We have a java application that has 2 remote components
jboss-gatein web application
standalone java app
Currently we communicate between 2 components using JBoss remoting.
I have heard about MQTT as light weight reliable.
Is it really better than Jboss remoting?
If so how can we use it?
Related
I know that Apache Camel is java open source framework and Jboss Fuse is ESB which act like container to bind camel into its container . However i need to know its differences in some more depth .
Any help will be appreciated .
In simplified terms, camel framework is the set of api's (java code) which are used in system integration projects whereas fuse is the server like tomcat where code is deployed.
"JBoss Fuse combines several technologies like core Enterprise Service Bus capabilities (based on Apache Camel, Apache CXF, Apache ActiveMQ), Apache Karaf and Fabric8 in a single integrated distribution."
Deploy applications utilizing some different configurations and technologies is one of many qualities in Jboss Fuse.
"Camel" as being a rule based routing & mediation engine which can be used inside a full blown ESB, a message broker or a web services smart client. Though if you want to, you could consider that Camel is a small, lightweight embeddable ESB since it can provide many of the common ESB services like smart routing, transformation, mediation, monitoring, orchestration etc.
We should also mention what Camel isn’t. Camel isn’t an enterprise service bus complete(ESB ), although some call Camel a lightweight ESB because of its support for routing, transformation, monitoring, orchestration, and so forth. Camel doesn’t have a container or a reliable message bus, but it can be deployed in one, such as Open-ESB or ServiceMix. For that reason, we prefer to call
Camel an integration framework rather than an ESB.
Recently we have moved our application from websphere to jboss application server.
IBM Http server (IHS) has front ended(proxy) the websphere application server.
Now we want to make changes to httpd.conf to make the IHS to front end the jboss. So whats the configuration to be done at IHS server to act like reverse proxy for JBOSS application server?
There's really no reason to do this, because IBM HTTP Server is only ever supported when it's used with IBM software that it was bundled with.
If you do do it, you're nearly alone in doing so and w/o the assistance of IBM.
Technically, you could use mod_proxy_balancer and mod_proxy_http just like any other Apache-based server, but they're not as well maintained because they are only used in one very obscure/withdrawn IBM product that bundles IHS. It's a basic proxy configuration for Apache and not really worth going into detail here.
The best option for JBoss AS/Wildfly application server proxy for you is Apache HTTP Server with mod_cluster.
Community
You can give it a try with Fedora: mod_cluster package
And there is an example on how to compile it from sources and configure it with Apache HTTP Server from scratch: example, recorded terminal session. It also operates on Windows and Solaris.
Why mod_cluster over mod_jk/mod_proxy?
The main benefit of mod_cluster over mod_proxy*balancer / mod_jk solutions is that both JBoss AS and Wildfly contain mod_cluster subsystems that automatically report deployed contexts and life cycle events to the mod_cluster balancer in Apache HTTP Server. JBoss AS/Wildfly workers join Apache HTTP Server balancer automatically, you don't have to reconfigure anything in your httpd.conf nor restart httpd when you add another JBoss AS/Wildfly worker.
Current load report is also a part of these service messages. One may use several different load metrics within JBoss AS/Wildfly, e.g. heap utilization, CPU load, number of currently open sessions, or one could easily implement a custom load metric.
The result is a high-throughput dynamic load balancer that takes into account actual utilization of your JBoss AS/Wildfly workers.
Commercial support
If you need a fully supported solution for mod_cluster balancer, both Red Hat JBoss Web Server, i.e. Apache HTTP Server, mod_cluster, OpenSSL, Tomcat 7, Tomcat 8, mod_jk, ModSecurity, and Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP), i.e. application server built on Wildfly 10+ or AS 7+, entitle you to fully supported mod_cluster balancer fronting either Tomcat workers or EAP workers.
Full Disclosure: I am an engineer at Red Hat
I would like to avoid dependency on ActiveMQ. Is there a way to make JBossFuse to use WebSphereMQ ? (I'm assuming activeMQ is required for framework to run - internal dependency)
The description on jboss fuse site reads like..
Core messaging is provided by Apache ActiveMQ, services framework (SOAP, XML/HTTP, RESTful HTTP)...
PS:
Arguements like "it would be innefficient, expensive" etc, need not be considered at this stage. Reason for prefering WebSphereMQ is beyond my control.
No you can use JBoss Fuse without ActiveMQ at all. For example the minimal distribution does not come with AMQ pre-installed.
JBoss Fuse allows you to slice and dice what you want pre-installed.
If you want to use WebSphereMQ then you can do that, though that would be under the assumption that WebSphereMQ as a server is running in another JVM / box. And that JBoss Fuse would act as a client to that broker. If so you can install the WebSphereMQ Java Client JARs in Jboss Fuse and use that.
We have an old JBoss 3.2.3 server which hosted an application and exposed EJBs for remote access.
This application has only received minor maintenance in years, and we did not put some effort to migrate it to newer releases of the app server.
Now, we are integrating it with another application, and we have a requirement to also expose SOAP Web Services.
At first, I wasn't worried, since JBoss 3.2.3 announces compliance with the J2EE 1.4 spec (JSR151), which specifies the APIs for web services: web services (JSR109) and JAXRPC (JSR101).
However, my first deploy using the JAX-RPC api failed, because JBoss did not find the JAX-RPC classes.
So my questions are:
Is JBoss 3.2.3 really a J2EE 1.4 app server ? The lack of JAX-RPC classes seem to indicate otherwise.
What are the APIs for exposing a web services in JBoss 3.2.3 ?
What are the APIs for consuming a web services from an EJB deployed in JBoss 3.2.3 ?
In the end, I can always deploy additional APIs and libraries with my application, but I'd like to avoid overlapping existing libraries.
JBoss 3.2.3.GA is not a fully compliant J2EE 1.4 server. For instance, it does not implement the EJB 2.1 interface, only EJB 2.0 [1].
Also, JBoss 4.0 announces being the first J2EE 1.4 compliant server; I conclude that JBoss.org did not certify JBoss 3.2.3 as compliant.
Even though not-compliant, JBoss 3.2.3 has some features for consuming SOAP Web-Services. For instance, it ships with Apache Axis 1.1 and JAX-RPC apis, so one can easily generate java classes for a WS client outside the server and have them run in an enterprise app.
Exposing web services is a more difficult task. One way of exposing web services is to create a Stateless EJB and expose it as a webservice endpoint. However, that's part of the EJB2.1 spec, which is not available in 3.2.3.
Too bad ! In the end, we will look for other alternatives in exposing our web services.
The newer JavaEE specs and servers are so much easier to develop for. It's the old specs and servers that gave JavaEE a bad rep.
We are currently using JMS queue in Weblogic.
Can we use same JMS queue in Websphere as part of weblogic to websphere migration.
Is there any other concept available in websphere which can replace JMS queue?
WebSphere Application Server has a built-in JMS provider, due to the Java EE standard which defines it as mandatory (as Arjan Tijms already stated).
Setting up the JMS provider requires a so called Service Integration Bus, which is a simple Messaging Bus inside WebSphere. The Service Integration Bus also allows to setup High Available JMS queues/topics when using WebSphere Application Server Network Deployment.
Using this queues/topics outside of a WebSphere context - by putting messages into the queues from external clients or reading them from external clients - is hard.
Mainly due to the WebSphere internal CORBA communication it is quite tricky to setup a working and stable
configuration - and you need to know some internal WebSphere tricks.
My recommandation is to use internal jms configuration only for applications which are deployed on the same WebSphere Application Server-Configuration.
If you really need external access to the JMS queues/topics, you should write a adapter to access it.
This blog post describes in detail how to setup a simple WebSphere internal JMS configuration.
WebSphere has indeed an internal JMS provider. It's accessed using the SIB (Service Integration Bus). See http://www.packtpub.com/article/messaging-with-websphere-application-server-7.0-part1
WepSphere has JMS queues as well. Are you wanting to have the queue running within WebSphere, or are you trying to point to a queue running elsewhere?
Yes, you can.
Configuration depends on your JMS System.
If your JMS Middleware is running external like ApacheMQ or Swift JMS, you can normally install an Resource Adapter and then use that specific configuration (at least for the Jms configuration). Then you can use Websphere's JMS Configuration (like Queues and Topics) and therefor your normal MDB configuration.
Besides ActivationSpec (like above) at least with Websphere MQ you could use Listener Ports. I don't know if Listener Ports are available for other JMS Products.
If you want to use a built in Messaging System, you can use SIB I guess.
So plenty of options depending on your System.
A JMS provider is mandated by the Java EE specs so every application server has an inbuilt JMS Provider.
You have to make the right calls about your application needs. There might be valid reasons to use an external JMS provider such as WebSphere MQ.