I'm using GTM and I need sending several values for each web/product.
In a specific web I've a lightbox to get some data from user and need to send a "conversionValue" with a different value when the user finish the task.
When I try to do this by using dataLayer.push it just add a new object to the original dataLayer (as it is in a fancybox loaded by ajax, not iframe, it gets the "parent page" dataLayer), so I get a dataLayer with many objects and only the last one has the correct "conversionValue".
The problem is, if I try to use this variable from GTM, it gets the first object to look for the conversionValue...
Should I clear the dataLayer before pushing new objects? Am I doing it wrong? Is there any other way to do this?
After reading about Google Tag Manager, it doesn't matter if you add new objects to dataLayer because their variables can't be readed from GTM the same way as you read them for the first time.
You have to read new values by defining events.
Related
I would like to create the following form:
Step 1: The user enters his contact details.
Step 2: A confirmation page, where the user has the possibility to confirm or edit his entered data again (back to step 1)
The contact details are stored in an entity domain object. The properties have annotations for validation.
My problem:
When I pass the contact object to the confirmation page, I get the message
Could not serialize Domain Object Vendor\Extension\Domain\Model\Object. It is neither an Entity with identity properties set, nor a Value Object.
I understand that I cannot pass a non-persistent domain object. A tip I found was to convert the object to an array and back again later. This works to display the input on the confirmation page. But if the user edits the data, I lose the validation functionality when converting to an array.
Another possibility would be to persist the object already after step 1 (temporarily?) . The problem here is that the data must not be displayed in the backend (they are not yet confirmed). In addition, unused data is created if the user cancels the process.
Is it possible to save objects temporarily?
What is the most elegant solution to this problem?
If you only wan't to create a form, why don't you use a form plugin like Ext:form or Ext:powermail? These have a summary page by default. And you have the possibility to write the entered data into you're database.
We want to develop a smooth-flowing workflow experience (but still use workflows). Currently, a user needs to use the sidekick to initiate the workflow, then to the inbox, which takes them back to the page to use the sidekick again. When they go to the inbox, they need to restrict to the model and path of the page. It would be nice for the user to only have to go to the content page and from there, launch the different workflow forms that need to happen, like a little "inbox" right on the page that is subject to the workflow.
I have written a custom component that can initiate the custom workflow. The custom component can also query the WorkFlowSession and obtain any active WorkItems for the current page that the component resides (using the WorkItemFilter interface). What I want to do is provide a link to the user to the next step in the workflow from the custom component, just like the inbox does.
Here is an example output from an WorkItem instance toString method:
21.05.2014 09:45:29.300 *ERROR* [0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1%0 [1400679929160] GET /content/test/mailing1.html HTTP/1.1] org.rand.whatcounts.EmailCampaignCoordinator Found workitem: -----------------------------
WorkItem Id: /etc/workflow/instances/2014-05-21/model_1400679794564399000/workItems/node4_etc_workflow_instances_2014-05-21_model_1400679794564399000
Workflow Id: /etc/workflow/instances/2014-05-21/model_1400679794564399000
Payload: /content/test/mailing1
Payload Type: JCR_PATH
key = historyEntryPath value = /etc/workflow/instances/2014-05-21/model_1400679794564399000/history/1400679924113
key = comment value =
My hope is that by using the workflow api items, I can create the link that the user could click on to proceed in the workflow (just like the inbox).
Thanks for listening!
Phillip
There are two ways to implement this
Java-Based Solution
I was able to figure out one way by looking at
http://localhost:4502/libs/cq/workflow/components/inbox/list/json.jsp
The important part of this jsp is that, given a workItem instance, you can get the path for your next step using the JcrPathBuilderManager:
pathBuilder.getPath(wi);
Using this, I was able to output a link to the next step in the workflow to the user (without having user go to their inbox).
Javascript/JSON Based Solution
I didn't go far with this solution (I didn't write any js) but this was my fall back position if I didn't find the java-solution listed above. Once could implement custom JS in CQ Component that would call the json feed for the user inbox, do some client side filtering (to restrict it to only items related to current page). The URL to the feed is
http://localhost:4502/libs/cq/workflow/content/inbox/list.json?start=0&limit=40
Thanks!
I rewrote the title and content 3 times before posting it, I don't find the right way to ask this :P
I have a page that manage a list of notes, I have a CRUD on that page but the items are created and saved in javascript (using knockoutjs).
I create a new note, I add it to the model in javascript and it show up in the page.
The way Im saving the notes to the database is when I add it to the model, I send it via Ajax (async) to the server. So I have my note on screen and in the database really fast.
I send a note without Id to the server and EF will take care of the Id.
So far so good.
Imagine that I add a note but I dont refresh the webpage, so the note is in the database, is in the javascript model too but in the model it doesn't have the id yet.
I make some changes to the note and yeah, I want to update the note in the database... but... how?
I send my note to the server with the changes, but remember, the item still have no Id so I can't say:
Hey EF, give me the note with the ID == xx and we are going to update that note.
The others properties can be changed on the webpage so I have nothing that identifies the note apart from the Id, who doesn't work here.
I tried this:
Send the new note to the server, insert it on the database, retrieve it again (to pick the Id), send it back to javascript and update the object with the Id. So when I edit, I have the Id. Yeah, but the "save" call need to be sync and that destroy the experience.
Any ideas?
EDIT: The sync options is not that slow at the end but there have to be a async way and meh, the thing of "Insert on database", "Retrieve the last item I inserted" and "return back to the client" is a little hackish.
You could return the id of the new record in your asynch call. If you are using jQuery you can subscribe to the "success" callback and as long as your controller returns a JSON with the id of the new record you could update your model on the client side.
Even with this approach, you will need to have a way to identify the item updated on the client side (which is really the root of your question.) For that you can probably generate a random GUID on the client side, send it to the server when saving, and return it to jQuery when returning the ID so that you can identify the correct element to update on the page.
Im pretty new to ASP.NET MVC, trying to figure out my way around.
Currently i return a ViewModel which has a IEnumeable Events as its only property. This ViewModel is StronglyTyped to a UserControl which dislays the IEnumable Events in tabular form.
One of the properties of the Event Model is an XElement, which contains some XML loaded from the DB.
Now i've added a link to the end of the tablular data to be able to view the XML in a separate page. How do i pass this data to another page for viewing?
I would post a request back to the server with some sort of Id for the Event-object and have the receiving end send back the XML related to that Id.
if you're looping through the Event objects in your IEnumerable, you can do something like:
<%= Html.ActionLink("GetXml", "Events", new { id = currentEvent.Id }) %>;
Now create an Action on your EventsController (given that you have one) like so:
public ActionResult GetXml(int id)
and retrieve the XML to pass back to the View
There are basically two ways of bringing data from one page to another using ASP.NET MVC (or any other language/framework which follows the HTTP protocol):
Sessions: Use a session to store the data you need, and load it back up at the next page.
Post the needed data back to the server. This way, the server can hold it and display it on the next page. Posted data usually comes from input or textarea elements. If you use input type="hidden" you can give it a value which represents your data. This way, you can post it back and forth till you arrive where you want.
Besides what Arve is advising, you could also consider TempData.
If you use the Get-Post-Redirect/Forward concept for you app, you could do something like:
GET - Initial Request comes in, Server responds with View and model data. User selects an item which leads to ...
POST - User selects one of the items from #1, triggering a post. That particular item can be fetched from repository, placed in TempData and then...
REDIRECT/FORWARD - The redirect collects the information out of TenpData and uses it as the model for the new View.
here is an example http://www.eworldui.net/blog/post/2008/05/08/ASPNET-MVC-Using-Post2c-Redirect2c-Get-Pattern.aspx
I am using T4MVC to redirect to another action return RedirectToAction(MVC.MyController.MyAction());.
In result it is doing get request.
Is there any way to make post request from controller. I want to keep all the same but only make post instead get. I cant find any methods for that. I found one post helper here http://geekswithblogs.net/rakker/archive/2006/04/21/76044.aspx but i cant pass any values i need using this post helper. I was trying to pass values through TempData but they are not coming when i using this helper. May be some one have any ideas?
The reason i want to do this because when user come from one controller to another and then if user click update or just click enter in browser address bar, page will break.
Should i use session for that reason?
A RedirectToAction will always perform a GET, never a POST (it returns a HTTP 302 to the browser, which will then issue a GET request).
To persist data across the redirect, if it is data that can be easily represented as a string and stored in the query string, then you can just add it to the route values of the redirect.
e.g.
return RedirectToAction("Search", new { searchString = "whatever" });
If it is a complex type, then you will need to store it in TempData. A number of other questions on StackOverflow (such as this one) give details on how.
If repeatedly storing to and reading from TempData across your application offends your code-sense, then you can encapsulate this by using the PassParametersDuringRedirect attribute and generic RedirectToAction available in the MvcContrib project. Some details on this technique are available here.
only way of doing post is by having a form and doing submit on that form, either with a submit button or with javascript, any info you want passed to that action must be in that form and you will find everything posted in FormCollection(hope I spelled it right).