I have a Jenkins plugin where I am trying to show a repeatableProperty
namespace(lib.FormTagLib).with {
entry{
repeatableProperty(field: "FIELD", noAddButton: true, default:descriptor.loadDefaultItems())
}
}
and then in the form for the FIELD
f = namespace(lib.FormTagLib)
f.invisibleEntry{
if(instance.readonly){
f.textbox(field:"readonly",value:1)
}
if(instance.getReadonly() == false){
f.textbox(field:"readonly",value:1)
}
}
But instance is not defined. What would be the correct way to get at my readonly property or getReadonly() method?
update:
If I use 'it' this is the error
<d:invokeBody> Cannot get property 'readonly' on null object
at org.kohsuke.stapler.jelly.JellyFacet$1.dispatch(JellyFacet.java:100)
at org.kohsuke.stapler.Stapler.tryInvoke(Stapler.java:561)
at org.kohsuke.stapler.Stapler.invoke(Stapler.java:646)
at org.kohsuke.stapler.MetaClass$6.doDispatch(MetaClass.java:234)
at org.kohsuke.stapler.NameBasedDispatcher.dispatch(NameBasedDispatcher.java:53)
at org.kohsuke.stapler.Stapler.tryInvoke(Stapler.java:561)
at org.kohsuke.stapler.Stapler.invoke(Stapler.java:646)
at org.kohsuke.stapler.Stapler.invoke(Stapler.java:477)...
Related
My app's store has a store.authState subtree. In this subtree, there are three things, an authToken, an isFetching boolean and, most importantly a fields object. My form contains two fields : username and password.
I have created an action called SET_FORM_FIELD_VALUE which should generate and update each field's state as they are changed by the user.
I would like my SET_FORM_FIELD_VALUE to update the fields object. If a user normally fills in both username and password fields, my store.authState should look like this:
{
authToken: undefined,
isFetching: false,
fields: {
username: "Brachamul",
password: "azerty123"
}
}
However, it seems that my current code actually just overwrites everything and I end up with :
{
field: {
username: "Brachamul"
}
}
The data in the field changes based on what field I last edited. It's either username or password.
Here is my code :
switch (action.type) {
case 'SET_FORM_FIELD_VALUE':
let field = {} // create a "field" object that will represent the current field
field[action.fieldName] = action.fieldValue // give it the name and value of the current field
return { ...state.fields, field }
How can I change it to fix my issue ?
Your return is wrong, it should be something like this
switch (action.type) {
case 'SET_FORM_FIELD_VALUE':
return {
...state,
fields: {
...state.fields,
[action.fieldName] : action.fieldValue
}
}
}
Hope it helps.
i used change() from 'redux-form'
which only re rendered that specific form input, and isued it pretty often.
everytime the user clicked a dropdown menu it suggested values in 2 input fields
i abstracted away the html from the anwser and some other stuff.
import { FieldArray, Field, change, reduxForm } from 'redux-form';
class WizardFormThirdPage extends react.component{
runInject(target,value){
target.value= value; // sets the client html to the value
// change (formName, Fieldname, Value) in the state
this.props.dispatch(change('spray-record', target.name, value))
}
injectFormvalues(){
var tr = div.querySelector(".applicator-equipment");
var name = div.querySelector("select").value;
if(!name.includes("Select Employee")){
// var inputs = tr.querySelectorAll("input");
var employeeDoc= findApplicatorByName(name); // synchronous call to get info
tractor = tr.querySelector("input")
sprayer = tr.querySelectorAll("input")[1];
// here i send off the change attribute
this.runInject(tractor,Number(employeeDoc.default_t))
this.runInject(sprayer,Number(employeeDoc.default_s));
}
}
// you have to connect it get the dispatch event.
export default connect(state => ({
enableReinitialize: true,
}))(reduxForm({
form: "myFormName", // <------ same form name
destroyOnUnmount: false, // <------ preserve form dataLabel
forceUnregisterOnUnmount: true, // <------ unregister fields on unmount
validate,
})(WizardFormThirdPage));
I am trying to setup a variable in the scala template. Loop through the roles that user have , if found out the user is customer , then do something with the input. If not then do something else.
But scala isnt that simple , it won't compile on following code.
#var = #{ if(user != null){
#for(role <- user.roles.filter(_.getName()=="customer")) {
var=#customer(input)
}
}
}
#if( var == null){
var=#others(input)
}
It gives me two errors
t.scala.html:275:: identifier expected but 'for' found.
[error] #for(role <- user.roles.filter(_.getName()=="customer"))
t.scala.html:278: expected start of definition
Also , is there a better way to do this in scala ? Thanks
My reference : Scala template set variable
Update:
My goal was trying to do something like below , but in scala template:
result=null
for role in User.roles:
if(role == "customer"):
result=customer(xyz)
break
if(result==null):
result = others(xyz)
To set up a for loop inside of an if statement in a Scala template, you don't need to assign a variable. You can simply use an if block in the template where you want to display stuff. For example
#if(user != null) {
#for(role <- user.roles.filter(_.getName()=="customer")) {
#customer(input)
#* Do other stuff related to 'role' and 'input' here *#
}
} else {
#* Do something else *#
}
For further reference I encourage you to look at the documentation for Play templates. If you really want to define a variable you could do it using the defining helper:
#defining(user.getFirstName() + " " + user.getLastName()) { fullName =>
<div>Hello #fullName</div>
}
Instead of defining a variable you could also define a resusable block, which might be useful in your case. For example,
#customer_loop(input: String) = {
#if(user != null) {
#for(role <- user.roles.filter(_.getName()=="customer")) {
#customer(input)
#* Do other stuff related to 'role' and 'input' here *#
}
} else {
#* Do something else *#
}
}
To declare a variable do
#import scala.Any; var result:Any=null //where Any is the datatype accoding to your requirement
To reassign its value do
#{result = "somevalue"}
So the solution accoding to the pseudo you provided
#import java.lang.String; var result:String=null
#import scala.util.control._;val loop = new Breaks;
#loop.breakable {
#for(role <- roleList) {
#if(role.equals("customer")) {
#{
result = "somevalue"
}
#{loop.break};
}
}
}
#if(result==null){
#{result="notfound"}
}
Also check Similar1,Similar2
I tried the solution provided here:
automatic update of graphiti diagrams in case of changes in the datamodel
I am trying to call the Upadate feature in the UpdateNeeded function of my class which implements AbstractUpdateFeature:
TransactionalEditingDomain domain = TransactionUtils.getEditingDomain(diagram);
domain.getCommandStack().execute(new RecordingCommand(domain) {
public void doExecute() {
UpdateContext updateContext = new
UpdateContext(getDiagram().getChildren().get(0). getGraphicsAlgorithm().getPictogramElement( ));
IUpdateFeature updateFeature = getFeatureProvider().getUpdateFeature(updateContext);
updateFeature.update(updateContext);
}});
In the Update function I am trying to change the value of the text field of a Pictogram element:
// Set name in pictogram model
if (pictogramElement instanceof ContainerShape) {
ContainerShape cs = (ContainerShape) pictogramElement;
for (Shape shape : cs.getChildren()) {
if (shape.getGraphicsAlgorithm() instanceof Text) {
Text text = (Text) shape.getGraphicsAlgorithm();
text.setValue("aaa");
return true;
}
}
}
But I am getting the Exception:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot modify resource set without a write transaction
at org.eclipse.emf.transaction.impl.TransactionChangeRecorder.assertWriting(TransactionChangeRecorder.java:348)
at org.eclipse.emf.transaction.impl.TransactionChangeRecorder.appendNotification(TransactionChangeRecorder.java:302)
at org.eclipse.emf.transaction.impl.TransactionChangeRecorder.processObjectNotification(TransactionChangeRecorder.java:284)
at org.eclipse.emf.transaction.impl.TransactionChangeRecorder.notifyChanged(TransactionChangeRecorder.java:240)
Try executing the feature using DiagramBehavior
getDiagramBehavior().executeFeature(feature, context);
I want to handle application feedback regarding, in this case, form validation.
To do this I check for model validation in controller, using
// VALIDATE
if ($this->Event->validates($this->data))
{
// SAVE
$this->Event->create();
if ($this->Event->saveAll($this->data, array('validate' => false)))
{
$this->Session->setFlash('Evenimentul a fost salvat!', 'flash_admin_success');
$this->redirect(array('action' => 'index', 'admin' => true));
} else {
$this->Session->setFlash('Evenimentul nu a putut fi salvat. Va rugam sa incercati din nou!', 'flash_admin_error');
}
////////
$errors = 'O EROARE';
$this->set(compact('errors'));
}
else
{
// GET ERRORS to display it nicely :)
$errors = $this->Event->invalidFields();
$flash = '';
foreach($errors as $error)
{
$flash .= $error."<br />";
}
$this->Session->setFlash($flash, 'flash_admin_error');
}
I know that there is a way to get rid of form field errors using 'error' => false, but i want to set this for the entire application, thus for all fields in all forms.
It has to be there a way of setting that fot the object itself, and I would be gratefull if someone would tell me.
Thaks a lot!
Edit: This doesn't really disable error output, but will hide the error: go to webroot/css/cake.generic.css add display:none to selector div.error-message. That's the simplest way to achieve what you want that I can think of.
Though it may seem like a bit of an extreme approach to override a single property, you can achieve this by extend the core FormHelper. This will allow you to make Anh Pham's original suggestion the default for all FormHelper instances:
// app/views/helpers/app_form.php
App::import('Helper', 'Time');
class AppFormHelper extends FormHelper {
public $_inputDefaults = array('error' => false);
}
Now to use this as-is in CakePHP 1.3, you would have to use "AppForm" throughout your application to refer to this helper from now on (ie. $this->AppForm->input()). CakePHP 2.0 introduces helper aliasing to overcome this, but for now one has to resort to a bit of trickery to continue using "Form" instead. One blog post I found shows how to backport the functionality and another manages allow the helper to do it itself. I personally use the following without any problems:
// app/views/app.php
class AppView extends View {
function &_loadHelpers(&$loaded, $helpers, $parent = null) {
$return = parent::_loadHelpers($loaded, $helpers, $parent);
# rename App helpers (ie. AppHtml -> Html)
foreach ($return as $helperName => $helper) {
if (substr($helperName, 0, 3) === 'App') {
$newHelperName = substr($helperName, 3);
$return[$newHelperName] = $return[$helperName];
}
}
# done
return $return;
}
}
To use the new created classes above, just add the following to your AppController:
// app/app_controller.php
class AppController extends Controller {
public $helpers = array(/*...*/, 'AppForm');
public $view = array('App');
}
I have a many to many relation between Product and Properties. I'm using embedRelation() in my Product form to edit a Product and it's Properties. Properties includes images which causes my issue. Every time I save the form the updated_at column is updated for file properties even when no file is uploaded.
Therefore, I want to exclude empty properties when saving my form.
I'm using Symfony 1.4 and Doctrine 1.2.
I'm thinking something like this in my ProductForm.class.php, but I need some input on how to make this work.
Thanks
class ProductForm extends BaseProductForm
{
public function configure()
{
unset($this['created_at'], $this['updated_at'], $this['id'], $this['slug']);
$this->embedRelation('ProductProperties');
}
public function saveEmbeddedForms($con = null, $forms = null)
{
if (null === $forms)
{
$properties = $this->getValue('ProductProperties');
$forms = $this->embeddedForms;
foreach($properties as $p)
{
// If property value is empty, unset from $forms['ProductProperties']
}
}
}
}
I ended up avoiding Symfony's forms and saving models instead of saving forms. It can be easier when playing with embedded forms. http://arialdomartini.wordpress.com/2011/04/01/how-to-kill-symfony%E2%80%99s-forms-and-live-well/
Solved it by checking if posted value is a file, and if both filename and value_delete is null I unset from the array. It might not be best practice, but it works for now.
Solution based on http://www.symfony-project.org/more-with-symfony/1_4/en/06-Advanced-Forms
class ProductPropertyValidatorSchema extends sfValidatorSchema
{
protected function configure($options = array(), $messages = array())
{
// N0thing to configure
}
protected function doClean($values)
{
$errorSchema = new sfValidatorErrorSchema($this);
foreach($values as $key => $value)
{
$errorSchemaLocal = new sfValidatorErrorSchema($this);
if(array_key_exists('value_delete', $values))
{
if(!$value && !$values['value_delete'])
{
unset($values[$key]);
}
}
// Some error for this embedded-form
if (count($errorSchemaLocal))
{
$errorSchema->addError($errorSchemaLocal, (string) $key);
}
}
// Throws the error for the main form
if (count($errorSchema))
{
throw new sfValidatorErrorSchema($this, $errorSchema);
}
return $values;
}
}