How to generate .pi file that can be recognize by WingIDE - autocomplete

Because I want to use pyqt in WingIDE, but there is a serious problem, that My WingIDE cannot recognize pyqt's functions
Can you tell me how to generate .pi file using WingIDE, or can you tell me how to transform .sip file into WingIDE.

Wing should be doing this automatically for PyQt4 if you have it using the right Python. You can check this by trying to use PyQt4 in Wing's Python Shell or looking at sys.executable there. If that is incorrect, change Python Executable in Project Properties.
If you want to try to generate PIs manually from an extension module you can use src/wingutils/generate_pi.py in your Wing installation. A typical command line would be
python generate_pi.py myextension myextension.pi
The .pi file can then be put alongside the .so / .pyd or in the pi-files
sub-directory of your settings directory.
There are a few more options that generate_pi.py supports; a list of
these is printed to stdout when generate_pi.py is run without any arguments.
In the case of PyQt you probably need to use the --magic-code command line option. If you look at Wing's Source Analysis > Advanced > Scripting Helper Snippets preference you can see the magic code that is used by Wing when it tries to do this automatically for you.

Related

How To Run Robot Framework Project Developed In Eclipse Via Command Line

I have created a project using Robot Framework in Eclipse via RED. I want to know how can I run this project via Windows Command Line, so that I can create a Jenkins job to run it at a particular time ? I have tried using the steps for running Eclipse Project from command line via Debug mode, but it is not helping.
Please find the project structure below
I also tried to reach this location and run this test suit using the command
Robot Test_Suite.robot, but then I'm getting below 2 errors
1.) Importing test library 'Excel_Library' failed: ImportError: No module named Excel_Library. This file is a python file which I have written to support Excel operations and it is present at below location in the project -
2.) No Such File Or Directory - Path_To_External_Input\\External_Inputs.xls
This file contains the input which is being read before performing operations related to test suite and it is present at below location -
Do I need to add those in the command line if so how to take care of that ? This project run smoothly from eclipse but only problem is coming from command line.
It seems that you are able to run robot correctly, although I would prefer lowercase R with robot command.
1) I think you have misspelled the library name. If it's a pip package, try ExcelLibrary instead, and check that you have installed it by pip list command or equivalent.
2) Please check the path. Without additional info on how and where the file is called and where the file is located are needed.

Intellisense Support for Airflow Plugins in VSCode

I'm trying to find a way to make VSCode Python intellisense work with Airflow Plugins.
Following the code example the import path of plugin operators could be:
from airflow.operators import MyPluginOperator
VSCode cannot resolve this import because it will only be valid at runtime through the airflow plugin system.
Is there any way to configure VSCode to resolve this import?
Airflow loads plugins dynamically by searching the airflow/plugins folder for AirflowPlugin subclasses and add them in airflow namespace in a runtime. Here is the code from airflow/operators/__init__.py:
# Imports operators dynamically while keeping the package API clean,
# abstracting the underlying modules
...
def _integrate_plugins():
"""Integrate plugins to the context"""
from airflow.plugins_manager import operators_modules
for operators_module in operators_modules:
sys.modules[operators_module.__name__] = operators_module
globals()[operators_module._name] = operators_module
VS Code can't handle it. Even "big" Python IDEs like PyCharm has problems with it. It is impossible for VS Code to know that a piece of code in particular folder will transform in airflow.operator later. "python.autoComplete.extraPaths" will not help too. You should only hope that someone will write a VS Code extension for Airflow somewhere :)
Since version 2.0.0 the way that Airflow handles plugins imports has changed:
Importing operators, sensors, hooks added in plugins via airflow.{operators,sensors,hooks}.<plugin_name> is no longer supported, and these extensions should just be imported as regular python modules. For more information, see: Modules Management and Creating a custom Operator
The next important thing to consider is that Airflow adds dags/, plugins/, and config/ directories to PYTHONPATH env. source
Following the specifications from the docs, you could create your MyCustomOperator
in airflow_home/plugins/custom_operator/ directory. Then you could use it like this:
from custom_operator.my_custom_operator import MyCustomOperator
with dag:
sample_custom_task = MyCustomOperator(task_id='sample-task')
So far so good, the dag will run, but according to my experience, the VSCode IntelliSense won't work yet. To make it work, you need to add the path to /plugins as same as Airflow will do when it runs. Depending on your setup there are a few ways to do this. The goal is to add an extra path to the python interpreter VSCode is "using" (make sure to select the interpreter related to your project)
A common solution could be to use the env PYTHONPATH to append our path to the path the interpreter knows. In my case, I'm using a virtual environment, so following the explained in this post, I created a .pth file with the path I wanted to add and locate that file on airflow_home/venv/lib/my_python_version/site-packages/
Following the path on our example, this will create such a file:
cd $(python -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print(get_python_lib())")
echo airflow_home/plugins > airflow_plugins_example.pth
Once that is done, reload VSCode (could also just change to another interpreter and then come back) and you should see the intelliSense working properly.
Hope that works!

How to get Google Protobuf working in Matlab?

So if one was to want to use Google protocol buffers in Matlab and using a Windows computer what would be the best way to do that since Matlab is not in the list of supported languages?
I haven't seen an answer on this and I thought the solution was a bit obscure so I am going to post a how to for matlab_out using the protoc.exe
A how to for google protocol buffer matlab out, this is using resources from the internet I will also include a zip file containing all this already done.
Unzip protobuf-‘version#’.zip (looks like: protobuf-#.#.#)
Open file protobuf-#.#.# -> src
Choose your favorite editor (Notepad++ is good) and change Makefile.am (do not include quotes)
a. Under “nobase_include_HEADERS =”
and below “$(GZHEADERS)”
add the line “farsounder/protobuf/compiler/matlab/matlab_generator.h \” (Note the back slash)
b. Under “libprotoc_la_LIBADD = $(PTHREAD_LIBS) libprotobuf.la”
add lines
“farsounder/protobuf/compiler/matlab/matlab_generator.cc \”
“farsounder/protobuf/compiler/matlab/matlab_plugin.cc \”
c. Save the file and exit out
While still in the src directory go into ->google ->protobuf->compiler and change main.cc
a. Under “#include <google/protobuf/compiler/java/java_generator.h>”
add the line “#include <farsounder/protobuf/compiler/matlab/matlab_generator.h>”
b. In main function add the lines
“// Proto2 Matlab
farsounder::protobuf::compiler::matlab::MatlabGenerator matlab_generator;
cli.RegisterGenerator("--matlab_out", &matlab_generator,
"Generate Matlab M files.");”
c. Save the file and exit out
Unzip protobuf-matlab
Open file protobuf-matlab ->src and copy the farsounder directory to protobuf-#.#.# -> src directory
Go back to protobuf-#.#.# directory and into -> vsprojects and open protobuf.sln in Visual Studio, I believe any version should work
There should be a popup that wants to convert the solution file to a more updated version, go ahead and do that
If you do not see solutions explorer open it up using ctrl+alt+L
Open a new windows explorer and go into protobuf-#.#.# ->src->farsounder->protobuf->compiler->matlab, now in visual studio using the solutions explorer expand the libprotoc->Header Files, now in windows explorer copy the matlab_generator.h file and paste it into the Header Files directory
Still in Solutions explorer go into the Source Files directory and copy in the matlab_generator.cc
Contract libprotoc and right click on protoc and click on properties
Under Configuration Properties->Linker->General, Edit Enable Incremental Linking to be No
Under Configuration Properties->Linker->Input, Edit Additional Dependencies
a. Add the lines “Release\libprotobuf.lib” and underneath “Release\libprotoc.lib”
b. Click OK on the Additional Dependencies window and OK on the protoc Property Page
Change the build type to Release
Right-click on libprotobuf and select build, once completed right-click on libprotoc and select build
Once completed right-click on protoc and select build, it should provide you with an protoc.exe under protobuf-#.#.# ->vsprojects->Release, this will now allow you to create matlab .m files by using the matlab_out command
Help to find protobuf-#.#.# and the protobuf-matlab:
Follow these links:
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf-matlab/source/browse/
download the zip file
https://github.com/google/protobuf/releases
download the source code
Extra help, for using protoc.exe
Copy and paste the created protoc.exe to where your .proto file is
Run cmd and change the directory to where your protoc.exe and .proto file is
Run this command (lets pretend the name of my .proto file is “afunprotofile”) “protoc –matlab_out=./ -I./ afunprotofile.proto”
The easiest way is to use Java
The FarSounder code was nice, but it is quite old and unmaintained. The easiest way to produce Matlab compatible code is to just use the Java version of Protobuf. This solution should work on any platform that supports Matlab and Java.
The Steps
Create a .proto file
Process the file with the protoc compiler and output Java source
Using IntelliJ or other tool produce a JAR file that includes the dependencies
Add the JAR file to the Matlab classpath. edit('classpath.txt')
Restart Matlab
The protobuf runtime dependencies
I include these in a single JAR file output of the Protobuf and the two runtime libraries.
protobuf-java-3.3.0.jar
protobuf-java-util-3.3.0.jar
A sample
I wrote a simple Java wrapper class to hide the MyProtobuf.Builder return type from Matlab that I added to the JAR file
public class MyProtobufWrapperWrapper {
public static MyProtobuf.Builder newBuilder()
{
return MyProtobuf.newBuilder();
}
}
In Matlab
p = com.cameronpalmer.MyProtobufWrapper.newBuilder();
p.setIdentifier(java.util.UUID.randomUUID().toString());
p.setTimestampMilliseconds(timestamp);
p.setAngleRadians(0);
p.addAllChannelSamples(channel_vector);
planeWaveBuilt = p.build();
byteArray = planeWaveBuilt.toByteArray();
As Cameron Lowell Palmer's answer suggests, the way to go is via Java.
Is I lost a couple of hours today on this problem, I would like to elaborate some more. I started with Cameron's answer but I had to do a couple of more steps. Essentially, I had to do all of the following:
Compile proto message for java, e.g. protoc --java_out=./ your_file.proto
Remember to install protobuf java runtime, e.g. in ubuntu: sudo apt install libprotobuf-java
Locate the protobuf java runtime on your system, e.g.: /usr/share/java/protobuf-3.6.1.jar; its path will be used later on. The name should always follow the pattern protobuf-version.jar or protobuf-java-version.jar, therefore locate protobuf- | grep jar$ should reduce the search space for you.
Add a short java file to the same directory, where your protobuf java files went (./x/y/z/MyProto.java). Use your package path instead of x/y/z. If you did not declare java package explicitly in the proto file, then protoc just used your filename as package name. Either way, you can probably check where the protoc generated files went by yourself. Contents of MyProto.java are listed below. Just replace YourProtoFileName and YourMessageName with your stuff. Note that this step is not optional, as this will not generate a simple helper class. For the life of me, Matlab would not let me use inner classes directly (in java, YourMessageName is the inner class of YourProtoFileName). But with the above helper, it was quite happy to generate them for me. Note that if you have more than one message defined in your proto file, you might need to expose more than one builder in this way. And if you only need to read protobuffers, then you might need to export just YourMessageName and not Builder.
package x.y.z;
import x.y.z.YourProtoFileName; // if you do not know it, do `ls x.y.z/*.java`
public class MyProto {
public static YourProtoFileName.YourMessageName.Builder newBuilder() {
return YourProtoFileName.YourMessageName.newBuilder();
}
}
Check Matlab's version of java; in Matlab write version -java. In my case it was 1.8, while the default java installed on my system (java -version) is 11. I had to manually select java 1.8 for the next step, otherwise the whole thing did not work. Even worse, Matlab only produced a very nondescript error "No class x.y.z.YourProtoFileName." Thanks Matlab! You might need to install proper version first (sudo apt install openjdk-8-jdk) and then use update-java-alternatives or just locate javac for the appropriate java version on your system.
Compile both your java file and the one generated by protoc. Remember to point classpath at the jar file or protobuffer runtime that you found above. And remember to use your javac path. In a single command: /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/bin/javac x.y.z/*.java -cp /usr/share/java/protobuf-3.6.1.jar. This will generate class files in ./x/y/z/.
Optional: pack the class files in a jar for easier distribution: jar cvf ./YourProtoFilename.jar x/y/z/*.class. Note that this command line works for me, since I've put all classes, including MyProto, in the same package. You might need to adapt it to your needs.
Start Matlab.
% make Matlab aware of your new classes
javaaddpath('./')
% tell Matlab where protobuf dependancy lives (use the path from step 3)
javaaddpath('/usr/share/java/protobuf-3.6.1.jar')
% test if the classes were found
methods('x.y.z.YourProtoFilename.YourMessageName')
% if methods are listed then you are good to go
% use the helper form step 4
b = x.y.z.MyProto.newBuilder();
% now you have a builder you can use to build your protobuf message
See Google's protobuf java primer to go on from here, as using java in Matlab is fairly straight forward: just write java statements. As long as they are simple statements :)
The same procedure works on octave too. With a bit different syntax for java inside octave. And octave was less picky about the java version in my case. YMMV
#WPFUser,
We followed below steps to build protoc for matlab.
1) git clone https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf.git to protobuf-main folder
2) git submodule update --init --recursive
3) git clone https://github.com/farsounder/protobuf-matlab.git - protobuf_matlab folder
4) Copied src folder from protobuf_matlab repo to protobuf-main/src
5) Updated cmake/libprotoc.cmake to include matlab_generator.cc and matlab_generator.h files
6) Updated cmake/extract_includes.bat.in to include matlab_generator.h file
7) \src\google\protobuf\compiler\main.cc to include matlab_generator

Netbeans, phpdocumentor, and custom phpdoc.dist.xml by project

I am using Netbeans 8.0.2 and phpdocumentor 2.8.2 on a windows 7 platform.
I would like to use custom phpdoc.dist.xml config files by project so I can specify framework directories and etc. to exclude from the generated doc. I also want to keep my Netbeans PHPDOC plugin config as generic as possible, without specific output directories, ignore options, config path parameters, etc., so on, so that that the config will apply to all my projects.
The phpdoc.dist.xml file works great. The doc generated is exactly what I want.
The problem or feature, and it seems to be a phpdocumentor one as it also applies from plain command line, is that the phpdoc.bat command (without a specific config parm) has to be run from the same root directory as the phpdoc.dist.xml file, or it ignores it. No problem if I'm using command line as I can change into that directory first, but I would like to use Netbeans. I have searched on this extensively and cannot find an answer.
I considered whether to modify the phpdocumentor files to insert cd /D path/to/myproject/dir to change the directory using some Netbeans variable to represent myproject/dir, but I could not find the right place in the code or the variable to use. Plus, then I'm supporting a custom mod to phpdocumentor.
I did find these directions for a PHPStorm setup, where the author specified a PHPStorm variable for the --config command line option to point to his custom phpdoc.dist.xml.
--config="$ProjectFileDir$/phpdoc.dist.xml"
If I could do the same in Netbeans like maybe "${BASE_DIR}/phpdoc.dist.xml" it would be great, but so far I haven't hit on anything Netbeans will recognize/pay attention to in the PhpDoc script: box.
I have also tried writing a wrapper .bat file to capture my own command line variable %1 and do the directory change to that before calling phpdoc.bat, but Netbeans throws and error and says that's not a valid .bat file. I cannot find any phpdocumentor parameter to configure by specific Netbeans project but the output directory. And I would prefer not to be defining a bunch of projects on subdirectories in Netbeans, just to address phpdocumentor.
Now I am out of ideas. Can anyone point me to a solution?

How do I install a type library to the activex palette via command line for BCB5?

I can import a type library via tlibimp.exe, but when I open up the IDE, the libraries are not in the activex pallete. I can't seem to figure how to get it to install to a particular package either. In the IDE there is an install button in the Import Type Library dialog. How do I do this in the command line?
When I look in at the OCX.cpp file generated by tlibimp in the CBuilder5\Imports folder, I see "Errors: Error creating palette bitmap of (TTVBH3D) : No Server registered for this CoClass". Does this have something to do with the problem?
Edit:
I want to be able to install components to the activex palette without going through the IDE so that the process can be automated during a build. Any solutions must be able to be fully automated.
According to the parameter options of tlibimp.exe, there is a -Ha+ parameter which will "Generate IDE component wrappers for controls".
There is also a -Hr+ which generates the IDE registration for component wrappers.
Does supplying any of these parameters make any difference?
Not sure from this whether or not you then have to install the components using the generated registration code.
First, run tlibimp.exe (found under Program Files\Borland\C++Builder\Bin) with the ocx\dll you want to install.
Second, locate the cpp file generated by tlibimp (you can specify the output path with tlibimp) and find the string "Servers" at the bottom of the file and replace it with "ActiveX". This string determines the palette to install to. I'm not sure if this can be specified with tlibimp, but it doesn't look like it.
Next, compile the package that contains type library\activex component.
Finally, add a key to the registry. The key goes under HKCU\Software\Borland\C++Builder\5.0\Knownpackages. The name of the key should be the path to package that you just compiled (for example, $(BCB)\Bin\applet50.bpl).
When you open up BCB, you will see the components under the activex palette.
This is the only way I could find to do this that could be automated.