libpcap error pcap_open_live(): BIOCSRTIMEOUT: Invalid argument - pcap

With the following code, I get this error when I run the executable file:
...
dev = pcap_lookupdev(errbuf);
if(dev == NULL)
{
printf("%s\n",errbuf);
exit(1);
}
printf("DEV: %s\n",dev);
descr = pcap_open_live(dev,BUFSIZ,0,-1,errbuf);
if(descr == NULL)
{
printf("pcap_open_live(): %s\n",errbuf);
exit(1);
}
packet = pcap_next(descr,&hdr);
if(packet == NULL)
{
printf("Didn't grab packet\n");
exit(1);
}
...
And the error:
pcap_open_live(): gbeth0: BIOCSRTIMEOUT: Invalid argument
When I change
descr = pcap_open_live(dev,BUFSIZ,0,-1,errbuf);
to
descr = pcap_open_live(dev,BUFSIZ,0,1,errbuf);
sniffer does not grab anything and the program exit with this error: Didn't grab packet
and when I change 1 to 0 it does not grab anything but with errors.
What should I do?

-1 is NOT a valid timeout argument to pcap_open_live() on any platform.
0, as a timeout argument, may behave differently on different platforms, and is not recommended.
And pcap_next() is not guaranteed to wait forever for a packet to arrive; it might return NULL if the timeout expires. If you want to capture at least one packet, try looping until pcap_null() doesn't return NULL.

Related

Powershell and selenium chromedriver getting SSL error opening website [duplicate]

I have added
ChromeOptions options = new ChromeOptions();
options.AddArgument("--ignore-certificate-errors-spki-list");
options.AddArgument("--ignore-ssl-errors");
options.AddArgument("test-type");
options.AddArguments("-incognito");
options.AddArgument("no-sandbox");
options.AddArgument("--start-maximized");
driver = new ChromeDriver(options);
But still getting:
ssl_client_socket_impl.cc(1061)] handshake failed error
How to suppress this error from console?
This error message...
[ERROR:ssl_client_socket_openssl.cc(855)] handshake failed; returned -1, SSL error code 1, net_error -2
...implies that the handshake failed between ChromeDriver and Chrome Browser failed at some point.
Root Cause
This error is generated due to net::SSLClientSocketImpl::DoHandshake and net::SSLClientSocketImpl implemented in ssl_client_socket_impl.cc
net::SSLClientSocketImpl::DoHandshake as follows:
int SSLClientSocketImpl::DoHandshake() {
crypto::OpenSSLErrStackTracer err_tracer(FROM_HERE);
int rv = SSL_do_handshake(ssl_.get());
int net_error = OK;
if (rv <= 0) {
int ssl_error = SSL_get_error(ssl_.get(), rv);
if (ssl_error == SSL_ERROR_WANT_CHANNEL_ID_LOOKUP) {
// The server supports channel ID. Stop to look one up before returning to
// the handshake.
next_handshake_state_ = STATE_CHANNEL_ID_LOOKUP;
return OK;
}
if (ssl_error == SSL_ERROR_WANT_X509_LOOKUP &&
!ssl_config_.send_client_cert) {
return ERR_SSL_CLIENT_AUTH_CERT_NEEDED;
}
if (ssl_error == SSL_ERROR_WANT_PRIVATE_KEY_OPERATION) {
DCHECK(ssl_config_.client_private_key);
DCHECK_NE(kSSLClientSocketNoPendingResult, signature_result_);
next_handshake_state_ = STATE_HANDSHAKE;
return ERR_IO_PENDING;
}
OpenSSLErrorInfo error_info;
net_error = MapLastOpenSSLError(ssl_error, err_tracer, &error_info);
if (net_error == ERR_IO_PENDING) {
// If not done, stay in this state
next_handshake_state_ = STATE_HANDSHAKE;
return ERR_IO_PENDING;
}
LOG(ERROR) << "handshake failed; returned " << rv << ", SSL error code "
<< ssl_error << ", net_error " << net_error;
net_log_.AddEvent(
NetLogEventType::SSL_HANDSHAKE_ERROR,
CreateNetLogOpenSSLErrorCallback(net_error, ssl_error, error_info));
}
next_handshake_state_ = STATE_HANDSHAKE_COMPLETE;
return net_error;
}
As per ERROR:ssl_client_socket_openssl.cc handshake failed the main issue is the failure of handshake when ChromeDriver handshakes with SSL pages in Chrome. Though Chromium team conducts test for SSL handshake through net_unittests, content_tests, and browser_tests but were not exhaustive. Some usecases are left out relying on the upstream tests.
Conclusion
This error won't interupt the execution of your Test Suite and you can ignore this issue for the time being till it is fixed by the Chromium Team.
You can restrict Chromium's log level to 3, so that only fatal errors are logged. Please bear in mind that you won't see any other error-related messages which might cause mayhem in production! The code looks like this:
var chromeOptions = new ChromeOptions();
chromeOptions.AddArgument("log-level=3");
var driver = new ChromeDriver(options : chromeOptions);
Chromium log levels are:
Description
Value
INFO
0
WARNING
1
LOG_ERROR
2
LOG_FATAL
3

Why do I get an MSPL exception "ProxyRequest only valid for sipRequest"

I'm writing a Lync MSPL application using a manifest and a windows service. In my manifest.am I have the following code:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<r:applicationManifest
r:appUri="http://www.company.no/LyncServerFilter"
xmlns:r="http://schemas.microsoft.com/lcs/2006/05">
<r:requestFilter methodNames="ALL"
strictRoute="true"
domainSupported="false"/>
<r:responseFilter reasonCodes="ALL"/>
<r:proxyByDefault action="true" />
<r:allowRegistrationBeforeUserServices action="true" />
<r:splScript>
<![CDATA[
callId = GetHeaderValues("Call-ID");
cseq = GetHeaderValues("CSeq");
content = "";
sstate = GetHeaderValues("subscription-state");
xevent = GetHeaderValues("Event");
xdir = GetHeaderValues("Direction");
xexp = GetHeaderValues("Session-Expires");
referto = GetHeaderValues("Refer-To");
if (sipRequest)
{
if (sipRequest.Method == "INVITE") {
if (ContainsString(sipRequest.Content, "m=audio", true)) {
content = "audio";
}
else if (ContainsString(sipRequest.Content, "m=video", true)) {
content = "video";
}
else if (ContainsString(sipRequest.Content, "m=message", true)) {
content = "message";
}
else if (ContainsString(sipRequest.Content, "m=application", true)) {
content = "application";
}
else {
content = "unknown";
}
}
else if (sipRequest.Method == "NOTIFY" || sipRequest.Method == "BENOTIFY") {
content = sipRequest.Content;
}
DispatchNotification("OnRequest", sipRequest.Method, sipMessage.From, sipMessage.To, callId, cseq, content, xdir, xevent, sstate, xexp, referto);
if (sipRequest) {
ProxyRequest();
}
}
else if(sipResponse) {
DispatchNotification("OnResponse", sipResponse.StatusCode, sipResponse.StatusReasonPhrase, sipMessage.From, sipMessage.To, callId, cseq, content, xdir, xevent, sstate, xexp, referto);
ProxyResponse();
}
]]></r:splScript>
</r:applicationManifest>
I'm getting the following errormessage in Eventlog on Lync Front End server:
Lync Server application MSPL script execution aborted because of an error
Application Uri at 'http://www.company.no/LyncServerFilter', at line 60
Error: 0x80070057 - The parameter is incorrect
Additional information: ProxyRequest only valid for sipRequest
Line 60 is where I call ProxyRequest:
if (sipRequest) {
ProxyRequest();
}
Questions:
Why does the errormessage say that ProxyRequest is only valid for a sipRequest? I'm checking that it is a sipMessage right?
Can I remove my call to ProxyRequest() since I have set proxyByDefault=true? Does the DistpathNotification-method "handle" the method (swallow it), or will the message be proxied by default? The code "works" when I remove the call to ProxyRequest(), but I'm not sure what the consequences are...
The ProxyRequest method takes a argument of the uri, which is why you are getting the compile error message.
So you should be calling it like:
ProxyRequest(""); // send to the URI specified in the request itself
Removing it effectivity does the same thing as per your proxyByDefault setting being set to true:
If true, the server automatically proxies any messages that are not handled by the application. If false, the message is dropped and applications that follow this application in the application execution order will not receive it. The default value is true.
As a side-note, you can use compilespl.exe, which comes as part of the Lync Server SDK to verify that your MSPL script is correct before trying to start it on the lync server.
Check out this link in the 'Compile the MSPL application separately' section.

WSAECONNABORTED (10053) error received while calling send command after fixed iterations

I'm also facing some issue where a server sends data to client and client sends back the acknowledgement. But after certain iterations the socket is aborted and I'm getting WSAECONNABORTED (10053) while sending the acknowledgement back to server.
I'm on win7 64-bit machine.
Server code(this is perl code):
sub Send_Msg_to_SourceSelector
{
(my $msg)=#_;
my $msg_len = length("$msg")+1;
print "the message length is: $msg_len\n\n";
PrintLogFile(1, ">> $CurrentTime >> The message length is : $msg_len <<<<\n\n");
print "the SOCK1 is: SOCK\n\n";
PrintLogFile(1, ">> $CurrentTime >> The sent message is : $msg <<<<\n\n");
send $SOCK,$msg,$msg_len;
print "the SOCK2 is: $SOCK\n\n";
recv $SOCK,my $awk,3,0;
PrintLogFile(1, ">> $CurrentTime >> The acknowledgement received is : $awk <<<<\n\n");
print "the SOCK3 is: $SOCK\n\n";
}
Client code (this is in C...executable generated in visual studio 2013):
void RecvDataFromSequencer(SOCKET sock, FILE *Log)
{
char n,buffer[2000];
while(!FlagTestExecutionCompleted)
{
memset (buffer , 0 , 2000);
printf("The address of buffer before is: %d\n", buffer);
n = recv(sock,buffer,2000,0); //blocking call
printf("The address of buffer after is: %d\n", buffer);
printf("in recv func: %x\n", Log);
//printlogfile(Log, buffer);
fprintf(Log,"%s%s",buffer,"\n");
fprintf(Log,"%d%s",n,"\n");
fprintf(Log,"%s%d%s","FlagTestExecutionCompleted is ==> ",FlagTestExecutionCompleted,"\n");
fflush(Log);
if (n == -1)
{
printf("recv failed: %d\n", WSAGetLastError());
fprintf(Log,"%s%s",WSAGetLastError(),"\n");
error("ERROR reading from STATS");
fprintf(Log,"%s%s","ERROR reading from STATS","\n");
fflush(Log);
}
else
{
printf("\nMessage from STATS: %s\n",buffer);
strcpy(line_tcfile,buffer);
if(strstr(line_tcfile,"SessionCompleted"))
{
printf("\n End of Test Session");
FlagTestExecutionCompleted=1;
}
FlagNewTestCaseRecieved = 1;
}
//Send acknowledgement
Sleep(1000);
**n = send(sock,"ACK",3,0);
if (n == -1)
{
fprintf(Log,"%s%d%s","in send command FlagTestExecutionCompleted is ==> ",FlagTestExecutionCompleted,"\n");
printf("send failed: %d\n", WSAGetLastError());
fprintf(Log,"%s%s",WSAGetLastError(),"\n");**
fprintf(Log,"%s%s","ERROR writing to STATS","\n");
fprintf(Log,"%d%s",n,"\n");
fflush(Log);
error("ERROR writing to STATS");
}
In this the following is happening:
1. server reads a line and sends to client
2. client reads the line and sends back the acknowledgement back to server
3. this process happens successfully to some tests
4. after some time the while sending back acknowledgement to server through send command, it returns WSAECONNABORTED (10053)
I don't know what is the reason.
Please help
Thanks,
Pankaj

libmemcached - checking if I'm connected

Is there an easy way to check if a given memcached_st* is successfully connected to a memcached server?
I'm connecting via memcached_server_add_with_weight, and it's returning MEMCACHED_SUCCESS when I give it spurious hostnames. Similarly, calling memcached_last_error_errno immediately after the call to memcached_server_add_with_weight gives me MEMCACHED_SUCCESS.
One interesting way to do this is checking the actual socket descriptor.
If libmemcached successfully connected to the server then the socket descriptor is positive, otherwise it is -1.
std::shared_ptr<memcached_st> es (memcached_create (NULL), [](memcached_st* msp) {memcached_free (msp);});
memcached_server_add_with_weight (es.get(), "server1", 9201, 100);
memcached_server_add (es.get(), "server2", 9201);
memcached_server_add (es.get(), "server3", 9201);
memcached_server_fn serverVisitor = [](const memcached_st *ptr, memcached_server_instance_st server, void *context) {
if (server->fd < 0) throw std::runtime_error (std::string ("libmemcached connection to ") + server->hostname + " failed!");
return MEMCACHED_SUCCESS;
};
memcached_server_cursor (es.get(), &serverVisitor, NULL, 1);

SO_REUSEADDR with UDP datagrams - Resource unavailable

I'm using SO_REUSEADDR option, but I'm not sure why am getting
Resource temporary unvailable option.
I'm testing client server code on 127.0.0.1
if ( (sockfd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0)) < 0 )
{
perror("socket() error!!\n");
exit(1);
}
if ( setsockopt(sockfd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, &reuse, sizeof(reuse) ) < 0 ) {
perror("SO_REUSEADDR failed::");
exit(1);
}
while(1) {
nbytes_read = recvfrom(sockfd, (void *)&recvd_msg, sizeof(recvd_msg),
flags, &from, &from_len);
printf("nbytes_read = %d\n", nbytes_read);
if(nbytes_read == -1) {
perror("client: recvfrom() failed");
return FAILED;
}
if (nbytes_read > 0) {
if(recvd_msg.hdr.msgtype == DATA)
printf("recvd %d bytes from server\n", recvd_msg.hdr.payload_size);
ftp_show_payload(&recvd_msg);
}
if(recvd_msg.hdr.is_last == TRUE) {
break;
}
}
Error message:
" client: recvfrom() failed: Resource temporarily unavailable"
errno:11
After trying to run client for 3-4 times, I get the data, I'm not sure whats happening.
Also, this problem is on Ubuntu Linux, but when I run the same client server on Solaris,
it works fine!!
SO_REUSEADDR is useful when you use bind(), but here you are not using bind.
I dont see any problem if recvfrom() returns -1
Use bind() and replace your call recvfrom() with recv(). recv() will receive all the packets at the port you used in your bind call.
Are you trimming out any other socket configuration? EAGAIN is typically returned when you read a non-blocking socket and there's no data available. The manpage for recvfrom lists the possible errnos that will be set on failure with an explanation for each one.
Your test is invalid. recvfrom() can return zero, which doesn't indicate an error. It is only valid to call perror() if you get -1. So you may not have a problem at all ..
I don't see why you're using SO_REUSEADDR at all here, as you're not binding to a specific port.