Related
i'm trying to evaluate a G11 symfun in the code below but it fails and keep showing me the variable t that I choose to be set as specified in the code, I even tried to use the 'subs' command but it failed also. I define the necessary symbols and variables but the t variable does not evaluated in just 'G11' symfun, there are another similar symfun such G12 or K12 but the t variable evaluated in them
here is my code
% Defining the variables as symbols.
clear all, close all
clc
syms x xi q_1 q_2 q_3 q_4 q_01 q_02 q_03 q_04 EI Mr M m L t Omega S1 S2 S3
...
S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 w L_dot U U_dot g L_ddot M11 M22
% Defining the general coordinates and the trial function.
L_ddot=0;
g=9.8;
Mr=M/(M+m);
PHI(x,t)=[sqrt(2).* sin(pi.*(xi)) sqrt(2).* sin(2*pi.*(xi)) sqrt(2).*
sin(3.*pi.*(xi)) sqrt(2).* sin(4.*pi.*(xi))];
q_1(t)= S1*exp(sqrt(-1)*w*t);
q_01(t)= S5*exp(sqrt(-1)*w*t);
q_2(t)= S2*exp(sqrt(-1)*w*t);
q_02(t)= S6*exp(sqrt(-1)*w*t);
q_3(t)= S3*exp(sqrt(-1)*w*t);
q_03(t)= S7*exp(sqrt(-1)*w*t);
q_4(t)= S4*exp(sqrt(-1)*w*t);
q_04(t)= S8*exp(sqrt(-1)*w*t);
Q_v(t) =[q_1;q_2;q_3;q_4];
Q_w(t) =[q_01;q_02;q_03;q_04];
V(x,t) = PHI*Q_v(t);
W(x,t) = PHI*Q_w(t);
% Defining the coeficients of the ODE.
U(x,t)=U;
L(x,t)=1+0.1*t;
L_dot(x,t)=diff(L,'t',1);
L_ddot=0;
M11=int(PHI'*PHI,'xi',[0 1]);
M22=M11;
G11=(2*(L_dot/L))* int((2-xi)*PHI'*diff(PHI,'xi',1),'xi',[0 1])+2*Mr*
(U/L)*int(PHI'*diff(PHI,'xi',1),'xi',[0 1]);
G12=-2*Omega*int(PHI'*PHI,'xi',[0 1]);
G21=-G12;
G22=G11;
K11=(EI/((M+m)*L^4))*int(PHI'*diff(PHI,'xi',4),'xi',[0 1])+ (L_dot/L)^2
*int((2-xi)^2 *...
PHI'*diff(PHI,'xi',2),'xi',[0 1])+ ((L_ddot*L-2*L_dot^2)/L^2)*int((1-
xi)*PHI'*diff(PHI,'xi',1),'xi',[0 1]) ...
+ 2*Mr*(L_dot*U/L^2)*int((2-xi)*PHI'*diff(PHI,'xi',2),'xi',[0 1])+ Mr*
(U/L)^2 *int(PHI'*diff(PHI,'xi',2),'xi',[0 1])-...
(g-((L_ddot-2*L_dot^2)/L))*int((1-xi)*PHI'*diff(PHI,'xi',2),'xi',[0 1])+
(g/L)*int(PHI'*diff(PHI,'xi',1),'xi',[0 1])-...
Omega^2 * int(PHI'*PHI,'xi',[0 1]);
K12= -2*Omega*(L_dot/L)*int((2-xi)*PHI'*diff(PHI,'xi',1),'xi',[0 1])-2*Mr*
((U*Omega)/L)*int(PHI'*diff(PHI,'xi',1),'xi',[0 1]);
K21=-K12;
K22=K11;
% evaluating the Coefficient matrices for the time history 1 to 80 seconds
by the stepping of 0.1 .
t=0:0.1:80;
m=8;
M=2;
Mr=0.2;
x=1;
U=2; % the flow velocity
Omega=90;
EI=8.9782;
FUNM11 = matlabFunction(M11);
Mmatrix11 = feval(FUNM11);
FUNG11 = matlabFunction(G11);
Gmatrix11 = feval(FUNG11,t,U,Mr,L_dot,L);
FUNG12 = matlabFunction(G12);
Gmatrix12 = feval(FUNG12, t,x,Omega);
FUNK11 = matlabFunction(K11);
Kmatrix11 = feval(FUNK11, t,M,x,Omega,m,U,EI);
FUNK12 = matlabFunction(K12);
Kmatrix12 = feval(FUNK12, t,M,x,U,m,Omega);
Mmatrix22=Mmatrix11;
Gmatrix21=-Gmatrix12;
Gmatrix22=Gmatrix11;
Kmatrix21=-Kmatrix12;
Kmatrix22=Kmatrix11;
% Assembling the Coeficient matrices
Q=[Q_v;Q_w];
Mmatrix=[Mmatrix11 ,zeros(size(Mmatrix11)); zeros(size(Mmatrix11))
Mmatrix22];
Gmatrix=[Gmatrix11 Gmatrix12; Gmatrix21 Gmatrix22];
Kmatrix=[Kmatrix11 Kmatrix12; Kmatrix21 Kmatrix22];
After assembling my coefficient matrices I try to solve this algebric equation for w:
eqn=det(-w^2.*Mmatrix+i*w.*Gmatrix+Kmatrix)==0;
which w is the frequency of the system.
Introduction
NOTE IN CODE AND DISUSSION:
A single d is first derivative A double d is second derivative
I am using Matlab to simulate some dynamic systems through numerically solving the governing LaGrange Equations. Basically a set of Second Order Ordinary Differential Equations. I am using ODE45. I found a great tutorial from Mathworks (link for tutorial below) on how to solve a basic set of second order ordinary differential equations.
https://www.mathworks.com/academia/student_center/tutorials/source/computational-math/solving-ordinary-diff-equations/player.html
Based on the tutorial I simulated the motion for an elastic spring pendulum by obtaining two second order ordinary differential equations (one for angle theta and the other for spring elongation) shown below:
theta double prime equation:
M*thetadd*(L + del)^2 + M*g*sin(theta)*(L + del) + M*deld*thetad*(2*L + 2*del) = 0
del (spring elongation) double prime equation:
K*del + M*deldd - (M*thetad^2*(2*L + 2*del))/2 - M*g*cos(theta) = 0
Both equations above have form ydd = f(x, xd, y, yd)
I solved the set of equations by a common reduction of order method; setting column vector z to [theta, thetad, del, deld] and therefore zd = [thetad, thetadd, deld, deldd]. Next I used two matlab files; a simulation file and a function handle file for ode45. See code below of simulation file and function handle file:
Simulation File
%ElasticPdlmSymMainSim
clc
clear all;
%Define parameters
global M K L g;
M = 1;
K = 25.6;
L = 1;
g = 9.8;
% define initial values for theta, thetad, del, deld
theta_0 = 0;
thetad_0 = .5;
del_0 = 1;
deld_0 = 0;
initialValues = [theta_0, thetad_0, del_0, deld_0];
% Set a timespan
t_initial = 0;
t_final = 36;
dt = .01;
N = (t_final - t_initial)/dt;
timeSpan = linspace(t_final, t_initial, N);
% Run ode45 to get z (theta, thetad, del, deld)
[t, z] = ode45(#OdeFunHndlSpngPdlmSym, timeSpan, initialValues);
Here is the function handle file:
function dz = OdeFunHndlSpngPdlmSym(~, z)
% Define Global Parameters
global M K L g
% Take output from SymDevFElSpringPdlm.m file for fy1 and fy2 and
% substitute into z2 and z4 respectively
% z1 and z3 are simply z2 and z4
% fy1=thetadd=z(2)= -(M*g*sin(z1)*(L + z3) + M*z2*z4*(2*L + 2*z3))/(M*(L + z3)^2)
% fy2=deldd=z(4)=((M*(2*L + 2*z3)*z2^2)/2 - K*z3 + M*g*cos(z1))/M
% return column vector [thetad; thetadd; deld; deldd]
dz = [z(2);
-(M*g*sin(z(1))*(L + z(3)) + M*z(2)*z(4)*(2*L + 2*z(3)))/(M*(L + z(3))^2);
z(4);
((M*(2*L + 2*z(3))*z(2)^2)/2 - K*z(3) + M*g*cos(z(1)))/M];
Question
However, I am coming across systems of equations where the variables can not be solved for explicitly as is the case with spring pendulum example. For one case I have the following set of ordinary differential equations:
y double prime equation
ydd - .5*L*(xdd*sin(x) + xd^2*cos(x) + (k/m)*y - g = 0
x double prime equation
.33*L^2*xdd - .5*L*ydd*sin(x) - .33*L^2*C*cos(x) + .5*g*L*sin(x) = 0
L, g, m, k, and C are given parameters.
Note that x'' term appears in y'' equation and y'' term appears in x'' equation so I am not able to use reduction of order method. Can I use Matlab ODE45 to solve the set of ordinary differential equations in the second example in a manner similar to first example?
Thanks!
This problem can be solved by working out some of the math by hand. The equations are linear in xdd and ydd so it should be straightforward to solve.
ydd - .5*L*(xdd*sin(x) + xd^2*cos(x)) + (k/m)*y - g = 0
.33*L^2*xdd - .5*L*ydd*sin(x) - .33*L^2*C*cos(x) + .5*g*L*sin(x) = 0
can be rewritten as
-.5*L*sin(x)*xdd + ydd = -.5*L*xd^2*cos(x) - (k/m)*y + g
.33*L^2*xdd - .5*L*sin(x)*ydd = .33*L^2*C*cos(x) - .5*g*L*sin(x)
which is the form A*x=b.
For more complex systems, you can look into the fsolve function.
I've had problems with my code as I've tried to make an integral compute, but it will not for the power, P2.
I've tried using anonymous function handles to use the integral() function on MATLAB as well as just using int(), but it will still not compute. Are the values too small for MATLAB to integrate or am I just missing something small?
Any help or advice would be appreciated to push me in the right direction. Thanks!
The problem in the code is in the bottom of the section labelled "Power Calculations". My integral also gets quite messy if that makes a difference.
%%%%%%%%%%% Parameters %%%%%%%%%%%%
n0 = 1; %air
n1 = 1.4; %layer 1
n2 = 2.62; %layer 2
n3 = 3.5; %silicon
L0 = 650*10^(-9); %centre wavelength
L1 = 200*10^(-9): 10*10^(-9): 2200*10^(-9); %lambda from 200nm to 2200nm
x = ((pi./2).*(L0./L1)); %layer phase thickness
r01 = ((n0 - n1)./(n0 + n1)); %reflection coefficient 01
r12 = ((n1 - n2)./(n1 + n2)); %reflection coefficient 12
r23 = ((n2 - n3)./(n2 + n3)); %reflection coefficient 23
t01 = ((2.*n0)./(n0 + n1)); %transmission coefficient 01
t12 = ((2.*n1)./(n1 + n2)); %transmission coefficient 12
t23 = ((2.*n2)./(n2 + n3)); %transmission coefficient 23
Q1 = [1 r01; r01 1]; %Matrix Q1
Q2 = [1 r12; r12 1]; %Matrix Q2
Q3 = [1 r23; r23 1]; %Matrix Q3
%%%%%%%%%%%% Graph of L vs R %%%%%%%%%%%
R = zeros(size(x));
for i = 1:length(x)
P = [exp(j.*x(i)) 0; 0 exp(-j.*x(i))]; %General Matrix P
T = ((1./(t01.*t12.*t23)).*(Q1*P*Q2*P*Q3)); %Transmission
T11 = T(1,1); %T11 value
T21 = T(2,1); %T21 value
R(i) = ((abs(T21./T11))^2).*100; %Percent reflectivity
end
plot(L1,R)
title('Percent Reflectance vs. wavelength for 2 Layers')
xlabel('Wavelength (m)')
ylabel('Reflectance (%)')
%%%%%%%%%%% Power Calculation %%%%%%%%%%
syms L; %General lamda
y = ((pi./2).*(L0./L)); %Layer phase thickness with variable Lamda
P1 = [exp(j.*y) 0; 0 exp(-j.*y)]; %Matrix P with variable Lambda
T1 = ((1./(t01.*t12.*t23)).*(Q1*P1*Q2*P1*Q3)); %Transmittivity matrix T1
I = ((6.16^(15))./((L.^(5)).*exp(2484./L) - 1)); %Blackbody Irradiance
Tf11 = T1(1,1); %New T11 section of matrix with variable Lambda
Tf2 = (((abs(1./Tf11))^2).*(n3./n0)); %final transmittivity
P1 = Tf2.*I; %Power before integration
L_initial = 200*10^(-9); %Initial wavelength
L_final = 2200*10^(-9); %Final wavelength
P2 = int(P1, L, L_initial, L_final) %Power production
I've refactored your code
to make it easier to read
to improve code reuse
to improve performance
to make it easier to understand
Why do you use so many unnecessary parentheses?!
Anyway, there's a few problems I saw in your code.
You used i as a loop variable, and j as the imaginary unit. It was OK for this one instance, but just barely so. In the future it's better to use 1i or 1j for the imaginary unit, and/or m or ii or something other than i or j as the loop index variable. You're helping yourself and your colleagues; it's just less confusing that way.
Towards the end, you used the variable name P1 twice in a row, and in two different ways. Although it works here, it's confusing! Took me a while to unravel why a matrix-producing function was producing scalars instead...
But by far the biggest problem in your code is the numerical problems with the blackbody irradiance computation. The term
L⁵ · exp(2484/L) - 1
for λ₀ = 200 · 10⁻⁹ m will require computing the quantity
exp(1.242 · 10¹⁰)
which, needless to say, is rather difficult for a computer :) Actually, the problem with your computation is two-fold. First, the exponentiation is definitely out of range of 64 bit IEEE-754 double precision, and will therefore result in ∞. Second, the parentheses are wrong; Planck's law should read
C/L⁵ · 1/(exp(D) - 1)
with C and D the constants (involving Planck's constant, speed of light, and Boltzmann constant), which you've presumably precomputed (I didn't check the values. I do know choice of units can mess these up, so better check).
So, aside from the silly parentheses error, I suspect the main problem is that you simply forgot to rescale λ to nm. Changing everything in the blackbody equation to nm and correcting those parentheses gives the code
I = 6.16^(15) / ( (L*1e+9)^5 * (exp(2484/(L*1e+9)) - 1) );
With this, I got a finite value for the integral of
P2 = 1.052916498836486e-010
But, again, you'd better double-check everything.
Note that I used quadgk(), because it's one of the better ones available on R2010a (which I'm stuck with), but you can just as easily replace this with integral() available on anything newer than R2012a.
Here's the code I ended up with:
function pwr = my_fcn()
% Parameters
n0 = 1; % air
n1 = 1.4; % layer 1
n2 = 2.62; % layer 2
n3 = 3.5; % silicon
L0 = 650e-9; % centre wavelength
% Reflection coefficients
r01 = (n0 - n1)/(n0 + n1);
r12 = (n1 - n2)/(n1 + n2);
r23 = (n2 - n3)/(n2 + n3);
% Transmission coefficients
t01 = (2*n0) / (n0 + n1);
t12 = (2*n1) / (n1 + n2);
t23 = (2*n2) / (n2 + n3);
% Quality factors
Q1 = [1 r01; r01 1];
Q2 = [1 r12; r12 1];
Q3 = [1 r23; r23 1];
% Initial & Final wavelengths
L_initial = 200e-9;
L_final = 2200e-9;
% plot reflectivity for selected lambda range
plot_reflectivity(L_initial, L_final, 1000);
% Compute power production
pwr = quadgk(#power_production, L_initial, L_final);
% Helper functions
% ========================================
% Graph of lambda vs reflectivity
function plot_reflectivity(L_initial, L_final, N)
L = linspace(L_initial, L_final, N);
R = zeros(size(L));
for ii = 1:numel(L)
% Transmission
T = transmittivity(L(ii));
% Percent reflectivity
R(ii) = 100 * abs(T(2,1)/T(1,1))^2 ;
end
plot(L, R)
title('Percent Reflectance vs. wavelength for 2 Layers')
xlabel('Wavelength (m)')
ylabel('Reflectance (%)')
end
% Compute transmittivity matrix for a single wavelength
function T = transmittivity(L)
% Layer phase thickness with variable Lamda
y = pi/2 * L0/L;
% Matrix P with variable Lambda
P1 = [exp(+1j*y) 0
0 exp(-1j*y)];
% Transmittivity matrix T1
T = 1/(t01*t12*t23) * Q1*P1*Q2*P1*Q3;
end
% Power for a specific wavelength. Note that this function
% accepts vector-valued wavelengths; needed for quadgk()
function pwr = power_production(L)
pwr = zeros(size(L));
for ii = 1:numel(L)
% Transmittivity matrix
T1 = transmittivity(L(ii));
% Blackbody Irradiance
I = 6.16^(15) / ( (L(ii)*1e+9)^5 * (exp(2484/(L(ii)*1e+9)) - 1) );
% final transmittivity
Tf2 = abs(1/T1(1))^2 * n3/n0;
% Power before integration
pwr(ii) = Tf2 * I;
end
end
end
I am having difficulty in finding roots of a nonlinear equation. I have tried Matlab and Maple both, and both give me the same error which is
Error, (in RootFinding:-NextZero) can only handle isolated zeros
The equation goes like
-100 + 0.1335600000e-5*H + (1/20)*H*arcsinh(2003.40/H)
The variable is H in the equation.
How do I find the roots (or the approximate roots) of this equation?
Matlab Code:
The function file:
function hor_force = horizontal(XY, XZ, Lo, EAo, qc, VA)
syms H
equation = (-1*ZZ) + (H/qc)*(cosh((qc/H)*(XZ- XB))) - H/qc + ZB;
hor_force = `solve(equation);`
The main file:
EAo = 7.5*10^7;
Lo = 100.17;
VA = 2002;
XY = 0;
ZY = 0;
XB = 50;
ZB = -2;
XZ = 100;
ZZ = 0;
ql = 40;
Error which Matlab shows:
Error using sym/solve (line 22)
Error using maplemex
Error, (in RootFinding:-NextZero) can only handle isolated zeros
Error in horizontal (line 8)
hor_force = solve(equation);
Error in main (line 34)
h = horizontal(XY, XZ, Lo, EAo, ql, VA)
http://postimg.org/image/gm93z3b7z/
You don't need the symbolic toolbox for this:
First, create an anonymous function that can take vectors at input (use .* and ./:
equation = #(H) ((-1*ZZ) + (H./qc).*(cosh((qc./H).*(XZ- XB))) - H./qc + ZB);
Second, create a vector that you afterwards insert into the equation to find approximately when the sign of the function changes. In the end, use fzero with x0 as the second input parameter.
H = linspace(1,1e6,1e4);
x0 = H(find(diff(sign(equation(H))))); %// Approximation of when the line crosses zero
x = fzero(equation, x0) %// Use fzero to find the crossing point, using the initial guess x0
x =
2.5013e+04
equation(x)
ans =
0
To verify:
You might want to check out this question for more information about how to find roots of non-polynomials.
In Maple, using the expression from your question,
restart:
ee := -100 + 0.1335600000e-5*H + (1/20)*H*arcsinh(2003.40/H):
Student:-Calculus1:-Roots(ee, -1e6..1e6);
[ 5 ]
[-1.240222868 10 , -21763.54830, 18502.23816]
#plot(ee, H=-1e6..1e6, view=-1..1);
Solving coupled non linear differential equation by Mat-lab or by calculations
equation 1: x'(t) = -a* x(t) /(x(t) + y(t))
equation 2: y'(t) = -b* y(t) /(x(t) + y(t))
I tried in mathematica but got a very comlicated solution.
Solve[{x'[t] == -a* x[t] /(x[t] + y[t]), y'[t] == -b* y[t] /(x[t] + y[t])}, {x, y}, t]
How can I plot it?
My initial conditions are
x(0) = xo
y(0) = yo
Also, a and b are constants.
I have to plot x and y wrt t after inserting values of a and b . ( a= 2 , b =5 say )
A lot of things to note in this situation:
You need to create a function that contains both a and b:
function dy =soProblem(t,y,a,b)
dy=[-a*y(1)/(y(1)+y(2)); -b*y(2)/(y(1)+y(2))];
end
Call the standard ode function:
a = 2;
b = 5; tend = 10; x0 = 1; y0 = 2;
[T,Y] = ode45(#(t,y)soProblem(t,y,a,b),[0 tend],[x0 y0]);
plot (T,Y)
Realize you may have a stiff equation on your hands.
Have fun identifying the ideal function call:
[T15,Y15] = ode15s(#(t,y)soProblem(t,y,a,b),[0 tend],[x0 y0]);
[T23t,Y23t] = ode23t(#(t,y)soProblem(t,y,a,b),[0 tend],[x0 y0]);
[T23tb,Y23tb] = ode23tb(#(t,y)soProblem(t,y,a,b),[0 tend],[x0 y0]);
%note ode23s doesn't converge (or at least takes forever)
plot (T,Y,T15,Y15,T23t,Y23t,T23tb,Y23tb)
Understand why mathematica becomes restless
In mathematica:
Try ndsolve
In matlab:
Create a function file yourfunction.m:
function [Y_prime]=yourfunction(t, Y)
Y_prime=[-2*Y(1)./(Y(1) + Y(2)) -5*Y(2)./(Y(1) + Y(2))];
end
and then
[T,Y] = ode45(yourfunction,[0 t_end],[x0 y0]);
plot(T,Y(:,1));
hold on
plot(T,Y(:,2));