I am opening a remote url in a child window like this:
intel.xdk.device.showRemoteSite('http//my.site', 0, 0, 24, 24);
Apparently it is possible for me to use 'mainViewExecute' in javascript in my remote site code to execute api methods on the main form eg.
intel.xdk.device.mainViewExecute('intel.xdk.notification.beep(1);');
But the 'intel' object is undefined so it seems I am missing some reference etc. or is it not possible to do this at all?
make sure you have <script src="intelxdk.js"></script> added to your index.html, you dont need the actual file, the Intel XDK emulator and build will automatically include it, you just need to add a script tag to index.html
Related
I am trying to use Inferno to render on the server. The documentation inferno-server and server-side-rendering does not say show to set-up babel & run the sever.
All I could find is InfernoJS Babel Plugin but noting about running it on Node.
Any help would be appreciated.
Could you explain what you mean by "Running on node"?
Inferno Babel plugin converts the JSX code into a regular JS code, which runs without problems on node (the server uses renderToString). While you are not using browser elements (document and other tools), everything should be fine.
Then you need to make a separate component for the client, which when requested will be given as a bundle along with the html page, and then using hydrate function to "cling" into webpage and bind items.
you can check my repository (although this is for TypeScript): https://github.com/MrFoxPro/inferno-isomorphic-tempalte
I'm trying to merge large existing web app into sails.js. so I moved the folders into assets and build a custom route , 'GET /': '/assets/client/launch.html' and get 404 when I point my browser to http://localhost:1337/ as the / is correctly redirected to http://localhost:1337/assets/client/launch.html which produces the 404.
Now the file exists in the folder assets/client (and in .tmp), so I am thinking the Sails router is getting in the way.
I would leave the client (70K lines of JS) that generates all the UI dynamically and sailjs server that provides authentication separate and enable CORS but my customer wants client packaged with server. This type of operation is simple in frameworks like ASP.NET MVC but am wondering if Sails is up to the task.
Well, If everything you tried did not work out. There might be another solution ,
First of all since you are talking about sails app I am assuming other bundle must be sails as well ,
So here is what you do-
Change the port for another app that you want to attach to this.
Second whenever you want to go to page on another app simply redirect the client to another port ie
in html or esp put a href tag with different port.
<a href="localhost:PORT/route_to_file">
</a>
I got it working by placing my app into assets where we need to launch from assets/client/index.html as there would be too many dependencies to change. As I said above could not just add a route as Sails must getting in the way. However as in Chapter 3.2.2 of Sails in Action I generated a static asset npm install sails-generate-static --save. then I redirected to assets/client/index.html. As an aside that book is great and would highly recommend it.
very new at this. Could someone tell me what is the best method of submitting a form when using phonegap and JMQ? What I want to be able to do is passing the form data to a php file and then having the results passed back into app so that the user isnt directly accessing the php file at any point.
I found the following page link which basically does what I want but I keep getting "Origin null is not allowed by Access-Control-Allow-Origin" when testing out the code. So I'm guessing this will only work if the app is located on a server also?
Any happy would be great. thank <3
To test your solution on the computer you need to launch chrome from the terminal with the argument --disable-web-security. See this answer: Disable same origin policy in Chrome
In your Phonegap application you add a line of code to your config.xml in the www-folder: <access origin="*.yourdomain.com" />. Build, and you are now allowed to request all domains and subdomains from yourdomain.com. For more details on whitelisting see http://docs.phonegap.com/en/3.0.0/guide_appdev_whitelist_index.md.html#Domain%20Whitelist%20Guide
You are not able to make post through the local files, so Yes, you need to have it running in a Web Server.
But if you deploy your application, it should work either in a emulator or in your device.
So, this is a pretty trivial thing to accomplish apparently, but for some reason it just will not work for me. I created a VERY SIMPLE GWT app. It uses UIBinder just to display a label and a button, no actual processing or handling takes place. I did this to test deploying the app using strictly JS and html that is not hosted by Eclipse and Jetty or whatever.
I compile my app, run it in eclipse, and it works fine. However, when I try to run the html page directly from the WAR directory, it does not work.
Do I need this running on a webserver for it to work? It is just html and js, so I shouldn't? I've been to the GWT site about deploying, and surfed quite a few forums. They seem to always mention the necessity of a server, but it seems like it should not be necessary?
Since it is a pure JavaScript and HTML it should work properly without server. Checkout this link: Compile and run in Production Mode with Eclipse
In your EntryPoint class, in onModuleLoad() there's a RootPanel.get("someDivId") call somewhere. Make sure your html page (=the host page) contains a div with that id.
Also make sure your host page calls the right java script file. It's easy to forget to edit the host page after you renamed your GWT module (see rename-to in your .gwt.xml), as the generated JavaScript file matches your module name.
This will work locally on all browsers except Chrome for security reasons.
See http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=31068
and http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=70088
I develop a FB app using Flash using wmode="direct" (for 3D graphics).
In Internet Explorer, every time I popup any FB dialog (e.g Purchase Credits dialog), the flash disappears and when the dialog is closed, the flash does not re-appear...
I tried to set the visibility after dialog is closed:
http://developers.facebook.com/docs/appsonfacebook/tutorial/ (under "Special Considerations for Adobe Flash developers"), but it didn't work.
I've also tried the use FB.Init hideFlashCallback:
http://developers.facebook.com/blog/post/555/ (under "Detecting visibility of Flash objects in Canvas apps"), but it doesn't seem to call the callback function...
Any one had the same issue and manage to make it work?
Any other suggestions?
P.S - I use swfobject to embed the SWF file.
Thank a lot!
Roei
UPDATE: I removed the appId param from the FB JS url:
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#appId=XXXX&xfbml=1"></script>
and now the hideFlashCallback is executed, but still - the flash does not re-appear...
I've updated the section Special Considerations for Adobe Flash developers because the code snippet was a bit out-of-date.
The new snippet should give you an idea of how to use the hideFlashCallback, whose semantics have changed since that now out-of-date blog post, in that the function now takes a flash element as an argument. (Unfortunately, we haven't redocumented it yet, but will soon). One thing to note is that the callback does not currently work on IE8, but will after a fix gets pushed next Tuesday.
That said, it should work without that callback. It may be caused by a javascript fatal that stops script execution before the re-showing happens. Look in your javascript console to see if you see any errors.
Otherwise, if you can give me the canvas URL for your application, I can look into it.
Did you try it with other wmodes? what you can try is actually remove the div where you write your flash to, add it with innerHTML and run the swfobject.embed again