I am trying to use RestKit for an iOS application. So far, it works great. I have set up my routes with the router and can send requests using them.
I have been searching this for hours and can't find how to send a post request for a named route. I tried to use getObjectsAtPathForRouteNamed:object:parameters:success:failure, but it can only be used for GET requests. I know that I can send a POST request by creating a route mapped to a class using postObject:path:parameters:success:failure:, but I already have another route with POST for this class.
So the question is: Is there a way to send POST request using RestKit using named routes?
RestKit does assume that you only have one destination (route) for posting any one type of class. This is on a per-object-manager basis. So, if you want multiple different routes for a class they each need to be managed by a different instance of RKObjectManager.
Related
I want to 301 redirect the URLs from previous site that are nested, as pencilblue doesn’t support them,
e.g. a/b to page/b
For this I have been experimenting in include/http/request_handler.js but facing some issues.
Call never comes inside RequestHandler.prototype.handleRequest or even RequestHandler.prototype.onSessionRetrieved (seems these methods are not being called from anywhere)
Therefore I placed the code in RequestHandler and after confirming that req is not for public resource or api, I create a new url and execute
return this.doRedirect(newUrl, 301)
This actually works but at the same time I receive
Can’t render headers after they are sent error
#1075 has not helped me much as I’m not sure which specific controller I should modify. I need to catch the req as early as possible and see if it’s a page then redirect to page prefixed url.
Thanks in advance.
There are couple of ways to do redirects. You can do them from a controller or from middleware. You are correct in that, some of the functions in the request handler are not called. These are deprecated despite the fact pencilblue team didn't mark them as such. They replaced a good deal of the request handler functionality with /include/http/router.js and include/http/middleware/index.js. Plugins can register their own middleware to hijack the request pipeline.
See Advanced Routing on wiki for more info about creating your own middleware.
Using the routing framework your plugin would be able to register middleware that would be able to inspect the request and then redirect based on your specific criteria. The Router will be accessible from req.router and from there you could call req.router.redirect (Source).
Reference: #1224
Given a one page app that uses push state and RESTful backend, we can imagine accessing the listing of a resource at /resourceName (i.e. /users). So /users would create a formated list of users
Now the problem is that this resource JSON or XML feed should also be mapped to /resourceName, so if boot form my application entry point at / then all is good, when navigating to /users the JS router can trigger a Ajax call that get the JSON data. Now the problem is if the URL is pointing directly at /users then i will land on a JSON feed instead of the actual listing. I could route all call to a main entry point and then let the JS router do the work though if i do so the AJAX call to fetch JSON wil brake.
I remember a while ago people adding .json to their json request, or even a GET parameter ?format=json and then having the controller taking different actions. I find that somewhat hacky.. Are there any other ways to go about this?
For that matter i am using laravel4 backend and backboneJS
I think the .json on the end of the request is the best approach. the other approach could be to create a separate endpoint endpoint for api request api.mydomain.com vs www.mydomain.com
What method you use to get a different response depends on how you'd like to go about it. Since you're asking about an opinionated topic (There is no one right answer), here's some options you can explore.
First, here's a good read from Apigee on API design, which covers what I'll write about here. See page 20 on "Support multiple formats"
The Rails way: Append a .json, .xml or other extension at the end of your request and handle that code within Laravel (You may want to use the "before" filter to check the request or Laravel's excellent route parameters, which allow the use of regex to define the route).
You can check the "accept" header in the request and set that header in your ajax calls to "application/json" instead of the default "application/html" to inform your application which format to use in its response. Again, the before or after filters may come in handy to check the request and define the response as appropriate
Create a query string `?format=json" or similar. Same comments as in point 1.
Laravel doesn't have built-in methods to change the response for you. You can, however, fairly easily detect what's being asked and choose which format to return in. It does take some thinking about how you want to accomplish that, however.
Some options off the top of my head:
Use the "before" or "after" filter to check what the request "wants" for a format, and do some transformations on the response to make that work
Extend the request and response class to "automate" this (request class to detect format, response class to transform the response to the correct format)
Hope that helps
It's valid to say which representation do you want. E.g. JSON, XML or binary, depends on what you want and which serializers have you developed.
You framework should support either setting of default representation or if you provide some mapping URL -> method you should be able to say which representation you are going to return - also either by default or taken within some object which represents your request.
I ended up using different endpoints as suggested by #Aaron Saunders. In laravel 4 this is dumb easy to implement using group routes:
app.php:
'domain' => 'whatever.dev',
routes.php:
define('APP_DOMAIN', 'app.' . Config::get('app.domain'));
define('API_DOMAIN', 'api.' . Config::get('app.domain'));
Route::group(array('domain' => API_DOMAIN), function()
{
// API ROUTES
});
Route::group(array('domain' => APP_DOMAIN), function()
{
// VIEW ROUTES
});
Beautiful!
I have one class that extends org.restlet.Application class.
Various requests are handled using this class, say:
/register
/login
/listitem
I perform all operations using POST request and manage all org.restlet.resource.ServerResource classes with annotation #Post("json").
My problem is if requests other than POST come into scenario I got an error like 405 Method Not Allowed.
So how to handle other requests without explicitly write code for each annotation?
I'm not sure to correctly understand your problem. When using Restlet, you need to explicitly define an annotated method for each HTTP method you want to support.
What do you exactly want to do?
Thierry
This post if a follow-up question to mt previous post:
Android RESTful Web application using Zend Framework
I have written a web application which is based on the Zend Framework (Version 1.11.11) and I want to use the SAME backend code for coding the mobile version of this application (Android). To achieve this, I want to get the response for each of the actions in the controllers in XML and JSON - for mobile-based app.
Using the answers provided in the above link, I am able to get the XML and JSON response by making use of the AjaxContext helper. I set the contexts as json for the required actions in the init method and I am getting the desired json response.
Now I have another challenge. How to know from the URL if the given action was a GET or a POST request? Do I have have to add that as a query parameter? Is that the correct way?
For example, for login action within User controller: URL will be: [link] (http://localhost/user/login)
But within the loginAction, I check if the given request if a post and authenticate only if the request is a post. So the URL: http://localhost/user/login?format=xml will always return to me the response for a GET request since there is no way of knowing if the request was a GET or POST. Please help.
Thanks.
Abhilash
like you added format parameter do the same for request . Use "method" parameter to decide what type of request is it . Or you can also do is
$this->getRequest()->isPost(); //create
$this->getRequest()->isGet(); //read
$this->getRequest()->isPut(); // update
$this->getRequest()->isDelete(); // delete
We are trying to implement a REST API for an application we have now. We want to expose read/write capabilities for various resources using the REST API. How do we implement the "form" part of this? I get how to expose "read" of our data by creating RESTful URLs that essentially function as method calls and return the data:
GET /restapi/myobject?param=object-id-maybe
...and an XML document representing some data structure is returned. Fine.
But, normally, in a web application, an "edit" would involve two requests: one to load the current version of the resources and populate the form with that data, and one to post the modified data back.
But I don't get how you would do the same thing with HTTP methods that REST is sort of mapped to. It's a PUT, right? Can someone explain this?
(Additional consideration: The UI would be primarily done with AJAX)
--
Update: That definitely helps. But, I am still a bit confused about the server side? Obviously, I am not simply dealing with files here. On the server, the code that answers the requests should be filtering the request method to determine what to do with it? Is that the "switch" between reads and writes?
There are many different alternatives you can use. A good solution is provided at the microformats wiki and has also been referenced by the RESTful JSON crew. As close as you can get to a standard, really.
Operate on a Record
GET /people/1
return the first record
DELETE /people/1
destroy the first record
POST /people/1?_method=DELETE
alias for DELETE, to compensate for browser limitations
GET /people/1/edit
return a form to edit the first record
PUT /people/1
submit fields for updating the first record
POST /people/1?_method=PUT
alias for PUT, to compensate for browser limitations
I think you need to separate data services from web UI. When providing data services, a RESTful system is entirely appropriate, including the use of verbs that browsers can't support (like PUT and DELETE).
When describing a UI, I think most people confuse "RESTful" with "nice, predictable URLs". I wouldn't be all that worried about a purely RESTful URL syntax when you're describing web UI.
If you're submitting the data via plain HTML, you're restricted to doing a POST based form. The URI that the POST request is sent to should not be the URI for the resource being modified. You should either POST to a collection resource that ADDs a newly created resource each time (with the URI for the new resource in the Location header and a 202 status code) or POST to an updater resource that updates a resource with a supplied URI in the request's content (or custom header).
If you're using an XmlHttpRequest object, you can set the method to PUT and submit the data to the resource's URI. This can also work with empty forms if the server supplies a valid URI for the yet-nonexistent resource. The first PUT would create the resource (returning 202). Subsequent PUTs will either do nothing if it's the same data or modify the existing resource (in either case a 200 is returned unless an error occurs).
The load should just be a normal GET request, and the saving of new data should be a POST to the URL which currently has the data...
For example, load the current data from http://www.example.com/record/matt-s-example and then, change the data, and POST back to the same URL with the new data.
A PUT request could be used when creating a new record (i.e. PUT the data at a URL which doesn't currently exist), but in practice just POSTing is probably a better approach to get started with.