I have several tables I'm importing from ODBC using the import script step. Currently, I have an import script for each and every table. This is becoming unwieldy as I now have nearly 200 different tables.
I know I can calculate the SQL statement to say something like "Select * from " & $TableName. However, I can't figure out how to set the target table without specifying it in the script. Please, tell me I'm being dense and there is a good way to do this!
Thanks in advance for your assistance,
Nicole Willson
Integrated Research
Unfortunately, the target table of an import has to be hard coded in FileMaker up through version 12 if you're using the Import Records script step. I can think of a workaround to this, but it's rather convoluted and if you're importing a large number of records, would probably significantly increase the time to import them.
The workaround would be to not use the Import Records script step, but to script the creation of records and the population of data into fields yourself.
First of all, the success of this would depend on how you're using ODBC. As far as I can think, it would only work if you're using ODBC to create shadow tables within FileMaker so that FileMaker can access the ODBC database via other script steps. I'm not an expert with the other ODBC facilities of FileMaker, so I don't know if this workaround would be helpful in other cases.
So, if you have a shadow table into the remote ODBC database, then you can use a script something like the following. The basic idea is to have two sets of layouts, one for the shadow tables that information is coming from and another for the FileMaker tables that the information needs to go to. Loop through this list, pulling information from the shadow table into variables (or something like the dictionary library I wrote which you can find at https://github.com/chivalry/filemaker-dictionary). Then go to the layout linked to the target table, create a record and populate the fields.
This isn't a novice technique, however. In addition to using variables and loops, you're also going to have to use FileMaker's design functions to determine the source and destination of each field and Set Field By Name to put the data in the right place. But as far as I can tell, it's the only way to dynamically target tables for importing data.
Related
When you finish the free form query in microstrategy, the next step is to map the columns.
Is there any way to do it automatically? At least make the list of the columns with its names.
Thanks!!!!
Sadly, this isn't possible. You will have to map all columns manually.
While this functionality isnt possible with freeform reporting specifically, Microstrategy Data Import will allow you the ability to create Data Import Cubes. These cubes can be configured as live connections, meaning they execute against the data source selected every time they are used, and are not your typical snapshot cube. Data Imports from a database can be sourced from a database query. This effectively allows you to write your own SQL with the end result being a report that you did not have to specify columns manually for.
I am trying to import to pgAdmin a big table with more than 100 columns. Is there any way to import the table without creating those 100 columns in a table within the pgAdmin? That would be a considerably time-consuming task.
You are not importing data into pgAdmin, you are importing it into Postgres, and using pgAdmin to help you in that task. Graphical tools like pgAdmin are, at heart, just convenience wrappers around the actual functionality of the database, and everything they do can be done in other ways.
In the case of a simple task like creating a table, the relevant SQL syntax is well worth learning. It will work in any database tool, even (with some minor changes) on other SQL databases (e.g. MySQL), can be saved in version control, and manipulated with an editor of your choice.
You could even go so far as to write a script in the language of your choice that generates the SQL for you based on some other data (e.g. the headings of the CSV file) - although make sure you don't run that with third-party data without checking the result or taking extreme care with code injection and other security concerns!
The Postgres manual has an introduction to tables and creating them which would be a good place to start.
I am new to SSIS and am after some assistance in creating an SSIS package to do a specific task. My data is stored remotely within a MySQL Database and this is downloaded to a SQL Server 2014 Database. What I want to do is the following, create a package where I can enter 2 dates that can be compared against the create date/date modified per record on a number of tables to give me a snap shot and compare the MySQL Data to the SQL Data so that I can see if there are any rows that are missing from my local SQL Database or if any need to be updated. Some tables have no dates so I just want to see a record count on what is missing if anything between the 2. If this is better achieved through TSQL I am happy to hear about other suggestions or sites to look at where things have been done similar.
In relation to your query Tab :
"Hi Tab, What happens at the moment is our master data is stored in a MySQL Database, the data was then downloaded to a SQL Server Database as a one off. What happens at the moment is I have a SSIS package that uses the MAX ID which can be found on most of the tables to work out which records are new and just downloads them or updates them. What I want to do is run separate checks on the tables to make sure that during the download nothing has been missed and everything is within sync. In an ideal world I would like to pass in to a SSIS package or tsql stored procedure a date range, shall we say calender week, this would then check for any differences between the remote MySQL database tables and the local SQL tables. It does not currently have to do anything but identify issues, correcting them may come later or changes would need to be made to the existing sync package. Hope his makes more sense."
Thanks P
To do this, you need to implement a Type 1 Slowly Changing Dimension type data flow in SSIS. There are a number of ways to do this, including a built in transformation aptly called the Slowly Changing Dimension transformation. Whilst this is easy to set up, it is a pain to maintain and it runs horrendously slowly.
There are numerous ways to set this up using other transformations or even SQL merge statements which are detailed here: https://bennyaustin.wordpress.com/2010/05/29/alternatives-to-ssis-scd-wizard-component/
I would recommend that you use Lookup transformations as they perform better than the Slowly Changing Dimension transformation but offer better diagnostics and error handling than the better performing SQL merge statement.
Before you do this you will need to add a Checksum or Hashbytes column to your SQL data for ease of comparison with the incoming MySQL data.
In short, calculate some sort of repeatable checksum as the data is downloaded into your SQL Server, then use this in an SSIS Lookup, matching on the row key, to check for changes. Where the checksum value is different for the same row it needs updating and where there is no matching row key in your SQL Data you need to insert the new row.
Dear all ,
Can any one suggest me the postgres tool for linux which is used to find the
difference between the 2 given database
I tried with the apgdiff 2.3 but it gives the difference in terms of schema not the data
but I need both !
Thanks in advance !
Comparing data is not easy especially if your database is huge. I created Python program that can dump PostgreSQL data schema to file that can be easily compared via 3rd party diff programm: http://code.activestate.com/recipes/576557-dump-postgresql-db-schema-to-text/?in=user-186902
I think that this program can be extended by dumping all tables data into separate CSV files, similar to those used by PostgreSQL COPY command. Remember to add the same ORDER BY in SELECT ... queries. I have created tool that reads SELECT statements from file and saves results in separate files. This way I can manage which tables and fields I want to compare (not all fields can be used in ORDER BY, and not all are important for me). Such configuration can be easily created using "dump schema" utility.
Check out dbsolo DBSOLO. It does both object and data compares and can create a sync script based on the results. It's free to try and $99 to buy. My guess is the 99 bucks will be money well spent to avoid trying to come up with your own software to do this.
Data Compare
http://www.dbsolo.com/help/datacomp.html
Object Compare
http://www.dbsolo.com/help/compare.html
apgdiff https://www.apgdiff.com/
It's an opensource solution. I used it before for checking differences between differences in dumps. Quite useful
[EDIT]
It's for differenting by schema only
We're considering using SSIS to maintain a PostgreSql data warehouse. I've used it before between SQL Servers with no problems, but am having a lot of difficulty getting it to play nicely with Postgres. I’m using the evaluation version of the OLEDB PGNP data provider (http://www.postgresql.org/about/news.1004).
I wanted to start with something simple like UPSERT on the fact table (10k-15k rows are updated/inserted daily), but this is proving very difficult (not to mention I’ll want to use surrogate keys in the future).
I’ve attempted (Link) and (http://consultingblogs.emc.com/jamiethomson/archive/2006/09/12/SSIS_3A00_-Checking-if-a-row-exists-and-if-it-does_2C00_-has-it-changed.aspx) which are effectively the same (except I don’t really understand the union all at the end when I’m trying to upsert) But I run into the same problem with parameters when doing the update using a OLEDb command – which I tried to overcome using (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms141773.aspx) but that just doesn’t seem to work, I get a validation error –
The external columns for complent.... are out of sync with the datasource columns... external column “Param_2” needs to be removed from the external columns.
(this error is repeated for the first two parameters as well – never came across this using the sql connection as it supports named parameters)
Has anyone come across this?
AND:
The fact that this simple task is apparently so difficult to do in SSIS suggests I’m using the wrong tool for the job - is there a better (and still flexible) way of doing this? Or would another ETL package be better for use between two Postgres database? -Other options include any listed on (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extract,_transform,_load#Open-source_ETL_frameworks). I could just go and write a load of SQL to do this for me, but I wanted a neat and easily maintainable solution.
I have used the Slowly Changing Dimension wizard for this with good success. It may give you what you are looking for especially with the Wizard
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms141715.aspx
The External Columns Out Of Sync: SSIS is Case Sensitive - I encountered this issue multiple times and it makes me want to pull my hair out.
This simple task is going to take some work either way. SSIS is by no means an enterprise class ETL product yet, but it does give you some quick and easy functionality, and is sufficient for most ETL work. I guess it is also about your level of comfort with it as well.
SCD is way too slow for what I want. I need to use set based sql.
It turned out that a lot of my problems were with bugs in the provider.
I opened a forum topic (http://www.pgoledb.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=49) and had a useful discussion with the moderator/support/developer person.
Also Postgres doesn't let you do cross db querys, so I solved the problem this way:
Data Source from Production DB to a temp Archive DB table
Run set based query between temp table and archive table
Truncate temp table
Note that the temp table is not atchally a temp table, but a copy of the archive table schema to temporarily stored data in.
Took a while, but I got there in the end.
This simple task is going to take some work either way. SSIS is by no means an enterprise class ETL product yet, but it does give you some quick and easy functionality, and is sufficient for most ETL work. I guess it is also about your level of comfort with it as well.
What enterprise ETL solution would you suggest?