I have recently started developing an Eclipse plugin (which is basic stuff for now) and I am struggling with "default" way to run Eclipse plugin ("Run as Eclipse application").
The Eclipse is starting another instance with my plugin already installed in it (this is default behaviour).
The problem is that when I want to re-run my plugin project and I press "run" button again (or Ctrl + F11) (and the another Eclipse instance still running) I get following message:
"Could not launch the application because the associated workspace is currently in use by another Eclipse application".
The error makes sense, and when I close "testing" Eclipse instance I am able to run my plugin again.
The question is - "is it normal routine for plugin development?". Maybe I am missing something, e.g. special arguments for Eclipse?
This seems all pretty normal. The error message is since the run configuration is specifing a workspace and when you start a second instance using the same workspace it is locked and considered in use.
What I usually do when testing a plugin is to create a run configuration (click "Run...") where I disable all the plugins I wont need when testing. This makes sure that the test starts up a couple of seconds quicker. Make sure you save that run configuration as a *.launch file aswell, that makes it quicker to test the next time. Or it can be used to share the configuration.
There's a lot you can configure in the run configuration, such as eclipse arguments, vm argument, if you want environment variables set, etc. So be sure to experiment a little.
In your run configuration. Main tab->Workspace Data ->Location text box add this:
${workspace_loc}/../runtime-EclipseApplication${current_date:yyyyMMdd_HHmmss}
Note the suffix ${current_date:yyyyMMdd_HHmmss} by this every time you launch your application new workspace will be created. So you will not get any error message saying workspace is locked.
But be careful as the folder .metadata will be different for different instances as their work-spaces are different. Thus preferences stored/retrieved by different instances are NOT in sync.
You are probably missing one important point: Eclipse supports the Java hot code replacement. Therefore in many cases you can modify your Java code while your application Eclipse instance is running, save the code and continue without restarting.
If hot code replacement is not possible, Eclipse will tell you, so you always know whether the editing changes are applied to the running instance.
This works best with more recent versions of the JVM, so consider upgrading to the latest Java 7 version, even if you write code to be compliant with Java 1.5 or 6.
Related
I'm trying to run a JavaFX application to test some custom controls based on jdk14 and JavaFX14. My operating system is Windows 10, the IDE is Eclipse 2020-03, and I use m2e Maven plugin. The controls are exact copies of controls developed under jdk8 and JavaFX8; the earlier controls pass all tests, there was no problem with debugging.
There is no problem getting a test application to run using jdk14 and JavaFX14, but breakpoints are ignored regardless of whether I run in debug mode, or run mode, or whether I modify the Maven command from javafx:run to javafx:debug (that did NOT work) or to javafx:run#debug.
This issue seems to have been addressed several times in the context of a Netbeans IDE (see stackoverflow discussion, and I copied in the text from the modified plugin as suggested, but to no effect.
I have the following questions:
What must be done in order to debug a JavaFX application under the conditions described above?
Who is responsible for dealing with this? Eclipse? OpenJFX? Somebody else?
Based on the principle that whatever solution is developed, it should be as user friendly as the debugging process under jdk8 and JavaFX8 (i.e. before JavaFX and everything else got decoupled from Oracle), is it reasonable to expect that a solution along those lines will be available in the near future? Is anybody working on it now?
Thanks for feedback.
Back in the day I was debugging node.js applications using the ChromeDevTools. Breakpoints would be synced or reset on remote, so that no matter what, the breakpoints in the Eclipse breakpoint window would always match the actual breakpoints.
Also, setting up the Source Mapping as described here would cause Eclipse to break inside my actual local files, not in a read-only V8 window.
These days, ChromeDevTools is outdated and unmaintained. I started using Nodeclipse and their V8 debugger.
But now, when debugging, Eclipse keeps breaking on breakpoints I had already unset or removed. Seemingly irregardless of my setting here:
Also, whether or not it's a break point I meant to break on, A new read-only editor opens with the V8 (Chromium) icon in stead of the javascript-icon. If the original name was e.g. index.js, the script that opens is index.js (20).chromium.
What is changed? How exactly does one set up the Nodeclipse V8 debugger for proper breakpoint syncing and source mapping?
There is nice intro info given, but still a discussion should follow, that does not fit to StackOverflow format. Please create and follow with an issue on https://github.com/Nodeclipse/nodeclipse-1/issues
These days, (since Nodecipse 0.2) Launch configuration is created automatically, so most users may even don't know about it existence. And it is needed to be recalled looking at code how actually launch configurations are created and synced. Related source are here:
https://github.com/Nodeclipse/nodeclipse-1/tree/master/org.nodeclipse.debug/src/org/nodeclipse/debug/launch
I am trying to use eclipse kepler for Java EE 7.I already installed JBoss Tools and added JBoss Wildfly successfully as a server. However my changes are not automatically deployed. Is there anyway the app can be deployed automatically just as when using glassfish?
Using Eclipse, click twice on your WildFly Server to edit the following properties:
Publishing: choose "Automatically publish after a build event". I like to change the publishing interval to 1 second too.
Application Reload Behavior: check the "Customize application reload ..." checkbox and edit the regex pattern to \.jar$|\.class$
That's it. Good luck!
Both #varantes and #Sean are essentially correct, but these answers are not full.
Unfortunately the only way in a Java server environment to have full, zero-downtime hot deployment is to use paid JRebel or free spring-loaded tool.
But for small project there are some ways to speed up work by partial hot-deployment. Essentially:
When enabled option Automatically publish when resource change
then changes inside *.html, *.xhtml files are immediately
reflected as soon as you refresh the browser.
To make hot deployment work for *.jsp files too, then you should
inside ${wildfly-home}/standalone/configuration/standalone.xml
make following change:
<jsp-config/>
replace with:
<jsp-config development="true"/>
restart the server and enjoy hot deployment of web files.
But when modifying *.java source files, then only partial hot deployment is possible. As #varantes stated in his answer, enabling Application Reload Behavior with regex pattern set to \.jar$|\.class$ is an option, but has serious downside: whole module is restarted, thus:
It takes some time (depending on how big is a module).
Whole application state is lost.
So personally, I discourage this solution. JVM supports (in debug mode) code-swapping for methods' bodies. So as long as you are modifying only bodies of existing methods, you are at home (zero downtime, changes are reflected immediately). But you have to disable automatic publishing inside server settings otherwise the application's state will still be destroyed by that republish.
But if you are heavily crafting Java code (adding classes, annotations, constructors) then unfortunately I can only recommend set publishing into Never publish automatically (or shutdown server) and when you finish your work in Java files, then restart by hand your module (or turn-on server). Up to you.
It works for small Java projects, but for bigger ones, JRebel is invaluable (or just spring-loaded), because all approaches described above are not sufficient. Also because of such problems, solutions like Rails/ Django /Play! Framework gained so huge popularity.
I am assuming you are using the latest version of Wildfly (8.0 Beta 1 as of writing).
In the standalone.xml config file, look for <jsp-config/>. Add the attribute development="true" and it should hot-deploy. The resulting config will look like this:
<jsp-config development="true"/>
Add attributes (development, check-interval, modification-test-interval, recompile-on-fail) in configuration file in xPath = //servlet-container/jsp-config/
<servlet-container name="default" default-buffer-cache="default" stack-trace-on-error="local-only">
<jsp-config development="true" check-interval="1" modification-test-interval="1" recompile-on-fail="true"/>
</servlet-container>
(It works in WildFly-8.0.0.Final)
Start server in debug mode and It will track chances inside methods. Other changes It will ask to restart the server.
If you are using Eclipse and your development server is running in the debugger, when you save your changes to this file, Eclipse compiles the new code automatically, then attempts to insert the new code into the already-running server. Changes to classes, JSPs, static files and appengine-web.xml are reflected immediately in the running server without needing to restart
plz any one can explain this ??????????
For classes like JSP-files:
Its debugging using JPDA.
The IDE attach via socket to the JVM your running app and hot-redeploy the not-permanent-code (aka PermGen).
There are different techiques and frameworks for that:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_Platform_Debugger_Architecture
It doesn't happen automatically. Check Project --> Build Automatically option. It should have been checked.
If you un-check it; then project will not be build/deployed automatically.
I've got a Android AppEngine Connected Project I'm trying to build using GWT2.4 RequestFactory and Objectify on my Eclipse IDE.
Apparently I need to run the RequestFactory Validation Tool because I'm using ServiceName and ProxyForName annotations (these are required especially when working on the Android client side). My problem is the Eclipse can't validate it and the solution provided at http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/RequestFactoryInterfaceValidation#IDE_configuration is enough to make me rip my eyes out.
Since I'm working on a Windows machine, the shell script provided is not very useful. Trying to run Validation Tool from a cmd propt returns the error message:"This tool must be run with a JDK, not a JRE"
Can someone explain how this Tool is supposed to be run? Is there a way to use it as an External Tool in eclipse?
Normally if you follow carefully the instructions in the link you show, and run the GWT Development Mode from Eclipse, the Validation should be done automatically at the time you access the development URL with your browser.
For the record, I've actually had some problems with it, but launching the application several times maked it work.
Well, I ran into the same problem as well. When I tried annotation processing (under Java Compiler-> Annotation processing )was being disabled. So RequestFactoryDeobfuscatorBuilder was not being generated. Try enabling that and rebuilding your project.
I've just recovered from two days of hunting this bug down in a project that used to run validation properly but stopped.
In my case I had a new-ish generic BaseRequestContext and a specific sub-interface that extended it. My parent interface declared a method that didn't match the Locator's exactly (e.g. getThing(T) vs get(T)) and this wasn't reported as an error but did stop the validation tool from completing.
Apt is also removed in Java 8 : http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/117 . So beware.
Switching back to Java 7 will fix the issue if you are using Java 8.
I understood why the error happens sometimes in a project: the compiler was complaining it cannot find the directory .apt . But when I tried to create it manually it was not possible (under windows). I think the validation tool mutes the exception of not being able to create the directory: try renaming .apt in your validation tool calls (do a text search in your project)