e. CPU, RAM, network connections, etc.
I would recommend to test the deployment architecture in a development/staging cluster first under your typical workload and use case.
Also see Sharded Cluster High Availability for more info.
Lastly, I would recommend to check out MongoDB v3.2 which is the current stable release. The config servers in v3.2 are modelled as a replica set, see Sharded Cluster config servers for more info.
Technically is it supported to begin with just one shard for a shard cluster? So we can be ready for adding additional one(s) at anytime, at the same time save the cost of additional shard(s) before we really need it(them)?
To go further, is it possible to have a shard running on one single instance, instead of having to be based off of a 3 instance replica set?
From here, sharding is:
A database architecture that partitions data by key ranges and
distributes the data among two or more database instances.
A shard will be either a replica set or a standalone mongod instance. It is possible for you to use a single machine by using different ports to establish distinct communication endpoints for the config, mongod and mongos processes on the single machine. Also, yes, you may add a shard at a later time when you need to expand.
However, the point of providing sharding is to support horizontal scaling. Additionally, the point of sharded clustering is to provide failover and redundancy support. By using a single shard on a single server, you are losing the benefits of scaling and certainly failover.
The recommended production architecture includes:
Three config servers on separate machines for each sharded cluster.
Two or more replica sets as shards.
One or more query routers (mongos); typically, one mongos instance per application server.
Peruse the Sharded Cluster Requirements section in the documentation to get a feel for whether or not your environment needs sharding and sharded clusters since there is complexity in establishing such an architecture.
I am aware that mongodb has a master-slave architecture.
Therefore, I was thinking that the master would be the single point of failure in mongoDB since it takes care of all the requests and sends it to the slave nodes. However, when the master fails, then a new master is reelected from the slaves. Therefore I need some clarification on where the single point of failure lies.
Does mongoDB have a single point of failure? Is it in the master node?
Thanks,
MongoDB can be set up in a way that there is no single point of failure (at least none specific to MongoDB).
When you set up replication as suggested (which includes primary, secondary and an arbiter on a 3rd server), the secondary will take the role of the primary when it goes down. Keep in mind that this only works when the applications know both the primary and the secondary (how to make it aware depends on the driver).
When you have a sharded cluster, the mongo router process (mongos) and the config servers becomes additional possible points of failure, but you can also set up reduntant routers and config servers. To send the clients to another mongos server when theirs goes down, you need a 3rd party load-balancing solution.
For a proper production MongoDB setup with clustering, MongoDB Inc. suggests:
At least 2 mongos routers
Exactly 3 config servers
3 servers per shard (primary, secondary and arbiter), where the arbiters do not necessarily need dedicated servers and can share hardware with the routers, config servers, members of a different replica-set or app servers.
Can we have this type of configuration?
Two server running the following things each-
1.Mongo Config Server.
2.Mongo Router.
3.Application.
Total 4 EC2 servers-
First Server-Running the web application & mongos.
Second Server-Running the web application & mongos.
Third Server-Running the First Shard with complete DB(Say for
example Demo).
Forth Server-Running The Second Shard with complete DB(Say for
example Demo).
Both the Mongos should point to one shard named Shard1?
Yes, You can have multiple mongos instances running against a single shard. Think of the mongos instances as clients for the sharded cluster which have to run as a daemon process in order to keep metadata and heartbeats up to date.
Edit: as for having a complete DB, this is only possible for a single DB. You can have one DB on shard1 and the other DB on shard2, for example. but you can never have a single complete DB on two shards. To achieve the goal of having db1 on shard1 and db2 on shard2, you simply make the respective shard the primary shard of the respective database and don't shard any collection. Please read the docs for the movePrimary command for details.
A bit OOT:
However, running a single config server is strongly advised against, and for a good reason. If the single config server goes down or gets corrupted, your cluster will be impossible to use - and recreating the sharded cluster will not an easy task to be done. And it's going to be a lengty process. So please, use three config servers.*
I'm trying to figure out how different instances of mongos server work together.
If I have 1 configserver and some shards, for example four, each of them composed by only one node (a master of course), and have four mongos server... do the mongos server communicate between them? Is it possible that one mongos redirect its load to another mongos?
When you have multiple mongos instances, they do not automatically load-balance between each other. They don't even know about each others existence.
The MongoDB drivers for most programming languages allow to specify multiple mongos instances when creating a connection. In that case the driver will usually ping all of them and connect to the one with the lowest latency. This will usually be the one which is closest geographically. When all have the same network distance, the one which is least busy right now will usually respond first. The driver will then stay connected to that one mongos, unless the program explicitely reconnects or the mongos can no longer be reached (in that case the driver will usually automatically pick another one from the initial list).
That means using multiple mongos instances is normally only a valid method for scaling when you have a large number of low-load clients, not one high-load client. When you want your one high-load client to make use of many mongos instances, you need to implement this yourself by creating a separate connection to each mongos instance and implement your own mechanism to distribute queries among them.
Short answer
As of MongoDB 2.4, the mongos servers only provide a routing service to direct read/write queries to the appropriate shard(s). The mongos servers discover the configuration for your sharded cluster via the config servers. You can find out more details in the MongoDB documentation: Sharded Cluster Query Routing.
Longer scoop
I'm trying to figure out how different instances of mongos server work togheter.
The mongos servers do not currently talk directly to each other. They do coordinate activity some activity via your config servers:
reading the sharded cluster metadata
initiating a balancing round (any mongos can start a balancing round, but only one round can be active at a time)
If I have 1 configserver
You should always have 3 config servers in production. If you somehow lose or corrupt your config server, you will have to combine your data and re-shard your database(s). The sharded cluster metadata saved on the config servers is the definitive source for what sharded data ranges should live on each shard.
some shards, for example four, each of them composed by only one node (a master of course)
Ideally each shard should be backed by a replica set if you want optimal uptime. Replica sets provide for auto-failover and can be very useful for administrative purposes (for example, taking backups or adding indexes offline).
Is it possible that one mongos redirect its load to another mongos?
No, the mongos do not perform any load balancing. The typical recommendation is to deploy one mongos per app server.
From an application/driver point of view you can specify multiple mongos in your connect string for failover purposes. The application drivers will generally connect to the nearest available mongos (by network ping time), and attempt to reconnect to in the event the current mongos connection fails.